Pennsylvania Standard J. Geometry Standard

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing constructed response items
Advertisements

California Standards for the Teaching Profession
1 The Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle in Action.
Learning Targets. OUR Targets I can articulate the difference between a ‘standard’ and a ‘target.’ I can deconstruct standards and evaluate my work for.
The Importance of Technology in Mathematics. Annika Moore Mathematics Consultant Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Professional Development.
Mathematics in the MYP.
Making Assignment Expectations Clear: Create a Grading Rubric Barb Thompson Communication Skills Libby Daugherty Assessment FOR Student Learning 1.
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
Learning Targets Helping Students Aim for Understanding in Every Lesson! Part II.
Consistency of Assessment
Geometry Theme MAA PREP WORKSHOP Laurie Burton and Maria Fung Western Oregon University July 8 th 2003.
Understanding the Process and the Product Professional Development Spring, 2012.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Learning Trajectory Everyday Mathematics Program Goals.
Brian Sarkozy MAT 529. Brief Overview  Purpose  Students should understand and apply twenty essential geometric terms  Students should use application,
Principles of Assessment
Developing Geometric Reasoning K-2 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class March 14, 2011 Paige Richards and Dana Thome.
LinearRelationships Jonathan Naka Intro to Algebra Unit Portfolio Presentation.
NYC Schools Task Alignment Project The Common Core State Standards Aligning and Rating Math Tasks April 28, 2011.
© 2008 by PACT PACT Scorer Training Pilot.
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline In planning.
Flying High With Symmetry Christie Oehman Maplemere Elementary School Sweet Home School District Mrs. Baetzhold Grade 3 Spring 2010.
Goals for Learning: I can describe what rigor looks like in my classroom. I can examine student work products for rigor. I can incorporate rigor into my.
DEVELOPING ART LESSONS WITH AT-RISK YOUTH AND ELLS IN MIND Delanie Holton Art Teacher Fletcher Primary and Intermediate Aurora, CO.
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CCSS FOR MATHEMATICS COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS PRESENTED BY: BEATRIZ ALDAY.
Language Objective: Students will be able to practice agreeing and disagreeing with partner or small group, interpret and discuss illustrations, identify.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Chapter 4: Planning Educational Outcomes Presented by: April Gannon & Lizzy Allen.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Understanding Shape in Kindergarten and Grade 1 Common Core.
EDN:204– Learning Process 30th August, 2010 B.Ed II(S) Sci Topics: Cognitive views of Learning.
Selected Teaching-Learning Terms: Working Definitions...
Standard Setting Results for the Oklahoma Alternate Assessment Program Dr. Michael Clark Research Scientist Psychometric & Research Services Pearson State.
Pennsylvania Standard B Algebra and Functions Discover and generalize patterns, including linear, exponential and simple quadratic relationships.
Curriculum Framework for Mathematics 1 Curriculum Framework for Mathematics Hawaii State Dept. of Education OCISS, Instructional Services Branch.
SHOW US YOUR RUBRICS A FACULTY DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP SERIES Material for this workshop comes from the Schreyer Institute for Innovation in Learning.
1 Math 413 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction October 2008.
Module 3 January, 2009 Sponsored by The Kentucky Department of Education And The University of Kentucky (PIMSER)
Stage 2 Understanding by Design Assessment Evidence.
Tracy Guerrera Jasmine Rivera Jodi-Ann Martells. Brief Overview Purpose Present a transformations activity for students to complete Get feedback from.
Using GSP in Discovering a New Theory Dr. Mofeed Abu-Mosa This paper 1. Connects Van Hiele theory and its levels of geometric thinking with.
Session 1 Introduction: Assessment & Evaluation Assessment & Evaluation.
Introduction to Content Standards Jacqueline E. Korengel, Ed.D.
Calculating the Area of Rectilinear Figures Unit of Study 15: Understand Area Global Concept Guide: 3 of 3.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Geometry 1 st Grade Geometry Lesson. Content Strand Addressed Geometry Strand Students will: use visualization and spatial reasoning to analyze characteristics.
Preparing Teacher Candidates to Address Academic Language for the edTPA Bryan Gillis Ph.D. Associate Professor of English Education and Literacy Kennesaw.
EdTPA Elementary Mathematics. The Big Picture Plan a “Learning Segment” (3-5 lessons) Consistent with the Common Core and the NCTM Standards, the learning.
Grade 7 & 8 Mathematics Reporter : Richard M. Oco Ph. D. Ed.Mgt-Student.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Bloom’s Taxonomy The Concept of “Levels of Thinking”
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
SBAC-Mathematics November 26, Outcomes Further understand DOK in the area of Mathematics Understand how the new SBAC assessments will measure student.
Introduction to Supporting Science. What Does Science Involve? Identifying a question to investigate Forming hypotheses Collecting data Interpreting data.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
MATH BY MEAGHAN, ROWEN, ELSIE. CONTENT LIST ▪ INTRODUCTION : Past vs Present ▪ SELECTING APPROPRIATE MATH : Math Standards ▪ RESEARCH ON MATH INSTRUCTION.
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning
Writing in Math: Digging Deeper into Short Constructed Responses
Exploring Symmetry Core Mathematics Partnership
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Understanding by Design
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 4
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 5
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 7
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
Progression of Geometry
What is a Performance Task
Presentation transcript:

Pennsylvania Standard 2.9.8 J. Geometry Standard Analyze geometric patterns (e.g., tessellations, sequences of shapes) and develop descriptions of the patterns.

Step 1: Evidence to Excellence Process   Why study geometry? Discussion of the standard (Focus the discussion on: Geometry describes and provides understanding of the physical world. This description includes size, shape, position, and dimension.)

The Standard Ø What is the intent of the standard? Ø Identify the essential understandings. Ø What prior knowledge and understandings must students have in order to achieve this standard by grade 8? (focus on examples of what students should know and be able to do to answer the following questions at K-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-8.)

Can students-- recognize, draw, construct, visualize, compare and analyze real and abstract geometric shapes that have one, two, and/or three-dimensional features?  identify the characteristics that are necessary to classify and name geometric shapes and can they differentiate one shape from another?

Can students-- describe geometric shapes in terms of their relationships (relative size, position, orientation, congruence, similarity, and symmetry) with other shapes? compose or decompose geometric shapes into other geometric shapes?

Can students-- discover and express constant relationships within and between geometric shapes through measuring and looking for patterns and can students connect and relate these constant relationships to formulas?

Can students-- discover and express constant relationships within and between geometric shapes through measuring and looking for patterns and connect and relate these constant relationships to formulas?

The Standard Identify and describe the lessons/activities used to equip students with the needed knowledge and skills to achieve understanding? What would be acceptable as evidence that students understand?

Step 2: The Task Ø Was the language of the task clear? Ø      Does the task provide an opportunity for students to have a relevant and meaningful experience that actively engages them in constructing their own knowledge? Analyze a task which addresses the standard

The Task Ø Does the task stimulate higher order thinking and discussion? Explain. Ø Did the task provide students an opportunity to work with significant ideas and relationships that are included in the standard?

The Task Ø     If you would have given this task, what evidence would you use to determine if the student understood the content of the lesson?

Step 3: Student Work Ø     Analyze the student work samples and provide their assessment of each sample of work. Ø      What is the evidence that the student used good thinking and reasoning skills in completing the task? Share 4 samples of student work, WITHOUT identifying the evaluation of the work.

The Student Work Ø     How does the student connect the mathematics they were learning to the real world?

The Student Work Ø How would you assess the work? Ø What is the evidence that the student achieved the goal of the task? Ø  How would you assess the work? Ø   Which pieces of student work achieve the understandings intended in the standard? To assess, Use the criteria you defined in step 2

The Student Work Ø     What is the evidence that the student achieved the goal of the task? Ø How would you assess the work? Ø Which pieces of student work achieve the understandings intended in the standard? (Use the criteria you defined in step 2)

Step 4: The Assessment Ø      Does the assessment fairly reflect the objectives of the task? Ø  Based on the student work that you saw, and what you read and understood of the assessment, do you agree or disagree with the assessment of the task? Presents the assessment of the task. Explain answers to questions.

The Rubric Advanced - Student demonstrates comprehensive understanding of a geometric pattern by consistently identifying correct extensions of the pattern and clearly explaining its rationale. Proficient - Student demonstrates general understanding of the pattern by consistently identifying the correct extensions or by clearly explaining its rationale.

The Rubric Basic - Student shows basic understanding of the concept of the pattern by identifying an adequate number of correct extensions. Below Basic - Student shows minimal understanding of the pattern.

Step 5: The Reflection Ø How can the task be improved?   Ø      How can the assessment of the work be improved? Reflect on the assignment, student work, and assessment of the task

The Reflection Ø What additional evidence is needed to make this a more complete picture of student understanding of the concepts addressed?

The Reflection Ø      What interventions should be considered to help students who do not yet understand the concepts?   Ø      As a result of looking at the student's work, are there things you will consider in your classroom in making assignments and in assessing student work? (Considerable time should be spent discussing strategies and interventions to ensure understanding)