Fusion Engineering Science

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fusion Nuclear Science and Technology (FNST) Challenges and Facilities on the Pathway to Fusion Energy Mohamed Abdou Distinguished Professor of Engineering.
Advertisements

1 Summary Slides on FNST Top-level Technical Issues and on FNSF objectives, requirements and R&D Presented at FNST Meeting, UCLA August 18-20, 2009 Mohamed.
First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
VLT Report the fusion trend line Stan Milora (ORNL) and Richard Nygren (SNL) FNST/PFC/MASCO Meeting Aug 2-6, UCLA.
Implications of Plasma-Material Interactions Dennis Whyte, MIT PSFC & PSI Science Center With contributions from Jeff Brooks (Purdue), Russ Doerner (UCSD),
FNST Issue 1 Tritium Self Sufficiency -Technical Issues and Conditions for Attaining tritium self sufficiency in a practical DT fusion system -Requirements.
Briefing to DOE Office of Science on Fusion Chamber Technology Washington, D.C., June 3, 2003 Prepared on behalf of the US Fusion Chamber Technology Community.
Chamber Technology Goals Used in APEX to Calibrate New Ideas and Measure Progress 1. High Power Density Capability Average/Peak Neutron Wall Load ~ 7 /
FNSF Blanket Testing Mission and Strategy Summary of previous workshops 1 Conclusions Derived Primarily from Previous FNST Workshop, August 12-14, 2008.
January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 Plan for Engineering Study of ARIES-CS Presented by A. R. Raffray University of California, San Diego ARIES Meeting UCSD San.
Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Presentation to: ARIES Program Peer Review August 18, 2000 UC San Diego.
Suggested US Plans and Strategy for ITER Test Blanket Mohamed Abdou Presented at APEX/TBM Meeting, UCLA, November 3-5, 2003.
Page 1 of 14 Reflections on the energy mission and goals of a fusion test reactor ARIES Design Brainstorming Workshop April 2005 M. S. Tillack.
Burning Plasma Gap Between ITER and DEMO Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy US-Japan Workshop Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies.
March 3-4, 2008/ARR 1 Power Management Technical Working Group: TRL for Heat and Particle Flux Handling A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego.
Action Items For ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi ARIES Project Meeting June 19-21, 2000 University of Wisconsin, Madison Electronic copy:
1 Brief Status of ITER TBM A High-Level Ad Hoc Group (AHG) met April 10-11, per request of the ITER Council. In that meeting, Parties intentions were stated,
Thoughts on Fusion Nuclear Technology Development and the Role of ITER TBM Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy.
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
Thermofluid MHD issues for liquid breeder blankets and first walls Neil B. Morley and Sergey Smolentsev MAE Dept., UCLA APEX/TBM Meeting November 3, 2003.
Distribution of Advanced Design Research FY02 FY03 (Current) ARIES (IFE & MFE) System Studies1,9661,939 Socio-economic Studies UCSD/UW/RPI 1,189.
Power Extraction Research Using a Full Fusion Nuclear Environment G. L. Yoder, Jr. Y. K. M. Peng Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN Presentation.
ITER Test Blanket Module and the Need for Coordination Outline What ITER means for the World Technology / Chamber / Blanket Community ITER Plans for TBM.
1 Recent Progress in Helium-Cooled Ceramic Breeder (HCCB) Blanket Module R&D and Design Analysis Ying, Alice With contributions from M. Narula, H. Zhang,
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
Developing a Vendor Base for Fusion Commercialization Stan Milora, Director Fusion Energy Division Virtual Laboratory of Technology Martin Peng Fusion.
Fusion: Bringing star power to earth Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy Research UC San Diego NES Grand Challenges.
Page 1 of 11 An approach for the analysis of R&D needs and facilities for fusion energy ARIES “Next Step” Planning Meeting 3 April 2007 M. S. Tillack ?
October 27-28, 2004 HAPL meeting, PPPL 1 Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis of Ceramic Breeder Blanket and Plan for Future Effort A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions.
An Expanded View of RAMI Issues 02 March 2009 RAMI Panel Members: Mohamed Abdou (UCLA), Tom Burgess (ORNL), Lee Cadwallader (INL), Wayne Reiersen (PPPL),
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego ARIES brainstorming meeting UC San Diego April 3-4, 2007 Electronic copy:
ITER test plan for the solid breeder TBM Presented by P. Calderoni March 3, 2004 UCLA.
Thoughts on Fusion Competitiveness Initiative Farrokh Najmabadi, George Tynan UC San Diego University Fusion Initiatives Meeting, MIT 14-15, February 2008.
1 1 by Dr. John Parmentola Senior Vice President Energy and Advanced Concepts Presented at the American Security Project Fusion Event June 5, 2012 The.
2. Tritium extraction, inventory, and control in fusion systems Why? Unprecedented amounts of highly mobile, radioactive, elemental tritium are used as.
Fusion Fire Powers the Sun Can we make Fusion Fire on earth? National FIRE Collaboration AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT,
Fusion Energy Sciences Program Department of Energy Perspective February 23, E xcellent S cience in S upport of A ttractive.
Programmatic issues to be studied in advance for the DEMO planning Date: February 2013 Place:Uji-campus, Kyoto Univ. Shinzaburo MATSUDA Kyoto Univ.
KIT Objectives in Fusion by 2020 Workshop on the European Fusion Roadmap for FP8 and beyond April 13 – 14, 2011; IPP Garching.
Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Presentation to ARIES Program Peer Review August 29, 2013, Washington, DC.
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.
Compact Stellarator Approach to DEMO J.F. Lyon for the US stellarator community FESAC Subcommittee Aug. 7, 2007.
Background information of Party(EU)’s R&D on TBM and breeding blankets Compiled and Presented by Alice Ying TBM Costing Kickoff Meeting INL August 10-12,
An ITER-TBM Experimental Thrust for ReNeW Themes III and IV Neil B. Morley, Mohamed Abdou, Alice Ying (UCLA); Mohamed Sawan, Jake Blanchard (UW); Clement.
Materials Integration by Fission Reactor Irradiation and Essential Basic Studies for Overall Evaluation Presented by N.Yoshida and K.Abe At the J-US Meeting,
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Technical Readiness Level For Control of Plasma Power Flux Distribution.
Review of Thermofluid / MHD activities for DCLL Sergey Smolentsev & US TBM Thermofluid/MHD Group 2006 US-Japan Workshop on FUSION HIGH POWER DENSITY COMPONENTS.
Comments on Fusion Development Strategy for the US S. Prager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory FPA Symposium.
Top-Level Technical Issues for FNST #3 MHD Thermofluid Phenomena and Impact on Transport Processes in Electrically Conducting Liquid Coolants/Breeders.
Fuel Cycle Research Thrust Using A Full Fusion Nuclear Environment
1 Discussion with Drs. Kwon and Cho UCLA-NFRC Collaboration Mohamed Abdou March 27, 2006.
Material System Thermomechanics Interactions (cont’d) International Collaboration: Role / Impact / Recognition - Serves a unique role in IEA program on.
Highlights of US ITER TBM Technical Plan and Cost Estimates (and Impact of International Collaboration) Mohamed Abdou and the U.S. Team TBWG-17 Presented.
CFD Simulation & Consulting Services Hi-Tech CFD | Voice: Optimizing Designs of Industrial Pipes, Ducts and.
HARNESSING FUSION POWER POWER EXTRACTION Power Extraction Panel Preliminary Research Thrust Ideas Robust operation of blanket/firstwall and divertor systems.
US Participation in the
DCLL TBM Reference Design
Debriefing/New Results of ReNeW Themes III/IV (HFP) Workshop
Can We achieve the TBR Needed in FNF?
Integrated Modeling Approach and Plans
Status of the ARIES Program
VLT Meeting, Washington DC, August 25, 2005
Mohamed A. Abdou Summary, Approach and Strategy (M. Abdou)
An ITER-TBM Experimental Thrust for ReNeW Themes III and IV
TRL tables: power conversion and lifetime
University of California, San Diego
UCLA, Los Angeles - April 26, 2001
Presentation transcript:

Fusion Engineering Science Subgroup A Subgroup B (Science questions for Materials and Plasma Chamber) (Science questions in technologies for plasma heating, confinement, and control) Co-Chairs: Mohamed Abdou (UCLA), Steven Zinkle (ORNL) Co-Chairs: Stan Milora (ORNL), Wayne Meier (LLNL) J. Blanchard (UW) M. Kotschenreuther (UT) R. Kurtz* (PNL) B. Merrill* (INEEL) N. Morley* (UCLA) R. Nygren (SNL) R. Odette (UCSB) P. Peterson (UCB) D. Petti (INEEL) R. Raffray (UCSD) M. Sawan* (UW) D. Sze (UCSD) S. Willms (LANL) C. Wong (GA) A. Ying* (UCLA) N. Ghoniem (UCLA) R. Callis (GA) C. Forrest (UW) D. Goodin (GA) R. Hawryluk* (PPPL) J. Minervini (MIT) H. Neilson* (PPPL) D. Rasmussen* (ORNL) D. Swain (ORNL) R. Temkin (MIT) M. Ulrickson (SNL) S. Wukitch (MIT) L. Baylor * Major Contributor

T13: How does the challenging fusion environment affect plasma chamber systems? T14: What are the operating limits for materials in the harsh fusion environment? As the US actively seeks opportunities to explore the physics of D-T burning plasma, the importance of establishing the needed material and plasma chamber engineering science knowledge base moves to the forefront of issues. This knowledge base is required to: - support the construction and safe operation of ITER - provide the capabilities for testing blankets in ITER - demonstrate the feasibility of the D-T fusion fuel cycle in a practical, safe system compatible with plasma operation.

Challenging Environment: The plasma chamber and its materials must provide simultaneously for: - Power extraction - Tritium breeding, extraction, and control - Structural integrity, high performance, high temperature, reliability, and maintainability Under extreme conditions of high heat and particle fluxes, energetic neutrons, intense magnetic field, large mechanical and electromagnetic forces and complex geometry The components and materials surrounding the plasma must be compatible with plasma stability and operation and exhibit favorable safety and environmental features, while withstanding a fusion environment significantly harsher than any existing nuclear system

Scientific Phenomena: Many complex scientific phenomena occur within and at the interfaces among coolants, tritium breeders, neutron multipliers, structural materials, conducting shells, insulators, and tritium permeation barriers. EXAMPLES: magnetohydrodynamic reorganization and damping of turbulent flow structures and transport phenomena in conducting coolants neutron-induced ballistic mixing of nano-scale strengthening features in structural materials fundamental deformation and fracture mechanisms in materials surface chemistry desorption and recombination phenomena in tritium breeding ceramics Integral Part of the Broader Science Understanding these phenomena requires utilizing and expanding on advances in computational and experimental methods in material science, fluid mechanics, MHD, chemistry, nuclear physics, particle transport, plasma-material interactions, and other disciplines.

RESEARCH APPROACH Focus on the following Thrusts: A. Develop plasma chamber systems and materials knowledge to support the construction and operation of ITER, including blanket testing capability in the fusion environment B. Establish the engineering science base required for the D-T cycle C. Identify performance limits for materials and plasma chamber technologies Each thrust has both critical experiments and simulation aspects that need to be developed together to achieve understanding of phenomena, resolution of scientific questions, and development of usable components.

Research Thrust A: Develop plasma chamber systems and materials knowledge to support the construction and operation of ITER, including blanket testing capability in the fusion environment What will be the true Nuclear Environment and machine response in ITER? ITER as the first large-scale, long-pulse DT burning machine, presents many challenges for safety and nuclear design, some of which still need more accurate predictive capability and more detailed analysis to fully resolve. Improve simulation codes required for more detailed nuclear and safety analysis to support ITER construction and licensing How will blanket components and materials behave in an Integrated Fusion Environment? ITER will be utilized as the first integrated nuclear fusion environment for testing of blanket designs and materials. Provide Scientific and Engineering Basis for ITER Test Blanket Modules (TBM) which will investigate issues such as tritium breeding and recovery, materials interactions, MHD flows, and thermomechanical interactions

Blanket Testing in ITER is one of ITER’s Key Objectives Strong international collaboration among the ITER Parties is underway to provide the science basis and engineering capabilities for ITER TBMs Bio-Shield Plug TBM Frame & Shield Plug Cryostat Plug Breeder Concentric Pipe Transporter EU HCLL Test Module FW Cryostat Extension Drain Pipe US Solid breeder submodule Conceptual Liquid Breeder Port Layout and Ancillary equipment

Research Thrust A: Develop plasma chamber systems and materials knowledge to support the construction and operation of ITER, including blanket testing capability in the fusion environment (continued) Examples of Capabilities Required for ITER Test Blanket Module Experiments: Capability for simulation of 3-D magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) forces distribution in liquid breeder flows including effects on drag, turbulent mixing, and flow distribution in complex geometry. Experimentally-validated mechanical-property and dimensional stability models of the effects of combined material and environmental variables on the behavior of low activation martensitic steel Experiments and phenomenological and computational models to address other key issues for blanket modules such as: behavior of electrical and thermal insulators tritium permeation barriers chemistry control and material compatibility

Research Thrust B: Establish the engineering science base required for the D-T cycle What is the “phase-space” of plasma, nuclear and technological conditions in which tritium self-sufficiency can be attained? Tritium self-sufficiency is affected by all aspects of the fusion system including: the plasma configuration, operation modes and parameters (fractional burn-up, edge recycling, power excursions, disruptions), the control systems for plasma stability, heating and exhaust embedded in the blanket (shells, coils, RF and beam ports, divertors), safety considerations and many other factors in addition to the blanket and tritium processing systems Parallel and highly interactive research in plasma physics, plasma control technologies, plasma chamber systems, materials science, safety, and systems analysis is required (significant interactions with many plasma physics thrusts) Is there a practical blanket system that can exist in this phase-space? A critical element in assessing the engineering feasibility of the D-T cycle in a practical system is the development and testing of blankets and materials that can safely operate in the integrated fusion environment at reactor-relevant neutron and surface heat fluxes for prolonged periods of time at high temperature with sufficient reliability and maintainability. Extensive modeling of materials and plasma chamber phenomena along with select experiments in various laboratory-scale facilities and fission reactors will be utilized to supplement ITER testing in providing the scientific and engineering knowledge-base at more demanding environmental conditions. -

Research focus areas for this thrust include (examples): Research Thrust B: Establish the engineering science base required for the D-T cycle (cont’d) Research focus areas for this thrust include (examples): Modeling and experimental investigation of the transport, fate, and consequences of fusion-relevant levels of transmutant helium in reduced-activation materials. Physically-based interaction mechanisms studied in experiments with unit cells of breeder/multiplier/coolant/structure/insulators. Experiments and micro-structure models to explore high-temperature radiation-induced sintering and low-temperature tritium diffusion in ceramic breeders and their effects on the allowable operating temperature “window”, which is essential to assessing the tritium breeding potential in solid breeders. Novel methods to divert eddy currents generated in liquid metal coolants away from the walls, and hence control the MHD drag and suppress turbulence This research will be critical in guiding fusion plasma physics research and technology R&D toward the path for a truly “renewable” energy source

Understanding of phenomena is a critical element of Plasma Chamber and Materials research Example: Liquid Metal Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) Liquid metal blanket designs have the best potential for high power density, but magnetohydrodynamic interactions of the flowing LM with confinement fields leads to: Pressure Gap extreme drag leading to high blanket pressure and stresses, and flow balance disruption velocity profile and turbulence distortion leading to severe changes in heat transfer and corrosion Pioneering research into highly-parallel multi-scale incompressible MHD solvers is extending the frontiers of problem size and geometric complexity accessible via numerical simulation Simulations beginning to shed light on MHD flow features in complex channels of electrically heterogeneous materials at ITER relevant Ha number 3D MHD Simulation of PbLi flow with SiC Flow Channel Insert with SiC = 500 -1m-1 shows formation of strong velocity jets even though the pressure drop is tolerable Such advances in MHD are of great interest to the broader CFD community

Research Thrust C: Identify performance limits for materials and plasma chamber technologies What are the performance limits of materials and blanket components? Materials and plasma chamber systems will play a critical role in determining the ultimate attractiveness of fusion power because of the need for high power density, high thermodynamic efficiency, high reliability, fast maintainability, long lifetime, and low long-term radioactivity. Meeting these simultaneous demands in the multiple-field, intense fusion environment and complex plasma confinement configurations are a challenge that requires important advances in several scientific fields and engineering applications. Continue various long-lead-time aspects of material performance limits and chamber technology research over the next 10 years that could have the largest impact on the ultimate attractiveness of fusion energy Can innovative material and technology solutions be found that can dramatically improve the attractiveness of and/or shorten the development path to fusion energy? Innovation in materials and technology research should continue, as more conventional materials and technology approaches may prove to be infeasible or not attractive in the long run. For example, materials with high temperature potential or innovative liquid wall and divertor concepts that can reduce significantly the demands on structural materials are both pathways to enable high power density performance Continue work at the fundamental science level on advanced materials and plasma chamber solutions like liquid walls

Research Thrust C: Identify performance limits for materials and plasma chamber technologies (cont’d) In addition to the research described in the Thrusts 1 and 2, which will also aid in advancing aspects of this thrust, research focus areas for this thrust include (examples): Design of fusion materials that utilize and expand on revolutionary advances in computational and experimental methods to control at the nanoscale level the structural stability of the material during exposure to intense neutron fluxes, high mechanical loads, and corrosive environments. Basic research on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) development for turbulent (IFE) and magnetohydrodynamic (MFE) free surface flows to allow simulation and study of phenomena in liquid wall systems free surface vaporization and mass transfer model development will be critical to simulating recondensation rates in IFE coupling to edge plasma physics codes will be necessary in MFE to assess the coupled penetration of impurity vapor and the effect on local heat loads and electrical currents back to the liquid surface

Comparison of tensile strength of 12YWT Nanocomposited Ferritic Steel vs. ODS steels

MFE Working Group Members T15: How can systems be engineered to heat, fuel, pump, and confine steady state or repetitively pulsed burning plasmas? - MFE MFE Working Group Members Technologies L. Baylor S. Milora J. Minervini D. Rasmussen D. Swain R. Temkin M. Ulrickson Fusion Facilities R. Callis C. Forrest R. Hawryluk H. Nielson S. Wukitch In general, each presentation should cover only the material in the interim report. The presentation should be limited to 20 minutes and should be no more than 12-15 slides. I suggest the following content: - identify WG key participants and methods used (e.g., website, meetings, etc.) in involving the community (1 slide) - scope of WG - list topical questions covered by WG (1 slide) - introduction - overview of general approach used by WG (1 slide) - for each question: (3 slides per question) * describe issue stressing importance and relevance to overarching themes * describe research approach - list thrust areas - conclusion (1 slide)

Fusion research requires the development and deployment of tools to create, confine, understand and control plasmas Technologies that heat, fuel, pump shape and confine plasmas are essential and ubiquitous enable all exiting MFE experiments to achieve scientific research and performance goals enable the execution of the U.S.commitment to the construction and operation phases of ITER advances needed to address advanced tokamak and burning plasma challenges and evolution of other concepts Plasma technologies impact directly and broadly all three overarching themes: fundamental understanding of plasmas (O1), burning plasma studies (O2) and developing practical fusion energy (O3) The fusion program requires the development and deployment of various tools to create, confine, understand and control plasmas across the portfolio of fusion concepts and throughout their stages of development from concept exploration to the realization of a long pulse burning plasma experiment. In magnetically-confined fusion energy (MFE), these enabling technologies are essential to enable existing and near-term experiments to achieve their scientific research and performance goals. Real-time plasma control requires an integrated set of tools to monitor plasma parameters and responding technologies such as: plasma heating, current drive, and fueling systems that raise the plasma temperature and density and manipulate plasma properties to access advanced operating regimes; pumping systems for control of edge plasma conditions and particle exhaust; and magnets that provide the forces for confining, shaping and controlling the plasmas in magnetic fusion devices. A burning plasma cannot be confined or sustained without these technologies and major advances in these technologies will be required to cope with the requirements of a burning plasma environment (plasma and nuclear heating and damage effects, steady state operation at high performance and high reliability, tritium issues and helium ash removal). Magnetic configuration development for practical fusion systems will require complementary advances in enabling technologies to meet their special control needs.

Approach: integrate modeling, development, component construction, testing, and deployment of advanced plasma control tools to support scientific missions Two research thrusts address a wide range of scientific and technological issues of importance to magnetically confined plasmas together both thrusts ensure that the technologies needed for the study of magnetically confined plasmas will be developed expeditiously. Research Thrust T15-A. Develop long pulse plasma control technologies for tokamaks including ITER. focuses on developing the technology needed to address key elements of the tokamak development path―long-pulse, advanced operating regimes and burning plasma research technology development is driven by technical challenges and demanding conditions associated with ITER―progresses technologies to an advanced stage of development ie. superconducting magnets and high power density ICRF launchers MFE Research Approach: The approach taken to address this question encompasses an integrated effort of modeling, technology development, component construction, testing, and deployment of advanced plasma control tools aimed at supporting the scientific missions of MFE devices. Two research thrusts address a wide range of scientific and technological issues of importance to magnetically confined plasmas: T15-A. Develop long pulse plasma control technologies for tokamaks including ITER.The first thrust utilizes the tokamak as the primary vehicle for advancing the development ofcritical advanced technologies. This thrust focuses on developing the technology needed to address key elements of the tokamak development path, namely long-pulse, advancedoperating regimes and burning plasma research. The technical challenges and demandingconditions associated with ITER drive the development of these technologies–the research and development of plasma control technologies will enable the execution of the U.S.commitment to the construction and operation phases of ITER. Potential examples of R&Dfor ITER include: improved performance superconducting strand with critical current density greater than 1000 A/mm2 (50% improvement) and acceptably low hysteresis losses for thecentral solenoid coils; a 20 MW burning-plasma compatible, long pulse, ICRF antenna; a 1MW, 120 GHz gyrotron for plasma initiation; and a high throughput, tritium-compatible pellet fueling system. The R&D is done in collaboration with theory and modeling groups,and the results benchmarked against well-diagnosed experiments and advanced multi-physicscodes to reduce the cost of component testing. The code scalability, such as an ICRF antenna code coupled with a full wave electromagnetic solver, will be improved to facilitate thecomparison.

T15 (MFE) Research thrusts cont’d. Research Thrust T15-B. Provide plasma control technology support for developing other confinement approaches. focuses on addressing needs of other concepts at various stages of evolution―Spherical Torus, Reversed Field Pinch, Compact Stellarator etc. addresses a wider range of technologies many of which are at an earlier stage of development such as high temperature superconducting magnets and ICRF launchers for sustaining non-axisymmetric plasmas. T15-B. Provide plasma control technology support for developing other confinement approaches.This thrust addresses a wider range of technologies many of which are at an earlier stage of development. This research focuses on other concepts and is expected to play a prominentrole in their development through the various stages of evolution. The physics requirements of other concepts that are relatively closely linked to the present knowledge base (such as the compact stellarators and spherical torus) will require an evolutionary rethinking of existingtechnologies. As the portfolio expands into emerging and new concepts that are less welllinked to the present tokamak and stellarator knowledge base, it will be necessary to pursue new technologies as well. Taken together both thrusts ensure that the technologies needed forthe study of magnetically confined plasmas will be developed expeditiously. Potentialexamples of R&D for other concepts include: high performance copper magnets to support the spherical torus concept, shaped magnets for compact stellarators, and high temperaturesuperconducting (HTS) conductor and magnet technology for innovative confinementconcepts; heating techniques such as ICRF antennas that efficiently couple to and sustain, non-axisymmetric and high magnetic shear symmetric torus plasmas ; high power ElectronBernstein Wave sources and launchers for heating and current drive of high-beta, high-densityspherical torus, compact stellarator and reversed field pinch concepts; flexible, low cost fueling systems that meet the needs of specific new concepts and demonstration of localizeddeep fueling with compact torus injection.

T15 (IFE) IFE Research Approach: 1. The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) funds R&D on many aspects of laser- and z-pinch driven IFE. 2. The NNSA programs are briefly described in the interim report, but are NOT included in the FESAC prioritization process. 3. Key issues for heavy ion drivers are discussed in topic T10.