Using the Fieldwork Performance Evaluation for Occupational Therapy Students: By Elizabeth DeIuliis, OTD, OTR/L Academic Fieldwork Coordinator Duquesne.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education (ACOTE®) Programs (Primary Sites) AccreditedCandidateApplicantTotal OT Doctoral OT Masters.
Advertisements

CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
The Challenge and Importance of Evaluating Residents and Fellows Debra Weinstein, M.D. PHS GME Coordinators Retreat March 25, 2011.
Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment An Overview of Purpose, Structures and Systems Approved by Curriculum Committee Approved by Academic.
Assessment of the Cooperative Education Program in Relationship to the Program Outcomes of the Undergraduate Nursing and UHM Cooperative Education Programs.
Mesa County Valley School District #51 STANDARDS - BASED GRADING AND REPORTING
New Employee Orientation: Performance Management
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
The teacher of each classroom is responsible for evaluating the individual student's progress toward the AKS as described in the guidelines below. Kindergarten.
STAAR/EOC Overview of Assessment Program HISD Professional Support & Development High School Science Team.
Leadership Skills & Professional Behavior for Career Success TOTA Annual Conference November 8, 2014 Sophie Rydin, OTR, PhD.
Curriculum, Courses, Syllabi By Sue Field DNP, RN, CNE.
Clinical Evaluation Tools Copyright 2008 by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC.
Applying Assessment to Learning
PROFESSIONAL AND PROGRAMMATIC DEVELOPMENT Collaborative Assessment of Student Products.
The Assistant Principal Pool Process 2014
COURSE PREVIEW Course Name Course Director: Course Coordinator:
Graduate Program Assessment Report. University of Central Florida Mission Communication M.A. Program is dedicated to serving its students, faculty, the.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
WRITING SITE-SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES FOR THE FWPE FORMS Roberta Wimmer, OTR/L Pacific University Forest Grove, OR 2004 AOTA Conference Minneapolis, Minnesota.
2014 Fieldwork Educator Appreciation Workshop
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
QEP Update CFCC Planning Retreat June 19, QEP Update Mid-Term Report Global Outcomes 1.Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills.
An Introduction to Understanding the OT and OTA Fieldwork Performance Evaluations (FWPEs) Karen Atler, MS, OTR Colorado State University, Fort Collins,
KARORI NORMAL SCHOOL We encourage our children to be the best they can be “Tino pai ake” Parent Information Meeting Tuesday 26 November 2014 Reporting.
1. 2 What tests will students have to take? High School COURSES with EOCs MathEnglishScienceSoc. Studies Algebra I Geometry Algebra II Eng. I-R&W Eng.
Interim Evaluation Documents evidence of meeting standards
Assessing Student Performance in Practice Colin Bright – Solent University June Tilling – Soton University.
Develop site-specific learning objectives. Why Site-Specific Objectives? The FWPE can be used across all practice settings…………… ……………however, site specific.
COLLABORATIVE LEARNING. Collaborative Learning Why introduce (or re-introduce) this model?? – May be an effective way to supervise (some students may.
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION. Copyright Keith Morrison, 2004 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT... Concerns direct reality rather than disconnected.
Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program Teacher
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
Assessing Program Quality with the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
Developing an Assessment System B. Joyce, PhD 2006.
UBC Dietetics Major FEED Teleconference session: Modules/Forms update & Preceptor Orientation Wednesday, September 2, 2015 from h Call into the.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Occupational Therapy Practice Development Meeting (PDM): Occupational Formulation 29 th November 2013.
Title of presentation umanitoba.ca Final Evaluation.
Secondary WOLT Grading Committee Recommendations to Support District Benchmarking Initiative.
© 2007 Thomson - Wadsworth Role of the Dietitian in the Health Care System Chapter 2.
INNOVATIVE GRADING POLICY Leigh Ann Earnhart CAI 5322: Assessment and Evaluation February 15, 2012.
Gronlund, Chapter 10 Burke, Chapter 4
Chapter 2 RAP.
Assessing Learners The Teaching Center Department of Pediatrics UNC School of Medicine The Teaching Center.
Clinical Evaluation: Concepts and Processes Copyright 2008 by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
Assessment. Summative assessment Summative assessment is the process of evaluating (and grading) the learning of students at a point in time. The University.
Performance Evaluation for Occupational Therapists and Physical Therapists North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Exceptional Children Division.
APPROVED CLINICAL INSTRUCTOR WORKSHOP Evaluation.
Competency 007 ASSESSMENT. Demonstrate knowledge of assessment principles and procedures, including the appropriate use of tests and test results. The.
Standards-Based Teacher Education Continuous Assessment of Teacher Education Candidates.
UBC Dietetics Major Modules and Forms Update
PRECEPTOR ORIENTATION
An Introduction to Understanding the OT and OTA Fieldwork Performance Evaluations (FWPEs) SLIDE EXPLANATION This PowerPoint presentation is a brief overview.
Standards-Based Grading
Standards-Based Grading
Best Practices for Precepting Click the arrow below to advance
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Para Date of Presentation: Jan. 20, 2017
Develop site-specific learning objectives
AOTA Fieldwork Performance Evaluation (FWPE) Scoring Guidance
PRECEPTOR ORIENTATION
AOTA Fieldwork Performance Evaluation (FWPE) Scoring Guidance
Presentation transcript:

Using the Fieldwork Performance Evaluation for Occupational Therapy Students: By Elizabeth DeIuliis, OTD, OTR/L Academic Fieldwork Coordinator Duquesne University

ACOTE: Minimum Standards and Outcomes Be a generalist Achieve entry-level competence Articulate, apply, and justify occupation interventions Supervise and collaborate with the OTA Keep current with best practice Uphold the ethics, values, and attitudes of the profession Be an effective consumer of research and knowledge 2

Provides student with accurate assessment of his or her competence for entry-level practice over time ( the midterm and final scores reflect this change) Provides feedback to student Provides opportunity for student to perform a self-assessment 3 Purpose of the Fieldwork Performance Evaluation

Format / Layout of FWPE Summary Sheet Overview/instructions Organization of items Space for comments—midterm and final Performance Rating Summary Sheet 4

Content of OT Evaluation Fundamentals of practice (3) Basic tenets (4) Evaluation/screening (10) Intervention (9) Management of OT services (5) Communication (4) Professional behavior (7) 5 42 questions

Content of OT Evaluation Section 1: Fundamentals of practice Ethics (1 – 4 points) Safety (1 – 4 points) Judgment (1 – 4 points) Note: The student must pass this section, which is section #1, to successfully complete FW. Must receive at least 9 points in this section 6

Rating Scale of FWPE 7 4 = Exceeds Standards 3 = Meets Standards 2 = Needs Improvement 1 = Unsatisfactory Performance is highly skilled and self-initiated. This rating is rarely given and would represent the top 5% of all the students you have supervised. Performance is consistent with entry-level practice. This rating is infrequently given at midterm and is a strong rating at final. Performance is progressing but still needs improvement for entry-level practice. This is a realistic rating of performance at midterm and some ratings of 2 may be reasonable at the final. Performance is below standards and requires development for entry-level practice. This rating is given when there is concern about performance.

Scoring System of FWPE Each item must be scored Ethics, safety, & judgment items must be passed Each item rating is recorded on Performance Rating Summary Sheet All items are totaled at midterm/final Total score is compared to midterm or final rating scales 8

Midterm and Final Scores of the FWPE Overall Midterm Score Satisfactory: 90 & above Unsatisfactory: 89 & below Overall Final Score Pass: 122 & above Fail: 121 & below 9

Final Score Scenario Minimum Passing Score = 122 points Section I: must receive between 9 & 12 points 3 questions, Likert Scale 1 – 4 Sections II – VII: must receive between 113 and 156 points 39 questions, Likert Scale 1 – 4 Examples: Minimum passing score, = 122 points Section I: 9 points Sections II – VII: 1/3 “4” 52 points 1/3 “3” 39 points 1/3 “2” + 26 points 126 points 10