Consolidated Fiscal (OCFO) Requirements: Special Education and Federal Programs Components Spring Fiscal WorkshopsSpring Fiscal Workshops.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented By WVDE Federal Programs Staff July 15, 2009 Title III Monitoring and Fiscal Updates.
Advertisements

IDEA-B LEA Maintenance of Effort (MOE) FY 2014 and Beyond Texas Education Agency (TEA) Division of Federal Fiscal Compliance and Reporting November 2013.
West Virginia’s Experience. West Virginia Issues  SEA Maintenance of Financial Support (MFS) – USED Waiver  LEA Maintenance of Effort (MOE) – OSEP Verification.
 Census Data  Non-Census Data  State per-pupil expenditures  Amount appropriated  Hold-harmless guarantee  School Improvement allocations.
Maintenance of Effort IV-B Funding LEA Level Special Education Services Kansas Department of Education Special Education Services.
IDEA Recovery Funds for Services to Children and Youths with Disabilities | May 20, 2009.
IDEA Proportionate Share and Equitable Services: Serving Parentally Placed Private School Students with Disabilities OSE/ISD Directors Leadership Meeting.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education
IDEA-B and NCLB LEA Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Maintenance of Effort for Special Education April 11, /11/14Office of Special Education1.
Do Now: Matching Game  Match the numbers from Column A to the clues in Column B to learn fun facts about Title IIA Massachusetts Department of Elementary.
NC Department of Public Instruction Division of Financial Business Services School Allotments Section.
Federal Fiscal Compliance 101 Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Excess Cost Presenter Patricia Holcomb-Gray Office of Special Education Programs NJ Department of Education June 3, 2015.
Marching Forward to Fiscal Accountability Exceptional Children Program Directors’ Leadership Institute Embassy Suites, Greensboro, NC March 13, 2013.
FY 14 Special Education Funding Issues Illinois ASBO Annual Conference May 16, 2013 Illinois State Board of Education Funding and Disbursement Services.
Special Education Funding Education Service Center, Region 20 Sherry Marsh 1.
1 South Dakota Department of Education – Grants Management Rob Huffman – Administrator Mark Gageby – Special Education Fiscal Kim Fischer – Fiscal Monitoring.
Demonstrating Comparability School Year October 2014October 2014.
Office of Special Education Fall Forum 2013 General Initiatives and the Role of Special Education.
Special Education Proportionate Set-Aside Requirements October 2014.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement Texas Education Agency (TEA)
IDEA EC Grant Application & Fiscal Accountability New Charter Leaders Institute June 16-17, 2015 Valencia W. Davis, Consultant IDEA, Part B Programs NCDPI.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Maintenance of Effort Danna Sanders Phone:
Data and Fiscal Management Monthly Webinar June 2, /27/20151.
1 Annual Request for Special Education Funds Application Training Fiscal Year 2010 May 28, 2009 New Hampshire Department of Education Bureau of Special.
DIVISION OF PROGRAM MANAGEMENT. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT UPDATES.
1 Understanding IDEA and MOE The basics of maintenance of effort.
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SPED Finance-Grants and Data LEA Academy SPED Finance 1.
Virginia Department for the Aging Area Plan Financial Section Training FY2006.
SPECIAL EDUCATION MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT (MOE). MOE REQUIREMENT Federal law requires that each local education agency (LEA) receiving federal funds pursuant.
Consolidated Funding ApplicationConsolidated Funding Application ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 6-9, 2014October 6-9, 2014.
Budgeting. Objectives Participants will learn: Resources for budgeting Distribution of state special ed funds Projecting state and federal funds Code.
Maintenance of Effort Office of Special Education Fall Forum 1.
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) for Special Education April 7, 2015 April 2015Office of Special Education1.
Federal Grant Training. I. Title I-A Fiscal Requirements  To ensure Title I-A funds are in addition to regular services normally provided, three fiscal.
Special Education Budgets GCASE – SELDA February 2015.
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section IDEA Part B Grant Fiscal Monitoring Presented by: Antonia Johnson, IDEA Part B Consultant.
1 Connecticut State Department of Education American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA): Bureau of Special Education Teleconference May 21, 2009.
April 2010 Copyright © 2010 Mississippi Department of Education 1 SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING.
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Maintenance of Effort Federal Cross-Cutting & Special Education MoE Daniel Lunghofer Supervisor, School District/ESD Accounting.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
Local Education Agency (LEA) Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Requirements under IDEA.
1 Division of Public Schools (PreK -12) Florida Department of Education Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 NCLB: 2009.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 IDEA Recovery Funds for Services to Children and Youths with Disabilities.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
Application Amendments and Budget Transfers Title I University Chris McLaughlin, Title I Specialist Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
Excess Cost Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education.
1 Connecticut State Department of Education American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA): Strategic Planning, Community Consensus Mark K. McQuillan Commissioner.
SPECIAL EDUCATION MONITORING – IDEA GRANT Jenifer Spear Office of Special Education Programs.
Title III Application Process Maria Garcia-Morales (717) Title III Program Manager Pennsylvania Department of Education.
SES Training on Screens 11, 12, and Part of 8. By Steve Crew September 12, 2007.
ESS G RANT M ANAGEMENT IDEA Charter School Expansion Act (CSEA), Basic Entitlement and supplemental grants New Charter Operator Training 2015.
Grant Applications Shanna Graham-Garrett
Migrant Student Information Exchange (MSIX) State Data Quality Grants Presented by the Office of Migrant Education, US Department of Education April 20.
Fundamentals of Special Education Finance OkASBO Conference FY 2013.
Special Education Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Michael Brooks Division of School Finance Special Education.
IDEA Grants Application: Maintenance of Effort. 2 What is Maintenance of Effort? IDEA regulation (34 CFR § ) which directs districts, for each grant.
Special Education Proportionate Set-Aside Requirements
VASBO Winter Conference February 17, 2017 Tracie L. Coleman
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Introduction to LEA MOE Tool
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
LEA Maintenance of Effort and Excess Cost Calculation
IDEA Maintenance of Effort
ESEA Programs | December 2018
VASBO Spring Conference May 19, 2016 Tracie L. Coleman
SPECIAL EDUCATION FINANCE UPDATES
SPECIAL EDUCATION FINANCE UPDATES
Presentation transcript:

Consolidated Fiscal (OCFO) Requirements: Special Education and Federal Programs Components Spring Fiscal WorkshopsSpring Fiscal Workshops

Office of the Chief Financial Officer Consolidated Planning and Monitoring Rationale  Better support districts in meeting ambitious goals for overall growth and gap closure  Streamline work in all aspects of monitoring and compliance  Increases focus on academic support for districts  Analyzing and utilizing all of available financial resources  Districts will continue to be supported throughout the transition in planning, monitoring and finance.  AJT and CORE staff will be available in the processes of closing out district finances and developing spending plans for

Office of the Chief Financial Officer  Bringing together 6 divisions under coordinated leadership Local finance TDOE accounting / fiscal State IDEA ESEA Perkins Other – PK, miscellaneous grants 11/28/2015 3

Maintenance of Effort and Excess Cost What is maintenance of effort (MOE)?  A federal requirement that is designed to look at the local support for the education of children with disabilities over a specified period of time.  Requires that LEAs spend at least as much of local or state and local funds on the education of children with disabilities as they did in the prior year (either in total or per capita). 4

Maintenance of Effort  Includes exceptions to the requirements as follows: Voluntary department of staff Decrease in enrollment Termination of services to high cost student Termination of costly expenditures for long-term purchases Assumption of cost by the high cost fund operated by the SEA  Includes adjustments to local fiscal efforts in certain years: During year in which allocation received by an LEA exceeds that from the previous fiscal year, reductions in MOE may be taken in an amount not more than 50 percent of the excess in allocation 5

Maintenance of Effort What funds are included in the calculation?  Any expenditures from State/local funds for the special education programs and or services to eligible special education students  No federal funds may be included  Do not include services to gifted students May funds be excluded once MOE has been met?  No, the calculation must include all special education expenditures regardless of the total amount spent 6

Excess Cost What is excess cost?  The costs of special education that are above and beyond the costs of the regular education of students with disabilities  Generally requires that the LEA spend in aggregate at least as much on the non-special education of children with disabilities that they spend on non-disabled children at that educational level, before spending IDEA federal funds on the excess cost of eligible students with disabilities. 7

Excess Cost  Delves into the total cost to educate any child in elementary and secondary schools within the district  Looks at all costs: administrative, operational, and instructional of the general education program within the district  Determines that the LEA is spending at least the minimum of these costs on special education students prior to using Federal IDEA funds for the excess costs of providing FAPE 8

Excess Cost LEAs can meet these costs requirements by taking into account the following expenditures:  Elementary/Secondary funds from the State Special Education Expenditure Report  Instructional costs for the time sped students spend in the regular classroom  A prorated amount of administrative and operational costs (based on the number of special education students within the LEA) 9

High Cost What is High Cost?  Expenditures from local/state funds for the high cost of providing services to children with disabilities not including those that are Functionally Delayed and Intellectually Gifted.  Any reimbursement received must be budgeted and expended as Special Education General Purpose Funds in the and series for audit purposes 10

High Cost What is needed for High Cost Reimbursement?  Certification signed by the Director of Schools  Completion of the appropriate form(s)  Provide supporting documentation for the amount(s) requested on each form(s) 11

High Cost  Priority 1 are for special needs children placed in State Department of Education  Priority 2 are for special needs children placed in a state agency for the first year of service in a school system.  Priority 3 are for special needs children placed and served by the Local Education Agency whose costs are three times or more than the State Average per pupil expenditure of $9,123 for FY 2012 ($27,369)  Priority 4 are for special needs children who are the responsibility of the school system when the additional cost is 250% greater than the total funds to be deducted on a specific student. 12

High Cost What is new this year?  Providing documentation for the General Purpose Special Education expenditures such as invoices for contracted services, calculation and reasoning for transportation expenses, purchase orders for specialized equipment, etc. 13

Parentally Placed Proportionate Share What is it?  The minimum dollar amount that your LEA should be expending for the 2014 fiscal year.  This set aside will be determined by the state and provided to Local Education Agencies to budget appropriately in the consolidated application. 14

Parentally Placed Proportionate Share What is new this year?  ePlan has a section in the application to complete requesting information regarding parentally placed private school services  In ePlan, Local Education Agencies who have Parentally Placed Proportionate Share amounts will state how they are budgeting services and if they have any carryover from the last fiscal year to expenditure in the current year. 15

Federal Programs Fiscal Update 16

Fiscal Items of Interest  Preliminary Estimates  Preliminary Allocations due from USEd around April 25 th  Status Page  Check Fiscal Items-Use Late Reporting Form, if needed  FACTS compliance-Use Grant Status/Grant Transaction Reports  5% of allocation differential allowed between payments and expenditures by March 31 (or with note)  5 systems on hold for 12/31 report  eReporting quarterly AFR  LEAs submitted by April 15 th  Comparisons between line item expenditures and approved final budgets 17

 Release of Funds  Form on website and in ePlan Document Library  FY 13 Budget Amendments  Latest submission date-April 30 th, 2013  Transfer flexibility  Comparability forms  Maintenance of Effort  Compares local spending from last year to the previous year-must be at least 90%-results 18 Fiscal Items of Interest (continued)

FY12 Funds Remaining  8 systems with I-A funds  1 system with I-D funds  42 systems with II-A funds  13 systems with III funds  19 systems with VI-A funds 19

Poverty Percentages and Impact Federally defined Poverty Determines Initial Allocations to States Poverty ONLY % 68 sys: -.06 to-8.46% (31 went down less than 1%) 68 sys: +.01 to 8.42% (17 sys went up less than 1%) Children in poverty: FY to FY13-260,224=increase of 6,983 20

Hold Harmless Impact Hold Harmless brackets 85%=less than 15% poverty 6 systems 90%=15% to 29.9% poverty 84 systems 95%=30% or more poverty 45 systems Hold Harmless % brackets Level: 115 Up: 12 All went from 90% to 95% Down: 9 8 from 95% to 90%; 1 from 90% to 85% 21

Poverty and Population  School age children: Poverty % is 23.94% this year from 23.29% last year  TN Percent of National Poverty TN % dropped from 2.33% to 2.29%  TN 5-17 population FY12: 1,087,338 (FY10 Census) FY13: 1,087,119 (FY11 Census update) Drop of 119 students 22

What Do I Do Next?  Closely monitor FY12 funds-help your program folks close them out if possible  Monitor FY13 funds Amend quickly if program needs require Assure all line items needed this summer are on FY14 ePlan budget Help program personnel to budget these and FY14 funds on correct line items in ePlan Release any funds LEA cannot/will not spend prior to September 30 if above allowed CAP Submit FACTS and eReporting quarterly reports for April and July deadlines! 23

What Do I Do Next?  FY14 Funds ePlan collaboration for correct budgeting “new” funds Assist, if requested, with submission of budget on ePlan CFO approval of budget on ePlan when allowable-be aware of timelines and deadlines Efficient reimbursement requests when funds have been spent Maintain a positive outlook! 24

Consolidated Fiscal Team (OCFO) Presenters  Kathi Rowe-IDEA, Part B  Brett Printz-IDEA, Preschool  Brenda Staggs-ESEA Grants  George Amin-ESEA Grants  Rosa Jennings-ESEA Grants