Characterization of Aerosols using Airborne Lidar, MODIS, and GOCART Data during the TRACE-P (2001) Mission Rich Ferrare 1, Ed Browell 1, Syed Ismail 1,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A New A-Train Collocated Product : MODIS and OMI cloud data on the OMI footprint Brad Fisher 1, Joanna Joiner 2, Alexander Vasilkov 1, Pepijn Veefkind.
Advertisements

Using a Radiative Transfer Model in Conjunction with UV-MFRSR Irradiance Data for Studying Aerosols in El Paso-Juarez Airshed by Richard Medina Calderón.
Satellite Observations of Enhanced Pre- Monsoon Aerosol Loading and Tropospheric Warming over the Gangetic-Himalayan Region Ritesh Gautam 1, N. Christina.
GEOS-5 Simulations of Aerosol Index and Aerosol Absorption Optical Depth with Comparison to OMI retrievals. V. Buchard, A. da Silva, P. Colarco, R. Spurr.
Liang APEIS Capacity Building Workshop on Integrated Environmental Monitoring of Asia-Pacific Region September 2002, Beijing,, China Atmospheric.
A Dictionary of Aerosol Remote Sensing Terms Richard Kleidman SSAI/NASA Goddard Lorraine Remer UMBC / JCET Short.
GEO-CAPE COMMUNITY WORKSHOP MAY Vijay Natraj 1, Xiong Liu 2, Susan Kulawik 1, Kelly Chance 2, Robert Chatfield 3, David P. Edwards 4, Annmarie.
Global Climatology of Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Estimated from Remote-Sensed Aerosol Optical Depth Aaron van Donkelaar 1, Randall Martin 1,2,
Constraining aerosol sources using MODIS backscattered radiances Easan Drury - G2
CPI International UV/Vis Limb Workshop Bremen, April Development of Generalized Limb Scattering Retrieval Algorithms Jerry Lumpe & Ed Cólon.
1 Cloud Droplet Size Retrievals from AERONET Cloud Mode Observations Christine Chiu Stefani Huang, Alexander Marshak, Tamas Várnai, Brent Holben, Warren.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Direct Radiative Effect of aerosols over clouds and clear skies determined using CALIPSO and the A-Train Robert Wood with Duli Chand, Tad Anderson, Bob.
Direct aerosol radiative forcing based on combined A-Train observations – challenges in deriving all-sky estimates Jens Redemann, Y. Shinozuka, M.Kacenelenbogen,
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Bastiaan van Diedenhoven (Columbia University, NASA GISS) Ann Fridlind, Andrew Ackerman & Brian Cairns (NASA GISS) An investigation of ice crystal sizes.
AERONET in the context of aerosol remote sensing from space and aerosol global modeling Stefan Kinne MPI-Meteorology, Hamburg Germany.
Application of Satellite Data to Particulate, Smoke and Dust Monitoring Spring 2015 ARSET - AQ Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training – Air Quality.
(Impacts are Felt on Scales from Local to Global) Aerosols Link Climate, Air Quality, and Health: Dirtier Air and a Dimmer Sun Emissions Impacts == 
GOCART Model Study of Anthropogenic Aerosol Radiative Forcing Mian Chin NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
Summer Institute in Earth Sciences 2009 Comparison of GEOS-5 Model to MPLNET Aerosol Data Bryon J. Baumstarck Departments of Physics, Computer Science,
Using MODIS fire count data as an interim solution for estimating biomass burning emission of aerosols and trace gases Mian Chin, Tom Kucsera, Louis Giglio,
Aerosol Optical Depths from Airborne Sunphotometry in INTEX-B/MILAGRO as a Validation Tool for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on Aura J. Livingston.
Introduction Invisible clouds in this study mean super-thin clouds which cannot be detected by MODIS but are classified as clouds by CALIPSO. These sub-visual.
The combined use of MODIS, CALIPSO and OMI level 2 aerosol products for calculating direct aerosol radiative effects Jens Redemann, M. Vaughan, Y. Shinozuka,
A four year record of Aerosol Absorption measurements from OMI near UV observations Omar Torres Department of Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Hampton.
In Situ and Remote Sensing Characterization of Spectral Absorption by Black Carbon and other Aerosols J. Vanderlei Martins, Paulo Artaxo, Yoram Kaufman,
GE0-CAPE Workshop University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill August 2008 Aerosols: What is measurable and by what remote sensing technique? Omar Torres.
Figure 1. (left) Direct comparison of CCN concentration adjusted to 0.4% supersaturation and 499 nm AOD, both observed from ≤1 km altitudes during ARCTAS.
Direct aerosol radiative forcing based on combined A-Train observations and comparisons to IPCC-2007 results Jens Redemann, Y. Shinozuka, M. Vaughan, P.
Ocean subsurface studies from space-based lidar measurements Xiaomei Lu, 1 Yongxiang Hu, 2 1 Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI), Hampton, Virginia.
The Second TEMPO Science Team Meeting Physical Basis of the Near-UV Aerosol Algorithm Omar Torres NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Atmospheric Chemistry.
LASE Measurements During IHOP Edward V. Browell, Syed Ismail, Richard A. Ferrare, Susan A Kooi, Anthony Notari, and Carolyn F. Butler NASA Langley Research.
Modelling the radiative impact of aerosols from biomass burning during SAFARI-2000 Gunnar Myhre 1,2 Terje K. Berntsen 3,1 James M. Haywood 4 Jostein K.
UV Aerosol Product Status and Outlook Omar Torres and Changwoo Ahn OMI Science Team Meeting Outline -Status -Product Assessment OMI-MODIS Comparison OMI-Aeronet.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Using CALIPSO to Explore the Sensitivity to Cirrus Height in the Infrared.
Numerical simulations of optical properties of nonspherical dust aerosols using the T-matrix method Hyung-Jin Choi School.
AEROSOL CLASSIFICATION RETRIEVAL ALGORITHMS FOR EARTHCARE/ATLID, CALIPSO/CALIOP, AND GROUND-BASED LIDARS Sugimoto, N., T. Nishizawa, I. Matsui, National.
Timothy Logan University of North Dakota Department of Atmospheric Science.
Airborne Aerosol Profiling using HSRL Data NASA HQ Science Mission Directorate Radiation Sciences Program Richard Ferrare 1, Chris Hostetler 1, John Hair.
1 N. Christina Hsu, Deputy NPP Project Scientist Recent Update on MODIS C6 Deep Blue Aerosol Products and Beyond N. Christina Hsu, Corey Bettenhausen,
Synergy of MODIS Deep Blue and Operational Aerosol Products with MISR and SeaWiFS N. Christina Hsu and S.-C. Tsay, M. D. King, M.-J. Jeong NASA Goddard.
Introduction 1. Advantages and difficulties related to the use of optical data 2. Aerosol retrieval and comparison methodology 3. Results of the comparison.
Retrieval of Vertical Columns of Sulfur Dioxide from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development, Validation, and Error Analysis Chulkyu Lee.
1 Monitoring Tropospheric Ozone from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Xiong Liu 1,2,3, Pawan K. Bhartia 3, Kelly Chance 2, Thomas P. Kurosu 2, Robert.
How accurately we can infer isoprene emissions from HCHO column measurements made from space depends mainly on the retrieval errors and uncertainties in.
Aerosol Radiative Forcing from combined MODIS and CERES measurements
Jetstream 31 (J31) in INTEX-B/MILAGRO. Campaign Context: In March 2006, INTEX-B/MILAGRO studied pollution from Mexico City and regional biomass burning,
Direct aerosol radiative effects based on combined A-Train observations Jens Redemann, Y. Shinozuka, J. Livingston, M. Vaughan, P. Russell, M.Kacenelenbogen,
AEROCOM AODs are systematically smaller than MODIS, with slightly larger/smaller differences in winter/summer. Aerosol optical properties are difficult.
Airborne Sunphotometry and Closure Studies during the SAFARI-2000 Dry Season Campaign B. Schmid BAER/NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA.
TOMS Ozone Retrieval Sensitivity to Assumption of Lambertian Cloud Surface Part 2. In-cloud Multiple Scattering Xiong Liu, 1 Mike Newchurch, 1,2 Robert.
Stratospheric Aerosol Size Distribution Retrievals Using SAGE III Mark Hervig GATS Inc. Terry Deshler University of Wyoming.
March 29 – April 1, INTEX-NA Workshop Aerosol and Cloud Spatial Distributions and Microphysical Properties Bruce Anderson, Lee Thornhill, Gao.
Lorraine Remer, Yoram Kaufman, Didier Tanré Shana Mattoo, Richard Kleidman, Robert Levy Vanderlei Martins, Allen Chu, Charles Ichoku, Rong-Rong Li, Ilan.
Retrieval of desert dust aerosols vertical profiles from IASI measurements in the TIR atmospheric window Sophie Vandenbussche, Svetlana Kochenova, Ann-Carine.
number Typical aerosol size distribution area volume
Retrieving sources of fine aerosols from MODIS/AERONET observations by inverting GOCART model INVERSION: Oleg Dubovik 1 Tatyana Lapyonok 1 Tatyana Lapyonok.
The study of cloud and aerosol properties during CalNex using newly developed spectral methods Patrick J. McBride, Samuel LeBlanc, K. Sebastian Schmidt,
1 Y. Kaufman, L. Remer, M. Chin, NASA; Didier Tanré, CNRS, Univ. of Lille Aerosol measurements & models MODIS & AERONET vs. GOCART.
Studying the radiative environment of individual biomass burning fire plumes using multi-platform observations: an example ARCTAS case study on June 30,
What Are the Implications of Optical Closure Using Measurements from the Two Column Aerosol Project? J.D. Fast 1, L.K. Berg 1, E. Kassianov 1, D. Chand.
Vertically resolved CALIPSO-CloudSat aerosol extinction coefficient in the marine boundary layer and its co-variability with MODIS cloud retrievals David.
Fourth TEMPO Science Team Meeting
Extinction measurements
N. Bousserez, R. V. Martin, L. N. Lamsal, J. Mao, R. Cohen, and B. R
Near UV aerosol products
Need for TEMPO-ABI Synergy
Using dynamic aerosol optical properties from a chemical transport model (CTM) to retrieve aerosol optical depths from MODIS reflectances over land Fall.
Retrieval of SO2 Vertical Columns from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development and Validation Chulkyu Lee, Aaron van Dokelaar, Gray O’Byrne:
Presentation transcript:

Characterization of Aerosols using Airborne Lidar, MODIS, and GOCART Data during the TRACE-P (2001) Mission Rich Ferrare 1, Ed Browell 1, Syed Ismail 1, Yoram Kaufman 2, Mian Chin 2, Vince Brackett 3, Carolyn Butler 3, Marian Clayton 3, Marta Fenn 3, Jean Francois Léon 4 1 NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA 3 SAIC/NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA 4 Laboratoire d’Optique Atmospherique, Lille, France MODIS Science Team Meeting, March 2005

Outline Motivation Objectives Airborne Lidar Measurements Lidar + MODIS retrievals GOCART model evaluation Summary and Future

Motivation Key aerosol parameters required for assessing anthropogenic impacts on radiative forcing –Vertical distribution radiative forcing surface temperature and climate responses –Aerosol size distribution fine mode - biomass burning, pollution coarse mode - desert dust, sea salt Methodology –Models +Global coverage -Large uncertainties in vertical distribution –MODIS +Estimates of fine, coarse mode over ocean -Column average – no profile information –Lidar +High resolution vertical profiles -Typically provide little quantitative information on size or composition

Objectives Use combination of airborne lidar and MODIS to provide information regarding the vertical distribution of fine vs. coarse aerosol modes Retrieve aerosol extinction and optical thickness profiles from lidar data Identify aerosol types vs. altitude Evaluate ability of GOCART model to simulate aerosol extinction profiles and simulate contributions to fine and coarse modes

NASA Langley UV DIAL Airborne Lidar Ozone Differential Absorption Lidar (DIAL) Profiles ( on =289 nm & off =300 nm) Aerosol & Cloud Scattering Ratio Profiles (300, 576, & 1064 nm) Simultaneous Nadir and Zenith Ozone & Aerosol Profiling Nadir Aerosol Depolarization Profiles (576 nm) Deployed on NASA DC-8 for TRACE-P (2001), INTEX NA (2004) Browell et al., J. Geophys. Res, 108(D20), 8805, 2003.

UV DIAL Measurements TRACE-P Flight 14 March 23-24, 2001 Extensive parameters (300, 576, 1064 nm) aerosol scattering ratio backscatter extinction Aerosol intensive parameters backscatter wavelength dependence depolarization

Retrieval of Aerosol Extinction Profiles Backscatter lidar equation (2 unknowns) Solution approaches Assume a priori aerosol types and S p values and use lidar measurements of intensive parameters to determine aerosol types Use external information to constrain solution (e.g. MODIS AOT) “Lidar Ratio” =

Retrieval of Aerosol Extinction Profiles Aerosol types determined from AERONET climatology used for CALIPSO retrievals (Omar et al., 2003) Use backscatter and extinction “color ratios” to infer aerosol type and corresponding lidar ratio (Sasano and Browell, 1989; Reagan et al., 2004) “Lidar Ratio”

Retrieval of Aerosol Extinction Profiles TRACE-P Flight 14 March 23-24, 2001 Good agreement between techniques for this test case

Retrieval of Aerosol Extinction Profiles TRACE-P Flight 14 March 23-24, 2001 Good agreement between techniques for this test case

Retrieval of Aerosol Extinction Profiles TRACE-P Flight 14 March 23-24, 2001 Inversion provides some indication of aerosol types Planned modifications - examine layer averages to reduce sensitivity to noise in lidar profiles Use in conjunction with GOCART results

MODIS+lidar Aerosol Retrieval Retrieval algorithm (Kaufman et al., IEEE, 2003; GRL, 2003; Léon et al., JGR, 2003) Aerosol size distribution – bimodal lognormal MODIS aerosol models – 20 combinations of 4 fine, 5 coarse particles Size of each mode is assumed to be altitude independent Relative weight of each mode is determined as a function of altitude from lidar backscatter color ratio Retrievals are constrained to fit MODIS measurements Spectral reflectance Column AOT and r eff Modifications UV wavelength (300 nm) – more information on fine particle size Depolarization – adjust the backscatter phase function for nonsphericity

Terra MODIS AOT (555 nm) Effective radius March 24, 2001 MODIS+GOCART UV DIAL

MODIS+lidar Aerosol Retrieval Example TRACE-P Flight 14 March 23-24, 2001 Good agreement between techniques for this test case Results show qualitative agreement with in situ measurements Plan to evaluate additional cases from TRACE-P, INTEX NA

Terra MODIS AOT (555 nm) Effective radius GOCART Total AOT (500 nm)Sulfate AOT (500 nm) Dust AOT (500 nm)Organic Carbon AOT (500 nm) March 24, 2001 MODIS+GOCART

Comparison with GOCART TRACE-P Flight 14 March 23-24, 2001 Attenuated aerosol scattering ratio GOCARTUV DIAL

GOCART March 24, 2001 TotalSulfate DustOrganic Carbon

TRACE-P Flight 14 March 23-24, 2001 Comparison with GOCART

Summary Currently developing and evaluating algorithms to: Retrieve profiles of aerosol extinction, optical thickness from airborne lidar and MODIS data Infer profiles of aerosol type Begun evaluating GOCART results using lidar, MODIS, in situ data Initial comparisons show qualitative agreement Future Refine and implement algorithms for retrieving aerosol profiles from lidar data – with and without MODIS data Evaluate algorithms using data from other TRACE-P, INTEX NA flights Infer aerosol types as a function of altitude using lidar, MODIS, GOCART Derive vertical distributions of fine, coarse mode particles for TRACE-P and INTEX NA