Statistics for Tankers in Paris & Tokyo MOUs vs B/C – All ships Period 2003 – 2004 - 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMO Goal Based New Construction Standards Seminar in Heraklion 17 October 2005 Dragos Rauta INTERTANKO.
Advertisements

Port State Control What is it, and why do we do it? K. Crawford / R. Lough 23 Nov 2012.
SPANOS NIKOLAOS COMMANDER H.C.G. EXPERT P.S.C.O
Strategic Directions in Port State Control Benefits of Assessing Ship Risk Chris Barnes Maritime Operations
United States Coast Guard Marine Safety, Security, and Stewardship U.S. Coast Guard INTERTANKO North American Panel Presentation Jeff Lantz Director of.
Port State Control.
INTERCARGO International Association of Dry Cargo Shipowners Bulk Carrier Benchmarking Mr Rob Lomas 13 October 2006.
European Commissions’ Proposals on the Safety of the Seaborne Oil Trade (Euro OPA) - implications/issues SSY Monte Carlo Tanker Event, 2000.
SSTP GlobalMET Deck Cadet Structured Shipboard Training Program
Port State Control New Orleans Industry Day May 2014 LCDR Nick Neely.
Regional Training Centres
MARITIME LABOUR CONVENTION Welcome to : I F S M A DELEGATES AGA Vina del Mar, Apr 2015 y.
USCG Port State Control and Qualship 21 Programs Presented by Commander Paul Thorne, USCG Chief, Foreign and Offshore Vessels Division U.S. Coast Guard.
special training requirements for personnel on certain types of ships
2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code – Port State Control Perspective Jeff Lantz Director, Office of Operating and Environmental Standards.
Mediterranean MoU 7th Committee Meeting on PSC Alexandria, EGYPT 31st January - 2nd February A Presentation by INTERTANKO Port State Control Capt.
PORT STATE CONTROL The Singapore Experience Tan Kim Liang Senior PSCO, MPA 2 December 2003.
非常感谢中国海事界同事对我们支持 A Guide to The Vetting Process We thank All our Colleagues in the Maritime Industry in China for their Support Capt Howard Snaith – Marine.
1 Anti-fouling Systems—Port State Control Inspection Huang Tianbing Marine Biosafety Section Bangkok, June 2009 Views expressed in this presentation are.
PORT STATE CONTROL Conference 2005, London Increased Information Sharing The Issue of Transparency Peter M Swift.
1 The statistical approach for monitoring maritime safety used and developed by EMSA Béatrice Comby Project Officer - Production and development of maritime.
MARITIME SECURITY STATUS REPORT JOSEPH ANGELO U.S. COAST GUARD.
INTERTANKO Technical Seminar Mumbai 19 th September 2005 Ship Inspections & The Screening Process Capt Howard N. Snaith. Master Mariner. M.N.I. Director,
Safety and Marine Environment Protection; prospects we face - the EU perspective Marten Koopmans Permanent representative of the European Commission to.
1 Production of reliable and comparable statistical information in EMSA: from raw data to maritime knowledge Béatrice Comby Project Officer - Production.
PSC developments Dr. Vitaly Klyuev. PSC regional organizations  Paris MOU (Europe and North Atlantic)  Vina del Mar PSC Agreement (Latin America) 
Dieser Platz ist für Ihr Bild vorgesehen Goal Based Standards – A unique chance to define a new framework for the development of rules and regulations.
INTERTANKO North America Panel US Coast Guard Presentation RDML Paul Thomas Assistant Commandant for Prevention Policy March 2015.
One Inspection, Two Inspections, Three Inspections, More Peter M Swift.
Marine Symposium – World Shipping Forum Chennai 19th November 2004
INTERCARGO International Association of Dry Cargo Shipowners Bulk Carrier Issues Mr Rob Lomas January 2008.
Integrated technology , policy and legalization
PORT STATE CONTROL INSPECTIONS 1 Under the new regime established by Directive 2009/16 in the UK. The new EU directive came into force in June 2009 It.
Tripartite Discussions Beijing 2005, 31 st Oct – 1 st Nov Agenda Item Europe 3 rd Maritime Safety Package Speakers: Chris Horrocks Secretary General.
INTERTANKO Seminar The Tanker World Today Tokyo 10 November 2004 Peter M. Swift.
Safety and security A presentation by Imperial Ship Management AB.
Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations Pacific Module 6: Port State Control.
2003 LATIN AMERlCAN AGREEMENT ON PORT STATE CONTROL (VIÑA DEL MAR, 1992)
The ICS/ISF Shipping Industry Flag State Performance Table
PORT STATE CONTROL Arş.Gör. Veysel GÖKÇEK. What is Port State Control? A SYSTEM A SYSTEM designed to: ensure foreign ships comply with international safety,
CONCENTRATED INSPECTION CAMPAIGN – CREW FAMILIARISATION ON ENCLOSED SPACE ENTRY Pat Dolby Inspection Operations Manager UK MCA.
PORT STATE CONTROL For MODU or MOUs. Why Port State Control (PSC)?  Everybody knows today why ports States have been obliged to set up Port State control.
Risk Based Inspection Programmes Richard Matheson South Wales F&RS.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 14 – Transport policy Bilateral screening:
MLC Compliance for the Yachting Sector - Workshop Chamber of Commerce 23 rd March 2016 Dr. Nicholas Valenzia PORT STATE CONTROL An Introduction.
Development of a New Inspection Regime by the Paris MoU Panama Maritime IX 8-11 February 2009.
Tripartite Tokyo September 2007 Procedural
Peter M Swift CMA, March 2004 Trade Associations and how they can represent their members with governments, extra-government organizations, and enforcement.
PORT STATE CONTROL INSPECTIONS
A brief update to inform on current actions
North American Panel 23 March 2009 Stamford, CT.
Common Deficiencies in Sector Northern New England
Mr. Fredrik Larsson Marine Manager
Open Forum for Exchanging Views with Industry
ACTIVITIES OF THE LATIN AMERICAN AGREEMENT
البرنامج التدريبي إدارة المخاطر الجمركية
ФОНД ЗА РАЗВОЈ РЕПУБЛИКЕ СРБИЈЕ
BACKGROUND 1987 Joint MSC/MEPC working group on:
برنامه‌ريزي منابع انساني
'III \-\- I ', I ,, - -
Navigation and Maritime Regulations
(Adapted from the presentation made by Mr Colin Young at MACHC18)
Ашық сабақ 7 сынып Файлдар мен қапшықтар Сабақтың тақырыбы:
Windows басқару элементтері
The ICS/ISF Shipping Industry Flag State Performance Table
Global Integrated Shipping Information System
Қош келдіңіздер!.
,, 'III \-\-
Информатика пән мұғалімі : Аитова Карима.
Presentation transcript:

Statistics for Tankers in Paris & Tokyo MOUs vs B/C – All ships Period 2003 –

Statistics for Tankers in Paris MOU Year 2003(Tankers) Inspections 2362 With Deficiencies 971 (41.11%) Detentions 110 (4.66%) Year 2003 (All ships) Inspections With deficiencies (55%) Detentions 1431 (7.05%)

Statistics for Tankers in Paris MOU Year 2003(Tankers) Inspections 2362 With Deficiencies 971 (41.11%) Detentions 110 (4.66%) Year 2003 (B/C) Inspections 3507 With deficiencies 2110 (60.17%) Detentions 227 (6.47%)

Statistics for Tankers in Paris MOU Year 2004(Tankers) Inspections 2060 With Deficiencies 793 (38.50%) Detentions 51 (2.48%) Year 2004 (All ships) Inspections With deficiencies (53.59%) Detentions 1187 (5.84%)

Statistics for Tankers in Paris MOU Year 2004(Tankers) Inspections 2060 With Deficiencies 793 (38.50%) Detentions 51 (2.48%) Year 2004 (B/C) Inspections 3429 With deficiencies 1984 (57.86%) Detentions 206 (6.01%)

Statistics for Tankers in Paris MOU Year 2005(Tankers) Inspections 1789 With Deficiencies 685 (38.29%) Detentions 43 (2.40%) Year 2005 (B/C) Inspections 3486 With deficiencies 1931 (55.39%) Detentions 150 (4.30%)

Statistics for Tankers in Paris MOU Year 2005(Tankers) Inspections 1789 With Deficiencies 685(38.28%) Detentions 43 (2.40%) Year 2005 (All ships) Inspections With deficiencies (51.60%) Detentions 1043 (4.96%)

Statistics for Tankers in Paris MOU/Detentions

Statistics for Tankers in Paris MOU Detention rates % Tankers 4.66% 2.48% 2.40% 3,18 B/C 6.47% 6.01% 4,30% 5,60

Statistics for Tankers in Paris MOU – Flags Inspections Detentions % Bahamas Greece Comoros Cambodia Honduras Spain Romania

Statistics for Tankers in Paris MOU Most common deficiencies Tankers Fire safety measures Structural safety Life Saving Appliances Propulsion % Auxiliary

Statistics for B/C in Paris MOU Most common deficiencies B/C Fire safety measures Structural safety Life Saving Appliances Safety of navigation

Statistics for Tankers in Tokyo MOU/Detentions

ERIKA III New profile for ships not only for B/C – Tankers – Passenger – Ro/Ro – Chemical Tankers High Risk Ships 6 months Time window 1 month Medium Risk 12 months ΄΄ 5 months Low Risk ships 24 months 36 months

ERIKA III / Ship’s Profile Type Age R.O. Flag including SAF or IMO Audit Scheme Company Generic / History performance