Andreas Bamberger, Uwe Renz, Andreas Zwerger

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEM Chambers at BNL The detector from CERN, can be configured with up to 4 GEMs The detector for pad readout and drift studies, 2 GEM maximum.
Advertisements

TIME 2005: TPC for the ILC 6 th Oct 2005 Matthias Enno Janssen, DESY 1 A Time Projection Chamber for the International Linear Collider R&D Studies Matthias.
Cosmic Ray Test of GEM- MPI/TPC in Magnetic Field Hiroshima University Kuroiwa CDC Group Mar
General Characteristics of Gas Detectors
GEM Detector Shoji Uno KEK. 2 Wire Chamber Detector for charged tracks Popular detector in the particle physics, like a Belle-CDC Simple structure using.
Using the EUDET pixel telescope for resolution studies on silicon strip sensors with fine pitch Thomas Bergauer for the SiLC R&D collaboration 21. May.
1 Pixel Readout of GEMs Motivation The Setup Results Next Steps A. Bamberger, K. Desch, J. Ludwig, M. Titov, U. Renz, N. Vlasov, P. Wienemann, A. Zwerger.
Measuring distortions in a TPC with photoelectrons D. Karlen University of Victoria & TRIUMF June 2, 2007.
Calibration, simulation and test-beam characterisation of Timepix hybrid-pixel readout assemblies with ultra-thin sensors International Workshop on Future.
October 28-th, 2005Straw tracker 1 Status of Straw Tracker for P236 P.L. Frabetti, V.Kekelidze, K.Kleinknecht, V.Peshekhonov, B.Peyaud, Yu.Potrebenikov,
Carleton University A. Bellerive, K. Boudjemline, R. Carnegie, A. Kochermin, J. Miyamoto, E. Neuheimer, E. Rollin & K. Sachs University of Montreal J.-P.
IHEP, Bejing 9th ACFA ILC Physics and Detector Workshop & ILC GDE Meeting The preliminary results of MPGD-based TPC performance at KEK beam.
SPHENIX GEM Tracker R&D at BNL Craig Woody BNL sPHENIX Design Study Meeting September 7, 2011.
1 The GEM Readout Alternative for XENON Uwe Oberlack Rice University PMT Readout conversion to UV light and proportional multiplication conversion to charge.
1 Silicon Pixel Readout for a TPC ALCPG Fermilab 23 October 2007 Jan Timmermans NIKHEF.
LRT2004 Sudbury, December 2004Igor G. Irastorza, CEA Saclay NOSTOS: a spherical TPC to detect low energy neutrinos Igor G. Irastorza CEA/Saclay NOSTOS.
A. Bamberger1 Experimental study of double GEM readout using MediPix2 chip A. Bamberger, M. Debatin, J. Ludwig, M. Titov, N. Vlasov.
TPC R&D status in Japan T. Isobe, H. Hamagaki, K. Ozawa, and M. Inuzuka Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo Contents 1.Development of a prototype.
EPS-HEP 2015, Vienna. 1 Test of MPGD modules with a large prototype Time Projection Chamber Deb Sankar Bhattacharya On behalf of.
An Integrated Single Electron Readout System for the TESLA TPC Ton Boerkamp Alessandro Fornaini Wim Gotink Harry van der Graaf Dimitri John Joop Rovekamp.
Performance of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
M. Bianco On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration
GEM basic test and R&D plan Takuya Yamamoto ( Saga Univ. )
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
IHEP, Beijing 9th ACFA ILC Physics and Detector Workshop & ILC GDE Meeting The preliminary results of MPGD-based TPC performance at KEK beam.
Development of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM Shahnoor Habib For HEP Group, UT Arlington Oct. 12, 2002 TSAPS Fall ’02, UT Brownsville Simulation.
1 Update on Silicon Pixel Readout for a TPC at NIKHEF LCWS08 - Chicago 19 Nov 2008 Jan Timmermans NIKHEF.
1 The Silicon TPC System EUDET Extended SC meeting 31 August 2010 Jan Timmermans NIKHEF/DESY.
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
1 The pixel readout of TPCs Max Chefdeville, NIKHEF, Amsterdam.
Wenxin Wang 105/04/2013. L: 4.7m  : 3.6m Design for an ILD TPC in progress: Each endplate: 80 modules with 8000 pads Spatial Resolution (in a B=3.5T.
Test of the GEM Front Tracker for the SBS Spectrometer at Jefferson Lab F. Mammoliti, V. Bellini, M. Capogni, E. Cisbani, E. Jensen, P. Musico, F. Noto,
Goddard February 2003 R.Bellazzini - INFN Pisa A new X-Ray Polarimeter based on the photoelectric effect for Black Holes and Neutron Stars Astrophysics.
1 The Silicon TPC System EUDET Extended SC meeting 1 September 2008 Jan Timmermans NIKHEF.
Abstract Beam Test of a Large-area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System V. Bhopatkar, M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
Tracking in a TPC D. Karlen / U. Victoria & TRIUMF for the LCTPC collaboration.
Beam Test of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, A.
GEM+Timepix2 in the framework of project Gabriele Croci, Matteo Alfonsi on behalf of CERN-GDD Group RD51 Miniweek, February 2010.
Construction and beam test analysis of GE1/1 prototype III gaseous electron multiplier (GEM) detector V. BHOPATKAR, E. HANSEN, M. HOHLMANN, M. PHIPPS,
The BoNuS Detector: A Radial Time Projection Chamber for tracking Spectator Protons Howard Fenker, Jefferson Lab This work was partially supported by DOE.
On behalf of the LCTPC collaboration VCI13, February 12th, 2013 Large Prototype TPC using Micro-Pattern Gaseous Detectors  David Attié 
Construction and Characterization of a GEM G.Bencivenni, LNF-INFN The lesson is divided in two main parts: 1 - construction of a GEM detector (Marco Pistilli)
GD AND GD2O3 COATINGS AS NEUTRON CONVERTERS Dorothea Pfeiffer
J. Alozy, S. George, F.Murtas, M. Silari 1 CERN GEMPIX detectors as hadron therapy beam monitors and radioactive waste detectors GEMPIX construction.
ILC Tracking, Valencia – dE/dx and Particle ID Performance Michael Hauschild - CERN, 8-Nov-2006, page 1 dE/dx and Particle ID Performance with Cluster.
Development of a Single Ion Detector for Radiation Track Structure Studies F. Vasi, M. Casiraghi, R. Schulte, V. Bashkirov.
The digital TPC: the ultimate resolution P. Colas GridPix: integrated Timepix chips with a Micromegas mesh.
TRIUMF laboratory studies Christopher Hearty University of British Columbia/IPP 27-Sep-2010.
Thorsten Lux. Charged particles X-ray (UV) Photons Cathode Anode Amplification Provides: xy position Energy (z position) e- CsI coating 2 Gas (Mixture)
On behalf of the LCTPC collaboration -Uwe Renz- University of Freiburg Albert-Ludwigs- University Freiburg Physics Department.
Gossip : Gaseous Pixels Els Koffeman (Nikhef/UvA) (Harry van der Graaf, Jan Timmermans, Jan Visschers, Maximilien Chefdeville, Vladimir Gromov, Ruud Kluit,
R&D activities on a double phase pure Argon THGEM-TPC A. Badertscher, A. Curioni, L. Knecht, D. Lussi, A. Marchionni, G. Natterer, P. Otiougova, F. Resnati,
TPC for 4-th concept S.Popescu IFIN-HH, Bucharest.
Larger Pixels, New Insights
Activities on straw tube simulation
some thoughts on charging-up effects
Part-V Micropattern gaseous detectors
Silicon Lab Bonn Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn
Analysis Test Beam Pixel TPC
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
Gaseous Beam Position Detectors, with Low Cost and Low Material Budget
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
TPC Paul Colas Technical meeting, Lyon.
The Pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH
Test Beam Measurements october – november, 2016
MWPC’s, GEM’s or Micromegas for AD transfer and experimental lines
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout
Gain measurements of Chromium GEM foils
A DLC μRWELL with 2-D Readout
Presentation transcript:

Andreas Bamberger, Uwe Renz, Andreas Zwerger „Si-TPC“ with GEMs Hubert Blank, Christoph Brezina, Klaus Desch, Jochen Kaminski, Thorsten Krautscheid, Walter Ockenfels, Martin Ummenhofer, Peter Wienemann, Simone Zimmermann Andreas Bamberger, Uwe Renz, Andreas Zwerger *renz@physik.uni-freiburg.de

Outline Spatial resolution and understanding of possible systematics Time resolution and time walk correction Software issues -> Pixelman PlugIns 25-Apr-17

TPC – basic operation and pixelated readout Charged particle ionizes the chamber gas The primary charge drifts along the electric field E towards the end plates Magnetic field parallel to E reduces transverse diffusion and allows measurement of the particle momentum At the end plate the primary ionization is amplified Readout of the signal Time Projection Chamber TPC Micro Pattern Gas Detectors (MPGD): high resolution readout and high rates Pixilated readout offers high resolution Digital Bubble Chamber A TPC at the ILC needs excellent momentum resolution  GEM-TimePix for end plate readout region of interest for this talk 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

GEM - Gas Electron Multiplier F. Sauli, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A386(1997)531 F. Sauli, http://www.cern.ch/GDD Thin, metal coated polymer foil. Very high density of chemical pierced holes Principle: 2 layers Cu each 5µm thick, separated from each other by 50µm Kapton. Conical etched holes largest Ø70µm, diagonal distance of holes 140µm. Advantages of Triple-GEM-setup Gas gain up to 105 in ArCO2 easily achievable Minimizing the back drift of positive ions into the drift volume (O(10-2)) Encapsulated region of amplification 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

TimePix properties 1,4cm TimePix TimePix properties inherited from MediPix Pixel size 55µm in a 256x256 Matrix dimensions of the sensitive area: 1,4x1,4cm2 lower threshold of  700 e- charge-sensitive-input 1,4cm TimePix Based on improved design of MediPix2 MXR Time information on each pixel, due to an adjustable clock up to ≈100MHz, distributed to all pixels The 2 different modes out of four available modes are used: Time over threshold TOT- (amplitude recontruction) and TIME-mode modes individually selectable for each pixel Mixed Mode important feature for walk correction X. Llopart Cudie, “Design And Characterization Of 64-K Pixels Chips Working In Single Photon Processing Mode”, CERN-THESIS-2007-062 - 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Two different types of GEMs tested: DESY Test Beam June 2007 TimePix Failure-free and stable operation of TimePix-GEM-setup GEM: 10 * 10 cm2 e- beam DESY II trigger (scintill.) & Si-telescope GEM-stack with TimePix: Two different types of GEMs tested: Standard 100x100mm2 GEMs mit 140µm hole pitch small GEMs 24x28mm2 with a fine pitch of 50µm Shown for fine pitched (small) GEMs 6mm drift volume  1.8mm distance between transfer and induction gaps 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Data taking properties and reconstruction Two independent data streams: TimePix data (Windows based readout) and SiTel. Si-Tel allows the determination of the drift distance with ~50μm precision Cleaning up of multiple tracks by double hits in the SiTel in projection along the track: secondary maxi-mum signals another track Every other pixel in a row is set to the TOT property, and TIME property in between All over the surface ordered in a checker board fashion Reconstruction is done by mapping ½ of all pixels onto 256x256 matrix. Missing neighbors in TOT or TIME data are thereby interpolated TOT TIME 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Typical events 1.5ns 14mm merged cluster Search contiguous areas for cluster reconstruction Use TOT-information to separate merged clusters BUT diffusion smears our information of individual primary e- from distinct clusters. These electrons overlap and appear to belong to the same (single) cluster. 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Spatial properties of cluster position due to the discrete structure of GEMs 3 length scales: charge radius Rcharge, dhole, transv. diffusion Rdiff(z) hole of the first GEM is “perfectly mapped onto the detector. The centroid of the e- avalanche remains stable. for large drift distances Rdiff >>Rcharge, then centroid determination is perfect, even for multi electron clusters for small drift distances is Rdiff <<Rcharge and Rdiff < dhole there is also a perfect mapping for isolated clusters (single or multi electron clusters) for intermediate drift distances Rdiff <<Rcharge and Rdiff > dhole then its not any more perfect for multi-electron clusters drift distance z amplification volume Rdiff Rcharge dhole A. Bamberger pixel detector surface 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Special case for tracks close to the first GEM charges GEM holes The clusters are arranged in a line along the track and produce overlapping charges It depends on the direction considered for the precise mapping: rectangular to the track it may stay precise and reveal the hole structure the position of the centroids along the track is not necessarily mapping the cluster position because of overlapping charge distributions precision of hole mapping is maintained in transv. direction precision of hole mapping lost along the track 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Orientation of GEM beam “new” orientation “old” orientation x z 140µm As structure of 120µm visible in FFT Rotate GEM by 90° Now 70µm projected hole pitch 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

GEM Struktur FFT „old“ orientation „old“ orientation Signal bei (8.39±0.04)mm-1 „old“ orientation „old“ orientation FFT No Signal Use Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) periodic structure at 1/8.39mm corresponds 119μm, independent of sampling rate (number of supporting points of the FFT). No such structure seen for drift distances > 1mm seen. This structure is smaered by transverse diffusion After rotation by 90°: signal in FFT vanishes Signal amplitude depends on orientation Chip vs. GEM „new“ orientation (rotated by 90°) 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Check the angular dependance of the structured signal signal disappears with rotation of the coordinate system with respect to the TimePix frame α <-9 and α > 9 mrad “fortuitous” peak at α near zero (GEM almost coincides with the chip’s orientation) the signal strongly depends on the drift distance z . . Reason: the disappearance is due to the fact that the transverse diffusion smears out the structure Rdiff > dhole ≥2 electron cluster 2 mm 1 mm 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Discussion of a possible bias for the determination of the point resolution does the orientation of the track matter with respect GEM for the point resolution given by the centroids of the clusters? Eventually yes, if most of the tracks would run parallel to the holes however most tracks are inclined αtrack ~ (22±6) mrad i.e. far from zero 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Resolution of standard GEMs old GEM configuration with 120 µm projected z-pitch new GEM configuration with 70 µm projected z-pitch  2 µm improvement for σ0 only through rotating the first GEM by 90° 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

small GEMs z x Guard rings on both sides Active surface 28x24mm2 Referenced outer hole diameter in copper 30µm. Inner hole diameter in the Kapton between 17µm-21µm. Diagonal hole pitch 50µm Projected in x  43µm Projected in z  25µm Guard rings on both sides Active surface 28x24mm2 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Resolution of small GEMs Small GEMs improve so by  5µm. Driftlänge y [mm] Still possible systematics ? it is a delicate range since the fit function has an infinite slope here …there are events below the drift region…

Data processing for time walk correction original data for central column in MM interpolation of TOT and TIME produces 2 sets of data on each pixel for any pixels the time walk can be large take maximum in TIME and TOT for the correction. In this case at TOT = 180 the correction amounts to +2.7 counts to be close to the asymptote, where all clusters should lie. 10522 93 10526 139 167 10527 186 170 118 35 TOT range for this cluster asymptote 10 counts correction selected cluster 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Treatment of time walk correction Select a column near the centroid of the cluster Fit 2nd order polynomials to the TIME and TOT distributions, look for maxima Time walk correction done only by the maxima of fits Time correction with an exponential function for this run A = 24, B = 81 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

After correction of time walk for a 100 MHz clock Similar results from the 48 MHz data (2006) operation: σtime about 12 ns 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Measurements with laser Detector with metallized drift cathode. The laser releases single photo-electrons  creation of well defined and seperated clusters Installation of a laser test bench for measurements with a small number of (primary) electrons. 8cm 8 cm N2-laser Study single electron clusters Investigate influence from number of primary electrons on single point resolution. Possibly study ion backdrift proberties 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Chip Post-Processing originally processed 55x55µm2 110x110µm2 Fe55-Cluster originally processed 55x55µm2 110x110µm2 Pixel acitve Pixel passivated Clusters are partly filled. Possible reason for this: Insufficient thickness of passivation Crosstalk on chip level Pixel size 55x55µm2 Pixel size 110x110µm2 Work on technologies for post processing chips Optimization of readout granularity 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Pixelman Design Pixelman architecture All basic functions of the Pixelman Software are hardcoded and cannot be changed by the user. The source code is not available. http://aladdin.utef.cvut.cz/ofat/others/Pixelman/img/arch.png Interface Pixelman through a dynamically linked library (DLL) 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Pixelman Interface DLL Pixelman is Windows based Pixelman is written in C++  one is obliged to use the Microsoft Foundation Classes (MFC) which wrap the Windows®Application Interface (API) into a more user- friendly class architecture However today‘s Windows developer use the .NET framework (CLR). This is „incompatible“ with Pixelman. MFC is already a kind of old fashioned 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

First Plugins More „mature“ Plug-In for step motor control Socket Server Plug-In, written by L. Tlustos First plug-in was a kind of „toy“ plug-in to gain experience. But be warned - as it turns out it is not so straight forward to implement a Graphical User Interface (GUI) into a DLL. But the Prague people from IEAP were a great help, special thanks to M. Jakůbek.

Next steps... Can Linux and Windows be „friends“? ...or the question how can we manage on a reasonable (short) time scale to have a Linux based DAQ steering at least basic Pixelman functions, e.g. Start/stop??? 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Next steps... Solution  use network tools Program a plug-in that uses standard network connections and TCP/IP, so that Pixelman software can be operated by a Linux DAQ-system, e.g. EUDAQ 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Next steps... Details will be discussed this late afternoon A socket is a software interface between two programs for interprocess communication. The programs can be running on the same machine or on different machines connected via network. EUDAQ Producer TCP/IP socket plugin TimePix Pixelman As an option Pixelman can also send commands to the DAQ via the socket plug-in software interface Details will be discussed this late afternoon Room H331, 6 p.m. 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Summary Superb spatial resolution of 20-24 µm Time resolution of 8ns after corrections for time walk -> z resolution of ~0.5mm in typical TPC gases First successful test of pixel with enlarged pixels of 110x110µm2 Reliable operation of TimePix/GEM setup without any special „protective“ „add-ons“ 25-Apr-17

Outlook Finalizing setup of laser test-bench, which could be interesting also for other EUDET partners Developing software tools for integration with other DAQ systems and slow control BUT everybody is looking forward to a first test beam at DESY -> so focus man power and give a good show  25-Apr-17

Rotated GEM structure (2007) FFT expected signal signal spatial after rotation by 90° the observed spatial signal from the GEM pitch vanishes effect on the resolution is an improvement of ~ 2 μm 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

Simulation studies: Inverse TPC Interaction region -HV -HV Pixellated readout on central electrode Investigate optimal pixel size as function of: Drift distance Magnetic field Studies on technical feasibility, e.g. cooling expertise on design integration in Freiburg available 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam

First results with pro-cessed chip Clusters not filled Clusters filled 100% 27 V 10% 27V correspond to a factor 5 in gain. Ongoing investigation of the cross talk behavior 25-Apr-17, Amsterdam