Development Part 4: Streetcar Era David A. Lanegran Geography Department Macalester College Geography of the Twin Cities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
Advertisements

Distributing the Benefits and Burdens of Growth: Metropolitan Equity in the Portland Region.
Development Part 5: Industrial Suburb and Ethnicity David A. Lanegran Geography Department Macalester College Geography of the Twin Cities.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
Concepts of Urbanization David A. Lanegran Geography Department, Macalester College Geography of the Twin Cities.
Development Part 11: Renewed Interest in the Core David A. Lanegran Geography Department Macalester College Geography of the Twin Cities.
The Growth (and Decline) of the Suburbs
URBAN SPRAWL Denton High School The map to the right shows the urban sprawl of Baltimore, MD starting in = Baltimore, MD.
Outline Central Cities vs Suburbs Why Did Suburbs Grow? Decentralization of Employment and the Monocentric City Is Suburbanization Efficient?
Classic Urban Models.
U.S. suburbanization and gentrification Soc 331 Population and Society
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 8 Neighborhood Choice.
1 Understanding Urban Growth Patterns Real Estate 690 Market Analysis for Real Estate Dr. Longhofer.
The Evolution and Effects of Suburbanization By Carley Page.
Land-Use and Transportation
Chapter 8 Neighborhood Choice McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Burgess Classic Ring Model of Urban Ecology. CBD Central Business District Government Offices Business Shopping Churches Most accessible point Most expensive.
“Real Estate Principles for the New Economy”: Norman G
Chapter 14 LECTURE OUTLINE The CHANGING STRUCTURE OF THE CITY
What is Legacy? Current Comprehensive Plan for Forsyth County and Winston-Salem. Adopted in 2001 by Forsyth County and its 8 municipalities. Focuses on.
Perspectives from members of the Real Estate and Building Industry.
Peter Quinn General Manager – Residential Folkestone Limited.
Village of Ossining Vision Presentation Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. May 11 th, 2005.
KI 13-3 Why Do Inner Cities Face Distinctive Challenges?  Inner-city physical issues? Most significant = ___________ __________ (built prior to 1940)
POPULATION PATTERNS Chapter 6 Section 1.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
Human Geography – Urban Land Use & Planning Chapter 6
Urban Canada.
Class 12a: Suburban geography Transportation and land use History of suburban growth.
Classic Urban Models.
Urban Land Use: The Inner City
Urban, Suburban & Rural. Urban People often define urban areas, or cities, as land occupied by buildings and other structures used for residences and.
Development Part 3: Railroad Era David A. Lanegran Geography Department Macalester College Geography of the Twin Cities.
Urban Models For MEDC’s. What Are They? Often in geography models are used to try to explain something that we can see in the physical environment. During.
KI 13-3 Why Do Inner Cities Face Distinctive Challenges?  Inner-city physical issues? Most significant = deteriorating housing (built prior to 1940) ○
David A. Lanegran Geography Department Macalester College Development Part 10: Deindustrialization Geography of the Twin Cities.
Geography of Canada Land Use Planning.
Geography of Canada Land Use Planning.
America’s Major Metropolitan Areas in the 2000s Big City Density and Sun Belt Sprawl.
Land Use and Property Value Change along the Blue Line Transit in Minneapolis, MN Tanner Borgen.
Unit 6 Test Review Industrialization & Urbanization.
Urban Models. LT 2. I can identify generally accepted spatial structure models. (13.2) Learning Target.
CANADA ENTERING A NEW CENTURY CANADA: LAND OF OPPORTUNITY.
Urbanization Key Issue #4: Why do suburbs have distinctive problems?
Individualized Marketing (IM) Dialogue based Community-based Social Marketing ( approach Customized and tailored strategy to changing travel behaviour.
HUMAN AP. LEARNING OUTCOMES  Understanding Urban Land use Patterns.
David A. Lanegran Geography Department Macalester College Development Part 8: Auto Era and Suburban Competition Geography of the Twin Cities.
Higher Urban 4 Urban models 2. THE INNER CITY (ZONE 2) Also known as the Twilight or Transition Zone.
The Characteristics, Causes and Effects of Suburbanisation
Immigration to Minnesota and the Twin Cities David A Lanegran Ph.D MAGE Summer institute Macalester College July 13, 2012.
Urban Sprawl Warm Up p. 47 Urban Rural Create a 4 square positive
Urban Land Use Chapter Major Land Uses 1. Residential (40%) 2. Transportation (33%) 3. Commercial (5%) 4. Industrial (6%) 5. Institutional and Public.
Models of Urban Land Use. Characteristics of Zone One (CBD) Concentration of nonresidential activities High property costs Characteristics of Zone Two.
CBD Characteristics You will need to be able to describe and where appropriate explain the main characteristics of the CBD. Where possible always try and.
A. Urban Morphology The layout of a city, its physical
Question 6 – On the Back! Where did you locate Ms. Averell’s house? Why did you choose this location?
Urban Land Use Chapter 21.
Sarah, Anna, Logan, Hannah, Dylan.  Flatiron building under construction stands at intersection of 5 th avenue and 23 rd street in NYC. Opened 22 story.
Chapter 14 LECTURE OUTLINE The CHANGING STRUCTURE OF THE CITY
Student handout.
Chapter 14 LECTURE OUTLINE The CHANGING STRUCTURE OF THE CITY
Models of Cities.
URBAN STRUCTURE MODELS
Development Part 1: The Earliest Phase
URBAN STRUCTURE MODELS
Urban Models How and why does land use organize a city?
Development Part 7: Residential David A. Lanegran Geography Department
IV. Why Services Cluster Downtown Ch. 13 – Urban Patterns
URBAN STRUCTURE MODELS
Presentation transcript:

Development Part 4: Streetcar Era David A. Lanegran Geography Department Macalester College Geography of the Twin Cities

The greatest cause of expansion of the residential neighborhoods was the development of the streetcar. The greater efficiency of the streetcars increased the speed and lowered the cost of the commute. This enabled both middle and upper income households to move to the edge of the city.

At first the companies were known as Street Railroad companies and they worked with local governments to get an exclusive franchise to run their rails down the public right-of-ways. Therefore, each city had its own company which developed a system of tracks in the downtowns. There were very few cross links in these networks, and in 1913, only two links between the two cities existed. Gradually the system developed a more complex pattern with cross links, and finally there were four connections between the systems. The streetcars made it possible for downtowns to grow because the systems could focus large numbers of workers and shoppers on the urban cores. The streetcar system did not get much denser after the 1930s.

Although the streetcar companies were operated by some of the best businessmen (and the wealthiest) in the community, they were chronically short of cash. Eventually, eastern investors required the companies to merge to qualify for further financing. The result was a very extensive system that ran from Lake Minnetonka, where the company operated lake steamers in the summer, and east as far as the communities on the St. Croix and the prison at Bayport. Faster and heaver "inter-urban" cars served the suburban communities. The streetcar company also operated amusement parks on both Lake Minnetonka and White Bear Lake to generate weekend traffic. Most of the neighborhoods of Minneapolis and St. Paul were developed during the streetcar era.

The streetcar lines created a pattern of accessibility that in turn resulted in variations in land use. Those businesses that could afford higher rents or land prices located on the more accessible streetcar lines and intersections of lines. Their increased accessibility enabled them to reach a larger market and make more money. This map from the 1917 Plan for Minneapolis shows the patterns of land use that were created by the streetcar lines.

This view of a neighborhood in St. Paul shows the sort of middle- class neighborhood that the developers were creating during the streetcar era. The houses are called St. Paul Eclectic Cubes (in Minneapolis they are called something else) and reflect the builders taste and ability to pay.

This map developed by John R. Borchert of the University of Minnesota Geography Department illustrates the pattern of land use in It shows that most of the area of the two cities was densely built up, but suburban expansion was also occurring. We see the various directions of growth with tongues of growth toward the industrial suburbs and resort, summer home, and suburban villa communities around the lakes.