CC Hennon ATMS 350 UNC Asheville Model Output Statistics Transforming model output into useful forecast parameters.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
Advertisements

Mei Xu, Jamie Wolff and Michelle Harrold National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Research Applications Laboratory (RAL) and Developmental Testbed.
An Intercomparison of Surface Observations and High-Resolution Forecasting Model Output for the Lake Okeechobee Region By Kathryn Shontz July 19, 2006.
Basic Meteorology ©Oklahoma Climatological Survey Earthstorm 2009.
Part 5. Human Activities Chapter 13 Weather Forecasting and Analysis.
Aspects of 6 June 2007: A Null “Moderate Risk” of Severe Weather Jonathan Kurtz Department of Geosciences University of Nebraska at Lincoln NOAA/NWS Omaha/Valley,
Visually Enhanced Composite Charts for Severe Weather Forecasting and Real-time Diagnosis Josh Korotky NWS Pittsburgh PA NROW Annual Meeting 2002.
GFS MOS Wind Guidance: Problem Solved? Eric Engle and Kathryn Gilbert MDL/Statistical Modeling Branch 15 May 2012.
Rules of Thumb for Weather Forecasting AOS October 2005 There’s a 50% chance of (insert weather condition here)… Bad GEMPAK analysis.
Probabilistic Forecasting in Practice
Huntsville, AL CST (UTC -6 Hours) Week #2 Forecast November 15, 2010.
MOS Developed by and Run at the NWS Meteorological Development Lab (MDL) Full range of products available at:
National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Hydrometeorlogical Prediction Center (HPC) Forecast Operations Branch Winter Weather Desk Dan Petersen.
Supplemental Topic Weather Analysis and Forecasting.
GFS (left), ECMWF (right) 500 mb Height, Winds, and Temp 00 hr forecast valid 12z 24 Dec 2010.
The Christmas Day Snowstorm of 2002 Meteorology 361 presentation.
MOS What does acronym stand for ? –MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS What is the difference between the GFS and GFS MOS ?
Boundary Layer Parameterization Issues in the MM5 and Other Models. Cliff Mass, Eric Grimit, Jeff Baars, David Ovens, University of Washington.
MOS Performance MOS significantly improves on the skill of model output. National Weather Service verification statistics have shown a narrowing gap between.
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Weather Forecasting - II. Review The forecasting of weather by high-speed computers is known as numerical weather prediction. Mathematical models that.
1 Localized Aviation Model Output Statistics Program (LAMP): Improvements to convective forecasts in response to user feedback Judy E. Ghirardelli National.
Phillip Bothwell and Patrick Marsh-Storm Prediction Center Lindsey Richardson –CIMMS Dry Thunderstorm Forecasting Using Perfect Prog(nosis) Forecast results.
A Generalized Approach to Precip Type Forecasting.
Weather Information for the Ballooning Community Jennifer McNatt Lead Forecaster National Weather Service Tampa Bay Office.
MARS METEOROLOGY Eve Halligan Science Education Consultant
Lecture 10 (11/11) Numerical Models. Numerical Weather Prediction Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) uses the power of computers and equations to make.
Alpha-Numeric Model Guidance. Two Types of Alpha-Numeric Guidance FOUS (Forecast Output United States): Raw model forecast data interpolated to specific.
Rules of Thumb for Weather Forecasting AOS October 2005 There’s a 50% chance of (insert weather condition here)… Bad GEMPAK analysis.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Air Force Weather Agency Lt Col Jeffrey S. Tongue Individual Mobilization Augmentee Air Force Weather.
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
CC Hennon ATMS 350 UNC Asheville Development of Modern Numerical Weather Prediction.
ATMS 373C.C. Hennon, UNC Asheville Tropical Cyclone Forecasting Where is it going and how strong will it be when it gets there.
Review for Final Exam. Final Exam Tuesday December 17 th, 5pm-7:30pm Room CC301 (this room) 25% of final grade Combination of quick general questions.
ETA 6-hr fcst. Valid 18z 02/19/02 Will it rain at MEM, JAN at 00z???
Symposium on Weather Information for Surface Transportation 4 Dec 00 Lt Col Jerry Borger United States Transportation Command.
Status Report on the Sounding-based Experiment on Mixed Precipitation Events (SEMPE) Douglas Miller UNC Asheville Laurence Lee NOAA/National.
NCEP Production Suite Review: Land-Hydrology at NCEP
OUTLINE Current state of Ensemble MOS
Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.
Model Post Processing. Model Output Can Usually Be Improved with Post Processing Can remove systematic bias Can produce probabilistic information from.
HOW TO BEAT MOS Need to understand how it works MOS does well when: –Weather is close to climatology (equations lean toward the modal case) MOS does poor.
Guidance. What is Guidance? If it helps you to decide on a forecast, then it is guidance.
ATS/ESS 452: Synoptic Meteorology Friday 2/8/2013 Quiz & Assignment 2 Results Finish Thermal Wind MOS decoding (Assignment) New England weather.
Briefing by: Roque Vinicio Céspedes Finally Here! The MOST awaited briefing ever! February 16, 2011.
Forecasting Winter Precipitation
MOS AVN = Dynamical Model –Seven fundamental equations ! AVN MOS = Statistical Model –No seven fundamental equations ! –Equations are statistical, not.
Models: General Characteristics Much better in Short Term –Doubling of error about every 2.5 days.
Using Ensemble Model Output Statistics to Improve 12-Hour Probability of Precipitation Forecasts John P. Gagan NWS Springfield, MO Chad Entremont NWS Jackson,
What is the Difference Between Weather and Climate?
Developing GFS-based MOS Thunderstorm Guidance for Alaska Phillip E. Shafer* and Kathryn Gilbert Meteorological Development Laboratory, NWS, NOAA
Meteo 415 The Lab Component. Today’s Objectives What makes an excellent forecaster?
Unit 4 Weather ©Mark Place,
Forecasting Techniques
Winter Forecasting Tips By Rick Garuckas and Andrew Calvi
Model Post Processing.
Basic Forecasting Tips
Basic Forecasting Tips By Rick Garuckas and Andrew Calvi
MOS Developed by and Run at the NWS Meteorological Development Lab (MDL) Full range of products available at:
Post Processing.
BFB Thursdee, October 27th.
FORECAST MODELS: DYNAMIC(PHYSICAL) VS. STATISTICAL
CLIMO EXERCISE LONG-TERM AVERAGES.
Unit 4 Weather about Doppler Radar.
Weather ©Mark Place,
NATS 101 Lecture 3 Climate and Weather
MOS What does acronym stand for ?
Atmospheric Sciences 452 Spring 2019
Model Output Statistics
Presentation transcript:

CC Hennon ATMS 350 UNC Asheville Model Output Statistics Transforming model output into useful forecast parameters

CC Hennon ATMS 350 UNC Asheville Forecast Output United States (FOUS) Raw model output (e.g. from NGM, NAM, GFS) Only includes such parameters as –Mean relative humidity in certain layers –Vertical velocity at 700 mb – mb thickness –Temperature at a few model layers Not incredibly useful for surface forecasting applications

CC Hennon ATMS 350 UNC Asheville Station ID Day of month UTC time of model cycle Fcst. valid time 6-hr Accum Precip 0.01” Mean RH in lowest layer Mean RH up to 500 mb Mean RH ( mb) Lifted Index SLP (coded) WDIR (lowest model layer) WSPD (kt) in lowest layer Vert. Veloc. (‘-’ is down) mb thickness (dm) Temp. (C) of lowest layer Temp. (C) of layer 3 Temp(C) of layer 5

CC Hennon ATMS 350 UNC Asheville Model Output Statistics (MOS) Production of surface variables not created by dynamical models Improvement of other variables that are created by dynamical models Developed at the Meteorological Development Lab (MDL)

CC Hennon ATMS 350 UNC Asheville How MOS Works Relates model output variables to common forecast variables (e.g. surface temperature, dew point, precipitation) through statistical techniques Analyze past correlations between model outputs and forecast variables –‘Analog’ method of forecasting MOS is produced from NGM, NAM, and GFS models

CC Hennon ATMS 350 UNC Asheville ** See page in text for decoding information

CC Hennon ATMS 350 UNC Asheville Interpreting some MOS output Probability of Precipitation (P06, P12) –Precipitation chance (%) for a point –’40%’ means it will precipitate 4/10 times at that point in the given situation Probability of Snow (POS) –Conditional probability –If precipitation occurs, this is the chance (%) that it will be snow –Actual chance of snow is the product of P06/P012 and POS

CC Hennon ATMS 350 UNC Asheville

Things to consider when using MOS output for forecasting Not proficient at depicting local and mesoscale events Beware of rare events (since MOS is statistical) MOS better 1.5 and 4.5 months into the season –Uses seasonal equations tuned to be best at those times Extended forecasts less skillful –Trends toward climatology MOS usually too warm for shallow cold air events –common east of Appalachians

CC Hennon ATMS 350 UNC Asheville MOS Seasonal Equations ElementGFS MAVNAM METNGM FWCGFS MEX Temperature 4/1 - 9/30 10/1 - 3/31 3/1 - 5/31 6/1 - 8/31 9/1 - 11/30 12/1 - 2/29 4/1 - 9/30 10/1 - 3/31 Ptype9/1 - 5/31 9/16 - 5/15 -- CONUS 9/1 - 5/31 -- AK 9/1 - 5/31 Thunderstorms 10/16 - 3/15 3/16 - 6/30 7/1 - 10/15 4/1 - 9/30 10/1 - 3/31 10/16 - 3/15 3/16 - 6/30 7/1 - 10/15 All other Elements 4/1 - 9/30 10/1 - 5/31 4/1 - 9/30 10/1 - 3/31

CC Hennon ATMS 350 UNC Asheville

MAV – GFS MOS MET – ETA MOS FWC – NGM MOS MEX – GFSX MOS (Extended)

CC Hennon ATMS 350 UNC Asheville MOS Links Changes/updates – FAQ – Definition of MOS elements/acronyms – MOS performance (WRF vs. GFS vs. NAM) – MDL –