The Crucible by Arthur Miller Elizabeth. How do Elizabeth’s language and actions contribute to the tension in the final act?  “Aye. It were a fearsome.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Crucible Jeopardy.
Advertisements

“The Crucible” Act III & IV Review.
CONFLICT IN THE CRUCIBLE.
The Crucible Act IV Quiz Review.
The Crucible Who’s Who.
Analyzing The Crucible
Crucible Bellringer #159/5/12 Directions: Use your notes from yesterday to fill in the blanks below. 1. ___________________is a contrast between what the.
The Crucible Acts I & II *Choose a question from the board on the next slide. Click once to reveal the answer, then click the star to return to the board.
The Critical Essay Structure. How will my essay be structured? 1. Introduction 2. Main Body- usually four or five paragraphs. 3. Conclusion.
John Proctor’s inner conflict
The Crucible Act II.
Jeopardy Review Game. Characters Identifying Key Events Notable Quotable Characters Fact or Fiction
The Crucible Bellringer #7 8/22/12
$100$200$100$300$100$200 $400 $200$200$400 $100 $400 $100$400 $500 $200$500 $300$500$300$300$500$300$400 $500.
The Crucible Act IV.
The Crucible Act III.
Presentation 4.1 The ending of The Crucible. Why do the court want Proctor to confess? ‘It is a weighty name; it will strike the village that Proctor.
The Crucible Parris Character Study. Introduction to Parris Parris is a minister from Salem, who is corrupt and ignorant. His characteristics are not.
Act IV Study Guide Questions
*OPEN-ENDED QUESTION Response
The Crucible Themes.
Sample Essay ‘The Crucible’.
The Crucible - Arthur Miller ARTHUR MILLER » (1915 – 2005) Considered one of the greatest dramatists of the twentieth century The Crucible, All My Sons,
ACT FOUR SEGMENT 1. P ‘Sarah, wake up!’ – ‘Let me speak with him’ Sarah Good and Tituba await hanging – deluded, slightly crazy Rebellion breaking.
Intro Notes.  AUTHOR: Arthur Miller  DATE: 1952  GENRE: Drama (Play) Historical Fiction  POINT OF VIEW: 3 rd person.
Themes, Motifs, and Symbols
The play’s moral compass and tragic hero.
Warm-Up Act I Review Characterization: Proctor and Elizabeth Homework
Jeopardy Vocab Quotes Characters Plot Misc. Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy.
Focus Questions The Crucible: Act I.
Assignment Character astrology signs
The Crucible Bellringer #17 9/5/13 1. What does Giles accuse Mr. Putnam of in the beginning of Act III? 2. When Danforth gives John Proctor the offer to.
Warm-Up Characterization: Proctor and Elizabeth Homework
The Crucible Discussion Questions.
The Crucible A play by Arthur Miller. PURITAN SOCIETY In order to understand the events of “The Crucible”, it is important to look at exactly what the.
Parris slave daughter niece Tituba Betty Abigail John Proctor Had an affair Thomas and Ann Putnam daughter Ruth Conjured spirits in the forest Dislike.
Characters MotifsMotivesVocabEvents.
‘The Crucible Themes. Introduction to Themes This play was written in the context of the anti-communist political witch hunts of the 1950s, and its central.
The Crucible Act III.
The Crucible An in-depth look at the play. Basic Questions - Characters  Who was the old man crushed with stones?  Answer: Giles Corey.
$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200.
THIS IS Characters True/ False Short Answer Who Said?! Name that Act! Misc.
The Crucible Act III and IV. The details create a mood that is gloomy and forbidding Abigail threatens Danforth when she says, “Think you be so mighty.
Higher Crucible Critical Essay In-depth plan with exemplars.
The Crucible CHARACTERS The Crucible American Literature.
Crucible Jeopardy Characters Literary Terms Plot Events Setting McCarthy Trials/Kazan and Miller
Warm-Up Act III Discussion Homework
1 ST QUARTER POWER-UPS English 11. Day 1 – 9/9 Copy the quote to the right, then answer the following question in complete sentences. What does this quote.
The red scare Quotes Important Characters Plot and setting Mystery bag
CharactersCourtAccusationsQuotesMisc
Important Stuff Act 4.  Just FYI: Act III ended with John Proctor’s arrest and Reverend Hale’s exit from the court.  Setting: the JAIL  The Gist of.
Sample #1: Proctor: That woman will never lie, Mr. Danforth.” Proctor’s statement, “That woman will never lie…” suggest his rigid belief in the idea that.
Cause and Effect in The Crucible
The Crucible Act II.
The Crucible Act III. Martha Corey is on trial It is clear they don’t believe Martha is not a witch – they think everyone accused is guilty Giles disrupts.
GOOD VS EVIL STUDENTS WILL UNDERSTAND HOW TO EXPLAIN THE NATURE OF GOOD AND EVIL IN ‘THE CRUCIBLE’
Page#27-Vocab list 2 10/27/14  Aim: How can we strengthen our knowledge of vocabulary by reading and writing?  Do now: Take out HW (Vocabulary Sheet)
Jeopardy Lit Dev. Char.Act 1-2Act 3-4 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy Quotes.
Act III Comprehension Questions
“The Crucible” Act III & IV Review.
The Crucible Act IV.
The Crucible by Arthur Miller
The Crucible Introduction Notes.
Asia C, Xavier P, Roberson J
The Crucible Act Four.
The crucible jeopardy review game
The Crucible Critical Essay
The Crucible Themes, Motifs, and Symbols.
The Crucible By Arthur Miller.
Presentation transcript:

The Crucible by Arthur Miller Elizabeth

How do Elizabeth’s language and actions contribute to the tension in the final act?  “Aye. It were a fearsome man, Giles Corey.”  Elizabeth uses a respectful tone in describing the heroic actions of Giles Corey prior to his death.  This has a dramatic influence on Proctor as he now realises what he must do in order to gain respect from his wife and to find forgiveness in himself.  Elizabeth implies through her description of Giles death that she expects her husband to demonstrate similar strength of character. Although Proctor doesn’t react the audience know that he is aware of Elizabeth's suggestions.

In what ways does Elizabeth’s language and actions relate to the theme of the play ‘the importance of reputation and social standing’, ‘the nature of forgiveness?’, ‘corruption’, ‘religious fanaticism’?  “I cannot judge you, John.”  This relates to the nature of forgiveness and refers back to early in the play when Elizabeth says ‘I do not judge you, the magistrate in your heart that judges you.’  Elizabeth shows that Proctor must learn to forgive himself before she can.  Hale, Parris and Danforth all try to find answers in Elizabeth as she is the only character not corrupt in the play.

How do we judge this character’s actions in the final act? How do we feel about their final actions/decisions/words?  Elizabeth blames herself for Proctor’s sins.  “It needs a cold wife to prompt lechery.”  Elizabeth has changed from the beginning of the play. At the start she is blunt whereas at the end she is more sympathetic towards her husband’s actions.

What message does the resolution of this character’s part in the play contain for the audience? What, if anything, should we learn from this character’s part in the whole play?  Elizabeth is the most consistent, least deserving of criticism and the character who suffers the most throughout the course of the…  Elizabeth proves that even the least deserving are not immune from the capricious nastiness of the court, Danforth and the forces of evil. In a sense Elizabeth stands for the innocent victim. She is incapable of preventing her husband from dying or of changing her own circumstances.  We admire Elizabeth however, as she does not waver or disintegrate under the most extraordinary pressure. We also admire her integrity – she only lies to the court under the most extreme pressure: a lie that it is hard to judge her for. We respect the fact that she remains with Proctor – someone she tries to see the best in despite his bad treatment of her…she even takes some of the responsibility for the predicament she and Proctor find themselves in at the end… “It needs a cold wife to prompt lechery.”

How has this character “changed” or developed over the course of the drama?  The character of Elizabeth stays consistent throughout the play  She has continuously refused to pardon or interfere in her husband's moral dilemma. In the final act she repeats the phrase ‘I do not judge you’ a number of times. She does not believe it is her responsibility nor does she force or command her husband’s actions – to the point that she is willing to quietly observe his sacrifice. This ‘quiet dignity’ is consistent with Elizabeth’s character throughout the play, confusing and angering Proctor in Act II and similarly confusing Hale, Parris, and Danforth in the final scenes of the play: all three request that she pardon her husband or interfere in his judgement making. She ignores all, full in the knowledge that Proctor must decide for himself…”Whatever you will do, it is a good man does it.”  In many ways Elizabeth, despite being accused of witchcraft by Abigail, is the least affected of all of the characters in the play. She demonstrates a resolute persona throughout. Perhaps it is this quality that Proctor fell in love with. She is certainly the strongest character in the play.

Why we might criticise Elizabeth  Hale, Danforth and Parris criticise Elizabeth in the final scene because she shows no emotion towards her husbands conviction.  “Are you stone?...have the devil dried up any tear of pity in you?”  Stone implies Elizabeth is unsympathetic and emotionless, this is ironic because Danforth is comparing her to something lifeless.  Danforth accuses Elizabeth of witchcraft.