Getting Started: a user’s guide to the GO TAMU GO Workshop 17 May 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Annotation of Gene Function …and how thats useful to you.
Advertisements

Applications of GO. Goals of Gene Ontology Project.
GO : the Gene Ontology “because you know sometimes words have two meanings” Amelia Ireland GO Curator EBI, Cambridge, UK.
Modeling Functional Genomics Datasets CVM Lesson 3 13 June 2007Fiona McCarthy.
Annotating Gene Products to the GO Harold J Drabkin Senior Scientific Curator The Jackson Laboratory Mouse.
GO-based tools for functional modeling GO Workshop 3-6 August 2010.
Gene Ontology John Pinney
Gene function analysis Stem Cell Network Microarray Course, Unit 5 May 2007.
CACAO - Remote training Gene Function and Gene Ontology Fall 2011
COG and GO tutorial.
CACAO Biocurator Training CACAO Fall CACAO Syllabus What is CACAO & why is it important? Training Examples.
BICH CACAO Biocurator Training Session #3.
CACAO - Penn State Gene Function and Gene Ontology January 2011
Gene Ontology at WormBase: Making the Most of GO Annotations Kimberly Van Auken.
GO Enrichment analysis COST Functional Modeling Workshop April, Helsinki.
PAT project Advanced bioinformatics tools for analyzing the Arabidopsis genome Proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana (PAT) & Gene Ontology (GO) Hongyu Zhang,
Viewing & Getting GO COST Functional Modeling Workshop April, Helsinki.
SPH 247 Statistical Analysis of Laboratory Data 1 May 12, 2015 SPH 247 Statistical Analysis of Laboratory Data.
Strategies & Examples for Functional Modeling
Using The Gene Ontology: Gene Product Annotation.
CACAO Training Fall Community Assessment of Community Annotation with Ontologies (CACAO)
Annotating Gene Products to the GO Harold J Drabkin Senior Scientific Curator The Jackson Laboratory Mouse.
AgBase: bioinformatics enabling knowledge generation from agricultural omics data Fiona McCarthy.
SPH 247 Statistical Analysis of Laboratory Data 1May 14, 2013SPH 247 Statistical Analysis of Laboratory Data.
Managing Data Modeling GO Workshop 3-6 August 2010.
Adding GO for Large Datasets COST Functional Modeling Workshop April, Helsinki.
Strategies for functional modeling TAMU GO Workshop 17 May 2010.
Ontologies GO Workshop 3-6 August Ontologies  What are ontologies?  Why use ontologies?  Open Biological Ontologies (OBO), National Center for.
Monday, November 8, 2:30:07 PM  Ontology is the philosophical study of the nature of being, existence or reality as such, as well as the basic categories.
GO-based tools for functional modeling TAMU GO Workshop 17 May 2010.
From Functional Genomics to Physiological Model: Using the Gene Ontology Fiona McCarthy, Shane Burgess, Susan Bridges The AgBase Databases, Institute of.
Workshop Aims NMSU GO Workshop 20 May Aims of this Workshop  WIIFM? modeling examples background information about GO modeling  Strategies for.
Manual GO annotation Evidence: Source AnnotationsProteins IEA:Total Manual: Total
Introduction to the GO: a user’s guide Iowa State Workshop 11 June 2009.
SRI International Bioinformatics 1 Submitting pathway to MetaCyc Ron Caspi.
24th Feb 2006 Jane Lomax GO Further. 24th Feb 2006 Jane Lomax GO annotations Where do the links between genes and GO terms come from?
Gene Product Annotation using the GO ml Harold J Drabkin Senior Scientific Curator The Jackson Laboratory.
Alastair Kerr, Ph.D. WTCCB Bioinformatics Core An introduction to DNA and Protein Sequence Databases.
Getting Started: a user’s guide to the GO GO Workshop 3-6 August 2010.
Functional Annotation and Functional Enrichment. Annotation Structural Annotation – defining the boundaries of features of interest (coding regions, regulatory.
1 Gene function annotation. 2 Outline  Functional annotation  Controlled vocabularies  Functional annotation at TAIR  Resources and tools at TAIR.
DATA MANAGEMENT AND CURATION AT TAIR
Rice Proteins Data acquisition Curation Resources Development and integration of controlled vocabulary Gene Ontology Trait Ontology Plant Ontology
CACAO Training Fall Community Assessment of Community Annotation with Ontologies (CACAO)
Introduction to the Gene Ontology GO Workshop 3-6 August 2010.
Introduction to the GO: a user’s guide NCSU GO Workshop 29 October 2009.
Update Susan Bridges, Fiona McCarthy, Shane Burgess NRI
CACAO Training Jim Hu and Suzi Aleksander Fall 2015.
GO based data analysis Iowa State Workshop 11 June 2009.
1 Annotation EPP 245/298 Statistical Analysis of Laboratory Data.
Getting GO: how to get GO for functional modeling Iowa State Workshop 11 June 2009.
An example of GO annotation from a primary paper Rebecca E. Foulger (UniProt Curator) GO Annotation Camp, June 2005 PMID:
Prioritization of Avian GO Annotation , , Chicken ,06949,5163.4Rat ,69664, Mouse ,83036, Human.
Tools in Bioinformatics Ontologies and pathways. Why are ontologies needed? A free text is the best way to describe what a protein does to a human reader.
An example of GO annotation from a primary paper GO Annotation Camp, July 2006 PMID:
CACAO Training Jim Hu and Suzi Aleksander Fall 2015.
Gene Annotation & Gene Ontology
Getting GO annotation for your dataset
CACAO Training ASM-JGI 2012.
Annotating with GO: an overview
Strategies for functional modeling
GO : the Gene Ontology & Functional enrichment analysis
Introduction to the Gene Ontology
Workshop Aims TAMU GO Workshop 17 May 2010.
Functional Annotation of the Horse Genome
Modified from slides from Jim Hu and Suzi Aleksander Spring 2016
GO Annotation from different sources
A User’s Guide to GO: Structural and Functional Annotation
Gene expression analysis
Insight into GO and GOA Angelica Tulipano , INFN Bari CNR
Presentation transcript:

Getting Started: a user’s guide to the GO TAMU GO Workshop 17 May 2010

Introduction to GO 1. Annotation 2. Bio-ontologies 3. the Gene Ontology (GO) a GO annotation example GO evidence codes literature biocuration & computation analysis ND vs no GO sources of GO 4. Using the GO

Genomic Annotation  Genome annotation is the process of attaching biological information to genomic sequences. It consists of two main steps: 1. identifying functional elements in the genome: “structural annotation” 2. attaching biological information to these elements: “functional annotation”  biologists often use the term “annotation” when they are referring only to structural annotation

CHICK_OLF6 DNA annotation Protein annotation Data from Ensembl Genome browser TRAF 1, 2 and 3TRAF 1 and 2 Structural annotation:

catenin Functional annotation:

Structural & Functional Annotation Structural Annotation:  Open reading frames (ORFs) predicted during genome assembly  predicted ORFs require experimental confirmation  the Sequence Ontology (SO) provides a structured controlled vocabulary for sequence annotation Functional Annotation:  annotation of gene products = Gene Ontology (GO) annotation  initially, predicted ORFs have no functional literature and GO annotation relies on computational methods (rapid)  functional literature exists for many genes/proteins prior to genome sequencing  GO annotation does not rely on a completed genome sequence!

1. Provides structural annotation for agriculturally important genomes 2. Provides functional annotation (GO) 3. Provides tools for functional modeling 4. Provides bioinformatics & modeling support for research community Avian Gene Nomenclature

1. Bio-ontologies

Bio-ontologies  Bio-ontologies are used to capture biological information in a way that can be read by both humans and computers. necessary for high-throughput “omics” datasets allows data sharing across databases  Objects in an ontology (eg. genes, cell types, tissue types, stages of development) are well defined.  The ontology shows how the objects relate to each other.

Bio-ontologies:

Ontologies digital identifier (computers) description (humans) relationships between terms

2. The Gene Ontology

What is the Gene Ontology?  assign functions to gene products at different levels, depending on how much is known about a gene product  is used for a diverse range of species  structured to be queried at different levels, eg: find all the chicken gene products in the genome that are involved in signal transduction zoom in on all the receptor tyrosine kinases  human readable GO function has a digital tag to allow computational analysis of large datasets COMPUTATIONALLY AMENABLE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF GENE FUNCTIONS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS “a controlled vocabulary that can be applied to all organisms even as knowledge of gene and protein roles in cells is accumulating and changing”

GO annotation example NDUFAB1 (UniProt P52505) Bovine NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1, alpha/beta subcomplex, 1, 8kDa Biological Process (BP or P) GO: fatty acid biosynthetic process TAS GO: mitochondrial electron transport, NADH to ubiquinone TAS GO: lipid biosynthetic process IEA Cellular Component (CC or C) GO: mitochondrial matrix IDA GO: mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I IDA GO: mitochondrion IEA NDUFAB1 Molecular Function (MF or F) GO: fatty acid binding IDA GO: NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) activity TAS GO: oxidoreductase activity TAS GO: acyl carrier activity IEA

GO annotation example NDUFAB1 (UniProt P52505) Bovine NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1, alpha/beta subcomplex, 1, 8kDa aspect or ontology GO:ID (unique) GO term name GO evidence code

GO EVIDENCE CODES Direct Evidence Codes IDA - inferred from direct assay IEP - inferred from expression pattern IGI - inferred from genetic interaction IMP - inferred from mutant phenotype IPI - inferred from physical interaction Indirect Evidence Codes inferred from literature IGC - inferred from genomic context TAS - traceable author statement NAS - non-traceable author statement IC - inferred by curator inferred by sequence analysis RCA - inferred from reviewed computational analysis IS* - inferred from sequence* IEA - inferred from electronic annotation Other NR - not recorded (historical) ND - no biological data available ISS - inferred from sequence or structural similarity ISA - inferred from sequence alignment ISO - inferred from sequence orthology ISM - inferred from sequence model Guide to GO Evidence Codes ogy.org/GO.evidence.s html

GO Mapping Example NDUFAB1 GO EVIDENCE CODES Direct Evidence Codes IDA - inferred from direct assay IEP - inferred from expression pattern IGI - inferred from genetic interaction IMP - inferred from mutant phenotype IPI - inferred from physical interaction Indirect Evidence Codes inferred from literature IGC - inferred from genomic context TAS - traceable author statement NAS - non-traceable author statement IC - inferred by curator inferred by sequence analysis RCA - inferred from reviewed computational analysis IS* - inferred from sequence* IEA - inferred from electronic annotation Other NR - not recorded (historical) ND - no biological data available Biocuration of literature detailed function “depth” slower (manual)

P05147 PMID: Find a paper about the protein. Biocuration of Literature: detailed gene function

Read paper to get experimental evidence of function Use most specific term possible experiment assayed kinase activity: use IDA evidence code

GO Mapping Example NDUFAB1 GO EVIDENCE CODES Direct Evidence Codes IDA - inferred from direct assay IEP - inferred from expression pattern IGI - inferred from genetic interaction IMP - inferred from mutant phenotype IPI - inferred from physical interaction Indirect Evidence Codes inferred from literature IGC - inferred from genomic context TAS - traceable author statement NAS - non-traceable author statement IC - inferred by curator inferred by sequence analysis RCA - inferred from reviewed computational analysis IS* - inferred from sequence* IEA - inferred from electronic annotation Other NR - not recorded (historical) ND - no biological data available ISS - inferred from sequence or structural similarity ISA - inferred from sequence alignment ISO - inferred from sequence orthology ISM - inferred from sequence model Biocuration of literature detailed function “depth” slower (manual) Sequence analysis rapid (computational) “breadth” of coverage less detailed

Unknown Function vs No GO  ND – no data Biocurators have tried to add GO but there is no functional data available Previously: “process_unknown”, “function_unknown”, “component_unknown” Now: “biological process”, “molecular function”, “cellular component”  No annotations (including no “ND”): biocurators have not annotated this is important for your dataset: what % has GO?

1. Primary sources of GO: from the GO Consortium (GOC) & GOC members most up to date most comprehensive 2. Secondary sources: other resources that use GO provided by GOC members public databases (eg. NCBI, UniProtKB) genome browsers (eg. Ensembl) array vendors (eg. Affymetrix) GO expression analysis tools Sources of GO

 Different tools and databases display the GO annotations differently.  Since GO terms are continually changing and GO annotations are continually added, need to know when GO annotations were last updated. Sources of GO annotation

 EXAMPLES: public databases (eg. NCBI, UniProtKB) genome browsers (eg. Ensembl) array vendors (eg. Affymetrix)  CONSIDERATIONS: What is the original source? When was it last updated? Are evidence codes displayed? Secondary Sources of GO annotation

For more information about GO  GO Evidence Codes:  gene association file information:  tools that use the GO:  GO Consortium wiki: All websites are listed on the AgBase workshop website.

3. Using the GO

However….  many of these tools do not support non-model organisms  the tools have different computing requirements  may be difficult to determine how up-to-date the GO annotations are… Need to evaluate tools for your system.

Some useful expression analysis tools:  Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID)  agriGO -- GO Analysis Toolkit and Database for Agricultural Community used to be EasyGO chicken, cow, pig, mouse, cereals, dicots includes Plant Ontology (PO) analysis  Onto-Express can provide your own gene association file  Funcassociate 2.0: The Gene Set Functionator can provide your own gene association file

Evaluating GO tools Some criteria for evaluating GO Tools: 1. Does it include my species of interest (or do I have to “humanize” my list)? 2. What does it require to set up (computer usage/online) 3. What was the source for the GO (primary or secondary) and when was it last updated? 4. Does it report the GO evidence codes (and is IEA included)? 5. Does it report which of my gene products has no GO? 6. Does it report both over/under represented GO groups and how does it evaluate this? 7. Does it allow me to add my own GO annotations? 8. Does it represent my results in a way that facilitates discovery?

Functional Modeling Considerations  Should I add my own GO? use GOProfiler to see how much GO is available for your species use GORetriever to find existing GO for your dataset Does analysis tool allow me to add my own GO?  Should I do GO analysis and pathway analysis and network analysis? different functional modeling methods show different aspects about your data (complementary) is this type of data available for your species (or a close ortholog)?  What tools should I use? which tools have data for your species of interest? what type of accessions are accepted? availability (commercial and freely available)

Protein/Gene identifiers GORetriever GO annotations Genes/Proteins with no GO annotations GOanna Pathways and network analysis GO Enrichment analysis ArrayIDer Microarray Ids GOSlimViewer Yellow boxes represent AgBase tools Green/Purple boxes are non-AgBase resources Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) Pathway Studio Cytoscape DAVID Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) Pathway Studio Cytoscape DAVID EasyGO Onto-Express Onto-Express-to-go (OE2GO) Overview of functional modeling strategy

All workshop materials are available at AgBase.