HEAPnet meeting, 19-20 February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 1 LIDAR Atmospheric corrections.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cloud Radar in Space: CloudSat While TRMM has been a successful precipitation radar, its dBZ minimum detectable signal does not allow views of light.
Advertisements

UPRM Lidar lab for atmospheric research 1- Cross validation of solar radiation using remote sensing equipment & GOES Lidar and Ceilometer validation.
Studying the Physical Properties of the Atmosphere using LIDAR technique Dinh Van Trung and Nguyen Thanh Binh, Nguyen Dai Hung, Dao Duy Thang, Bui Van.
Calibration Scenarios for PICASSO-CENA J. A. REAGAN, X. WANG, H. FANG University of Arizona, ECE Dept., Bldg. 104, Tucson, AZ MARY T. OSBORN SAIC,
Uncertainty in Cloud Aerosol Transport System (CATS) Products and Measurements Presented by Patrick Selmer Goddard advisor: Dr. Matthew McGill Assisted.
EUSO Onboard LIDAR M.Teshima Discussion by Valentin Mitev Neuschatel Observatory
Measured parameters: particle backscatter at 355 and 532 nm, particle extinction at 355 nm, lidar ratio at 355 nm, particle depolarization at 355 nm, atmospheric.
Work Package 2 – Overview of instrumentation, data gathering and calibration issues Lidar Calibration Ewan O’Connor, Anthony Illingworth and Robin Hogan.
Extracting Atmospheric and Surface Information from AVIRIS Spectra Vijay Natraj, Daniel Feldman, Xun Jiang, Jack Margolis and Yuk Yung California Institute.
NDACC Working Group on Water Vapor NDACC Working Group on Water Vapor Bern, July 5 -7, 2006 Raman Lidar activities at Rome - Tor Vergata F.Congeduti, F.Cardillo,
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
A 21 F A 21 F Parameterization of Aerosol and Cirrus Cloud Effects on Reflected Sunlight Spectra Measured From Space: Application of the.
Atmospheric Measurements at Capel Dewi field station Prof. Geraint Vaughan.
6 July 2006First NDACC Water Vapor Working Group Workshop, Bern, Switzerland. 1 NDACC and Water Vapor Raman Lidars Thierry Leblanc JPL - Table Mountain.
Scanning Raman Lidar Error Characteristics and Calibration For IHOP David N. Whiteman/NASA-GSFC, Belay Demoz/UMBC Paolo Di Girolamo/Univ. of Basilicata,
Results obtained with the Tropospheric Ozone DIAL System Using a YAG Laser and Raman Cells (A53Q – 0439) J. T. Sullivan 1,2, T. J. McGee.
LIDAR Light Detection and Ranging Kate Whalen PHY 3903 Nov. 25, 2005.
Ben Kravitz November 5, 2009 LIDAR. What is LIDAR? Stands for LIght Detection And Ranging Micropulse LASERs Measurements of (usually) backscatter from.
Turbulence layers detection from ground-based Rayleigh lidar Alain Hauchecorne 1, and the MMEDTAC Team Charles Cot 1, Francis Dalaudier 1, Jacques Porteneuve.
David N. Whiteman/NASA-GSFC, Belay Demoz/UMBC
Lidar remote sensing for the characterization of the atmospheric aerosol on local and large spatial scale.
Lidar for Atmospheric Remote sensing
Project Overview Laser Spectroscopy Group A. A. Ruth Department of Physics, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Correct atmospheric optics modelling: Theory and Experiment Irina Melnikova Observatory of Environmental Safety Resource Center, Research Park St.Petersburg.
LIDAR: Introduction to selected topics
July 2001Zanjan, Iran1 Atmospheric Profilers Marc Sarazin (European Southern Observatory)
Geneva, September 2010 EARLINET-ASOS Symposium Second GALION Workshop Uncertainties evaluation for aerosol optical properties Aldo Amodeo CNR-IMAA.
Lidar Profiling of the Atmosphere
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R Goddard Lidar Observatory for Winds (GLOW) Wind Profiling from the Howard University Beltsville Research.
Observation of a Saharan dust outbreak on 1-2 August 2007: determination of microphysical particle parameters Paolo Di Girolamo 1, Donato Summa 1, Rohini.
EARLINET and Satellites: Partners for Aerosol Observations Matthias Wiegner Universität München Meteorologisches Institut (Satellites: spaceborne passive.
Atmospheric Monitoring in the TA experiment
12 April 2007 Lidar Measurements of Atmospheric State Parameters in the Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere Jonathan Friedman Arecibo Observatory Seminar.
Blue: Histogram of normalised deviation from “true” value; Red: Gaussian fit to histogram Presented at ESA Hyperspectral Workshop 2010, March 16-19, Frascati,
B. Gentry/GSFCSLWG 06/29/05 Scaling Ground-Based Molecular Direct Detection Doppler Lidar Measurements to Space Using Wind Profile Measurements from GLOW.
Summer Institute in Earth Sciences 2009 Comparison of GEOS-5 Model to MPLNET Aerosol Data Bryon J. Baumstarck Departments of Physics, Computer Science,
B.-M. Sinnhuber, Remote Sensing I, University of Bremen, Summer 2007 Remote Sensing I Active Remote Sensing Summer 2007 Björn-Martin Sinnhuber Room NW1.
Mike Newchurch 1, Shi Kuang 1, John Burris 2, Steve Johnson 3, Stephanie Long 1 1 University of Alabama in Huntsville, 2 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center,
Page 1 Validation by Balloons and Aircraft - ESRIN - 9– 13 December 2002 Observations of aerosol and clouds obtained during the M-55 Geophysica ENVISAT.
Micro-Pulse Lidar (MPL)
Scaling Surface and Aircraft Lidar Results for Space-Based Systems (and vice versa) Mike Hardesty, Barry Rye, Sara Tucker NOAA/ETL and CIRES Boulder, CO.
B. Gentry/GSFCGTWS 2/26/01 Doppler Wind Lidar Measurement Principles Bruce Gentry NASA / Goddard Space Flight Center based on a presentation made to the.
Measurement Example III Figure 6 presents the ozone and aerosol variations under a light-aerosol sky condition. The intensity and structure of aerosol.
Set-up of a ground-based Rayleigh lidar to detect clear air turbulence Alain Hauchecorne 1, Charles Cot 1, Francis Dalaudier 1, Jacques Porteneuve 1, Thierry.
Berechnung von Temperaturen aus Lidar-Daten Michael Gerding Leibniz-Institut für Atmosphärenphysik.
Numerical simulations of optical properties of nonspherical dust aerosols using the T-matrix method Hyung-Jin Choi School.
NASA ESTO ATIP Laser Sounder for Remotely Measuring Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations 12/12/01 NASA Goddard - Laser Remote Sensing Branch 1 James B. Abshire,
CLN QA/QC efforts CCNY – (Barry Gross) UMBC- (Ray Hoff) Hampton U. (Pat McCormick) UPRM- (Hamed Parsiani)
CLOUD PHYSICS LIDAR for GOES-R Matthew McGill / Goddard Space Flight Center April 8, 2015.
Monitoring of Eyjafjallajökull Ash Layer Evolution over Payerne- Switzerland with a Raman Lidar Todor Dinoev, Valentin Simeonov*, and Mark Parlange Swiss.
EUSO Atmospheric Monitoring from Space M.Teshima on behalf of the EUSO collaboration MPI für Physik, München (Werner-Heisenberg-Institut)
A new method for first-principles calibration
Atmospheric Measurements: The Next Generation Laser Remote Sensor Russell Philbrick and Hans Hallen Physics Department and MEAS Department, NC State University,
Ceilometer absolute calibration to calculate aerosol extensive properties Giovanni Martucci Alexander Marc de Huu Martin Tschannen.
UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA CNR-IMAA (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale) Tito Scalo (PZ) Analysis and interpretation.
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. (a) Vision of the Brillouin lidar operated from a helicopter. The center ray represents.
METR Advanced Atmospheric Radiation Dave Turner Lecture 11.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC.
Atmospheric Monitoring for the MAGIC Telescopes Markus Gaug 1,2, Michele Doro 1,2,3, Daniel Garrido 1,2, Christian Fruck 4 for the MAGIC Collaboration.
Early VALIDAR Case Study Results Rod Frehlich: RAL/NCAR Grady Koch: NASA Langley.
The importance of reliable depolarisation measurements
Aerosol extinction coefficient (Raman method)
LIDAR Ben Kravitz November 5, 2009.
G. Mevi1,2, G. Muscari1, P. P. Bertagnolio1, I. Fiorucci1
Regional Radiation Center (RRC) II (Asia)
Atmospheric Aerosol Characterization using
Huailin Chen, Bruce Gentry, Tulu Bacha, Belay Demoz, Demetrius Venable
Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC Height-resolved aerosol R.Siddans.
G. Mevi1,2, G. Muscari1, P. P. Bertagnolio1, I. Fiorucci1
Lidar Profiling of the Atmosphere
Presentation transcript:

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 1 LIDAR Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements Valentin Mitev Observatory of Neuchâtel Rue de l’Observatoire 58, CH2000 Neuchâtel Switzerland Tel.: +41–32–

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 2 LIDAR Content: Measurement requirements Concept for the Lidar set-up Extinction derivation, vibrational Raman Numerical performance simulations for Extinction derivation, Raman lidar Extinction derivation, elastic backscatter Temperature derivation, pure Rotational Raman Conclusion Annex: Compact backscatter lidar in field measurements

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 3 LIDAR ~7km Total transmission Range-resolved transmission (extinction coefficient) Zenith angle 0°-60° Measurement requirements Direction of probing Temperature profile

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 4 LIDAR Raman-elastic backscatter lidar – Concept: One laser with two/optional three separate receivers for increased dynamic range and decrease of the « blind » range Transmitted wavelength: 355nm, 532nm, 3rd/2nd harmonics of Nd:Yag laser Receiverd wavelengths: 355nm (elastic); 387nm (Raman N 2 ), 532nm elastic + polarisation/depolarisation; Rotational Raman at (533nm, 531nm)+ (529nm, 535nm) Lidar on pointing platform for collocation of the direction of probing with te line-of-sight of the Cerenkov camera; Optical&Laser part in environmental housing

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 5 LIDAR Raman backscatter lidar: Basics One laser line transmitted (UV/ vis) Received Raman vibrational: N2, O2, H2O/Rorational Determined: extinction, water vapours, temperature Development and use: since early 1980s / in atmospheirc probing for aerosol extinction and microphysics, humidity, temperature, …

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 6 LIDAR

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 7 LIDAR 1.Laser; 2a, 2b, 2c. Telescope long/med/short range 3a, 3b, 3c. Spectral selection 4a, 4b, 4c. Detectors 5. Pointing platform/environnmental housing 6. Synchronisation: Acqusition and Laser pulse& Main Experiment 7.Signal acquisition electronics Synch out 1 5 2a3a4a 2b3b4b 6 7 Data out 2c3c4c

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 8 LIDAR 532nm, 355nm 532nm 387nm 532nm-s 532nm -p 355nm RR1…RR4 532nm (e) 355nm (e) 356/8nm (2*RR-S) 352/4nm (2*RR-aS) aS1/ aS2/ 355nm/ S1/ S2 Laser Receiver Coupling optics 2-Dichroic beamsplitter 3-Interference filter 4-Depolarisation beamsplitter 5-Grating spectrometer 2

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 9 LIDAR Extinction derivation from vibrational Raman backscatter … two times the averaged value of the extinction coefficient in the spectral range 355nm – 387nm

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 10 LIDAR Inputs for the performance simulations: Lidar subsystems specifications Pulse energy at 355nm: 300mJ/PRR : 20Hz Telescope diameter of the « long-range » receiver: 80cm Efficiency transmitter/receiver (without filter): 07./07 Transmission, filter: 0.6 Detector, Quantum efficiency: 0.2 Lidar measurement parameters Integration time: 600sec Zenith angle (from zenith): 60° Range resolution: 120m at 60 Ambient optical background: full moon – 7*10 -4 Wm -2  m -1

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 11 LIDAR Atmosphere: Molecular model: hydrostatic Aerosol model: PBL/dust, km tropospheric layer, 3 - 5km cirrus cloud, ,4km PBL/Dust layer, 0-2km Tropopsphere/Desert Dust, 3-5km Cirrus cloud, 9 – 10.4km

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 12 LIDAR Vibrational -Raman signal – simulated, at slant path 60 deg

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 13 LIDAR Extinction from the vibrational Raman signal

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 14 LIDAR Error of the extinction coefficient obtained from the vibrational Raman signal

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 15 LIDAR Error of the extinction coefficient obtained from the vibrational Raman signal - ZOOM Range x10 4 zenith angle

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 16 LIDAR Total atmospheric transmission of the marked layers, derived from the simulated Raman signal « TRmod » = model value; « TRmeas » = derived value TRmodel = TRmeasured = PBL/Dust layer Tropopsphere/Desert Dust Cirrus cloud TRmodcloud = TRmeas cloud =

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 17 LIDAR Concept for derivation of the extinction coefficient inside aerosol layer using elastic backscatter Assumptions: - The layer contains the same type of aerosol (e.g.,subvisible cirrus cloud) - Aerisol-free atmosphere above the cloud - Total layer (cloud) transmision is determined from the Raman signal

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 18 LIDAR Extinction from Elastic backscatter signal - simultion reference Aerosol layer (Cirrus cloud)

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 19 LIDAR The elastic-backscatter lidar equation

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 20 LIDAR The Fernald's inversion method for derivation of the backscatter coefficient; is omitted Additional conditions: “ lr ” is constant (extinction to backscatter ratio, initial approximation taken from model values, here the depolarization ratio may help to classify the cloud particles), “ r f ” is a reference range “  (r f ) ” is known ( typically, the molecular backscatter)

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 21 LIDAR Assuming: “  (r) ” is derived from elastic lidar Total double trip transmission “DT” is derived from Raman lidar, Molecular backscatter is known/type of particles may be “guessed” Then we may determine “ lr ” from And the profile of the aerosol extinction in the cloud

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 22 LIDAR Derivation of the atmospheric temperature profile using pure rotational Raman backscatter Rotational Raman Spectra of N2 and O2, Excitation at 532nm

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 23 LIDAR Spectral intervals in pure RR where the scattering cross-sections derivative has opposite sign A calibration of the lidar is critical. « + » « - » Temperature derivative of the Rotational Raman lines of N2 (red) and O2 (black) « + » R(T)=exp(  –  /T) Typically dR/dT ~0.05%

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 24 LIDAR

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 25 LIDAR Uncertainty - ZOOM 60° zenith angle Integration time: 30min Range resolution: 120m

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 26 LIDAR Summary: A Raman-backscatter Lidar for CTA-site is a technically feasible solution for the requirements in CTA: Advantages: « Real time » and « Real direction » coinciding with the pointing direction the Cherenkov Telescope(s) The necessary lidar methods and algorithms are developed, adaptation to the tasks will be possible ; Realistic subsystem specifications, compatible with the commercially available hardware; Additional /Optional lidar tasks: laser backscatter for calibration of the Cherenkov telescope; Remark: This presentation is not with system optimisation. The final specifications may be different from the specifications used for numerical simulations

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 27 LIDAR Next step for the Raman lidar - a design study with the following objectives: Detailed numerical simulations of the various detection modes with respect to the finalised detection requirements Concept design and optimisation; Algorithm developments; Optional 1: Participation in atmospheric characterisation at the potential CTA sites; Optional 2: Raman lidar bread-board/ lower aperture and power

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 28 LIDAR ANNEX: Possibility for atmospheric characterisation at potential CTA sites with a compact elastic backscatter lidars

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 29 LIDAR Micro-pulse lidars on stratospheric aircraft (M55) MAL 1MAL 2 MAL-1MAL-2 32 cm

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 30 LIDAR Micro-pulse lidars on stratospheric aircraft (M55) SCOUT O3/ Brunei - Darwin, 12 November 2005 Backscatter Ratio= (  a +  m )/  m

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 31 LIDAR Ground-based LIDAR, transportable development, observations, data analysis The lidar on the balcony of the 5th floor of the University of Basel; Project BUBBLE ( ). The lidar was remotely operated from ON Example for 24h- measurement of the aerosol load above Basel in project BUBBLE 600mmx600mmx700mm

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 32 LIDAR Ground-based three-wavelength elastic Raman LIDAR, in Observatory of Neuchatel Operational, Presently under refurbishment Concerning the CTA-activity: Not transportable May be a base for the Raman lidar bread- board/test bench wrt the CTA requirements Possibility to be deployed on site (with limitations for steering, schedule …)

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 33 LIDAR Summary for the “compact lidar” capabilities: - Possibility for qualitative characterisation of the aerosol vertical/slant path profile: Backscatter coefficient profile (~30% uncertainty, systematic), altitude of layers, -Convenient transportation and implementation on the field - Limitations: The qualitative evaluation is not adequate to the requirements in CTI, i.e., NOT a replacement for the Raman lidar)

HEAPnet meeting, February 2007, Amsterdam Atmospheric corrections determined using Raman/backscatter lidar measurements 34 LIDAR Thank you! Valentin Mitev Observatory of Neuchâtel Rue de l’Observatoire 58, CH2000 Neuchâtel Switzerland