Communications and Timeline Damon Gardenhire Director of Communications and Policy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A-F Report Card Update Tommi Leach and Kelly Arrington, ODCTE.
Advertisements

Bureau of Indian Education
College and Career Ready Performance Index (CCRPI) The NEW Report Card in Georgia.
Rules and Legislation Regarding A-F Report Cards June 2013 Jennifer Stegman, Program Manager CTB.
ACE-Achieving Classroom Excellence.  2005: Achieving Classroom Excellence Act (SB 982) ◦ Established the ACE Task Force and guiding principles  2006:
CTE and the A-F Report Card ODCTE Summer Conference 2012.
Current legislation requires the phase-out of high school TAKS and replaces it with 12 EOC assessments in  English I, English II, English III  Algebra.
Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011.
Board Update April 2015 Sonya Fitzgerald, Executive Director of State Testing 1.
1 School Designation Detailed Methodology Reward Identify the “highest-performing schools” and “high-progress schools” based in all-students group over.
New DC OSSE ESEA Accountability. DC OSSE ESEA Accountability Classification Overview I. DC OSSE Accountability System II. Classification of Schools III.
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
School Performance Measure Calculations SY Office of Achievement and Accountability.
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR): What You Need to Know Feb. 16, 2012 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
A-F Grading: The Impact On Our Schools A Presentation Created by the VOICE Education Action Team.
Local Control Accountability Plan. LCAP  The Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) is a document that provides details regarding the District’s services,
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
Kerri White, EdD Assistant State Superintendent Office of Educational Support Oklahoma State Department of Education A-F School Report Cards.
Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.
 ACE Curriculum  ACE Testing  ACE Remediation and Intervention  ACE Resources.
Wisconsin’s School Report Cards October Agenda 2017 Standards & Instruction –W–What and how should kids learn? Assessments and Data Systems –H–How.
A-F Information Night. Welcome Introductions Purpose Outline of tonight Q & A session at the end.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
New Student Services Workshop Tommi Leach, Academic Advisement Specialist July 2013.
What’s going on in Richmond? Items of Interest to VESIS March 21, 2012 Bethann H. Canada Director of Educational Information Management Virginia Department.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
District Certification of Student Level Data Technology Training Seminars February-March 2013.
Parent Information Night Oklahoma’s A-F School Grading System.
High Stakes Testing: Is it Worth the Costs? A Presentation Created by the VOICE Education Action Team.
The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.
Oxford High School Academic Planning Information Grady Lacher 10 th / 11 th Counselor.
Title III Updates & AMAOs Jacqueline A. Iribarren, Title III Susan Ketchum, Office of Educational Accountability September 24, 2008.
CTE and the A-F Report Card Tommi Leach and Kelly Arrington, ODCTE.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Dr. Chun-Wu Li Assessment and Accountability Services.
Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Career and Academic Connections Update Superintendents’ Meeting Kelly Arrington and Tommi Leach ODCTE.
Achieving Classroom Excellence Act of 2005 Norman Public Schools Dr. Joseph Siano, Superintendent.
703 KAR 5:225 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
June 5, 2014 Accountability Update. Accountability Updates 110% for At-Risk, Criterion #4 Accountability Manual Updates.
The State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness January 2012.
TAKS Release Plan  In 2007 SB 1031 changed the release of tests to every three years  In 2009 HB 3 changed the release of tests to exclude retests 2.
Legislative Requirement 2013 House File 215. Category Cut Scores Based on a Normal Distribution across Measures.
Leader slts PRIOR TO : Principal set a minimum of two goals, which express an expectation of student growth. SPS available for use.
Communication Webinar:
Accountability Update
Teacher SLTs
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Teacher SLTs
Release of PARCC Student Results
School Accountability Report Cards
Growth Models Oklahoma
Accountability Update
New Statewide Accountability System
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Teacher SLTs
EOCT BACKGROUND SPRING 2012
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
Leader SLTs
Leader SLTs
School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Teacher SLTs
Accountability Updates
Teacher SLTs
Presentation transcript:

Communications and Timeline Damon Gardenhire Director of Communications and Policy

Top 3 things Timeline and process Data coming next week & how grades are calculated. Next steps

Communications Communications toolkit Media Briefing at Capitol Embargoed Data – What does this term mean?

KFOR Story

A to F Report Card Data Overview Maridyth McBee, PhD Assistant State Superintendent Accountability and Assessment

A to F Report Card Comprised of three main sections each worth one-third of the overall grade: – Student Achievement – Student Growth – Whole School Performance

Student Achievement Section Includes all Oklahoma State Testing Program (OSTP) exams administered during the most recent school year

Student Achievement Section The 3% cap for OMAAP and OAAP are applied. At least thirty (30) students tested before a performance index is reported.

PRELIMINARY A-F REPORT CARD GRADES 09–12 DISTRICT: EXAMPLE DISTRICT SCHOOL:HIGH SCHOOL 2012 Student Achievement (33%) Subject# of StudentsPerformance IndexLetter Grade English II/English III 4786B Algebra I/Algebra II/Geometry 6478C Biology I 2991A US History 1548F Overall 2012 Student Performance Grade 15580B

Student Growth Section Growth is divided into two sub-categories; – All students – Bottom twenty-five percent of students

Growth Index: Bottom 25% Only students with a pre-score proficiency level of “Unsatisfactory” or “Limited Knowledge” are included.

Growth Index 30 scores needed to receive a grade for each growth section. If less than 30 scores for the bottom 25% section, grade is based on total growth. If there are less than 30 scores for the total growth section, the report card grade is computed using 50% Student Achievement and 50% Whole School Performance.

Overall Student Growth (17%) Subject English II 2796A Algebra I 450F Overall 2012 Student Growth Grade 3190A Bottom Quartile Student Growth (17%) Subject English II 683B Algebra I 1100A Overall 2012 Bottom Quartile Growth Grade 786B PRELIMINARY A-F REPORT CARD GRADES 09–12 DISTRICT: EXAMPLE DISTRICT SCHOOL:HIGH SCHOOL

Growth Index Spreadsheet of matched student scores provided with report card data

Whole School Performance Section See the following on the Accountability website – A to F Report Card Data Source Summary – A to F Report Card Guide.

Data Source Summary IndicatorDataData Source and Description Student attendance is calculated as the Average Daily Attendance (ADA) divided by the Average Daily Membership (ADM). ADA is calculated by dividing the total number of days students were present by the number of days in the school calendar. ADM is calculated by dividing the total number of days students were enrolled in school by the number of days in the school calendar. Total # of days students were present Districts/Schools report aggregate on the WAVE website. Total # of days in School calendar Districts/Schools report aggregate on the WAVE website. Total Number of Days Student enrolled in school Districts/Schools report aggregate on the WAVE website. Total # of days in School calendarDistricts/Schools report aggregate on the WAVE website.

Whole School Performance (33%)**** Student Attendance Rate A98.2% 4(.90) = 3.6 Advanced Coursework F0.0% 0(.06) = 0 Dropout Rate A0.0% 4(.04) =.16 BONUS School Climate Survey N Parent & Community Engagement N Total Whole School Performance =A FINAL GRADE PRELIMINARY A-F REPORT CARD GRADES DISTRICT: EXAMPLE DISTRICT SCHOOL:MIDDLE SCHOOL

Whole School Performance (33%)**** Graduation Rate A95.5% 4 (.82) = 3.28 Advanced Coursework Participation F3.0% 0(.03) = 0 AP/IB Exam Performance F0.0% 0(.03) = 0 Advanced Courses Performance F0.0% 0(.03) = 0 College Entrance Exam Participation A93.0% 4(.03) =.12 College Entrance Exam Performance D38.0% 1(.03) =.03 Eighth Grade Graduation Rate Five Year Graduation Rate A95.5% 4(.03)=.12 BONUS School Climate Survey N Parent & Community Engagement Y ACE Graduation Participation College Remediation N Total Whole School Performance = 3.61 =B FINAL GRADE PRELIMINARY A-F REPORT CARD GRADES 09–12 DISTRICT: EXAMPLE DISTRICT SCHOOL:EXAMPLE SCHOOL

Timeline Data released next week , letter and posting on Accreditation website 30 days to review and make corrections Data Verification Form included in communications and on Accountability Website

More Information Contact Maridyth McBee or Michael Flory

Resources Kerri White, MEd Assistant State Superintendent Educational Support

Raise the Grade Together Symposium September 12-13, 2012 For schools preliminarily identified as Priority, Targeted Intervention, and Focus

Raise the Grade Together Booklet Week of September 10 Information for all schools that will assist schools in determining what steps to take that will likely improve student performance

Reward School Grant Timeline – Preliminary Information about the Grant: Mid- September – Public Release of Eligible Schools: Early October – Grant Application Due: November 16, 2012 (Tentative) Partnership Between Reward Schools and Priority Schools for the benefit of both schools

Streamlined, Consistent Terminology High-Performing Reward School – 2 Methods of Identification High-Progress Reward School – 1 Method of Identification Focus School – 2 Methods of Identification Targeted Intervention School – 1 Method of Identification Priority School – 4 Methods of Identification

More Information Contact Kerri White or Gina Scroggins