Dr. Derek Webb Bemidji State University Faculty.bemidjistate.edu/dwebb.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Advertisements

Dr. Derek Webb Bemidji State University Faculty.bemidjistate.edu/dwebb.
P.M van Hiele Mathematics Learning Theorist Rebecca Bonk Math 610 Fall 2009.
Dr. Derek Webb Bemidji State University Faculty.bemidjistate.edu/dwebb.
How Are New Turkish Textbooks Presenting Geometric Concepts? An Analysis of the Turkish New Elementary Mathematics Curriculum and Textbooks in Terms of.
Dr. Jackie Sack NCTM Annual Meeting March 23, 2007 B u ild I t D raw It I n t er p r e t It.
500 Chapter Chapter Chapter 22Chapter
VDW Ch 20: Geometric Thinking
5th Grade Common Core Math
5th Grade Common Core Math Practice and Solutions for 5th Grade Common Core Math Standard 5.NBT.3 Multiple Choice Set #1 without Answers Multiple Choice.
Dr. Derek Webb Dr. Heidi Hansen Bemidji State University Faculty.bemidjistate.edu/dwebb.
Dr. Derek Webb Bemidji State University Faculty.bemidjistate.edu/dwebb.
1 Geometry and Spatial Reasoning Develop adequate spatial skills Children respond to three dimensional world of shapes Discovery as they play, build and.
Developing Geometric Reasoning Mary Jane Schmitt August 22–24, 2006 Washington, DC.
Geometric and Spatial Reasoning
Wheeler Lower School Mathematics Program Grades 4-5 Goals: 1.For all students to become mathematically proficient 2.To prepare students for success in.
Students can identify objects by their overall shape. They need to see many examples and non-examples. Van Hiele Model of Geometric Understanding Level.
Elementary School Teachers: Teaching, Understanding and Using Statistics Anna E. Bargagliotti 1 & Derek Webb 2 1 University of Memphis, 2 Bemidji State.
Geometry Grades K-2. Goals:  Build an understanding of the mathematical concepts within the Geometry Domain  Analyze how concepts of Geometry progress.
5th Grade Common Core Math
What? A Math Class That is Not All Lecture? Needs of college math students today are different but curriculum has NOT kept pace Most students do NOT learn.
Parent Math Information Night December 6, 2011 Rebecca Fleming & Noreen Haus.
TIPM3 Second and Third Grade Geometry November 3, 2010.
1 Seminar and Report Writing PhD (Business Administration) Dr Fred Mugambi Mwirigi.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
Tending the Greenhouse Vertical and Horizontal Connections within the Mathematics Curriculum Kimberly M. Childs Stephen F. Austin State University.
Sunnyside School District
1 State Board of Education October 18, 2007 Draft Content Standards for K-8 Mathematics First Reading C. Michelle Hooper, Jon Wiens Office of Educational.
Mathematics Curriculum Roadmap. What Materials Will Be Used to Support Student Learning? Grade 8 Math Resource: EngageNY Supplemental resources are used.
An Introduction to Chapter 9: Geometric Figures
T1PM3 4 th and 5 th grade Math Institute Focus on Geometry, Measurement and Data & The Eight Mathematical Practice September 27, 2011.
Class 4: Part 1 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class April 4, 2011.
By: Angel Burrow Rigorous Coherent Measureable State-Led Clear Specific Evidence-Based.
Understanding Alaska Measures of Progress Results: Reports 1 ASA Fall Meeting 9/25/2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon,
Middle School iSquad Grades 6-8 Measuring Shapes Using Geometer’s Sketchpad.
An Ideal van Hiele Web- based Model for Computer Programming Learning and Teaching to Promote Collaborative Learning Dr. J. Wey Chen, Professor Department.
MH Geometry & Measurement Unit 1 William Caten October 2011.
5th Grade Common Core Math
Geometric Thinking Cohort Training October 9 8:30-3:30 Mid-Central Educational Cooperative.
MH502: Developing Mathematical Proficiency, Geometry and Measurement, K-5 Seminar 1 September 28, 2010.
Pumpkin Math. Mathematical Investigations Has multidimensional content Is open-ended, with several acceptable solutions Is an exploration requiring a.
Ms.Samina Javed The City School Mathematics,Grade 5
Seminar and Report Writing
 Van Hiele Levels Math Alliance September 14, 2010 Kevin McLeod Chris Guthrie.
SATMathVideos.Net A set S consists of all multiples of 4. Which of the following sets are contained within set S? A) S2 only B) S4 only C) S2 and S4 D)
Teaching Young Learners with the Ohio Early Mathematics Standards in Mind Sponsored by the Ohio Department of Jobs & Family Services in collaboration with.
Geometry The Van Hiele Levels of Geometric Thought.
NC NAEP Project Middle Grades Module 2 – Activity 4 Research Reflections.
4th Grade Common Core Math Practice and Solutions for 4th Grade Common Core Math Standard 4.NF.7 Multiple Choice Set #1 without Answers Multiple Choice.
Which list of numbers is ordered from least to greatest? 10 –3, , 1, 10, , 1, 10, 10 2, 10 – , 10 –3, 1, 10, , 10 –3,
ANSWERS!. Completing the Square Level 1 Answers Completing the Square Level 2 Answers.
TIPM3 March 2, 2011 Kindergarten and First Grade.
Order of Operations Oral examples x 5 x x 5 ÷ ÷ 5 x ÷ 5 ÷ 2 9.
Geometry 7-R Unit 7 Area Review Problems
Introduction to Math Methods Math Standards. Why can math be fun? Math can be fun because… it can have so much variety in topics. many different ways.
Taxicab Geometry TWSSP Monday.
1st Grade Common Core Math
Creating, Describing, and Comparing Shapes
Levels of Geometric Thinking The van Hiele Levels
Local Control Accountability Plan
Math Standards Math 120—Algorithms for Arithmetic
Find all solutions of the equation
Math Standards Math 120—Algorithms for Arithmetic
Бази от данни и СУБД Основни понятия инж. Ангел Ст. Ангелов.
Combining Like terms.
Chapter 01.
Topic 1: Be able to combine functions and determine the resulting function. Topic 2: Be able to find the product of functions and determine the resulting.
Common Core Vs Kansas Standards
Practice Geometry Practice
Common Core Vs. Kansas Standards
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Derek Webb Bemidji State University Faculty.bemidjistate.edu/dwebb

 Name  School  Grades you teach

 Examination of Standards ◦ NCTM ◦ MN ◦ Common Core  Van Hiele Model  Attributes Activity  Mira Activity  Conclusions

 Examination of Standards – NCTM Examination of Standards – NCTM

 Examination of Standards – NCTM Examination of Standards – NCTM Geometry K Geometry

 Examination of Standards – MN Examination of Standards – MN Geometry standards are combined with measurement standards.

 NCTM vs. MN Standards NCTM Standards are broad, encourage multiple solutions, and focus on concepts. MN Standards are more specific, focus on “correct answers” and formulas as grade level increases.

 Examination of Standards – Common Core Examination of Standards – Common Core Which states have adopted Common Core? NCTM endorses Common Core Common Core more similar to NCTM than to MN standards MN likely to adopt Common Core in future

 Van Hiele Model Van Hiele Model Most widely accepted model of how students learn geometry Five levels Level 0 – Visualization Level 1 – Analysis Level 2 – Abstraction Level 3 – Deduction Level 4 – Rigor