PSC developments Dr. Vitaly Klyuev. PSC regional organizations  Paris MOU (Europe and North Atlantic)  Vina del Mar PSC Agreement (Latin America) 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation to RSAHC Stephen Bennett; Programme Manager March 2013.
Advertisements

© JABEE 2013 Japan Accreditation Board for Engineering Education Washington Accord And International Engineering Alliance Dr Yasuyuki AOSHIMA Executive.
Leadership Summit New York 6th-7th March 2015 Presenter: Susan Jones – Regional Coordinator Asia Pacific BPW International.
THE APEC ENGINEER A Model for the Mobility of Engineers
Education and Training Linkages, Opportunities and Challenges The Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization.
APEC Energy Section International Energy Branch Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources EGNRET 23, Christchurch NZ November 2003.
Management Second Canadian Edition
UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION.
PORT STATE CONTROL Safety onboard. Picture from:
Port State Control.
ASEAN quiz Dylan 11GS. 1 Which countries does ASEAN group?
Bodies of Water Landmasses. Bodies of Water Landmasses.
Robert Scollay University of Auckland
Asian-Pacific Economic Cooperation By Shelby and LOLA THE DESTROYER.
Presented by PID / BA Wing-kun TAM
APEC Energy Data Collection 2001/ th March 2002 Taipei Shigeru Kimura for EDMC/IEEJ.
USCG Port State Control and Qualship 21 Programs Presented by Commander Paul Thorne, USCG Chief, Foreign and Offshore Vessels Division U.S. Coast Guard.
Progress Report of EGEDA EWG47 Kunming, China May 2014 Expert Group on Energy Data Analysis EDMC, IEEJ.
PASC’s role in supporting Free Trade in the region.
Company Profile Executive WorkPlace International.
PORT STATE CONTROL The Singapore Experience Tan Kim Liang Senior PSCO, MPA 2 December 2003.
APEC/SCSC Activities for Regulatory Reform Related to Standards and Conformance Koichi Noda Director of JETRO GENEVE Representative of JISC in GENEVE.
The Road Transport harmonisation Project Group (RTHP) 21 st APEC TRANSPORTATION WORKING GROUP MEETING RTHP Phase 5 Stage 3 Workshop 24, September,2002.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Supporting the Nation’s commerce with information for safe, efficient, and environmentally sound transportation. AMDAR Perspective JMA Meeting March 23,
1 Standard Float Cycle  Drifting Depth: 1000 m  Profiling Depth: 2000 m  10 Days Cycles.
MARITIME SECURITY STATUS REPORT JOSEPH ANGELO U.S. COAST GUARD.
Unit 1:The world around us A. What is a map?  Different from a plan, as it cannot show many details of a location Map  A drawing of an area on the earth’s.
1 Review on the Monthly Oil Data Collection 11th March 2002 Taipei Shigeru Kimura for EDMC/IEEJ.
AP* Retreat APAN Activities Kilnam Chon APAN Chair
Word Bank N. America S. America
Epidemiology of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
XXXXXXXXXXX. Where is Mongolia? A B D C XXXXXXXXXXX Where is China? A B D C.
Standards-Related Technical Assistance and Capacity Building Research Project National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Agenda Command Structure Mission Operating Environment Conclusion.
AIPC SUMMIT 2012 The Big Picture: Global Industry Status & Prospects Asia Pacific Overview.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
1 SEADMC 2009 ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) Disaster Management & Emergency Response Efforts 2 December 2009.
Chapter 18 - Language and regional variation1  Standard language  Accent  Dialect – differences in grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation.
Session II International and regional approaches to regulatory cooperation June 20, 2006 Yuki HAYASHI Deputy director International Standards and MRA Policy.
Integrated technology , policy and legalization
PORT STATE CONTROL INSPECTIONS 1 Under the new regime established by Directive 2009/16 in the UK. The new EU directive came into force in June 2009 It.
Global Integrated Shipping Information System
Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations Pacific Module 6: Port State Control.
2003 LATIN AMERlCAN AGREEMENT ON PORT STATE CONTROL (VIÑA DEL MAR, 1992)
Attracting International Students Presented by Kaushal Jhaveri Senior Marketing Consultant Education and Training International.
PORT STATE CONTROL Arş.Gör. Veysel GÖKÇEK. What is Port State Control? A SYSTEM A SYSTEM designed to: ensure foreign ships comply with international safety,
CONCENTRATED INSPECTION CAMPAIGN – CREW FAMILIARISATION ON ENCLOSED SPACE ENTRY Pat Dolby Inspection Operations Manager UK MCA.
The World Map Where are the major countries and physical landmarks of international importance?
Mexican Business Council for Foreign Trade, Investment and Technology COMCE 2012.
MLC Compliance for the Yachting Sector - Workshop Chamber of Commerce 23 rd March 2016 Dr. Nicholas Valenzia PORT STATE CONTROL An Introduction.
PACIFIC AREA STANDARDS CONGRESS (PASC) APEC SCSC – SRB Workshop 23 June 2007 Convention Centre Cairns.
PORT STATE CONTROL INSPECTIONS
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)
Mongolia Papua New Guinea South Korea Japan China Myanmar Taiwan
Basic Geography.
World Map Bodies of Water Landmasses.
The United States of America
Asia/Pacific ATN Regional Backbone
INTERTANKO Hellenic Mediterranean Panel
Stephen Bennett; Vice-Dean IALA WWA
Asia: Political Map. Asia: Political Map.
36th USAEE/IAEE: NORTH AMERICAN CONFERENCEE Washington DC, United States September Removing destination clauses: The implications on long-term.
Introduction to Travel and Tourism Here, There, Almost Anywhere: The Geography of Travel Chapter 9.
Session 3: ASP RI 1: Special Consideration For LDCs, SIDSs, Including Pacific Island Countries, And Landlocked Developing Countries Asia-Pacific Region.
Chapter The reasons for economic union
Global Integrated Shipping Information System
XXXXXXXXXXX.
Regulation of harbours through international administrative law?
Presentation transcript:

PSC developments Dr. Vitaly Klyuev

PSC regional organizations  Paris MOU (Europe and North Atlantic)  Vina del Mar PSC Agreement (Latin America)  Tokyo MOU (Asia-Pacific)  Caribbean MOU  Mediterranean MOU  Indian Ocean MOU  Abuja (west and central Africa) MOU  Black Sea MOU  Riyadh (Gulf) MOU

Russia  Member State for: – Paris MOU –Tokyo MOU –Black Sea MOU  Member of the Paris MOU Advisory Board  Chair of the Tokyo MOU Committee

 Paris MOU has 27 member States

Tokyo MOU has 18 member States Canada China Hong Kong, China Japan Australia Chile Fiji Indonesia Korea, Rep. of New Zealand Philippines Singapore Vanuatu Brunei Solomon Islands ILO, IMOParis MOU, I-O MOU, Auerdo Viňa del Mar, Black Sea MOU Malaysia Papua New Guinea Russian Federation Thailand Vietnam USAMacao, China Korea, DPR

Initiatives of by the MOUs  New Inspection Regime (NIR)  New Information System (THESIS)  Distance Learning Program (DLP)  Code of Conduct for PSC officers  Recognized Organization (Calcification Societies) performance  Concentrated Inspection Campaigns  “Observer” status to IMO

New Inspection Regime  100% vessels to be inspected;  Focusing on vessels with “bad” profile  Preferences to vessels with “good” profile  “Fair sharing” of inspections among member States  Wider criteria for selection procedure  More strict obligations of MOU member States  Implementation (target)

Training efforts  Basic training of PSC officers  Seminars  Expert training  Specialized training  Expert missions  Advanced training  Distance training course (DLP)  Unified training model and requirements

Concentrated Inspection Campaigns  2007 – ISM Code  2008 – SOLAS Chapter V (Navigation)  2009 – Life Saving Appliances  2010 – Ship loading and Stability

Review Panel  Paris and Tokyo MoUs – similar procedures  Paris MOU 2007: –5 requests –1 case – lack of information by Flag –3 cases – detentions were unreasonable (Port States reconsidered decisions in all 3 cases) –1 case – detention order was reasonable