Cristina Gonzalez-Maddux ITEP MODEL INPUTS AND FEDERAL GUIDANCE CRISTINA GONZALEZ-MADDUX ITEP, RESEARCH SPECIALIST.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Advertisements

1 RLINE: A Line Source Dispersion Model for Near-Surface Releases Presented at the 12 th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC October 28 – 30, 2013.
Session 11: Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA 1 Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA Prepared by Dr. Erno Sajo, Associate.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering and Technology.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
Session 8, Unit 15 ISC-PRIME and AERMOD. ISC-PRIME General info. PRIME - Plume Rise Model Enhancements Purpose - Enhance ISCST3 by addressing ISCST3’s.
Paul Wishinski VT DEC Presentation for: MARAMA-NESCAUM-OTC Regional Haze Workshop August 2-3, 2000 Gorham, New Hampshire LYE BROOK WILDERNESS CLASS I AREA.
Meteorological Data Issues for Class II Increment Analysis.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
The Use of High Resolution Mesoscale Model Fields with the CALPUFF Dispersion Modelling System in Prince George BC Bryan McEwen Master’s project
ADMS ADMS 3.3 Modelling Summary of Model Features.
INTEGRATION OF MEASURED, MODELLED & REMOTELY SENSED AIR QUALITY DATA & IMPACTS ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN HIGHVELD Kubeshnie Bhugwandin - November 2009.
1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
fluidyn – PANAIR Fluidyn-PANAIR
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for NO 2 and SO 2 – New Modeling Challenges August 4, 2011 Air & Waste Management Association – Southern Section.
Introduction to Air Pollution John Atkinson and Dr. Mark Rood Environmental Engineering and Science Program Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
8 th Conference on Air Quality Modeling – A&WMA AB3 Comments on Nonstandard Modeling Approaches By Ron Petersen, CPP Inc Blue Spruce Drive Fort Collins.
Air Quality Modeling.
Session 1, Unit 1 Course Overview. Introduction Course – ENV 7335 Air Quality Modeling Instructor – Yousheng Zeng, Ph.D., P.E. Prerequisite – ENV 7331.
Overview of Dispersion Modeling in Air Permitting Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Robert Arpino P.E.
Session 4, Unit 7 Plume Rise
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
Earth System Sciences, LLC Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases Doug Blewitt, CCM 1.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
Dispersion Modeling A Brief Introduction A Brief Introduction Image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
CONCEPTUAL MODELING PROTOCOL FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT PROGRAM.
Modeling Overview For Barrio Logan Community Health Neighborhood Assessment Program Andrew Ranzieri Vlad Isakov Tony Servin Shuming Du October 10, 2001.
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar University of Toledo Introduction.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
WRAP Update WESTAR Meeting San Francisco April 25, 2011.
Meteorology & Air Pollution Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun.
Emission Inventories and EI Data Sets Sarah Kelly, ITEP Les Benedict, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
Air Dispersion Modeling City of Albuquerque Environmental Health Department Air Quality Program Director: Mary Lou Leonard.
Regulatory Requirements For Modeling. Air Quality Model Estimates Developing Air Pollution Control Plans Assessment of Environmental Impacts Projecting.
GIS Applications for Air Quality Management Robert Wu 吳震球 South Coast Air Quality Management District SCCAEPAApril 26, 2008.
Session 3, Unit 5 Dispersion Modeling. The Box Model Description and assumption Box model For line source with line strength of Q L Example.
April  Collaborative effort between BLM, EPA, States, other FLMs and the Oil and Gas Industry to better predict 1- hour NO 2 impacts from drill.
Cristina Gonzalez-Maddux ITEP
Regional Modeling Joseph Cassmassi South Coast Air Quality Management District USA.
WRAP Workshop July 29-30, 2008 Potential Future Regional Modeling Center Cumulative Analysis Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California.
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Proposed Revisions to the Guideline on Air Quality Models
1 Tracer Experiments Barrio Logan Working Draft Do Not Cite or Quote Tony Servin, P.E. Shuming Du, Ph.D. Vlad Isakov, Ph.D. September 12, 2002 Air Resources.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
How Tribes Use Models Part 1 Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.
Intro to Modeling – Terms & concepts Marti Blad, Ph.D., P.E. ITEP
Source: Javier Fochesatto Regulatory Context for Modeling Robert Elleman EPA Region 10.
Introduction to Modeling – Part I Sarah Kelly ITEP Sarah Kelly ITEP.
Stephen F. Austin State University February 27, 2014 Justin Cherry, P.E. Reece Parker TCEQ Air Permits Division.
AERSCREEN Status and Update James Thurman, Ph.D. U.S. EPA/OAQPS/AQAD Air Quality Modeling Group 2009 NESCAUM PMC Annual Meeting Mystic, CT.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
Consequence Analysis Robert Wu South Coast Air Quality Management District.
The Clean Air Act (CAA) is the comprehensive federal law that regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources.
Comparisons of CALPUFF and AERMOD for Vermont Applications Examining differing model performance for a 76 meter and 12 meter (stub) stack with emission.
Western Regional Technical Projects 2011 through 2013
Types of Models Marti Blad PhD PE
Meteorological Site Representativeness and AERSURFACE Issues
AERLINE: Air Exposure Research model for LINE sources
Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Meteorology & Air Pollution Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun
INPUT DATA REQUIREMENTS
Oil and Gas Emission Inventories and Applications for Estimating Impacts to Health and Welfare Tom Moore, WESTAR-WRAP John Grant and Amnon Bar-Ilan, Ramboll.
Institute for Nature Management, Minsk, Belarus
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Cristina Gonzalez-Maddux ITEP MODEL INPUTS AND FEDERAL GUIDANCE CRISTINA GONZALEZ-MADDUX ITEP, RESEARCH SPECIALIST

WHAT ARE OUR INPUTS? Fundamental inputs: source data (EI) and met data What is being emitted and in what quantities?? Are these “named” pollutants according to the CAA??

Clockwise from upper left hand corner: Coning plume, Fanning plume, Fumigation, Lofting plume, Looping plume Source: US EPA, APTI Lesson 4 – Vertical Motion and Atmospheric Stability ConingFanning Fumigation Lofting Looping Where are the pollutants headed? How fast? What’s the plume doing?

MODEL INPUTS AND CONSIDERATIONS Meteorological data RECALL: Wind speed and direction; Ambient temperature, Differential temperature; Atmospheric stability class (A-G); Mixing height; Surface roughness Receptor Coordinates (x, y, z) Options: Grid (C/P), Discrete receptors (C/P), Plant boundary (C/P), Fenceline grids, Multi-tier grids

POLLUTANT RECEPTORS Above: Chemical manufacturing plant Upper right: Eulerian photochemical model – Boylan et al. 2002, Atmos. Env.

RECEPTORS – REAL WORLD EXAMPLES

Near-field: < 1 km from mine site Red Cliff Mine in Mesa and Garfield counties, CO Resource: Coal Photo: Oxbow Coal Mine Somerset, CO

MODEL INPUTS Source type Point Square, rectangular, circular, polygon area Volume Open pit Line Flare

MODEL INPUTS Site Data Geographic location i.e. Proximity to coast Topography – simple v. complex Source - Stack data Diameter Exit temperature (T s ) and velocity (V s ) Pollutant emission rate (Q) Stack height Stack diameter

OTHER FACTORS INFLUENCING MODEL SELECTION AND OUTPUT Temporal and spatial scales seconds or hours; 10 km or 1000 km Pollutant transport (mobile or stationary; fixed or moving frame) Atmospheric turbulence Met conditions (quiescent v. turbulent) Topography Pollutant type (i.e. stable or reactive) Source types (line, area, volume) Modified from APTI 410

AERMOD PRE-PROCESSORS

CALPUFF PRE-PROCESSORS

AERMOD Gaussian plume model Steady state model Within 50 km Preprocessors  AERMET (Met preprocessor) – Surface and Upper air data  AERMAP (Terrain processor) – Terrain files  BPIP (building downwash)  Input parameters : o Met data o Buildings o Sources o Receptors o Averaging periods CALPUFF Gaussian puff model Non-steady state model > 50 km Preprocessors ▫ CALMET ▫ Geophysical preprocessors ▫ Met preprocessor ▫ CALPUFF (dispersion model) ▫ CALPOST (post-processor)  Input parameters: o Met data o Buildings o Sources o Receptors o Averaging periods

WHAT IS THE END RESULT? Representative model? (x, y, z) Data requirements Must be representative! Instrument siting Data completeness Analyze and evaluate What is our ideal model? → one that “most accurately estimates concentrations in the area of interest” US EPA, Appendix W

FEDERAL GUIDANCE ON AQ MODELS Guideline on Air Quality Models (‘‘Guideline’’) 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–99 Edition), APPENDIX W TO PART 51— GUIDELINE ON AIR QUALITY MODELS What is the Guideline? “The Guideline recommends air quality modeling techniques that should be applied to State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions for existing sources and to new source reviews, including prevention of significant deterioration (PSD).” Newest Edition: August 1, 1999 First Published: 1978 (recall CAA enacted in 1977) Congress “mandated consistency & encouraged standardization of model applications” Regulatory app of AQ models – Criteria pollutants under the CAA

CAA – APPENDIX W “Provides a common basis for estimating the air quality concentrations used in assessing control strategies and developing emission limits.” Regularly updated: EPA workshops EPA cooperative agreement with the American Met Society (representing the scientific community) Solicitation & review of new models (privately developed – procedure developed and published in 1980) Ongoing research in AQ and met modeling

CAA – APPENDIX W Guideline provides recommendations on: air quality models databases requirements for concentration estimates the use of measured data in lieu of model estimates, and model evaluation procedures “…intended for use by EPA Regional Offices in judging the adequacy of modeling analyses performed by EPA, State and local agencies and by industry.”

SAMPLE REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems (Vol. IV Meteorological Measurements) Ambient Monitoring Guidelines for PSD Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications EPA-454/B EPA-450/ EPA-454/R

SAMPLE REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Model-specific guidance documents δύσκολο να κατανοήσουμε!

FEDERAL LAND MANAGERS NEPA Guidance: BLM, USFS, USDOT, FTA, state DOTs, regional transportation districts, municipalities i.e. USFS guidance docs for smoke, oil and gas, ski areas, planning “The Clean Air Act and subsequent amendments give Federal land managers an ‘affirmative responsibility’ to protect Air Quality Related Values in Class 1 areas and to protect human health and basic resource values in all areas.” - USFS

US EPA - TTN SCRAM SITE Technology transfer network - Support Center for Regulatory Atmospheric Modeling Modeling Guidance and Support Permit Modeling SIP Attainment Demonstrations Toxics Guidance TTN SCRAM site BINGO GAME WIN PRIZES!