Nairobi 1-2 October 2007 1 Some Approaches to Agricultural Statistics NOTES 1. PLACE, DATE AND EVENT NAME 1.1. Access the slide-set.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Montenegro, 8-9 November 2010 – 1 st Innovation Dialogue Forum: WBC-INCO.NET project 1 Joint Programming & Foresight: Shaping a Regional Innovation Action.
Advertisements

NTTS 2009 Brussels February 20 1 A Downscaled Population Density Map of the EU from Commune Data and Land Cover Information NOTES.
Brest, 27 – 29 of February COBECOS 1 COBECOS SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY 8.1 Policy-Oriented Research Second progress meeting Brest, 27 th.
© European Communities, 2004 Towards a Multi-scale European Soil Information System M. Van Liedekerke, P. Panagos, L. Montanarella (Joint Research Centre)
Sampling.
Counting the Dutch, The Future of the Virtual Census in the Netherlands Presentation at the seminar Counting the 7 Billion 24 February 2012 * Geert Bruinooge.
Workshop on Alternative Dispute Resolution in Research and Development Collaborations, November 13, 2009, Leuven, Belgium 1 R&D Collaborations in FP7 –
Chapter 11 Sampling Design. Chapter 11 Sampling Design.
Barcelona 8 th October 2008 –Symposium on Business Dynamics and Innovation: The role of space 1 Evidence on the role of Ownership Structure on Firm’s Innovative.
The Excel NORMDIST Function Computes the cumulative probability to the value X Business Statistics: A First Course, 5e © 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc
Formalizing the Concepts: Simple Random Sampling.
WMO / COST 718 Expert Meeting on Weather, Climate and Farmers November 2004 Geneva, Switzerland.
1 JRC – Ispra Area frames for land cover estimation: Improving the European LUCAS survey Javier Gallego Jacques Delincé.
Sample Design.
Rome, 25 October 2007 – QUOVADIS Consortium Meeting 1 QUOVADIS Validation Exercise From raw materials to ready results An overview on the identification,
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
Transforming a sample design for taking into account new statistical needs, new information or new technological instruments for data collection Elisabetta.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Agricultural Census Sampling Frames and Sampling Section A 1.
Reykjavik rd of June COBECOS 1 COBECOS SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY 8.1 Costs and Benefits of control strategies Final consortium meeting.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Integrating Agriculture into National Statistical Systems Section A 1.
Introduction to Foresight for Policy- and Decision-Making Retreat on Technology Foresight for High-level Decision Makers Seville, October 2008 Professor.
San Sebastian 2 – 3 rd of September COBECOS 1 COBECOS SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY 8.1 Policy-Oriented Research Mid-term meeting San Sebastian,
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Sampling: Overview MICS Survey Design Workshop.
© European Communities, 2011 renewable and clean energy supply technologies and a growing demand for the equipment used to convert that energy to useful.
List frames area frames and administrative data, are they complementary or in competition? Elisabetta Carfagna University of Bologna Department of Statistics.
© European Communities, 2011 EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS CARRIED OUT WITH THE A DVANCED S USTAINABILITY A NALYSIS (ASA) APPROACH European Union with novel methodological.
How USDA Forecasts Production and Supply/Demand. Overview  USDA publishes crop supply and demand estimates for the U.S. each month.  Because of the.
Scot Exec Course Nov/Dec 04 Survey design overview Gillian Raab Professor of Applied Statistics Napier University.
Benchmarking the efficiency of coarse resolution satellite images for area estimation. J. Gallego, M. El Aydam – MARS AGRI4CAST.
© European Communities, 2004 Introduction The permafrost regions of the world are occupied by CRYOSOILS. These regions are at high latitudes and also at.
© European Communities, 2007 Introduction The utilisation and economic success of foresight activities in farm management have been seldom scrutinised.
© European Communities, 2011 Questions to be answered: Opportunities and challenges for Web 2.0 on the SMEs Small and medium enterprises (SME) are pressured.
Sampling Techniques 19 th and 20 th. Learning Outcomes Students should be able to design the source, the type and the technique of collecting data.
1 Joint Research Centre (JRC) Using remote sensing for crop and land cover area estimation
Area estimation in the MARS project. A summary history J. Gallego,– MARS AGRI4CAST.
Basic Business Statistics, 10e © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc.. Chap 7-1 Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions Basic Business Statistics.
© European Communities, 2011 Background & Context The National Foresight Programme “Poland 2020” (NPF “Poland 2020”) was realised in the 2007 – 2009 period.
European Forum of Geostatistics Bled October Downscaling population density with CORINE Land Cover Warning: This presentation.
© European Communities, 2007 Group discussion in panels of experts and stakeholders is widely used in foresight both to produce future visions and images,
Sampling technique  It is a procedure where we select a group of subjects (a sample) for study from a larger group (a population)
1 Overview of the JRA1 activities at JRC-IRMM F.-J. Hambsch, A. Al-Adili, I. Fabry, A. Plompen, S. Oberstedt, S. Zeynalov IRMM - Institute for Reference.
LUCAS 2006 J. Gallego, MARS AGRI4CAST. Sampling scheme Adaptation of the Italian AGRIT First phase: Systematic sampling of unclustered points (single.
© European Communities, 2007 Agricultural Biotechnology – Science and Society - Public research provided the foundation for the first agricultural biotechnology.
WFD WG E NOTES 1. PLACE, DATE AND EVENT NAME 1.1. Access the slide-set place, date and event name text box beneath the JRC logo from the Slide.
INRA Rabat, October 14, Crop area estimates in the EU. The use of area frame surveys and remote sensing NOTES 1.
© European Communities, 2007 The Ultimate Goal: Informed Decision-Making The business of research and development has felt the growing pressure to produce.
© European Communities, 2011 Conceptual approach: FTA as specific mode(s) of governing expectations Expectations as promises, visions, risk concerns motivate,
© European Communities, 2011 Introduction Efficient technology forecasting and focusing on promising research is crucial to knowledge based economy. Because.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Core and Supplementary Agricultural Topics Section A 1.
Nagraj Rao Statistician Asian Development Bank CROP CUTTING: AN INTRODUCTION.
Objectives This work focuses on the analysis of economic impacts of government funded research institute’s(GFRI) short-term R&D for SME. In this work short-
Nagraj Rao Statistician Asian Development Bank CROP CUTTING: AN INTRODUCTION.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Agricultural Census Sampling Frames and Sampling Section B 1.
General Concepts on Sampling Frames
NOTES 1. Poster Title • Replace the mock-up text of the poster title (”Joint Research Centre”) with the text of your own title. • Keep the original font.
CALCULATION OF GHG EMISSIONS IN THE FUEL CHAIN
INDUSTRY-DRIVEN ROADMAPS 2020:
NOTES 1. PLACE, DATE AND EVENT NAME
Environmental Quality Standards (EQS)
Chemical Monitoring on-site 3
NOTES 1. PLACE, DATE AND EVENT NAME
Chemical Monitoring on-site 3
Joint JRC / NORMAN Workshop
Water Framework Directive River Basin Specific Pollutants
NOTES 1. Poster Title • Replace the mock-up text of the poster title (”Joint Research Centre”) with the text of your own title. • Keep the original font.
Analytical Methods for the New Candidate Priority Substances
Water Framework Directive River Basin Specific Pollutants
with EUSAAR NA2 Partners
Chemical Monitoring On-site 3
Chemical Monitoring on-site 3
Presentation transcript:

Nairobi 1-2 October Some Approaches to Agricultural Statistics NOTES 1. PLACE, DATE AND EVENT NAME 1.1. Access the slide-set place, date and event name text box beneath the JRC logo from the Slide Master Do not change the size nor the position of that text box Replace the mock-up texts for the place (“Place”), the date (“dd Month YYYY”) and the event name (“Event Name”) with your own texts Set it in MetaPlus Book Roman, if you own the typeface. Otherwise, keep the original typeface – Arial Keep the original flush-left justification Keep the original font colour (white) Keep the original font body size (7 pt) and the text on one single line. 2. SLIDE NUMBER 2.1. The slide number on the banner’s lower right-hand side is automatically generated. 3. SLIDES 3.1. Duplicate the first slide as needed Do not change the size nor the position of the slide’s text box Try not to place more text on each slide than will fit in the given text box Replace the mock-up heading text (“Joint Research Centre (JRC)”) with your own text heading Set it in Eurostile Bold Extended Two or in Helvetica Rounded Bold Condensed, if you own one of these typefaces. Otherwise, keep the original typeface – Arial Keep the original flush-left justification Keep the original font colour (100c 80m 0y 0k) Keep the original font body size (28 pt) and the heading on one single line whenever possible. Reduce the font body size if needed Replace the mock-up text (“The European Commission’s Research-Based Policy Support Organisation)”) with your own text Set it in MetaPlus Book Roman, if you own the typeface. Otherwise, keep the original typeface – Arial Keep the original flush-left justification Keep the original font colour (100c 80m 0y 0k). Use black if you need a second colour Keep the original font body size (22 pt) or reduce it if unavoidable Replace the EU-27 map mock-up illustration with your own illustration(s) Try to keep your illustration(s) right- and top- or bottom-aligned with the main text box whenever possible. NOTES 1. PLACE, DATE AND EVENT NAME 1.1. Access the slide-set place, date and event name text box beneath the JRC logo from the Slide Master Do not change the size nor the position of that text box Replace the mock-up texts for the place (“Place”), the date (“dd Month YYYY”) and the event name (“Event Name”) with your own texts Set it in MetaPlus Book Roman, if you own the typeface. Otherwise, keep the original typeface – Arial Keep the original flush-left justification Keep the original font colour (white) Keep the original font body size (7 pt) and the text on one single line. 2. SLIDE NUMBER 2.1. The slide number on the banner’s lower right-hand side is automatically generated. 3. SLIDES 3.1. Duplicate the first slide as needed Do not change the size nor the position of the slide’s text box Try not to place more text on each slide than will fit in the given text box Replace the mock-up heading text (“Joint Research Centre (JRC)”) with your own text heading Set it in Eurostile Bold Extended Two or in Helvetica Rounded Bold Condensed, if you own one of these typefaces. Otherwise, keep the original typeface – Arial Keep the original flush-left justification Keep the original font colour (100c 80m 0y 0k) Keep the original font body size (28 pt) and the heading on one single line whenever possible. Reduce the font body size if needed Replace the mock-up text (“The European Commission’s Research-Based Policy Support Organisation)”) with your own text Set it in MetaPlus Book Roman, if you own the typeface. Otherwise, keep the original typeface – Arial Keep the original flush-left justification Keep the original font colour (100c 80m 0y 0k). Use black if you need a second colour Keep the original font body size (22 pt) or reduce it if unavoidable Replace the EU-27 map mock-up illustration with your own illustration(s) Try to keep your illustration(s) right- and top- or bottom-aligned with the main text box whenever possible.

Nairobi 1-2 October Main approaches to agricultural statistics (1) Expert subjective estimations In each administrative unit, a local expert fills a form with his assessment Census Farm census General population census (households) List frame surveys Statistical sampling – Small administrative units can be used as first sampling stage Selected farms (“purposive sampling”)

Nairobi 1-2 October Main approaches to agricultural statistics (2) Area frame sampling Observations on the ground – Crop area – Yield Expert eye estimations Objective measurements Remote sensed observations – Photo-interpretation – Classified images – Vegetation or yield indicators Agro-meteorological models

Nairobi 1-2 October Expert subjective estimates Advantages Cheap if there is a network of agricultural experts No sampling error Easy to manage All items can be addressed – Crop area and yield – Livestock – Means of production Disadvantages No idea of the accuracy of data Difficult to control the quality (non-sampling error), unless a sampling survey is made Changes are often underestimated Generally not recommended, but in some situations it can be the only alternative. Can be used as covariables to improve the accuracy of a sample survey Regression estimator or similar

Nairobi 1-2 October Farm census Advantages No sampling error Detailed information on the farm structure Disadvantages Expensive: In general it can be made only every 10 years. – Heavy to manage in many countries. – Items that change every year are not included (e.g: crop area and yield) Only farms above a size threshold are included: bias (sometimes >10% of systematic underestimate for a recent census). Possible additional bias if farmers think that data can be used for tax purposes. Can be used as list frame for sample surveys

Nairobi 1-2 October Population census (agricultural holdings) Subset of the population census: holdings with some agricultural activity. Compared to farm census: Advantages Agricultural and non-agricultural activity (income) can be analysed together Smaller bias (part-time farming included) Disadvantages Farm structure is more difficult to analyse More problematic to use as list frame for sampling surveys

Nairobi 1-2 October List frame surveys from census A statistical sample is selected in the census (farms or households) Advantages Flexible: general or specialized surveys possible. Stratification can be very efficient if farms have heterogeneous sizes or they are specialised in different productions. Often smaller bias than census (quality control is easier) Disadvantages Bias can be important if: – Census is incomplete or not updated – Answers of farmers are not fully reliable

Nairobi 1-2 October Two-stage list frame if census is unavailable A statistical sample of (small) administrative units is selected A “mini-census” is made in each of the selected administrative units A statistical sample is selected in each of the mini-censuses Advantages compared to list frame survey on a census Easier to update the sampling frame (smaller bias) Disadvantages Less flexible than sampling on a proper census Less efficient stratification

Nairobi 1-2 October Purposive sampling of farms A set of farms is selected without a proper statistical method. Advantages Provides an emergency solution if a proper statistical method is not applicable – Crisis situations Avoids high rates of non-response – Data difficult to provide or sensitive (accountancy) Disadvantages Requires a good knowledge of covariables in the population for extrapolation Very high risk of bias May produce acceptable results on the inter-annual change rates.

Nairobi 1-2 October Area Frame Sampling The sampling frame is not a list of farms, but the geographic space divided into sampling units: Segments: portions of territory, generally 9 ha – 400 ha. – Physical boundaries: segments are delimited by roads, rivers or field limits – Geometric shape: squares…. Points: in practice a “point” is conceived as a piece of land (3 x 3 m) Transects: straight lines of a given length – Often used for environmental observations. Observation mode: Direct on the ground: crop, yield estimation…. Interview with the farmers who manage the selected fields Sampling techniques: Random or systematic Clustered or unclustered Stratified or non-stratified, ……

Nairobi 1-2 October Area Frame Sampling (2) Advantages The sampling frame coincides quite precisely with the population – No (few) missing elements in the frame – No repeated elements Sampling units easy to define – Except for segments with physical boundaries Objective (if direct observations) Can be combined with remote sensing for further improvement Drawbacks For direct observation, the date of the field visit can be critical. Problems appear if – Crop not yet emerged – Already harvested and insufficient traces left – Not clear if it will be harvested Locating the units (segments or points) requires reliable field survey material – Aerial photographs with a proper enlargement – GPS Daily access to a reliable power supply Technical ability to operate the device Sometimes limitations due to security-military concerns

Nairobi 1-2 October Yield observations on the ground (1) Expert eye estimates on a statistical sample Possibly with the help of a table: number of ears per m 2, number of grains per ear, size of the grains… Advantages Cheap Possibility of providing geo-referenced data to combine with satellite images Good results if the experts are reliable Drawbacks Difficult to assess accuracy. Possible strong bias. (interest to have higher/lower estimates: aids..) Need of quality control

Nairobi 1-2 October Yield observations on the ground (2) Objective measurements. The crop is cut in a square of a given size (e.g.: 1 m 2 ) Precise weighing in laboratory. Advantages Statistical error can be computed Possibility of providing geo-referenced data to combine with satellite images Good results if the enumerators are meticulous Drawbacks Difficult to be precise in the application of the rules of sample collection. – Enumerators tend to avoid parts of the field with lower yield Possible bias (over-estimation), even applying coefficients for harvest loss.

Nairobi 1-2 October Remote sensed observations (satellite images) Can provide information on area or yield As covariable: combined with a consistent ground survey For area estimation Should not be used to substitute ground survey, except in particular cases: – Conflict (dangerous to go to the field) – No authorization (illegal crops, North Korea,…) – Very high accuracy in the identification of crops (>95%). E.g: large fields of rice For yield estimation Vegetation indexes in arid regions give good indications on inter-annual change Co-variable to be combined with geo-referenced measurements

Nairobi 1-2 October Remote sensing: cost-efficiency assessment The accuracy of a (normal) ground survey + remote sensing = accuracy of a more intense ground survey. Which option is cheaper? Elements needed to assess: – Cost structure of the of the ground survey Fixed cost Cost per additional Primary Sampling Unit (Administrative unit?) in the sample Cost per additional Secondary Sampling Units (farms, segments, points, fields) – Cost of remote sensing Images Image processing Combining remote sensing with ground data

Nairobi 1-2 October Agro-meteorological models Require a relatively complex information Soil map (water capacity) Phenological calendar (planting, flowering..) Coefficients describing the physiology of the plant. “Clean” meteorological data in nearly-real-time (10 days..) But simplified versions are also possible. For yield estimates, results need to be combined with historical statistical data Historical results of the agro-met model needed (long process) Inter-annual yield change indicators can be good without historical statistical data Geographical analysis of areas of concern Possibility to combine with coarse resolution satellite images (vegetation indexes….)

Nairobi 1-2 October Some vocabulary Bias and standard error Bias ~ non-sampling error Systematic tendency No reduction with a higher amount of data – Cannot be removed with an exhaustive census, classified image of the whole territory, etc Usually difficult to compute – In general no formula available Standard error ~ sampling error Due to the randomness of the sample Decreases when the sample grows In general formulas are available – Sometimes very complicated: simulation possible (bootstrap)

Nairobi 1-2 October Variables and co-variables Use of these terms in the context of this presentation (and often in sampling survey techniques) We have a targeted result (e.g. Crop Area) Variable (or main variable): usually refers to a magnitude that (nearly) coincides conceptually with the targeted result (direct observation) measured on a sample of units – farms, – households, – small administrative units, – territorial segments, – points, – fields Measurements nearly unbiased Co-variable: usually refers to more biased measurements known for the whole population or a very large sample Subjective estimates Classified images Vegetation indexes.

Nairobi 1-2 October Variables and co-variables (2) Variables and co-variables can be combined Regression estimators and similar (difference, ratio…) Calibration estimators Small area estimators If the main variable is (nearly) unbiased, the combined estimator is (nearly) unbiased Even if the covariable is biased If the variable and the co-variable are well correlated, the combined estimator has a smaller standard error – But the gain is limited – It is important that the estimator based on the main variable has a decent standard error – Good ground or farm survey. – Quality control When combining a variable (known for a sample) and a covariable (exhaustive knowledge), it is important that the covariable has the same quality in the sample and out of the sample – Do not improve the co-variable in the sample if you cannot improve it out of the sample.