Secondary Systems Overview What to Know Before Venturing Out of Bounds OrRTI Project January 15, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
November 2009 Oregon RTI Project Cadre 5.  Participants will understand both general IDEA evaluation requirements and evaluation requirements for Specific.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Response to Intervention: Creating a Systematic Response.
DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING EFFECTIVE K-5 RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION PROGRAMS Kate Esposito, Ph.D. Jeff Miller, Ph.D.
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
Multi-tiered Systems of Support Improving Outcomes for All Office of Special Programs.
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
RTI & MTI: Building the Foundation TTSD RTI Site Visit October 21, 2008.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Multi-tiered Instruction at the Secondary Level “I think what makes a difference for our kids is that they graduate with a sense of place: high school,
Multidisciplinary Teams
Summit County’s Changing Demographics Hispanic Population3262,4064,207 Total County Population15,51829,73636,100 Hispanics as percent of.
Multi-tiered Instruction at the Secondary Level. Today We’ll Be Serving… Secondary RTI: Uncharted territory Data-based Teaming Leadership Professional.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
Creating an RTI Culture at the Building Level in Order to Make Sound Eligibility Decisions Oak Hills Local School District Cincinnati, Ohio UC Summer Institute.
Creating an RTI Culture at the District Level in order to make Sound Eligibility Decisions Oak Hills Local School District Cincinnati, Ohio UC Summer Institute.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
K ILLING 2 B IRDS WITH 1 T RIANGLE R T I & PBIS Dean Richards, OrRtI Sarah Crane-Simpson, UMESD.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials.
Tigard-Tualatin Spring site visit overview April 23, 2008.
Systems Requirements for RTI The nuts and bolts that hold it all together!
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
Effective Teaming Using Data to Guide Actions Sally Helton & Lisa Bates B ehavior and I nstructional S upport E ffective.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Foundations and Critical Features of Successful R.T.I. Implementation Erin Lolich, OrRTI project Dean Richards, OrRTI project Tigard-Tualatin School District.
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
RTI Essential Components Jenice Pizzuto Jenice Pizzuto Jenice Pizzuto National Consultant, Learning Forward, President, Learning Forward Oregon Leadership.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
RTI in Tigard-Tualatin School District: Effective Behavior & Instructional Support (EBIS) National SEA Conference on SLD Determination April 20, 2006 Erin.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Response to Intervention: Core Components and Resources Related to Implementation Marie Fisher March 3, 2012.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Response to Instruction: Creating a Systematic Response.
DSAC Leadership Meeting 1/24/12 Massachusetts Tiered System of Support (MTSS)
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
 October 29,2009. Define Response to Intervention Provide an overview of EBIS implementation Learn about TTSD’s history, demographics, program and outcomes.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
RTI 101 Jon Potter Dean Richards Oregon RTI Project.
Response to Intervention SPED 461. Basic Principles of RTI Response to intervention integrates assessment and intervention within a multi-level prevention.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Kent ISD MTSS Implementation Team.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Response to Intervention in Educational Transformation Schools
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

Secondary Systems Overview What to Know Before Venturing Out of Bounds OrRTI Project January 15, 2009

Objectives:  Provide an overview of secondary systems requirements  Build background and common language for those less familiar with RTI  Share some exciting data to get you pumped up!

Multi-tiered Instruction & RTI Multi-tiered, Research-based Core Curriculum & Interventions Universal Screening & Progress Monitoring Standardized Decision Rules & Procedures Integrity of Implementation and Sustainability RTI Identification of Learning Disabilities Effective Teaming & Problem Solving

The Big Picture  Leadership at all levels  Teaming  Use of a research based core reading curriculum  Universal screening  Implementation of research based interventions  Progress monitoring  Policy and procedure development (standardization)  Professional development including fidelity of implementation.

Leadership Top-Down  Leadership priority  Strategic planning  Budget planning  Support and buy-in for systemic, consistent programs  School improvement plans Bottom-up  School literacy committees participated in training and planning  Teacher-teams identified key literacy strategies for training and roll-out  Literacy committees reviewed curriculum and selected intervention programs

Teaming Members might include…  Principal  Instructional Coordinator  Counselor  Special Ed Rep  ELL Rep  Alt Ed  Content Area or Cluster Teams

Core Program  Evidence-based English/Language Arts curriculum  Common agreements around content and standards  Literacy strategies taught and utilized across content areas

Universal Screening  Universal screening occurs for ALL students at least three times per year (fall, winter, spring)  Screening identifies which students are making progress in the core curriculum (80%) and which are in need of further support (20%).  Data should be used to start conversations about:  If the core is meeting the needs of most students (including most students in each subgroup)  Which students need additional intervention

Interventions  Research-based  Increase the intensity of instruction  More time  Smaller groups  Regularly monitored  Delivered as designed

Progress Monitoring  All students receiving interventions should be progress monitored  Frequency is determined by district decision rules (twice per month in TTSD secondary schools)

Progress monitoring with Maze 3 to 4 Data-points Below the Aimline Intervention Change: “Language C” with Randall

Policy and Procedure Development The RTI process replaces a standardized (IQ) test, RTI also requires standard administration Districts adopt common procedures for doing this work:  Protocols  Decision Rules  Forms  SpEd Procedures

Professional Development Topics:  Core curriculum and instruction  Interventions  Assessment  Teaming  Data-based decision making  Special Education

The Big Picture  Leadership at all levels  Teaming  Use of a research based core reading curriculum  Universal screening  Implementation of research based interventions  Progress monitoring  Policy and procedure development (standardization)  Professional development including fidelity of implementation.

Next Steps in TTSD  EBIS Decision Rules need to be evaluated (screening/intensifying/exiting)  Evaluation of current Core curricula – are all content teachers consistently using the literacy strategies in their classes?  Ratcheting up of New Teacher Program  Evaluate fidelity across classrooms and schools  Implement Team Coaching Model with Curriculum & Instruction TOSAs

Is All This Work Really Worth It?  Progress monitoring tools: Maze-CBM GRADE+ Measures within curriculum  Program evaluation: OAKS GRADE+ Grades Office Discipline Referrals Attendance

Absences

The Growth Target: Want to Beat the Average RIT Gain in Mastery in Motion for Students that Did Not Meet