January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joe Kwak, InterDigital 1 Submission PSNI: New PHY Measurement a subjective, comparative measurement to support network management Joe Kwak InterDigital.
Advertisements

An approach to the problem of optimizing channel parameters March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /152 Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /531 Submission July 2003 Hart/Skellern CiscoSlide 1 EVM vs PER Plot Not Promising for PSNI Brian Hart, David Skellern (Cisco Systems)
The Impact of Channel Estimation Errors on Space-Time Block Codes Presentation for Virginia Tech Symposium on Wireless Personal Communications M. C. Valenti.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1508r0 November 2014 Edward Reuss, UnaffiliatedSlide 1 Link Margin Comments on Letter Ballot 203 Date: Authors:
September 2002 Steve Pope, TISlide 1 doc.: IEEE /520r0 Submission Issues Related to RSSI Measurement Steve Pope Texas Instruments September.
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
Doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission Jan 2015 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Roaming Date: 2015-January Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0705r2 Submission Control PHY Design for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems Authors: May 2015 Slide 1Jianhan Liu (MediaTek)
Doc.: IEEE /xxxx Submission Control PHY Design for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems.pptx Authors: May 2015 Slide 1Jianhan Liu, et.
Doc.: IEEE /0890r3 Submission July 2014 Youhan Kim, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 1 WLAN-3GPP Interworking Metric Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0890r0 Submission July 2014 Youhan Kim, QualcommSlide 1 WLAN-3GPP Interworking Metric Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Discussions on the Definition of CCA Threshold
CEFRIEL Deliverable R4.1.5 MAIS adaptive and reconfigurable modem Giovanni Paltenghi Roma – 24 Novembre 2005.
Doc.: IEEE /0705r1 Submission Control PHY Design for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems Authors: May 2015 Slide 1Jianhan Liu, et.
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
DMG-12/00 Page 1 April 23, 2002 Digital Communications Basics Dan M. Goebel 4/23/2002.
Summary Thus far we have: ECE 4710: Lecture #39
Doc.: IEEE /209r2 Submission March 2004 Lanzl, Aware; Ketchum, QualcommSlide 1 Carrier Frequency / Symbol Clock Offset Proposal for TGn FRCC Colin.
SubmissionKwak/Johnson, InterDigital/Nortel1 Link Quality Strawpole Joe Kwak/Brian Johnson doc: IEEE /970r0November 2003.
Doc.: IEEE /383 Submission November1998November 1998 Jamshid Khun-Jush, ETSI-BRANSlide 1 BRAN#11 PHY Decisions & Issues to Resolved with
Doc.: IEEE /270 Submission July 2003 Liang Li, Helicomm Inc.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE s Submission September 2015 Hidetoshi Yokota and Ruben Salazar, Landis&GyrSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 BSS Load: AP Loading Metric for QOS Joe Kwak InterDigital doc: IEEE /0079r1May 2005.
Doc: IEEE /0779r1September 2005 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 1 RSNI: Simple SNIR for TGk Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc: IEEE /0467r1May 2007 Submission Joe Kwak( InterDigital), Jokela, Durand 1 Interference Diagnostics Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc: IEEE /0435r0May 2005 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 1 Support for Advanced Antennas & Techniques in TGk Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /235r0 Submission May 2001 Philips SemiconductorsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE xxx a Submission November 2004 Welborn, FreescaleSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /536r0 Submission September 2001 A. Soomro and S. Choi, Philips Research, USASlide 1 Proposal to Add Link Margin Field in IEEE h.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 BSS Load: AP Loading Metric for QOS Joe Kwak InterDigital doc: IEEE /0079r0January 2005.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 2009 Michael SchmidtSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 RCPI: Improved RSSI Measurement a quantized power measurement to support network management Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications.
Doc.: IEEE a Submission November 2004 Welborn, FreescaleSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Preliminary PHY.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1314r2 November 2015 Interdigital CommunicationsSlide 1 I/Q Imbalance Impact to TGax OFDMA Uplink Reception Date:
IEEE n Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:LB93 Comment resolution.
Doc.: IEEE /0408r0 Submission May 2005 John Klein, SymbolSlide 1 TPC Comments Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It.
Doc.: IEEE /0635r1 Submission May 2014 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Implementation Date: 2014-May Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 STA disassociation behavior Joe Kwak, Marian Rudolf InterDigital doc: IEEE /106r0January 2004.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 Retrieving MIB contents from STA’s Joe Kwak, Marian Rudolf InterDigital doc: IEEE /554r0July 2003.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 Two New MAC Measurements loading measurements for STA transmit traffic and AP service ability to support network management.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 PHY measurements for interference reduction from 11h Joe Kwak, Marian Rudolf InterDigital doc: IEEE /537r0July.
Doc.: IEEE e submission Kondou (Sony)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /457 Submission May 2003 Hart/Ryan/Skellern CiscoSlide 1 Use of EVM to Measure Rx Output Signal Quality Brian Hart, Phil Ryan, David.
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
Date Submitted: [18 March 2004]
Advanced Wireless Networks
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
SC 64-QAM in clause 21 PHY Date: Authors: November 2015
AP Service Load: Improved Definition
عوارض کانال(تداخل نمونه ها،نویز،فیدینگ) آنالیز خطا،کدینگ کانال
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
Submission Title: [Harmonizing-TG3a-PHY-Proposals-for-CSM]
EVM vs PER Plot Not Promising for PSNI
Submission Title: FPP-SUN Bad Urban GFSK vs OFDM
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
6 July, 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: FPP SUN Simulation Results – Redpine Signals.
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Simple SNIR for TGk 2005-JULY-21 Authors: Joe Kwak, InterDigital
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity for ac
WRSS in p Date: July 2005 Month Year
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
Presentation transcript:

January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation IEEE 802.11-03/100r1 doc: IEEE 802.11-03/315r0 May 2003 RCPI and PSNI: New PHY Measurements comparative measurements of receiver input and output to support network management Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital

Outline Need for new PHY measurements January 2003 IEEE 802.11-03/100r1 Outline Need for new PHY measurements RCPI and PSNI Relation to SNR in Demodulator Received Channel Power Indicator (RCPI) Definition Perceived Signal-to-Noise-plus-interference Indicator (PSNI) Definition PSNI Analysis: Relation to EbNo, SNR and BER Motions to incorporate RCPI and PSNI Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

Need for New PHY Measurements RSSI is defined at antenna input connector but is not fully specified: no unit definitions, no performance requirements (accuracy, testability). Since so little about RSSI is specified, it must be assumed that widely variant implementations already exist. It is not possible to compare RSSIs from different STAs and perhaps not even from different channels/PHYs within same STA. RSSI may have limited use for evaluating AP options within a STA and within a given PHY, but not between PHYs. RSSI is rescaled between DSSS and OFDM PHYs. RSSI is clearly not useable by network management for handoff or load balancing. RSSI from one STA does not relate to RSSI from any other STA. In high interference environments, RSSI is not an adequate indicator of desired signal quality, since it indicates the sum of desired signal + noise + interference powers. Proposed RCPI provides quantized, objective input power measure (S+N+I). Proposed PSNI provides quantized, comparative measure of received signal quality [observed S/(N+I)] for all channels/rates and among all PHYs and between all STAs. Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

PHY Measurement Architecture RCPI measures total RF Power at antenna input connector A. PSNI measures observed S/(N+I) within demodulator but normalizes measurement for FER at E. AGC B C D Demodulator and tracking loops (PHY specific) E Radio front end FEC Decoder (optional) Frame Check (CRC) A/D A A: Total RF power, RF S/(N+I) from each AP C&D: Bit Error Rate (BER) @each data rate from each AP B: BB S/(N+I) from each AP (BB power constant by AGC) E: Frame Error Rate (FER) @each data rate from each AP Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

Measure PHY Demod Input (power) and Output (QOS) Accurate S/(N+I) measurement at A is interesting but because RF/demod implementations vary widely, it cannot be used comparatively between STAs to evaluate delivered signal quality. Accurate FER measurement at E is ideal quality measure, but cannot be measured frame by frame. FER can only be accurately measured over 100s-1000s of frames. Also, FERs are comparable only at same frame size and data rate. -80dbm Good STA 10E-5 -80dbm Good STA 10E-5 A (dBm) E (FER) A (dBm) E (FER) Med STA 10E-4 Med STA 10E-5 -78dbm -80dbm Marginal STA Marginal STA 10E-2 -75dbm 10E-5 -80dbm Signal at same objective SNR Signal at same subjective SNR Measure RCPI power at A. Measure PSNI quality in middle, but specify PSNI with FER at E. Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

RCPI and PSNI Relation to SNR in Demodulator Received Channel Power Level dBm (S + N + I) Operating Margin Required Min RSPL Level Desired Signal Power dBm Interference Power at Input Boltzman’s C (-198dBm/Hz/K) Antenna Connector: Input Power Level (S+ N + I) Input Analog SNIR Ratio Thermal Input Noise Level (-100dBm) Theoretical SNR for required BER (RCPI at antenna connector) NBW = 22MHz = 73.4dB Temp = 290K = 24.6dB Channel Impairments (CI) (fading + multipath + etc, = 0 in AWGN) dBm Total Modem Implementation Losses (TML) FEC Decoder Loss, if any Demodulator Loss Rx Amp Noise Figure + IM Distortion Observed Digital (PSNI in demodulator) Input SNR Ratio Total Channel Condition Losses o Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

RCPI Concept: Measure Input Power Specified like RSSI: 8-bit unsigned value, monotonically increasing with increasing signal strength. RCPI shall be logarithmically scaled in dB to measure total received power within defined channel bandwidth at the antenna connector. Includes power from desired signal, noise, and interference. RCPI values shall be quantified in dBm and accuracy shall be specified across entire RCPI range. The 221 RCPI levels shall range from -110 dBm to 0 dBm with 2 units per dB. RCPI accuracy shall be +/- 5dB across the defined range, equivalent to accuracy specified by TGH for RPI histogram. RCPI may be used wherever RSSI is specified. Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

RCPI Normative Specification Text The RCPI indicator is a measure of the received RF power in the selected channel, measured at the antenna connector. This parameter shall be a measure by the PHY sublayer of the received RF power in the channel measured over the PLCP preamble and over the entire received frame. RCPI shall be a monotonically increasing, logarithmic function of the received power level defined in dBm. The allowed values for the Received Channel Power Indicator (RCPI) parameter shall be an 8 bit value in the range from 0 through 220, with indicated values rounded to the nearest 0.5 dB as follows: 0: Power < -110 dBm 1: Power = -109.5 dBm 2: Power = -109.0 dBm and so on 220: Power > -0 dBm 221-255: reserved Accuracy for each measurement shall be +/- 5dB. The measurement shall assume a receiver noise equivalent bandwidth of 22 MHz. Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

PSNI: Demodulator-specific, Post-processing Estimator of Observed S/(N+I) and BER/FER. All digital demodulators use tracking loops and complex post-processing to demodulate received symbols. Many internal demodulator metrics are proportional to perceived S/(N+I). Examples: PSK: baseband phase jitter and received Error Vector Magnitude (EVM) DSSS: spreading code correlation quality OFDM: frequency tracking and channel tracking stability Demodulator internal metrics are available on a frame-by-frame basis. Demodulator metrics proportional to S/(N+I) are available at all data rates. Demodulator internal metrics may be calibrated with respect to actual FER performance to accurately indicate perceived or observed S/(N+I) in controlled environment with AWGN. Such demodulator internal metrics are fast estimators of S/(N+I) in both interference environments and interference-free (noise only) environments. TGK need not specify which demodulator metrics to use, but needs only to specify how the quantized PSNI indicator relates to S/(N+I) and FER Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

PSNI Concept: Measure Output Signal Quality Specified like RSSI: 8-bit unsigned value, monotonically increasing with increasing S/(N+I). PSNI shall be logarithmically scaled to perceived S/(N+I) which relates directly to FER performance. Specify PSNI output value for each data rate using FER points: first point to “anchor” indicator, additional points to quantize and scale indicator slope and range of values. Specify accuracy of PSNI in AWGN to be +/- 1dB for all FER points. PSNI range shall span the lower 32 dB portion of the operating range of S/(N+I) to cover high FERs at data rates from 1 to 54 Mbps. Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

PSNI Normative Specification Text The PSNI indicator is a measure of the perceived, post-processing signal-to-noise-plus-interference (S/(N+I)) ratio in the demodulator. The allowed values for the Perceived Signal to Noise Indicator (PSNI) parameter shall be an 8 bit value in the range from 0 through 255. This parameter shall be a measure by the PHY sublayer of the perceived signal quality observed after RF downconversion and is derived from internal digital signal processing metrics of the demodulator used to receive the current frame. PSNI shall be measured over the PLCP preamble and over the entire received frame. PSNI is intended to be used in a relative manner, and it shall be a monotonically increasing, logarithmic function of the observed S/(N+I). PSNI accuracy and range shall be specified in AWGN at given FERs for each data rate as follows: Theoretical FEC coding gain assumed in FER calculations: R = 1/2, 5.4dB gain R = 2/3, 4.7dB gain R = 3/4, 4.4dB gain PSNI SPECIAL VALUE: “0” shall indicate inability to measure PSNI When PSNI exceeds high end of measurable range for a given data rate, maximum PSNI for that rate shall be reported. Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

PSNI specified on BER/FER curves Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

Data Rate/Modulation Adjustments (DRMx) Used to Offset BER Curves Table 1: DRM Rate/Modulation Adjustments Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

Example: PSNI = 101 BERs vary based on FEC coding used at each data rate. FERs vary based on BER and PPDU length. Note: in any STA, PSNI will vary only as a result of changing Channel Conditions or changing received Desired Signal Power Level. Note: for efficiency, all STAs should operate at highest data rate possible while maintaining acceptable FER (QOS). Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

PSNI Analysis: Relation to Observed Eb/No PSNI = 0 is selected for a post-processing, Observed Eb/No (OEbNo) equal to 4.4dB, for BPSK at 1Mbit/s data rate. 8 units (steps) per dB is selected to provide 32 dB range in 8 bit PSNI value. So for 1 Mbit/s BPSK operation, PSNI = 8*[OEbNo - 4.4dB]. In general for all other data rates and modulations, PSNI = 8*[OEbNo - 4.4dB + DRMx - CFy] , where DRMx is an S/N adjustment unique for each data rate/demodulation combination. DRMx values are calculated in Table 1 , as shown on page 11, and where CFy is a hardware-specific factor used to account for implementation variances in each FEC decoder in the STA. CFy = CGtheo - CGact = actual FEC decoder loss, for each decoder at each specified FER point. CGtheo values are listed on page 11. When no FEC decoder is used CFy = 0. This relation is the foundation of the PSNI measurement. . Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

PSNI Analysis: Relation to Input SNIR (ISNIR) SNR = C / N, where Eb = C * Tb, N = No * NBW (noise BW) and DR = 1 / Tb So SNR = -------------- = -------------- = EbNo * DR / NBW In db: SNR = EbNo + DR - NBW , where EbNo is shorthand for Eb/No in dB. For DR = 1 Mbit/s and NBW + = 22 MHz, SNR = EbNo + 60dB - 73.4dB = EbNo -13.4dB In general, SNR = EbNo -13.4dB + DRMx, with DRMx from Table 1. and so EbNo = SNR + 13.4dB - DRMx, and OEbNo = OSNIR + 13.4dB - DRMx From page 15 we have: PSNI = 8*[OEbNo - 4.4dB + DRMx - CFy], and substituting for OEbNo, PSNI = 8*[(OSNIR + 13.4dB - DRMx) - 4.4dB + DRMx - CFy], and PSNI = 8*[OSNIR + 9.0dB - CFy] Since ISNIR = OSNIR + TML + CI, where TML is the modem implementation loss and CI is the sum of all channel impairments, we have PSNI = 8*[(ISNIR-TML-CI) + 9.0dB - CFy] Eb / Tb Eb * DR No * NBW No * NBW Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

PSNI Analysis: Relation to BER/FER PSNI is a direct measure of observed SNIR considering all channel impairments and implementation losses measured at the demodulator. PSNI is specified with respect to output FER, which considers all implementation losses including any FEC decoder implementation loss. Each STA will measure PSNI using a correction factor Cfy to account for the actual coding gain (CGact) of each FEC decoder. Any STA measuring PSNI on a frame using FEC will use CFy so that the reported PSNI from all STAs is normalised and assumes a theoretical coding gain. CFy = CGtheo - CGact = actual FEC decoder loss Reported PSNI value may be used to estimate OEbNo and BER/FER (QOS) for the reporting STA for each data rate. OEbNo = (PSNI/8) + 4.4dB - DRMx : For data rates without FEC decoder, OEbNo is used with the theoretical PSK EbNo curve to estimate BER. For data rates with FEC decoder, OEbNo is used with the theoretical FEC EbNo curve for PSK to estimate BER. Note: PSNI relation to BER is specified only for AWGN. Since the net effect of channel impairments is to degrade OEbNo in the same way as AWGN, PSNI should be an adequate estimator of BER in all channel conditions. Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

Motion for RCPI normative text Move to instruct the editor to incorporate text from document 11-03-xxxr__-K-RCPI_NormText.doc into TGk draft specification document Moved by Joe Kwak Seconded by: _______________ Vote YEA _______ Vote NEA _______ ABSTAIN _______ Motion Passes/Fails at ___% Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission

Motion for PSNI normative text Move to instruct the editor to incorporate text from document 11-03-xxxr__-K-PSNI_NormText.doc into TGk draft specification document Moved by Joe Kwak Seconded by: _______________ Vote YEA _______ Vote NEA _______ ABSTAIN _______ Motion Passes/Fails at ___% Joe Kwak, InterDigital Submission