NOVEL PARADIGMS FOR DRUG DISCOVERY SHOTGUN COMPUTATIONAL MULTITARGET SCREENING RAM SAMUDRALA ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON NIH DIRECTOR’S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the Keys to Successful Commercialization Gerald J. Siuta, Ph.D. President Siuta Consulting, Inc. Tucson, Arizona October 18, 2001.
Advertisements

1 Increasing Biotech Involvement in Global Health Innovation Oxford Conference on Innovation and Technology Transfer for Global Health September 11, 2007.
The Drug Discovery Process
Vaxil BioTherapeutics Ltd.
VISION META CORPORATION TheRx (holding company) Self funded License patents from UW 1.Docking with dynamics, multitargeting, new use, herpes, malaria,
Biomedical research methods. What are biomedical research methods? An integrated approach using chemical, mathematical and computer simulations, in vitro.
Discovery of new medicines through new models of collaboration Simon Ward Professor of Medicinal Chemistry & Director of Translational Drug Discovery Group.
Bioinformatics Ayesha M. Khan Spring Phylogenetic software PHYLIP l 2.
Important Points in Drug Design based on Bioinformatics Tools History of Drug/Vaccine development –Plants or Natural Product Plant and Natural products.
NOVEL PARADIGMS FOR DRUG DISCOVERY SHOTGUN COMPUTATIONAL MULTITARGET SCREENING RAM SAMUDRALA ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON PIONEER AWARD.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.
Figure 4.1 NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Finance Corporate strategy and portfolio decisions Regulatory affairs Marketing and sales + market research.
Knowledgebase Creation & Systems Biology: A new prospect in discovery informatics S.Shriram, Siri Technologies (Cytogenomics), Bangalore S.Shriram, Siri.
Asia’s Largest Global Software & Services Company Genomes to Drugs: A Bioinformatics Perspective Sharmila Mande Bioinformatics Division Advanced Technology.
A new antivirulence approach against pathogenic bacteria A new antivirulence approach against pathogenic bacteria May 2005 Sonia Escaich - President &
Modelling, comparison, and analysis of proteomes Ram Samudrala University of Washington.
Chapter 13. The Impact of Genomics on Antimicrobial Drug Discovery and Toxicology CBBL - Young-sik Sohn-
1 Discovering new drugs in Africa Defeating Malaria Together Kelly Chibale PhD FRSSAf University of Cape Town.
Project Leader Authority in Pharmaceutical Discovery & Development is Inversely Proportional to Aggregate Project Risk James Samanen President James Samanen.
CS 790 – Bioinformatics Introduction and overview.
Modelling proteomes An integrated computational framework for systems biology research Ram Samudrala University of Washington How does the genome of an.
COMPUTATIONAL VACCINE DESIGN RAM SAMUDRALA ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON How can we design vaccines based on conformational epitopes and.
Developing medicines for the future and why it is challenging Angela Milne.
Samudrala group - overall research areas CASP6 prediction for T Å C α RMSD for all 70 residues CASP6 prediction for T Å C α RMSD for all.
An Integrated Computational Framework for Systems Biology Ram Samudrala University of Washington How does the genome of an organism specify its behaviour.
Strategies for developing India as a contract research hub Swaminathan Subramaniam Chief Operating Officer Aurigene Discovery Technologies.
INTERACTOMICS RAM SAMUDRALA ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON NIH DIRECTOR’S PIONEER AWARD 2010 How does the genome of an organism specify its.
Biological Signal Detection for Protein Function Prediction Investigators: Yang Dai Prime Grant Support: NSF Problem Statement and Motivation Technical.
BioPaths-Catalyze Drug Discovery, Development and Clinical Research
Computational engineering of bionanostructures Ram Samudrala University of Washington How can we analyse, design, & engineer peptides capable of specific.
THERAPUETIC DISCOVERY BY MODELLING INTERACTOMES RAM SAMUDRALA ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON How does the genome of an organism specify its.
COMPUTATIONAL ENGINEERING OF BIONANOSTRUCTURES
MODELLING INTERACTOMES RAM SAMUDRALA ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON How does the genome of an organism specify its behaviour and characteristics?
Modelling proteomes Ram Samudrala Department of Microbiology How does the genome of an organism specify its behaviour and characteristics?
COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY IN DRUG DISCOVERY RAM SAMUDRALA ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON How can we computationally screen compounds against.
NOVEL PARADIGMS FOR DRUG DISCOVERY
MODELLING PROTEOMES RAM SAMUDRALA ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON How does the genome of an organism specify its behaviour and characteristics?
Modelling proteomes Ram Samudrala University of Washington How does the genome of an organism specify its behaviour and characteristics?
MODELLING INTERACTOMES RAM SAMUDRALA ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON How does the genome of an organism specify its behaviour and characteristics?
Modelling proteins and proteomes using Linux clusters Ram Samudrala University of Washington.
SHOTGUN STRUCTURAL PROTEOMICS RAM SAMUDRALA ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Given a heterogeneous mixture of proteins, how can we determine.
Consumer Advocate Perspective Clinical Trials Registration Sharon F. Terry, JAM Sharon F. Terry, JAM President and CEO, Genetic Alliance, Inc. Founding.
Discovery of Therapeutics to Improve Quality of Life Ram Samudrala University of Washington.
Modelling proteomes Ram Samudrala University of Washington.
Modelling proteomes: Application to understanding HIV disease progression Ram Samudrala Department of Microbiology University of Washington How does the.
COMPUTATIONAL ENGINEERING OF BIONANOSTRUCTURES RAM SAMUDRALA ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON How can we design peptides and proteins capable.
Modelling proteomes Ram Samudrala University of Washington How does the genome of an organism specify its behaviour and characteristics?
MODELLING PROTEOMES RAM SAMUDRALA ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON How does the genome of an organism specify its behaviour and characteristics?
Today’s Drug Discovery Process “How Do We Discover Drugs” Dr. Vincent P. Gullo Drew University.
Shows tendency for mergers. These big companies may be shrinking – much research is now outsourced to low cost countries like Latvia, India, China and.
UPDATE ON SCA RESEARCH George Wilmot, MD, PhD. DISCLAIMER  The information provided by speakers in any presentation made as part of the 2016 NAF Annual.
Molecular Modeling in Drug Discovery: an Overview
An Integrative Personalized Approach to Diagnostics and Drug Discovery.
Page 1 Molecular Modeling Service in Profacgen. Page 2 The three-dimensional structure of a protein provides essential information about its biological.
Today’s Drug Discovery Process “How Do We Discover Drugs”
Drug Discovery &Development
FP6 Priority 1, Life Sciences Genomics and Biotechnology for Health
How does the genome of an organism
University of Washington
MODELLING INTERACTOMES
Modelling the rice proteome
MODELLING INTERACTOMES
University of Washington
APPLICATIONS OF BIOINFORMATICS IN DRUG DISCOVERY
How does the genome of an organism
Benjamin Wooden, Nicolas Goossens, Yujin Hoshida, Scott L. Friedman 
University of Washington
Drug Design and Drug Discovery
FP6 Priority 1, Life Sciences Genomics and Biotechnology for Health
NOVEL PARADIGMS FOR DRUG DISCOVERY
Presentation transcript:

NOVEL PARADIGMS FOR DRUG DISCOVERY SHOTGUN COMPUTATIONAL MULTITARGET SCREENING RAM SAMUDRALA ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON NIH DIRECTOR’S PIONEER AWARD 2010 How does the genome of an organism specify its behaviour and characteristics? How can we use this information to improve human health and quality of life?

GENOME SEQUENCE TO PROTEIN AND PROTEOME… STRUCTUREFUNCTION SYSTEMS INFRASTRUCTURE APPLICATIONS EVOLUTION THERAPEUTICS NANOTECHNOLOGY RICE DESIGN INTERACTION COMPOUND DNA/RNAPROTEIN

SHOTGUN MULTITARGET DOCKING WITH DYNAMICS ALL KNOWN DRUGS (~5,000 FROM FDA) ALL TARGETS WITH KNOWN STRUCTURE (~5,000-10,000) + FRAGMENT BASED DOCKING WITH DYNAMICS (~50,000,000) PRIORITISED HITS MACHINE LEARNING M Lagunoff (UW), W Van Woorhis (UW), S Michael (FCGU), J Mittler/J Mullins (UW), G Wong/A Mason/L Tyrell (U Alberta), W Chantratita/P Palittapongarnpim (Thailand) herpes, malaria, dengue hepatitis C, dental caries HIV, HBRV, XMRV, rabies, encephalitis, cholera, Tuberculosis, various cancers CLINICAL STUDIES/APPLICATION INITIAL CLINICAL TRIALS IN VITRO STUDIES IN VIVO STUDIES DISSOCIATION CONSTANTS (KD) (~ )

MD simulation time Correlation coefficient ps with MD without MD HIV protease PROTEIN INHIBITOR DOCKING WITH DYNAMICS Jenwitheesuk

Bernard & Samudrala. Proteins (2009). KNOWLEDGE BASED FUNCTION Bernard

FRAGMENT BASED DOCKING Bernard

FRAGMENT BASED DOCKING RECONSTRUCTION Bernard

INHIBITION OF ALL REPRESENTATIVE HERPES PROTEASES Jenwitheesuk/Myszka Observed: Function is inactivated. protease ligand KD < μM protease dimer KD < μM Predicted:

INHIBITION OF ALL HERPESVIRUSES HSV KSHV CMV Computationally predicted broad spectrum human herpesvirus protease inhibitors is effective in vitro against members from all three classes and is comparable or better than antiherpes drugs Lagunoff Viral load Fold inhibition HSV Our protease inhibitor acts synergistically with acyclovir (a nucleoside analogue that inhibits replication) and it is less likely to lead to resistant strains compared to acyclovir Viral load Experiment 1 Experiment 2 Experiment 3

None Predicted inhibitory constant Jenwitheesuk/ Van Voorhis/Rivas/Chong/Weismann MALARIA INHIBITOR DISCOVERY Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 2010.

Multitarget computational protocol 2,344 compounds simulation 16 top predictions experiment 6 ED50 ≤ 1 μM COMPARISON OF APPROACHES MALARIA INHIBITOR DISCOVERY High throughput protocol 1 2,687 compounds high throughput screen 19 ED50 ≤ 1 μM High throughput protocol 2 2,160 compounds high throughput screen 36 ED50 ≤ 1 μM Computational protocol 1 241,000 compounds simulation 84 top predictions experiment 4 ED50 ≤ 10 μM Computational protocol 1 355,000 compounds simulation 100 top predictions experiment 1 ED50 ≤ 10 μM In comparison to other approaches, including experimental high throughput screens, our multitarget docking with dynamics protocol combining theory and experiment is more efficient and accurate $ ++ $$$$$ +++ $$$ Jenwitheesuk/Van Voorhis/Rivas Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 2010.

DENGUE INHIBITOR DISCOVERY Jenwitheesuk/Michael Prediction #1 Prediction #2 PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2010.

MACHINE LEARNING FRAGMENT BASED DOCKING WITH DYNAMICS (~50,000,000) PRIORITISED HITS SHOTGUN MULTITARGET DOCKING WITH DYNAMICS ALL KNOWN DRUGS (~5,000 FROM FDA) ALL TARGETS WITH KNOWN STRUCTURE (~5,000-10,000) + CLINICAL STUDIES/APPLICATION DISCOVER NOVEL OFFLABEL USES OF MAJOR THERAPEUTIC VALUE M Lagunoff (UW), W Van Woorhis (UW), S Michael (FCGU), J Mittler/J Mullins (UW), G Wong/A Mason/L Tyrell (U Alberta), W Chantratita/P Palittapongarnpim (Thailand) herpes, malaria, dengue hepatitis C, dental caries HIV, HBRV, XMRV, rabies, encephalitis, cholera, Tuberculosis, various cancers DISSOCIATION CONSTANTS (KD) (~ ) Docking with dynamics Fragment based Multitargeting Use of existing drugs Drug/target maching learning matrix PK/ADME/bioavailability/toxicity/etc. Biophysics + knowledge iteration Fast track to clinic (paradigm shift) Cocktails/NCEs/optimisation Translative: atomic → clinic

HERPESVIRUS PROTEASE DRUG OPPORTUNITY All these three viruses cause life-threatening diseases in immunocompromised patients. HSV drugs alone represent a > $2 billion dollar yearly market and growing at a 10% rate. Nearly 90 million people worldwide are infected with the genital herpes virus, and about 25 million of them suffer frequent outbreaks of painful blisters and sores. CMV is a major cause of mortality in transplant patients, and drugs against it represent a $300 million dollar yearly market. Acylovir and related drugs are all nucleoside analogues/inhibitors whose patents will soon expire. Our protease inhibitor is a novel type of anti-herpes agent that may be used in combination therapy. The inhibitor has been evaluated in mouse models of cancer and found to very nontoxic. Inhibitor can be modified. Topical applications are therefore possible with a high likelihood of success.

PLATFORM OPPORTUNITY Partner with Biotech, Pharma to work on their libraries of compounds, targets, diseases (be a hired gun, share revenue). Apply platform a set of first world diseases with potential for large revenue, patent findings, and license the findings out. Platform may be applied as a separate company or as a SRA with UW (similar to Pioneer Award budget). Keep drug/target interaction matrix a trade secret. License new uses OR license modifications of those drugs OR both. Update above list as new drugs and new targets are identified, so a constant set of hits and leads will be available for patenting and licensing. ???

CONCLUSION High risk endeavour is successful if one or more diseases currently without an effective treatment can be treated completely. Particular diseases of interest are neglected tropical ones isolated to single populations without an effective treatment. Will be applied to several diseases of commercial interest also.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Adrian Laurenzi Brian Buttrick Chuck Mader Dominic Fisher Emilia Gan Ersin Emre Oren Gaurav Chopra George White Hernan Zamalloa Jason North Jeremy Horst Ling-Hong Hung Matthew Clark Manish Michael Shannon Michael Zhou Omid Zarei Raymond Zhang Stewart Moughon Thomas Wood Weerayuth Kittichotirat Current group members: Aaron Chang Aaron Goldman Brady Bernard Cyrus Hui David Nickle Duangdao Wichadukul Duncan Milburn Ekachai Jenwitheesuk Gong Cheng Imran Rashid Jason McDermott Juni Lee Kai Wang Marissa LaMadrid Michael Inouye Michal Guerquin Nipa Jongkon Past group members: Rob Braiser Renee Ireton Shu Feng Sarunya Suebtragoon Shing-Chung Ngan Shyamala Iyer Siriphan Manocheewa Somsak Phattarasukol Tianyun Liu Vanessa Steinhilb Vania Wang Yi-Ling Cheng Zach Frazier

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding agencies: National Institutes of Health National Science Foundation -DBI -IIS Searle Scholars Program Puget Sound Partners in Global Health Washington Research Foundation UW -Advanced Technology Initiative -TGIF BGI/U Alberta -Gane Wong -Jun Yu -Jun Wang -Andrew Mason -Lorne Tyrell BIOTEC/KMUTT Mahidol University - Prasit Palittapongarrnpim - Wasun Chantratita MSE -Mehmet Sarikaya -Candan Tamerler -et al. UW Microbiology -James Staley -John Mittler -Michael Lagunoff -Roger Bumgarner -Wesley Van Voorhis -et al. Collaborators: Budget: ~US$1 million/year total costs

Multitarget protocol: 2,344 → 16 → 6 ≤ 1 µM ED50 HTS protocol: 2,687 → 19 ≤ 1 µM ED50 HTS protocol: 2,160 → 36 ≤ 1 µM ED50 Docking protocol: 355,000 → 100 → 1 ≤ 10 µM ED50 Docking protocol: 241,000 → 84 → 4 ≤ 10 µM ED50 14 targets MALARIA Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, DENGUE PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, /4 ≤ µM ED50 against dengue virus Prediction #1 Prediction #2 Viral E protein PROSPECTIVE PRELIMINARY VERIFICATION Observed: Function is inactivated. KD protease ligand ≤ μM KD protease dimer ≤ μM Experiment 1 Experiment 2 HERPES (HSV, CMV, KSHV) Predicted protease (dimer) + inhibitor: Herpes viral load

BUSINESS ACTIVITIES Have WA corporation: 3D Therapeutics, Inc. Nominal CEO: Jason North. Board currently includes Perry Fell (cofounder of Seattle Genetics) and Sonya Erickson (Cooley). Scientists include Michael Lagunoff, Wesley van Voorhis, Roger Bumgarner, and Ram Samudrala. License for first generation platform and hits/leads somewhat negotiated with the UW. Patents: Michael SF, Isern S, Garry R, Costin J, Jenwithesuk E, Samudrala R. Optimized dengue virus entry inhibitory peptide (DN81). Priority/filing date: July 13, Jenwitheesuk E, Lagunoff M, Van Voorhis W, Samudrala R. Compositions and methods for predicting inhibitors of protein targets. Priority/filing date: July 6, 2007.

ADVANTAGES OF OUR APPROACHES Costs are reduced: Computational discovery Use of preapproved drugs Lower number of failed drugs Probabily of success is higher: Multitarget inhibition Mechanism of action is known Use of preapproved drugs Side effects may be predicted

BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION My research on protein and proteome structure, function, and interaction is directed to understanding how genomes specify phenotype and behaviour; my goal is to use this information to improve human health and quality of life. Protein functions and interactions are mediated by atomic three dimensional structure. We are applying all our structure prediction technologies to the area of small molecule therapeutic discovery. The goal is to create a comprehensive in silico drug discovery pipeline to increase the odds of initial preclinical hits and leads leading to significantly better outcomes downstream in the clinic. The knowledge-based drug discovery pipeline will adopt a shotgun approach that screens all known FDA approved drug and drug-like compounds against all known target proteins of known structure, simultaneously examining how a small molecule therapeutic interacts with targets, antitargets, metabolic pathways, to obtain a holistic picture of drug efficacy and side effects. Find new uses for existing drugs that can be used in the clinic, with a focus on third world and neglected diseases with poor or nonexisting treatments.

MULTITARGET DOCKING WITH DYNAMICS NOVEL FRAGMENT BASED TRADITIONAL SINGLE MULTITARGET SCREENING TARGET SCREENING Disease & target identification Single disease related protein Compound library High throughput screen Experimental verification Success rate + Time. Cost $$$$$ Computational docking Initial candidates Experimental verification Success rate ++ Time. Cost $$$ COMPOUND SELECTION Compound database (~300,000) Computational docking with dynamics Multiple disease related proteins Initial candidates Experimental verification Success rate Time. Cost $ DRUG-LIKE (~5000 from FDA)

WHY WILL IT WORK Fragment based docking with dynamics: dynamics improves accuracy; fragmentation exploits redundancy in existing drugs; most accurate docking protocol out there. Use of existing drugs: exploits all the knowledge from Pharma. Multitargeting: multiple low K d can work synergistically; screening for targets and antitargets simultaneously. Knowledge based: potential from known structures, will have a big matrix relating drugs, targets, PK, ADME, solubility, bioavailability, toxicity, etc.; rich dataset for combining our biophysics based methods with machine learning tools in an iterative manner. Known drugs docking score, Kd, PK, ADME, absorption, bioavailability, toxicity Targets with known structure

BROADER IMPACT Multiple drugs can be combined to produce therapeutic effect and overcome disease resistance. Good for any condition where one or more viable targets exist. Harnesses the power of all the drug discovery done thusfar; new paradigm for fast track FDA approval Translational approach goes from providing atomic mechanistic detail to measuring clinical efficacy in one shot. Protocol can be used to design novel drugs also.

SUITABILITY FOR THE PIONEER AWARD Not good for Pharma because of reuse of existing drugs (most profit in novel compounds) Not good for Pharma because of focus on third world/neglected diseases. Not good for Pharma because of nonfocus on single target model they love. Marked departure from my protein structure prediction work, but now applied research from basic protein folding to producing therapeutics in a clinic. Funding will help focus work on drug discovery which until now has been done on a shoestring.