UD IRB Guidelines for Applications for: Registrations of exempt research, Expedited IRB review, Full IRB review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

IRB Issues in Medical Education Research – OHRP Perspective American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine 2 nd Annual Meeting – June 24-26,
Human Investigation Committee  Is It Research?  Is It Human Subjects Research?  Is It Human Subjects Research that requires IRB review?
QI project or research? Thomas F. Byrd M.D. HRRC Chair Subcommitees 2 and 4 December 3, 2013.
Introduction to Human Subjects Research at the University of Michigan – Dearborn. Debra Schneider IRB Administrator (313)
THE UW HEALTH SCIENCES IRB S OVERVIEW PRACTICAL REGULATORY ISSUES IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Protecting the Privacy of Family Members in Survey and Pedigree Research Jeffrey R. Botkin, MD, MPH University of Utah.
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
 Federal regulations specify “engagement” at the institutional level  Cornell has a Federalwide Assurance specifying its commitment to comply with regulations.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
Request For Exemption RFE. A Review of Penn’s Commitment to Research Research is a substantial and esteemed enterprise at Penn. The research community.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Tasha Osafo, CIP Assistant Director IRB Office Exempt Review.
Quick Facts about Exempt Research No continuing review required IRB Reviewer makes Exempt determination 6 OHRP & 4 FDA categories(1 category overlaps)
Conducting Exempt Research An Overview of Human Subjects Protections Issues and the Review Process at ASU Office of Research Integrity and Assurance Institutional.
Expedited vs Exempt by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
April 2011 Conducting Research at SPC Approval Process and Procedures Center of Excellence for Teaching and Learning.
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
Risk by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
Research Ethics The Protection of Human Subjects.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Stanley Estime, MSCI, CIP Senior QA/QI Specialist Lisa Gabel, CIP QA/QI Specialist IRB Determinations: What type of Review will your study receive?
1 Ethics of Working with Human Subjects (BIOL/CHEM 397 ) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.
Conducting Exempt Research: An Overview of Human Subjects Protections Issues and the Review Process at ASU.
SLCL Human Subjects Review Committee. Who we are Four faculty from SLCL: – Melissa Bowles, Chair (SIP) – José Ignacio Hualde (Linguistics/SIP) – Jennifer.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Education Research and Social & Behavioral Science IRB.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
Regulations 201: Thorny Issues What is Research? Exempt and Expedited Reviews.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Privacy/Confidentiality – Principles and Regulations in the Social Sciences and Behavioral Research Moira Keane, MA, CIP University of Minnesota May 4,
Human Subjects Research at Mines Colorado School of Mines New Faculty Orientation November 20, 2015.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Human Specimen Repositories Requirements of 21 CFR Parts 50 & 56 PRIM & R May 5, 2004 Sally A. Hojvat, Ph.D. Director of Microbiology Devices Office of.
Exempt Unless otherwise required by Department or Agency heads, research activities in which the only involvement of human subjects will be in one or more.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
HUMAN SUBJECTS QUIZ! TRUE OR FALSE?
Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
Presentation prepared for GCSU ENGAGE INSTITUTION REVIEW BOARD (IRB): FUNCTION AND SERVICE Tsu-Ming Chiang, Chair Whitney Heppner, Vice Chair Qiana Wilson,
What is exempt research? Angela Bain, IRB Administrator
Institutional Review Board
Submitting human subjects research
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Changes to Exempt Categories
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Introduction to the Institutional Review Board
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations and Types of Review
Submitting human subjects research
Changes to Exempt Categories
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
Intro to Projects – Research with Human Subjects
What types of research are exempt and ohrp guidance on exemptions
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
Common Rule Update: Exempt categories UT IRB
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
What the IRB is looking for when reviewing your protocol
Human Participants Research
Valdosta State University
Current IRB at DMACC September 2018.
Presentation transcript:

UD IRB Guidelines for Applications for: Registrations of exempt research, Expedited IRB review, Full IRB review

Members of the IRB Gilbert Garza, Associate Professor, Psychology, IRB Chair Stephen Slaughter, Associate Professor, Chair of Biology Laura Serviere-Munoz, Assistant Professor, COB Erin Freeman, Assistant Professor, Psychology Alternate Members: Amy Fisher Smith, Associate Professor, Psychology Sally Hicks, Professor, Chair of Phsyics

UD policies seek: To assure the safety and welfare of human research participants. To assure such privacy as may be reasonably expected by those who are survey participants or otherwise subjects of observation. Do not disclose data by which the identity of a participant may be discovered – unless consent was given) To secure confidentiality or anonymity and other rights of participants. Keep records secure for seven years (i.e.) Anonymity is preferred: No way to identify the participant Confidentiality: Steps have to be taken to protect the participants’ identities IRB 3

U.S. Departments and agencies involved in the welfare of human research participants The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) houses : OHRP: Office for Human Research Protections Provides leadership for research conducted or supported by the HHS OHRP provides clarification, guidance, educational programs NIH: National Institute of Health NIH’s mission is to seek fundamental knowledge about the nature and behavior of living systems and the application of that knowledge to enhance health, lengthen life…] As a public service, NIH offers a free tutorial on Protecting Human Research Participants that institutions may elect to use to fulfill requirement for education in the protection of human subjects. (U.D. uses this tutorial)Protecting Human Research Participants IRB 4

Who needs to receive required education on the protection of human subjects? Individuals who will be involved in the design or conduct of human subjects research must fulfill the education requirement. These individuals are considered to be "Key Personnel" on research involving human subjects. This includes the Principal Investigator(s), all individuals responsible for the design or conduct of the study, and those individuals identified as key personnel of consortium participants or alternate performance sites. Human subjects research is any research or clinical investigation that involves human subjects – living human beings.

Exempt Registration There are six categories of research defined by 45 CFR (b), to be exempt from review: 1.Research conducted in established or commonly accepted educational settings, involving normal educational practices, such as (i) research on regular and special education instructional strategies, or (ii) research on the effectiveness of or the comparison among instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom management methods. 2.Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview procedures or observation of public behavior, unless: a. information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human subjects can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects; and b. any disclosure of the human subjects' responses outside the research could reasonably place the subjects at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects' financial standing, employability, or reputation. 3.Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview procedures, or observation of public behavior that is not exempt under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, if: a. the human subjects are elected or appointed public officials or candidates for public office; or b. Federal statute(s) require(s) without exception that the confidentiality of the personally identifiable information will be maintained throughout the research and thereafter.

4.Research involving the collection or study of existing data, documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens, if these sources are publicly available or if the information is recorded by the investigator in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects. 5.Research and demonstration projects which are conducted by or subject to the approval of Department or Agency heads, and which are designed to study, evaluate, or otherwise examine: a. public benefit or service programs; b. procedures for obtaining benefits or services under those programs; c. possible changes in or alternatives to those programs or procedures; or 1 of 3. d. possible changes in methods or levels of payment for benefits or services under those programs. 6.Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer acceptance studies, a. if wholesome foods without additives are consumed or b. if a food is consumed that contains a food ingredient at or below the level and for a use found to be safe, or agricultural chemical or environmental contaminant at or below the level found to be safe, by the Food and Drug Administration or approved by the Environmental Protection Agency or the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Exempt Registration

Applications for Exempt Research should identify which of the six exempt cases describes their project. Exempt status does not, however, lessen the ethical obligations to subjects as articulated in the Belmont Report and in disciplinary codes of professional conduct. Thus, depending on the circumstances, researchers performing exempt studies may need to make provisions to obtain informed consent, protect confidentiality, minimize risks, and address problems or complaints. For this reason, investigators for any research involving human subjects must show evidence of completion of NIH humans subjects training ( within the last 3 years. The application to register research as exempt can be found at All exempt human subjects research must be registered with the IRB PRIOR TO the conduct of this research.

When Research is not Exempt from Review According to the NIH, human subjects research is not exempt when: You are collecting data by interacting or intervening with living people. AND Any of the investigators or collaborators listed in the application can identify the subjects through coded private information or specimens, or the data are recorded in such a way that participants can be identified (such as audio or video recording, photographic records).

Additionally, research does not qualify for IRB exemption if the research includes any of the the following: 1. Prisoners 2. Pregnant women 3. In vitro fertilization 4. Deception 5. Fetuses 6. Decisionally impaired 7. The use of school records of identifiable students or interviewing instructors about specific students 8. Survey or interview procedures with children (participants under the age of 18 years) 9. Observation of public behavior when the investigator(s) participates in the activities being observed 10. Data collected that includes protected health or medical information when there is a direct or indirect link that would identify the participant 11. Sensitive aspects of the participant’s own behavior, such as illegal conduct, drug use, sexual behavior or use of alcohol When Research is not Exempt from Review

Expedited Review Research not exempt from review may be eligible for expedited review if it poses no more than minimal risk to human subjects. Minimal Risk generally means that the probability and magnitude of physical or psychological harm anticipated in the research are not greater in and of themselves than those ordinarily encountered in daily life, or in routine medical, dental, or psychological examinations.

Expedited Review Applications for expedited review should include Provisions for obtaining informed consent, Provisions for storing and destroying data, protecting identities of participants, Any survey instrument, interview or focus group protocols or other data recording documentation forms to be used, Documentation of all investigators' recent (less than 3 years) completion of NIH humans subjects training. The application for expedited IRB review can be found at Prior IRB approval is required for all non- exempt research.

Full IRB review Full review of research proposals by the IRB is indicated when any of either of the following is true: Participation in the study exposes participants to more than minimal risk, Participation in the study involves deception of participants.

IRB full review Applications for full review should include Provisions for obtaining informed consent, Provisions for storing and destroying data, protecting identities of participants, Any survey instrument, interview or focus group protocols or other data recording documentation forms to be used, An assessment of the relationship between the known or suspected risk of participating to the value of the knowledge to be produced by the study, Detailed protocol of the researchers' steps to prevent, mitigate, or remediate any risk that might be incurred by participants, Documentation of all investigators' recent (less than 3 years) completion of NIH humans subjects training. Investigators whose research may call for full review should contact the Chair of the IRB.

Questions about the level of review or eligibility for exempt registration for your research should be directed to the chair of the IRB. Gilbert Garza x5366