UMKC New Chairs/Program Directors Workshop August 8, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Culture of Collaboration Cultivating a Campus Environment for Assessment.
Advertisements

READINESS CRITERIA What does it mean to be ready to do a major course redesign? Is your institution ready? Which courses are readyi.e., are good candidates.
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
YOUR DEGREE MAY BE THE LAST THING THAT GETS YOU A JOB Support for Graduates Starting a New Career Your degree may be the last thing that gets you a job.
Ron Smelser Professor and Associate Dean Dean’s Office.
CHAPTER 1 : SECRETARY. Secretary is a person who conducts correspondence, maintains records and does ministerial and administrative work. This subject.
Utilizing Technology to Enhance Student Success and Retention David Yaskin, CEO and Founder Zach Gossin, Regional Sales Manager Starfish Retention Solutions,
Process for Policy Development and Mechanism for Policy Concerns.
University Council Shared Leadership for Integrated Planning and Consultative Decision-Making.
Academic W rld 411 at Gustavus. Declaring a Major You can declare your major and arrange for an advisor from that department any time after your first.
The Graduate School at The University of Missouri– St. Louis Kathleen M. Haywood, Ph.D. Professor and Associate Dean for Graduate Education in the College.
Organization chart of the functioning of practicums in the Faculty of Education and Psychology.
The Catholic University of America Human Resources Realignment Project President’s Council October 8, 2002.
Leadership (District/International) District 10 Nominating Committee Angela Weaver, Chair Donna Dodgen Amy Mercer.
UMKC Chairs/Program Directors Workshop Roles and Responsibilities Cindy Pemberton, Ph.D. Deputy Provost August 7, 2013.
CHRISTINE HUBBARD, PH.D. PRESIDENT NORTH TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE CONSORTIUM Making the Cut and Thriving at a Community College.
University Assessment Committee Comprehensive Standard (CS) The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves.
TTUHSC HR  Need common ground  Opportunity to assess organization  Make us all better at what we do  Reaffirm: Why we do what we do  Improve:
Task Force on Best Practices in PGME Program Support Recommendations Actions to Date March 2015.
Sr. Administrators Retreat August 18, 2008 Elyne G. Cole Associate Provost for Human Resources University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Planning Alignment Joseph A. Alutto Executive Vice President and Provost.
FERPA: What you Need to Know The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act & SEI.
Leading and Supporting the Success of Your Program Champions.
Seminars on Academic Computing Addressing Organizational Development at Collab State University August 5, 2007.
Online Orientation for Spring Term Freshmen Welcome to the University of Pittsburgh’s Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences!
Search and Selection / Recruiting. AGENDA Overview ◦ Ground Rules ◦ Discuss Key Concepts Questions to Answer ◦ Process Improvement (?) ◦ Automated Process.
Jeff Waddoups Chair, Sabbatical Leave Committee Department of Economics
Presentation by: Carol Mattson, Dean of Academic Services, Fullerton College Nancy Deutsch, Reading Faculty/Staff Development Coordinator, Cypress College.
Some examples of quality standards and their use for self assessment and planning CINDA Workshop for TEIs Ramallah, May 2007.
Practicing Meaningful Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA Department of Crop and Soil Sciences August 10, 2015 Dr. Leslie Gordon Associate Director for.
CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT PRESENTATION BY PROF. MITULLAH; PROF. NYINGURO & PROF. THOITHI AT SENSITIZATION WORKSHOP FOR DEANS, DIRECTORS, CHAIRS OF DEPARTMENTS.
Research Opportunities at the Burnett Honors College Eric Drew Cooper Director of Undergraduate Research The Burnett Honors College.
1 JISAO Review A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board Jim Kinter Chair, JISAO Review Committee Director, Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere.
THE QUALITY ASSURANCE AND ACCREDITATION Project Outcomes and Activities.
Program Review – Assessing the Health of Curriculum Programs Mark Lupton Director, Institutional Research, Planning and Effectiveness South Piedmont Community.
MDC Strategic Plan Strategic Plan Coordinating Committee October/November 2010.
Aligning IT Investments (Plan) and the Institutional Strategic Plan Team 2 Ed Pokraka Shelley Reed Jeff Cepull Will Krause Educause Seminars On Academic.
HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT In collaboration with QUALITY ASSURANCE DIVISION Engr. Farakh Javed Assistant Director Quality Enhancement Cell Good Governance,
VAE (Validation of Acquired Experience) panel 2nd workshop : Presentation of jury procedure in UBO, Mary laure perdigao.
UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND Teaching, Faith, & Service Michael Connolly, D.M.A. Workshop on Institutional Self-Study 2007.
Results of Projected Faculty Life & Work Survey (Pre-course) 19 January 2012 GS 650: Preparing Future Faculty The Graduate School University of Kentucky.
Performance Management – Part 3 BCUHB Capability Procedure (WP3A) 69.
Introductions Emily Carpenter Coordinator, Academic Advising College of Arts and Sciences Suzanne Dantuono Director of Advising College of Engineering.
Medical Students: Addressing Concerns and Complaints of Mistreatment Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary.
Workload Fulfillment Term Faculty Appointments Patricia Linton
District 4 Nominating Committee Area workshops, 2017
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Appointment, Promotion and Tenure
Promotion in Extension Presented by: Ken Martin, Ph. D
Stockton Federation of Teachers (SFT)
Planning and Managing your Academic Career: Deciding Where to Go and How to Get There Iain Young MD, CM, FRCPC Professor, Department of Pathology & Molecular.
GSE Organization by Unit
InstitutionAl Research
Overview UNC Charlotte will soon offer Acalog/Curriculog as an electronic academic program and course approval system for creating, modifying, and accessing.
Review of Interim Policy Regarding Appointment of Principal Investigators FA
Proposed New Process Department Chairs have the important role to
Chapter 7 Corporate governance and social responsibility
Unit/Title configurations (A) October 2008
Faculty performance for Institutional achievement
New Faculty Orientation Non-tenure-track Faculty Appointments
FA Review and Clarification of Appendix 15A
GSE Organization by Unit
LMS Transition to Canvas
LMS Transition to Canvas
Industry-academic collaboration is a strategic necessity in today’s fragmented and turbulent economy. Advisory boards offer an effective way to achieve.
LMS Transition to Canvas
LMS Transition to Canvas
Leadership and Nominating Committee
Brooklyn College Fall 2019 OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness August 29th 2019.
Responsibility for assessment at Brooklyn college – a distributed leadership model OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness September 9, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

UMKC New Chairs/Program Directors Workshop August 8, 2013

What does a newly appointed chair need to know? (Chu, 2006)  Chairs officially represent the department  Chairs are members of the team that is leading the institution as well as their own academic unit  Chairs are usually not personally liable for actions undertaken in the course of fulfilling their professional responsibilities (exceptions include – actions taken outside scope of job description, action that is unprofessional, malicious, reckless or imprudent)  Maintain confidentiality  The best sources of information on how to be a good chair are the best chairs on campus

What does a newly appointed chair need to know? (Chu, 2006) – cont.  How much chairs are able to do is largely dependent on how much support their deans are willing and able to publicly provide  Credibility is the chair’s most important personal asset  Who you spend time with should have your undivided attention  Maximize the talents of the faculty  Chairs have fiduciary responsibility  Chairs should operationalize the strategic plan into achievable pieces and make daily decisions in support of the plan  Not every problem is a real problem  There are two types of chairs: reactive chairs and proactive chairs  Chairs can make a real difference