Chapter 8 8-1 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2004 Flashline Inc. The Seven Faces of Reuse Enterprise Architect Summit June 8, 2004 Charles Stack Founder and CEO Flashline, Inc. © 2004 Flashline.
Advertisements

Life Science Services and Solutions
12 August 2004 Strategic Alignment By Maria Rojas.
JUNE 2007 page 1 EDS Proprietary Applications Modernization Services Modernizing the Applications Portfolio.
Building an Operational Enterprise Architecture and Service Oriented Architecture Best Practices Presented by: Ajay Budhraja Copyright 2006 Ajay Budhraja,
© 2005 by Prentice Hall Appendix 2 Automated Tools for Systems Development Modern Systems Analysis and Design Fourth Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F.
e-Framework Components and Responsibilities.
CHAPTER 1 Personal Selling and the Marketing Concept.
Chapter © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Chapter © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Basic guidelines for the creation of a DW Create corporate sponsors and plan thoroughly Determine a scalable architectural framework for the DW Identify.
Lecture 5 Themes in this session Building and managing the data warehouse Data extraction and transformation Technical issues.
8- Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Organizational Theory, Design, and Change Sixth Edition Gareth R. Jones Chapter.
© 2007 by Prentice Hall1-1 Chapter 1 Meeting Present and Emerging Strategic Human Resource Challenges.
Viewpoint Consulting – Committed to your success.
IT Governance and Management
Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 1-1 Chapter 1 Meeting Present and Emerging Strategic Human Resource Challenges.
IACT 901 Module 10 1 Plan Delivery. IACT 901 Module 10 2 Elements of IS & IT Plans Delivered Comprise Overall IS/IT vision Applications development plan.
Basic Challenges of Organizational Design
Enterprise Architecture
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Chapter © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Getting Smarter with Information An Information Agenda Approach
Developing Enterprise Architecture
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Strategic Information Systems Planning
Chapter © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Developing IT Capabilities
1. 2 IT innovations in specialized areas where competitors will have difficulty copying Excellence in design of processes and activities and how they.
Developing an IS/IT Strategy
Strategy #5. IT Architecture and IT Infrastructure are Metaphors Architecture - the relationship between planning and building Infrastructure - examples.
Engineering, Operations & Technology | Information TechnologyAPEX | 1 Copyright © 2009 Boeing. All rights reserved. Architecture Concept UG D- DOC UG D-
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Information Technology Strategy & 5 Year Plan.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Statewide Strategic IT Consolidation (ITC) Initiative ANF IT Consolidation Website Publishing / IA Working Group Kickoff.
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
Chapter 18- slide 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter Eighteen Creating Competitive Advantage.
Chapter © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Chapter © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
© 2008 IBM Corporation Challenges for Infrastructure Outsourcing July 29, 2011 Atul Gupta Vice President, Strategic Outsourcing, IBM.
Landstar Application Case Study: Development Of Content-rich Solutions For The Mobile Employee Bob Leo Director of Professional Services October 15, 2000.
2 Developing Marketing Strategies and Plans
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
Enterprise Architecture HOW COMPANIES ARE EXPLOITING INFORMATION TO THROUGH IT.
SSA:-COMPANY PROFILE: System Software Associates, Inc. (SSA) is founded in 1981 and has a headquarters in Chicago, USA. It has branches in more than 91.
Foundational Program Overview September  2004 Copyright RosettaNet. RosettaNet Foundational Programs Program Overview ProgramPhase InvestigateDesignImplement.
Integration integration of all the information flowing through a company – financial and accounting, human resource information, supply chain information,
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Chapter 2 Succeeding as a Systems Analyst 2.1.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Chapter 1 Meeting Present and Emerging Strategic Human Resource Challenges.
Basic Concepts Key Learning Points : The objectives of this chapter are as follows:  To provide an introduction to the basic Concepts of enterprise architectures,
Canadian SNOMED CT Strategy October 2012 Draft. Content 1 Background Approach Current State Future State Considerations Action Plan.
©2009 HP Confidential1 1 Teresa Schlegelmann CMS World Cup 2010 AMS - Houston Solution Consulting Services.
Agenda VA’s Transformation Continues
Process 4 Hours.
Structures of Chapter 19-21
Section 1 Delivering Value with IT
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
Developing IT Strategy for Business Value
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
Managed Content Services
Enterprise Architecture at Penn State
Portfolio, Programme and Project
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

The target architecture continuously evolves, so the technology roadmap must be an ongoing process. Technology has many masters, such as vendors, standards-setting boards, and trading partners. Unexpected roadblocks may occur. 8-2

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Without it companies run the risk of making sub-optimal technology decisions. “Plans are nothing, planning is everything”. The planning process tells an organization what they did where, where they failed, and how to improve. A technology roadmap limits the range of technology decisions. 8-3

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall A technology roadmap is the collective vision of the opportunities for technology to serve a business. A technology roadmap is a mechanism for the identification, justification, planned evolution, and orchestration of technology to enhance business performance. 8-4

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Achieves business goals by identifying the gap between the business plan and the current technological environment. Reduces complexity by reducing the number and variety of technological choices. Enhances interoperability of business functionality across lines of business. 8-5

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Increases flexibility Increases speed of implementation through common standards, methodologies and technology platforms. Preserves investments in new and existing systems by basing them on long-term considerations. Responds to market changes by building from an established framework. 8-6

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Focuses IT investment dollars Simplifies the response to new legislation Reduces difficulties associated with deployment of new technologies by utilizing fewer technologies, common platforms, and similar development approaches 8-7

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Provides a common design point that facilitates end-to-end integration of reusable components and applications. Builds a consistent and cohesive technology base that can create a critical mass of skills dedicated to select technologies. 8-8

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Provides the ability to move forward in planned phases by providing an orderly evolution of each technology through a life cycle approach Consolidates global solutions by synchronizing local technologies into the global roadmap Lowers the cost of development and maintenance by increasing reusability of components 8-9

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Seven Important Activities are derived from the Gap between the Current Technology and the Business Plan: 1. Guiding Principles 2. Current Technology 3. Gap Analysis 4. Technology Landscape 5. Future Technology 6. Migration Strategy 7. Governance 8-10

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-11 Figure 8.1

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Establish a statement of the role and purpose of technology within the business. Define how technology supports the business. Define the overall type of technology support to be delivered with a sense of performance. 8-12

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Outline the current technologies and their state. At a minimum indentify the business process area, vendor, level of support, dependencies, criticality, and life cycle. Assign a technology owner who is responsible for each technology domain including acquisition, maintenance, vendor relationship management, training, and documentation. 8-13

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Perform a gap analysis between the current technology and what is needed. Identify the required technology. Build technology in anticipation of business change and growth. Bridge the gap between business being driven by innovation and growth and IT benefits being derived from standards and reusability. 8-14

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Firms must invest in R & D to keep abreast of new technologies. The size of this investment should be driven by how critical IT is to the business. The roadmap should articulate how large this investment will be, how it will be enacted, who is responsible, and provide guidelines to assist this initiative. 8-15

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Describe the technologies to be adopted in the future. The roadmap should include the logic that was used to recommend these technologies to permit constructive input from business managers to challenge these recommendations. The roadmap should include all assumptions. 8-16

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Outline a Migration Strategy to get from the current technology to the future technology platform. Two common strategies are the gradual evolution and the big-bang. A major challenge is to assign priorities to technology components that need to be changed. 8-17

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Define an established process to determine who is responsible for creating/updating the technology roadmap and who approves changes to the roadmap. Distinguish between strategic architecture governance and tactical architecture governance. 8-18

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1. Be bold and innovative when planning the roadmap. 2. Align technology with the business. 3. Secure support for the roadmap. 4. Don’t forget the people. 5. Control, measure, and communicate progress. 8-19

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Migrate from production-centric to process-centric applications architecture using service-based architecture. Deploy component-based applications to minimize costs. Utilize components based on industry standards. Utilize middleware to minimize application changes. 8-20

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Develop strategic systems in-house. Maintain critical technologies skills base. Utilize strategic partnerships to bring in leading-edge technology skills and transfer that knowledge to your staff. 8-21

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Adhere to component-based and layered architectures with standardized generic interfaces. Engineer application quality by conforming to logical architecture specifications. Allow end users to establish and change business rules. 8-22

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Adhere to industry accepted-standards and methodologies. Adopt flexible data interface standards. Adhere to corporate technology and development standards to improve efficiency, effectiveness, and timeliness of applications development. 8-23

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Utilize middleware to integrate application services across and within business domains. Utilize metadata to define and document application interfaces. Include both application interface services and workflow integration services. Increase the degree of information and workflow integration across customer and vendor-facing processes. 8-24

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall The purpose of the technology roadmap is to guide the development of technology in an organization. The technology roadmap communicates the role that technology will play in advancing business goals. 8-25

© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8-26