KCR 2014 Spring Training CHANGES IN CODING GRADE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neoplasia II: Tumor Characteristics
Advertisements

Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasm Project. Acknowledgments American College of Surgeons (ACOS) Commission on Cancer (COC) Canadian Cancer Registries.
Lung “Coding Bootcamp” Nicole Catlett, CTR 2014 Kentucky Cancer Registry Fall Workshop.
Module 6: Clinical Stage and Grade. Introduction Stage and grade determine prognosis Staging reflects the clinical extent of the tumor Grading a tumor.
STAGING MCR Staff Show Me Healthy Women March 27, 2008 Supported by a Cooperative Agreement between DHSS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Esophagus, Esophagus GE Junction, Stomach
1 Renal Pelvis, Ureter, Bladder and Other Urinary.
Hematopoietic Database and Manual
Cancer Registry Coding Changes for 2014 Presented by the Kentucky Cancer Registry February, 2014.
Coding Pitfalls Jessica K. Dohler, BS, CTR. Objectives 0 Know how to code the Tumor/Ext Eval code when using intraoperative findings 0 Know when to code.
Jessica K. Dohler, BS, CTR. Need for Change  Complicated Site Specific Grading No easy conversion to available codes Need for special guidelines 
9 Chapter Nine Neoplasms. © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Learning Outcomes After completing this chapter, you will be able.
THE DEVELOPMENT OF SYNOPTIC REPORTS FROM FREE TEXT CONTENT OF ARCHIVAL PATHOLOGY REPORTS GENERATED IN THE ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY LABORATORY INFORMATION SYSTEM.
Bladder, Kidney Parenchyma and Testis
Cancer Staging. What is cancer staging? Staging describes the severity of a person’s cancer based on the extent of the original (primary) tumor and whether.
Malignant Adenomyoepithelioma of the Breast with Lymph Node Metastasis
TRAM Educational Conference September 19, 2014 Meritus Medical Center 1.
Directly Coded Summary Stage
Staging and Grading of cancers By Haleigh Nelson.
1 Colon MP/H Task Force Multiple Primary Rules Histology Coding Rules 2007.
Coding Factoids and Frequently Asked Questions Education & Training Team Collaborative Stage Data Collection System Version 1 (CSv2)
1 LUNG. 2 Equivalent Terms, Def, Charts, Tables, Illustrations.
Neoplasia. 3- Rate of growth  Most benign tumours grow slowly over a period of years, whereas most cancers grow rapidly, spread locally and to distant.
1 MP/H Coding Rules General Instructions MP/H Task Force Multiple Primary Rules Histology Coding Rules 2007.
Putting the Puzzle Together: Breast Collaborative Staging Melissa Riddle, RHIT, CTR October 6, 2012.
1 Preclinical-Bench Testing II Using Human Observers to Objectively Measure and Evaluate Imaging Performance of Digital WSI Systems Max Robinowitz, MD.
Principles of Surgical Oncology Salah R. Elfaqih.
Principles of Surgical Oncology Salah R. Elfaqih.
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Shahla Masood, M.D. Professor of Pathology University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville Chief of Pathology and Laboratory.
1 Myeloma Plasma Cell Disorders (Schema Name: MyelomaPlasmaCellDisorder) V0203.
What’s the Diff? Sue C. Vest, CTR Missouri Cancer Registry This project was supported in part by a cooperative agreement between the Centers for Disease.
VS. CSv2 Changes CSv2 compared to CSv1 Part 1, Section 1.
KCR SPRING TRAINING 2014 New ICD-O-3 Terminology.
2015 CHANGES IN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND CANCER CODING INSTRUCTIONS KENTUCKY CANCER REGISTRY SPRING TRAINING 2015 PRESENTED BY FRANCES ROSS.
Neoplasia p.1 SYLLABUS: RBP(Robbins Basic Pathology) Chapter: Neoplasia Definitions Nomenclature Characteristics of benign and malignant neoplasms Epidemiology.
Principles of Surgical Oncology Done by : 428 surgery team surgery team.
Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasm Project. Acknowledgments American College of Surgeons (ACOS) Commission on Cancer (COC) Canadian Cancer Registries.
Agency/Standard Setter Updates OSCaR Fall Educational Workshop Claudia Cooksie, RHIT,CTR October 9, 2015 Portland, Oregon.
PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION Oregon State Cancer Registry Abstracting Hematologic Malignancies Stepping Up Your Game LeeLa Coleman, CTR Cancer Data Consultant.
17 th century microscopes In The Name of God PARISA REZAEI,M.D.,AP.CP.
REPRODUCIBILITY OF GLEASON GRADING SYSTEM FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA Dr A. T Atanda, Consultant Pathologist, AKTH, kano.
New Data Items MP/H Task Force Multiple Primary Rules Histology Coding Rules 2007.
2010 Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasm Project Training, Tools and Resources.
Neoplasia 1. a) Definition b) Terminologies Neoplasia “new growth” Definition: “an abnormal growth of tissue, the growth of which exceed and is uncoordinated.
Principles of Surgical Oncology
Malignant Epithelial Tumors
Collaborative Staging for Colon Site Specific Factors Tonya Brandenburg, MHA, CTR QA Manager Abstracting and Coding Kentucky Cancer Registry.
New Abstractor’s Training Colon Cancer Marynell Jenkins, CCRP, CTR Regional Coordinator.
Vicki LaRue, CTR KCR Abstractor’s Training February 12,
BY FRANCES ROSS, CTR PRESENTED AT THE NAACCR ANNUAL CONFERENCE JUNE, 2008 Record Consolidation Test with the 2007 Multiple Primary/Histology Rules.
1 Virginia Cancer Registrars Association and Virginia Cancer Registry Annual Meeting October 3, 2007.
1. Multiple Primary and Histology Rules 101 Format of MP/H Materials.
Cancer: Staging and Grading What is meant by the term “biopsy”? How do tumors behave differently from one another ? Examples of the stages of cancer and.
CLINICAL ASPECT OF GRADING AND STAGING Hanggoro Tri Rinonce, MD, PhD Department of Anatomical Pathology Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University.
2016 Edits.
Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules Colon Cancer
2018 Solid Tumor Rules: What’s New- Working through the rules
Discussion & Conclusion Predictives of Meningioma Grading
CHARACTERISTICS OF BENIGN AND MALIGNANT TUMORS
BREAST CANCER A full classification includes histopathological type, grade, stage (TNM), receptor status, and the presence or absence of genes as determined.
Principles of Surgical Oncology
Tumor Grade.
W. Scott Campbell, MBA, PhD University of Nebraska Medical Center
2018 Updates to ICD-O-3 Histology Coding
Mignon Dryden, CTR April 11, 2018 Region 5 Educational Meeting
Staging Cancer.
What’s New for 8th Edition
Mary Jo Bowie MS, BS, AAS, RHIA, RHIT
Presentation transcript:

KCR 2014 Spring Training CHANGES IN CODING GRADE

Changes in coding grade Grade has long been a source of confusion…

Changes in coding grade Several issues complicate matters:  in situ vs invasive  terminology vs numbers  special rules for many sites  FORDS and SEER manual have different instructions

Changes in coding grade  SEER, CDC, and CoC formed a work group to address the problem  No new codes; only clarifications and changes to instructions  New rules apply to cases diagnosed January 1, 2014 forward

Changes in coding grade  Instructions for coding cell indicator in hematopoietic and lymphoid neoplasms (codes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9) have not changed  Determine cell indicator using the “Grade of Tumor Rules” in Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasm Manual

Changes in Coding Grade  For solid tumors, grade is a measurement of how closely the tumor cells resemble the tissue from the organ of origin  Similarities and differences may be based on pattern (architecture), cytology, nuclear features, or a combination of these  Depends upon which grading system is used

Changes in coding grade  Pathologists describe tumor grade using three systems:  Two levels of similarity (two-grade system)  Three levels of similarity (three-grade system)  Four levels of similarity (four-grade system)

Rules for coding solid tumors 1) Code grade based on information prior to neoadjuvant therapy, even if grade is unknown 2) Code grade from the primary tumor only- NOT mets or recurrence; in the rare instance that the tumor extends contiguously to an adjacent site and tissue from the primary site is not available, code grade from the contiguous site

Rules for coding solid tumor 3) Code the grade (6 th digit) for specific histologic terms that imply a grade (i.e., undifferentiated sarcoma 8805/3 4 ) 4) For in situ or combined in situ/invasive tumors- if a grade is assigned for an in situ tumor, code it. Do NOT code grade for dysplasia. If there are both in situ and invasive components, code only the grade for the invasive portion, even if it is unknown

Rules for coding solid tumors 5) If more than one grade is given, code the highest grade, even if it is only a focus. Code grade in the following priority order using the first applicable system: a) Special grade system for the sites listed in #6 b) Differentiation, using instructions in #7 (2, 3, or 4 grade system) c) Nuclear grade, using instructions in #7 (2, 3, or 4 grade system) d) If it isn’t clear whether the grade assigned is differentiation or nuclear, but a 2, 3, or 4 grade system was used, code it using instructions in #7 e) Terminology

Rules for coding solid tumors 6) Use information from the special grade system first; if no special grade can be coded, go on to #7 Grade information based on CS SSF’s for breast, prostate, heart, mediastinum, peritoneum, retroperitoneum, soft tissue, and kidney parenchyma is used to code grade

Rules for coding solid tumors See the rules for each of these SSF’s for details on how to code grade for these sites: CS Schema Special grade system Breast Nottingham or Bloom-Richardson (BR) Score/Grade (SSF7) Prostate Gleason's Score on Needle Core Biopsy/Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP) (SSF 8) Prostate Gleason's Score on Prostatectomy/Autopsy (SSF 10) Heart, Mediastinum Grade for Sarcomas (SSF 1) Peritoneum Grade for Sarcomas (SSF 1) Retroperitoneum Grade for Sarcomas (SSF 1) Soft Tissue Grade for Sarcomas (SSF 1) Kidney Parenchyma Fuhrman Nuclear Grade (SSF 6)

Rules for coding solid tumors 7) Use the two, three, or four grade system information Two grade system Term Description Grade Code Exception for Breast and Prostate Grade Code 1/2, I/IILow grade2 1 2/2, II/IIHigh grade4 3

Rules for coding solid tumors Three grade system Term Description Grade Code Exception for Breast and Prostate Grade Code 1/3Low grade21 2/3Intermediate grade32 3/3High grade43

Rules for coding solid tumors Four grade system Term Description Grade Code 1/4Grade I; Well differentiated1 2/4Grade II; Moderately differentiated2 3/4Grade III; Poorly differentiated3 4/4Grade IV; Undifferentiated4

Rules for coding solid tumors 8) When coding grade from terminology, use the “description” column or the “grade” column. Breast and prostate use the same grade code with a few noted exceptions.

Rules for coding solid tumors Description Grade Assign Grade Code Exception for Breast and Prostate Grade Code Differentiated, NOSI1 Well differentiatedI1 Only stated as ‘Grade I’I1 Fairly well differentiatedII2 Intermediate differentiationII2 Low gradeI-II21 Mid differentiatedII2 Moderately differentiatedII2 Moderately well differentiatedII2 Partially differentiatedII2 Partially well differentiatedI-II21 Relatively or generally well differentiated II 2 Only stated as ‘Grade II’II2

Rules for coding solid tumors Description Grade Assign Grade Code Exception for Breast and Prostate Grade Code Medium grade, intermediate grade II-III 3 2 Moderately poorly differentiated III 3 Moderately undifferentiatedIII3 Poorly differentiatedIII3 Relatively poorly differentiatedIII3 Relatively undifferentiatedIII3 Slightly differentiatedIII3 DedifferentiatedIII3 Only stated as ‘Grade III’III3 High gradeIII-IV43 Undifferentiated, anaplastic, not differentiated IV 4 Only stated as ‘Grade IV’IV4 Non-high grade 9

Rules for coding solid tumors 9) If no description fits or grade is unknown prior to neoadjuvant therapy, use code 9 (unknown)

Special grade system rules  Breast uses Bloom Richardson (BR) or Nottingham  Coded in SSF7  Code in priority order a) BR scores 3-9 b) BR grade (low, intermediate, high)

Special grade systems rules  BR score is expressed as a range, 3-9.  Based on three morphologic features: degree of tubule formation/histologic grade, mitotic activity, nuclear pleomorphism/nuclear grade of tumor cells

Special grade system rules  If a pathology report uses words such as low, intermediate, or high rather than numbers, use this table to code grade Description CS Code Grade Code Score of Score of Score of Score of Score of Score of Score of Low Grade, Bloom-Richardson (BR) grade 1, score not given1101 Medium (Intermediate) Grade, BR grade 2, score not given1202 High Grade, BR grade 3, score not given1303

Special grade system rules  If only a grade of 1 through 4 is given with no information on the score, and it is unclear if it is a Nottingham or BR grade, do not use the conversion table.  Instead, continue on to #7 in the grading rules  If multiple scores are reported, code the highest score

Special grade system rules  Kidney uses Fuhrman nuclear grade  Parenchyma ONLY- not renal pelvis!  Coded in SSF6  Fuhrman nuclear grade is a four-grade system based on nuclear diameter and shape, the prominence of nucleoli, and the presence of chromatin clumping

Special grade system rules DescriptionCS Code Grade Code Grade Grade Grade Grade 40404

Special grade system rules  Soft tissue sarcoma uses a three-grade system  French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group (FNCLCC)  Coded in SSF1  In some cases (especially for needle bxs), grade may be specified only as “high grade” or “low grade”  Numeric grade take precedence over high or low

Special grade system rules DescriptionCS Code Grade Code Specified as Grade 1 [of 3]0102 Specified as Grade 2 [of 3]0203 Specified as Grade 3 [of 3]0304 Grade stated as low grade, NOS1002 Grade stated as high grade, NOS2004

Special grade system rules  Prostate uses Gleason grade  Coded in SSF8 (bx/TURP) and SSF10 (prostatectomy/autopsy)  Gleason grade is based on a 5-component system and generally shows two main histology patterns

Special grade system rules  The primary pattern occupies >50% of the cancer  It is usually the first number of the Gleason grade  Secondary pattern is indicated by the second number  These two numbers are added together to create the score, ranging from 2-10

Special grade system rules  If there are two numbers, assume they refer to patterns, and add them together to obtain the score  If only one number is given, and it is < 5, and not specified as a score, do not use the information, because it could refer to either a score or a grade  If only one number is given, and it is >5, assume that is the score and use it

Special grade system rules Change in prostate grading Gleason Description SEER SEER score CS Code Grade Code AJCC 7th AJCC 6th prior G G G G1 G G1 G G2 G3 G G G G3

Special grade system rules  Due to these changes, analysis of prostate grade for cases diagnosed prior to 2014 based solely on the grade field is not recommended

Special grade system rules SSF 8 Code SSF 10 Grade Code * * * * * * * * *33 988************ *** ***

Changes in coding grade  The new grading instructions can be found at  CoC and SEER will incorporate these instructions in their respective coding manual for 2014  KCR Abstractor’s Manual will be updated

Changes in coding grade  Questions?