LLRF for EUCARD Crab Cavities Graeme Burt (on behalf of Amos Dexter) Paris May 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to RF for Accelerators
Advertisements

Cockcroft Institute LC-ABD plenary April 2007 ILC Crab Cavity Collaboration Cockcroft Institute : –Richard Carter (Lancaster University) –Amos Dexter (Lancaster.
5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program. May 2011 Review of waveguide components development for CLIC I. Syratchev,
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Prospects of Compact Crab Cavities for LHC Peter McIntosh LHC-CC Workshop, CERN 21 st August 2008.
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
Synchronization system for CLIC crab cavities Amos Dexter, Ben Woolley, Igor Syratchev. LCWS12, UTA October 2012.
Particle Accelerator Engineering, London, October 2014 Phase Synchronisation Systems Dr A.C. Dexter Overview Accelerator Synchronisation Examples Categories.
ILC RF phase stability requirements and how can we demonstrate them Sergei Nagaitsev Oct 24, 2007.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
A. Bay Beijing October Accelerators We want to study submicroscopic structure of particles. Spatial resolution of a probe ~de Broglie wavelength.
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
RF Synchronisation Issues
Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
Demonstration of the Beam loading compensation (Preparation status for ILC beam loading compensation experiments at ATF injector in this September) (PoP.
Conventional Source for ILC (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost) Junji Urakawa, KEK LCWS2012 Contents : 0. Short review of 300Hz conventional positron source.
Different mechanisms and scenarios for the local RF
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
RF particle acceleration Kyrre N. Sjøbæk * FYS 4550 / FYS 9550 – Experimental high energy physics University of Oslo, 26/9/2013 *k.n.sjobak(at)fys.uio.no.
Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August.
LLRF ILC GDE Meeting Feb.6,2007 Shin Michizono LLRF - Stability requirements and proposed llrf system - Typical rf perturbations - Achieved stability at.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 ILC Crab Cavity Collaboration Cockcroft Institute : –Graeme Burt (Lancaster University) –Richard Carter (Lancaster.
2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 Introduction to the CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure (PETS) Design. I. Syratchev.
IWLC10 CLIC Crab Cavities Amos Dexter (on behalf of the LC Crab System Collaborations) CERN 20 th October 2010.
X-Band Deflectors Development at SLAC
Anders Sunesson RF Group ESS Accelerator Division
Cockcroft Institute August2008 ILC Crab Cavity LLRF Amos Dexter, Imran Tahir, Peter McIntosh, Graeme Burt, Philippe Goudket, Carl Beard, Phil Buckley,
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
CLIC crab cavity design Praveen Ambattu 24/08/2011.
EUCARD WP12 DESY 2015 Slide 1 EuCARD-2 is co-funded by the partners and the European Commission under Capacities 7th Framework Programme, Grant Agreement.
Measurements of the X-ray/pump laser pulse timing Valery Dolgashev, David Fritz, Yiping Feng, Gordon Bowden SLAC 48th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop.
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
Femtosecond phase measurement Alexandra Andersson CLIC Beam Instrumentation workshop.
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
High Power RF Measurements Ben Woolley, Amos Dexter, Igor Syratchev. Jan Kovermann, Joseph Tagg HG2013, Trieste June 2013.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
High precision phase monitoring Alexandra Andersson, CERN Jonathan Sladen, CERN This work is supported by the Commission of the European Communities under.
Cockcroft Institute February 2008 Low Level RF for Crab Cavities (The ILC in particular) Amos Dexter, Imran Tahir, Peter McIntosh, Graeme Burt.
Conventional source developments (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost, Part-II) Junji Urakawa, KEK PosiPol-2012 at DESY Zeuthen Contents : 0. Short review.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
RF low level control & synchronization A. Gallo, M. Bellaveglia, L. Cacciotti SPARC review committee – ENEA Frascati – 16/11/2005.
European Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop, Elba, September 14 th -18 th, 2015Steffen Döbert, BE-RF Electron accelerator for the AWAKE experiment.
X-band Based FEL proposal
EUCARD WP10.3 Daresbury April 2010 LLRF for EUCARD Crab Cavities Amos Dexter and Imran Tahir Daresbury 7 th April 2010.
A CW Linac scheme for CLIC drive beam acceleration. Hao Zha, Alexej Grudiev 07/06/2016.
A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac
CLIC Crab Synchronisation
CLIC Crab Synchronisation
An X-band system for phase space linearisation on CLARA
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
Timing and synchronization at SPARC
RF Synchronisation Issues
Brief Review of Microwave Dielectric Accelerators
12 GHz High Power RF components requirements for CEA activities
Developments on Proposed
F.Marcellini, D.Alesini, A.Ghigo
CLIC Crab Cavities Amos Dexter, Graeme Burt, Praveen Ambattu,
Task 2: High-gradient normal-conducting technology development
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Electric Field Amplitude (MV/m)
Progress in the design of a damped an
LCLS RF Stability Requirements
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
Presentation transcript:

LLRF for EUCARD Crab Cavities Graeme Burt (on behalf of Amos Dexter) Paris May 2011

Crab Parameters Beam Energy Bunch Charge Bunch Repitition Crab peak Power Bunch Length ILC 0.5 TeV3.2 nC3 MHz1.24 kW 300  m CLIC 1.5 TeV0.6 nC2 GHz288 kW 100  m LHC 7 TeV18.4 nC40 MHz12.7 kW7.55 cm Stiff beam, needs a large voltage and/or small crossing angle Long bunch = low frequency to avoid non- linear kick Huge beam loading and wakes Simpler design required Short timescales, high current

Tolerance for Gaussian Amplitude Errors s z = nm s x = 45 nm q c = 0.02 rad

Kick and tolerance for 3 TeV CM amplitude error on each cavity1.0%1.5%2.0%2.5%3.0% luminosity reduction To minimise required cavity kick R12 needs to be large (25 metres suggested) Vertical kicks from unwanted cavity modes are bad one needs R34 to be small. For 20 mrad crossing and using as 12 GHz structure Error in kick tilts effective collision from head on. Luminosity Reduction Factor gives

Waveguide routing? klystron bunker crab cavity length ~ 0.1 m crab cavity detector 23.4 m 20 m detector hall

CLIC Solution Wakefields Large irises Small number of cells Strong damping Phase and amplitude control Passive during 156 ns bunch train Beamloading compensation High energy flow through cavity * small number of cells * high group velocity * low efficiency Phase synchronisation (4.4 fs) Same klystron drives both cavities Temperature stabilized waveguide Phase reference Optical interferometer Phase measurement calibration DBM and Down conversion to ~ 1 GHz, Digital phase detection Staggered sample and hold Phase stability Thick irises Strong cavity cooling

Fill Time and Beamloading For each cell solve energy equation convection - dissipation - beamloading Input = 6.45 MW Initial kick = 2.40 MV Plateau = 2.37 MV v g = group velocity L cell = cell length U n = energy in cell n f rep = bunch frequency q = bunch charge d x = bunch offset

Beamloading in 16 Cell Cavity Beam offset (mm) Power entering cell 1 (MW)6.388 Power leaving cell 16 (MW) Ohmic power loss (MW) Beamload power loss (MW) E max for cell 1 (MV/m)51.1 Efficiency12.04%16.39%20.74% Kick (MV) Cavity Parameters as on last slide and Q = 6381 A short inefficient cavity with a high power flow achieves adequate amplitude stability Can we make the gradient? Is pulse heating OK (consider low temperature operation)?

Cavity variables Cell length sets phase advance iris thickness iris radius Equator radius sets frequency beam Given the maximum surface fields and the available power one must chose number of cells and iris parameters to maximise luminosity

Cell number for fixed surface field Number of cells for 2.4 MV transverse kick not exceeding surface field 110 MV m -1.

Cell Number Optimisation Cavity power requirement for a beam offset of mm

Beam Loading As the electric field in dipole cavities vary with offset the beam- loading changes with time and cannot be predicted. The beam is too short for feedback. Need to design to minimise the effect (increase convection or dissipation) E Beam For each cell solve energy equation convection - dissipation - beamloading

Luminosity loss Luminosity loss for a beam offset of mm Increasing dissipation increases heating, this is not recommended We can increase power convection by increasing the structure group velocity. The group velocity is dependant on the iris radius. However we have limited power (20 MW) so we can only increase the convection so much. Possible solutions

Wakefactor ~ R/Q times cells R/Q multiplied by cell number plotted against iris radius to give figure of merit for wakefields

Choice Initial studies have started with the 10 cell option

Waveguide choice Assume 40 m waveguide run from Klystron to each Crab cavity Available klystron has nominal output of 50 MW Divide output for two beam lines = 25 MW For standard rectangular waveguide we have 10.2 MW available (OK for 15 cells) For special rectangular waveguide we have 12.8 MW available (OK for 11 cells) For circular 12mm TE11 waveguide we have 15.1 MW available (OK for 11 cells) (note that mode conversion from circular TE11 to circular TM10 is vanishingly small for properly designed bends) For copper s =5.8e7 S/m and at GHzAttenuationTransmissionOver moded Rectangular TE10 EIA90 (22.9 x 10.2 mm)0.098 dB/m40.6%no Rectangular TE10 special (24 x 14 mm)0.073 dB/m51.3%no Circular TE11 (r = 9.3 mm)0.119 dB/m33.3%no Circular TE11 (r = 12 mm)0.055 dB/m60.4%TM10 Circular TE01 (r = 40 mm)0.010 dB/m91.2%extremely

CLIC LLRF Timing Booster Linac 561 m 2.2 to 9.0 GeV IP Bunch timing pick-ups Klystron LLRF Bunch timing pick-ups Drive beams 12 GHz Chicane stretching PETS 0.05 km 2.75 km 21 km Crab cavity electrons positrons compressor linac Synchronisation to main beam after booster linac. For a 21 km linac we have 140 ms between bunches leaving the booster and arriving at the crab cavities. 2 GHz bunch rep LLRF Crab bunch timing pickups could be 2.75 km away from LLRF

Crab Cavity RF Beamloading constrains us to high power pulsed operation Intra bunch phase control looks impossible for a 140 ns bunch SOLUTION One Klystron (~ 20 MW pulsed) with output phase and amplitude control Intra bunch delay line adjustment for phase control (i.e. between bunch trains) Very stable cavities Dual Output or Magic Tee Laser interferometer Waveguide with micron- level adjustment 12 GHz Pulsed Klystron ( ~ 20 MW ) Pulsed Modulator Vector modulation Control travelling wave cavity Phase Shifter LLRF 12 GHz Oscillator Main beam outward pick up main beam outward pick up From oscillator

RF Layout and Procedure Splitter Laser interferometer Waveguide with micron- level adjustment 12 GHz Pulsed Klystron ( ~ 20 MW ) Pulsed Modulator Vector modulation Control travelling wave cavity Phase Shifter LLRF Once the main beam arrives at the crab cavity there is insufficient time to correct beam to cavity errors. These errors are recorded and used as a correction for the next pulse. 0. Send pre-pulse to cavities and use interferometer to measure difference in RF path length (option1) 1. Perform waveguide length adjustment at micron scale (option 2 use measurements from last pulse) 2. Measure phase difference between oscillator and outward going main beam 3. Adjust phase shifter in anticipation of round trip time and add offset for main beam departure time 4. Klystron output is controlled for constant amplitude and phase 5. Record phase difference between returning main beam and cavity 6. Alter correction table for next pulse main beam outward pick up From oscillator 12 GHz Oscillator Main beam outward pick up

Phase measurement vector modulation Load GHz Pulsed Klystron ( ~ 70 MW ) 10 MHz Master Oscillator analogue control GHz GHz GHz signal long transmission paths with controlled RF length adjustment as computed by laser interferometer Hittite digital phase detector HMC493 Calibration ADC Multiplexer DSP D flip/flop array providing delayed clock for triggering ADC sampling Need to make 8 to 12 accurate phase measurements during pulse to check that the phases of the two cavities are moving as one in synchronism. sample at ~ 10 ns intervals and read back to DSP at an appropriate rate. The DSP manages the time delay between outward beam pickup and firing Klystron. It controls pulse length and manages the overall phase offset for the drive Phasing to beam 120 ns pulse

Distribution Stability Requirement CERN April 2011 r.m.s. cavity to cavity synchronisation requirement is 4.4 fs hence r.m.s klystron to cavity stability requirement is 3.1 fs (two paths) phase velocity of light in the waveguide will be just over 3.0×10 8 hence waveguide length must be steady at the precision of metres (Expansion example without expansion joints) Control waveguide temperature to say 0.3 o C. Copper expansivity 17 x K metre waveguide could vary in length by 200  m. Waveguide wavelength ~ 25 mm Expansion ~ 200  m Phase shift ~ 2.9 degrees which is 150 times the allowance! It is probably that the waveguide will have expansion joints and so the real question is about the lateral stability of the cavity and the klystron.

Distribution Experiment CERN April GHz Pulsed Klystron ( ~ 50 MW ) long waveguide transmission paths Double balanced mixer Mini-circuits SIM-24MH+ RF 7.3 GHz to 20 GHz, IF DC to 7.2 GHz Need about 24 dB of amplification to resolve 1 milli-degree at 12 GHz, signal to noise before amplifier for 40 MHz bandwidth ~ 6 dB Measurement looks feasible. But need digital phase detection as before for calibration

Board Development 10 MHz Master Oscillator GHz GHz Hittite digital phase detector HMC493 Calibration DBM The calibration of the DBM is performed using a digital phase detector after down-conversion to 1.3 MHz. This hardware is underdevelopment but is so far not meeting the resolution specification.