Best Practices Documents – Are they Really Necessary? May 28, 2008 IASSIST 2008 Michelle Edwards, PhD, University of Guelph Jane Fry, Carleton University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET. July 2002Project presentation REGNET 2 Project Management and Co-ordination Overall project status: The.
Advertisements

DLI Training Nesstar Workshop
DDI in Ontario Putting the Pieces Together A. Michelle Edwards, Ph.D. Data Resource Centre, University of Guelph May 16, 2007 Presented at: IASSIST 2007.
Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) Workshop Carol Perry Ernie Boyko April 2005 Kingston Ontario.
An overview of selected DLI projects Marie-Claire Lauzon, Statistics Canada DLI Atlantic Training Acadia University April 24, 2008.
DDI Tags Why are we here? Some of the questions Some possible solutions Need for input and discussion.
Jane Fry, Carleton University Michelle Edwards, University of Guelph Jane Fry, Carleton University Michelle Edwards, University of Guelph Best Practices.
Data Made Easy! Away Day MacOdrum Library, Carleton University Jane Fry May 1st, 2008.
Manager Performance Evaluation
Presentation Name Elements and Standards
Kendle Implementation of Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonization Dr Elke Sennewald Kendle 9th German CDISC User Group Meeting Berlin, 28 September.
CVs & Résumés for Graduate Students Ian Robertson Lynn McCaughey.
© 2012 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. For internal MITRE use 11 July 2013 Meeting #6 hData Record Format Task Force 1 © 2012 The MITRE Corporation.
First Year in Focus at Canadian Colleges and Universities.
Trials and Tribulations of creating DDI Codebooks at the University of Guelph A.Michelle Edwards and Carol Perry, Data Resource Centre, University of Guelph.
Unlocking Public Opinion Poll Data in Canada May 27, 2009 IASSIST 2009 Michelle Edwards, PhD, University of Guelph Jane Fry, Carleton University.
0-1 Team # Status Report (1 of 4) Client Contact –Status Point 1 –Status Point 2 Team Meetings –Status Point 1 –Status Point 2 Team Organization –Description.
FGDC, Meet the DDI Adding Geospatial Metadata to a Numeric Data Catalog Julie Linden Yale University.
 User Manuals come in all types, designs and formats.  This presentation is designed to show a few basic elements that will serve any user manual. 
PLANNING RSTWG Review of Planning Concept of Operations & Requirements Tasks.
DLI Training April 2004 Kingston Ontario. DDI What, Why, How?
# 1 AMI Enterprise Task Force of the Utility AMI Working Group SRS Team Status Report (Palo Alto, Jan. 09) Joe Zhou.
How women drivers compare to men? MALE (Column %) FEMALE (Column %) Better Drivers As Good Drivers Worse Drivers Don’t Know
The Legislative Library of Ontario’s Ontario Documents Repository Road to Partnership.
A Journey in Data Discovery Wendy Watkins TSES October, 2007.
Ontario Data Documentation, Extraction Service and Infrastructure IASSIST 2008 Palo Alto, California.
The DLI Survival Guide: A reference document for DLI Contacts Marie-Claire Lauzon, Statistics Canada 2008 DLI Atlantic Training Acadia University, April.
CTI STIX SC Monthly Meeting August 19, 2015.
P1516.4: VV&A Overlay to the FEDEP 20 September 2007 Briefing for the VV&A Summit Simone Youngblood Simone Youngblood M&S CO VV&A Proponency Leader
INFO 424 Team Project Practicum Week 2 - Launch report, Project tracking, Review report Glenn Booker Notes largely from Prof. Hislop.
Metadata for Cloud Computing SC32 Study Group Interim report Draft1 Santa Fe, Nov 2013 (Revised)
Bringing DLI to the Classroom A. Michelle Edwards, Ph.D. DRC, University of Guelph Ontario DLI Training April 6, 2004.
Unified Case Management Treatment Plan Training June 2008.
12/6/2005DINO – Dec 2005 CANDDI DINO OCUL Data Group Ryerson – Dec
Knoxville, TN October 20, 2009 SG-Systems Systems Requirements Specification Team Status and Breakout Session.
Tips on Running a Data Centre Jane Fry & Alexandra Cooper DLI Ontario Training April 17, 2015.
1 Encore Data Distribution Services Workshop February 19, 2004.
Introduction to xml2rfc 27 July 2008 Dublin, Ireland.
Middle Fork Project Existing Resource Information Reports July 18, 2006.
CANDDI Bo Wandschneider CAPDU/DLI April 13, 2005 Queen’s University.
Getting Familiar with Metadata Laurie Porth Rocky Mountain Research Station Audience: Scientists/researchers who have heard of metadata and now need to.
ATML Test Description Orlando, FL January ATML Test Description2 September 2006 Agenda Status Feedback from Candidate evaluation Review standard.
DDI Moving Forward: Sprint 1 Schloss Dagstuhl October 28-November 1, 2013.
Welcome to the Professional Development School Workshop Day 2.
Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process Plan April 25, 2006.
Colorado Springs Producer-Archive Interface Specification Status of standardisation project Main characteristics, major changes, items pending.
CFS / Global – 09 June, 2010 PM Report: SB2009: –4 two-day workshops form the core of ‘TOP LEVEL CHANGE CONTROL’ –  as advised by AAP, PAC and etc –Written.
Trials Search Co-ordinators, Archie & RevMan 5 Lynn Hampson, Sheila Wallace, Gail Higgins, Karen Hovhannisyan Tuesday, 13 October 2009.
Data Access North of the (US) Border
AMI Enterprise Task Force of the Utility AMI Working Group
Implementation Review Team Meeting
Working in Groups in Canvas
Presenter Name Presentation Date
Ontario Data Documentation, Extraction Service and Infrastructure centralised, standardised web-based data extraction/analysis system.
Presenter Name Presentation Date
Presenter Name Presentation Date
All Wales Safeguarding Procedures Review Project
CIM Model Manager Report
Presenter Name Presentation Date
Activities of the UNECE-UNODC Task Force on Victimization Surveys
Planning of future MISSOC activities
MISSOC STATE OF AFFAIRS
Planning of MISSOC activities until the October Network Meeting
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Strategic Planning Timeline Overview
DDI in Ontario Putting the Pieces Together
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Presenter Name Presentation Date
Presenter Name Presentation Date
Correct document structure Easy for authors and accessible to readers
Presentation transcript:

Best Practices Documents – Are they Really Necessary? May 28, 2008 IASSIST 2008 Michelle Edwards, PhD, University of Guelph Jane Fry, Carleton University Alexandra Cooper, Queen’s University

Outline Why When Where What Who

Why? Did NOT want to re-invent the wheel Did NOT want to duplicate efforts

Why? Why did we start? University of Guelph & Carleton University already tagset documents Queen’s University started working on their document A number of other institutions interested wanted to join and contribute

When? May 1, 2007 started Developers started June 2007 First EAC meeting September 2007 Co-op students started October 2007 Project Manager started

Where? Ontario Lead Institutions Carleton University University of Guelph Behind the scenes Quebec British Columbia

What? Collaboration Three different points of view Two different servers to view Three different documents to examine

What? We joined efforts Three meetings in 2007: June – University of Guelph July - Queen’s University August – Carleton University

What? Goal of our meetings To produce one document Consistent and easy to interpret tag definitions – based on DDI “bible” Consistent formatting for Ontario files

What? Process (Logistics) Tag by tag – each of 5 DDI sections Definitions Examples Formatting

And then … lots of discussion … more discussion … DDI break … all of us lost our minds along the way… more discussion … s to DDI … more discussion … eventually a decision … more discussion … and then …

ta da … The Best Practices Document aka BPD

Who? Beneficiaries All Ontario Universities belonging to OCUL (Ontario Council of University Libraries)

BPD Structure Introduction Main document Five sections of DDI Appendices

Introduction BPD Introduction Overview of project The Set-up of this Document The Set-up of Each Section The Set-up of each Tag Formatting Conventions Abbreviations and Acronyms Questions, comments and contact info …

BPD Main Document Overview of each DDI section Introduction Table of all tags used Each tag Mandatory / optional Repeatable / Not Attributes Description Formatting notes Examples

Tags Tag Formatting BPD recommends common formatting for all tags Any unique formatting highlighted with

Tag Formatting Example Formatting Note: Format for Agency/Institution and Place of Work/Department: Name of Agency/Institution. Name of Place of Work/Department (yes, that is a period between the two place names!) Format for Names: Last name, First name

Many Tag Examples Edwards, Michelle Fair, Aaron Brett, Jan

BPD Appendices A.Glossary B.Nesstar Related Information C.Statistics Canada Related Information D.Data Documentation Initiative E. Related Information F.Notes and Comments Tags – More Information G.An XML Example

BPD Present status Draft 2 finished Translation into french in progress Next step Update the wiki Distribution

BPD Location wiki dex.php/Main_Page Open to all!

Therefore … Our initial question “BPDs – are they really necessary?”

Contact Information Michelle Edwards, PhD, University of Guelph Jane Fry, Carleton University Alexandra Cooper, Queen’s University Or