Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan Residents’ Survey Presented on 20 th October 2015 JER/1972.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Citizen Survey and Neighborhood Feedback City of Wichita District IV Spring/Summer 2013.
Advertisements

Pat Willoughby Director David Lock Associates 30 April 2009 Valuing Our Life Support Systems The Contribution of Eco-towns Natural Capital Initiative Savoy.
Welcome March 2012 Purpose of meeting with you 1. Determine if the Fire Hall at Grosvenor St. should be declared surplus. 2. To obtain feedback and direction.
November 2014 Attitudes around buying gas and electricity with smart pay-as-you-go.
Copyright 2009 Northumberland County Council Northumberland Local Plan Core Strategy Update Riding Mill Parish Council 28 April.
Cambridgeshire County Council is talking to people about a policy for transport for people who use its service. This will help us to make sure we can support.
UPAVON PARISH COUNCIL PUBLIC MEETING WHISTLEDOWN FARM DEVELOPMENT 04 JUNE 2014.
Retirement Villages : Best Practice Planning Friday 29 August 2008.
Survey Results September Survey Information There is an error margin of ±3.6 on this survey. South Ogden City sent out 5,300 surveys and received.
 Why the survey was devised – Interlink in partnership with TLI project and Salford City Council  Information collected from January till April’13 
Issues and Options Consultation September Plans A Neighbourhood Plan Our vision and local planning policies Housing, Business and Employment, Tourism,
Questionnaire sub-committee report to PPG 2nd December 2013 Internal Consultation & References 2012/13 questionnaire results and action plan PPG & Virtual.
The Future of Lechlade Survey Feedback 28 March 2012.
National Consumer Agency Market Research: Economiser – Transport Section February 2011 Research Conducted by.
Public Attitudes to Housing Results from Ipsos MORI On-Line Panel Poll 31 st May 2010.
Tiddington 4 Village Plan Survey Results – Roads Two thirds of respondents wanted a controlled crossing of the A418 in Tiddington, with the very large.
Nottingham’s Cycling Action Plan to 2015 Keith Morgan Transport Strategy Nottingham City Council.
BERE REGIS PARISH SURVEY -THE QUANTITATIVE FEEDBACK What you told us.
Community Planning Event for North and West 1 Output from workshop held on Tuesday 9 th February 2010 at John Clare Primary School, Helpston.
Wootton Wawen Neighbourhood Plan Wootton Wawen Neighbourhood Plan Welcome Survey feedback Current status of activities What next?
Meeting with Governors Kislingbury Primary School December
1 School of Health in Social Science 2011 UG Entrants’ Survey Analysis.
Mid Wales LTP Stakeholder Workshop 3 rd October Presentation by Ann Elias and Janice Hughes.
Neighbourhood Plan Upper Beeding Parish is 7.25 square miles (4637 acres) in size. The main settlements are Upper Beeding, Small Dole and Edburton. Only.
Hampshire, Portsmouth & Southampton Home Movers Survey 2010 PRLG 22 nd September 2010.
How does it look? Imagine a small area of land – a plot on a site big enough for one ‘executive style’ house. Here it is, with some figures Variation 1:
Phase 1 Consultation Results 23 rd September 2014.
Ongoing The Hook Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group – Barry Deller (Chair & Site Selection Lead) – Diana Whittaker (Secretary) – Sue Mesher (Community.
Ingwelala Member Research Ingwelala MemberResearchIngwelala Overall ResponseRate Overall SampleRespondents% Completed Ingwelala Overall
Merton Residents Survey 2008/09 LONDON BOROUGH OF MERTON RESIDENTS SURVEY 2008/09 TNS Social November 2008 © 2008 TNS UK Limited. All rights reserved.
2012 Community Survey Results Water Issues Conducted by.
Consumer attitudes to the energy market and smart meters Smart Meter Central Delivery Body May 2014: Wave 1.
Pilot National Travel Survey 2009 Summary Findings Prepared by Mairead Griffin.
1 Jacqui Banerjee Stephanie Carnachan May 2009 Forest Hill Pools Consultation Spring 2009.
Kislingbury Neighbourhood Plan 2014 Supplementary Questionnaire Analysis 1.
Drafting the NDP 23 rd June areas for NDP to focus on Housing Development Facilities Parking Commercial.
Neighbourhood Planning Consultation FULL REPORT, 23 SEPTEMBER 2015.
Shenstone Neighbourhood Plan Working Groups launch event 18 th June 2013.
Overview 2011 Prepared For South Salt Lake Brandon Smith Rick Davidson
Your town – your plan Bishop’s Stortford Neighbourhood Plan All Saints, Central, South and part of Thorley Neighbourhood Plan Team Meeting May 12 th 2015.
LEEDS & GRENVILLE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT.
Powered by Earswick Village Residents Questionnaire Key Findings October 2015.
Walking Survey 2015 National Top-Line Report June 2015.
Neighbourhood Development Plan December 1 st, 2013.
Kislingbury Neighbourhood Plan 2013 Questionnaire Analysis 1.
Housing; what we know so far : Target - 5 to 7 Houses a year Need is for - Affordable Homes -Starter Homes -Down sizer homes -Retirement homes.
Grinshill Community Meeting Welcome Tom Wycherley Grinshill Parish Council.
Consultation Days May, June 2014 Open Day at The Chiddingfold Archive - Sat 10 th May Evening Meeting at The Village Hall - Thu 15 th May Village Fete.
1. Neighbourhood Plan Village Meeting October 18th
SGNDP STEERING GROUP MEETING 20 TH JANUARY 2016 SGNDP Steering Group 20/01/20161.
Bramley Parish Plan Results and feedback Presented by Cllr Claire Penfold.
Produced in collaboration with the GA How do councils make decisions on where to build new homes? Lesson 6 The advantages and disadvantages of brownfield.
FERNHURST NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN Results of Questionnaire James Cottam Chairman Fernhurst Parish Council.
Housing Survey April Summary (1)  Strong support for the provision of affordable housing and starter homes  High level of home ownership—526 out.
Funding How much does it cost to produce a Neighbourhood Plan? The cost depends entirely on the scope, complexity, the type and scale of engagement & consultation,
Woodford Neighbourhood Forum 1. 2 This presentation is a brief summary of the work of WNF. It is supported by two circulated documents The Annual Progress.
1 Neighbourhood Plan Questionnaire Results May 2016.
Core Strategy Issues & Options consultation results.
Land west of Grace Crescent, Hardwick Presentation to Hardwick Parish Council 23/08/2016.
HOUSING SUMMARY Some of the questions we asked were about the type and amount of housing we might need to plan for in our neighbourhood plan We found out.
The Plan - Information Stage 1
Ewelme Neighbourhood Plan Questionnaire September 2017
The Regeneration of Swanley
Future Village development key requirements
Shaping the future of Laverstock and Ford Parish
How do councils make decisions on where to build new homes?
Potton Neighbourhood Plan Questionnaire
Residents’ questionnaire survey November 2016
Agenda – What we will be covering today
Presentation transcript:

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan Residents’ Survey Presented on 20 th October 2015 JER/1972

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 1a. Survey scope Designed to provide community feedback on village plans up to 2028 including broader village improvements Requirement: 155 new dwellings significant (but unspecified) increase in commercial/industrial space Key subject areas: housing village amenities infrastructure environment employment classification

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 1b. Other comments Please feel free to add any further comments about the plan. Traffic problems (mainly S&R but also A21 access) Parking (and lack of enforcement) Increased pressure on schools Need for affordable housing Retaining S&R’s character Flooding concerns Comments about sites Focus on brownfield

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 2. Research method Questionnaires issued to 1,196 households 804 households responded (67%) additional household members = 963 Questionnaire available for completion in print (82%) or online (18%) Print questionnaires distributed and collected by local champions Slight re-weighting of sample by age, to reflect Salehurst & Robertsbridge population profile

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 3. Today’s presentation The sampleCurrent and future housingSite selectionVillage amenities – retail, medical and leisureInfrastructureThe environmentEmployment premisesSummary of key findings

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 4. The sample Reproduced by kind permission of Tony Coombes

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 5. Area profile (response) 1.Salehurst village and all outlying. 2.Andrews, Kemps, Coronation & Rother V 3.Northbridge St and Rutley Close 4.High St and everything off it 5.Fair Lane, Fayre Meadow 6.Station Road, Willowbank et al. 7.George Hill, Bishops and Heathfield 8.Mill Rise 9.Everything else west of the level crossing, except…. 10. Darvell N.B. 5% = c50 responses Area 2 5% Area 9 22% Area 3 4% Area 5 5% Area 4 9% Area 6 7% Area 7 14% Area 8 7% Area 10 (Darvell) 19% Area 1 8%

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 6a. Demographics – sex and age % Male45 Female51 < – – – – Median age50 Q41, 42 Base: All weighted (963) (8) (15) (36) * unweighted figures in brackets

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 6b. Demographics – household size Q43, 44 Base: All weighted (963) (Average 2.8)

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 6c. Working status Q31. What is your current working status? Base: All weighted (963) 68% 31%

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 7. Residency Q1. How long have you lived in S&R? Base: All weighted (963) Average 18 years (though Darvell 12 yrs)

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 8. Current housing

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 9. Property Q2. Which of these best describes your current home? Base: All weighted (963) Detached 28% (36%) Semi-detached 21% (27%) Converted flat/maisonette 24% (2%) Terraced 16% (20%) Bungalow 8% (11%) Purpose built flat/maisonette 2% (2%) * Figures in brackets exclude Darvell

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 10. Ownership Q3. Is your home? Base: All weighted (963) * * Mainly area 7 – George Hill, Bishops and Heathfield

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 11. Bedrooms Q4. How many bedrooms do you have? Base: All Average = 3 4 in areas 8 & 9 (Mill Rise/West of level crossing) All weighted (963) All excluding Darvell (779)

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 12. Future housing – Needs and criteria ?

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 13a. Moving plans Q6a. Do you have plans to move in the next 10 years? Base: All weighted (963) All 20% (26% excl. Darvell)

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 13b. Moving plans Q6a. Do you have plans to move in the next 10 years? Base: All weighted (963) All 20%

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 14. Moving destination N.B. Area bases too low to highlight significant differences Within S&R 40% (8%) Q6b. Where are you likely to move to? Base: All planning to move (182) (Figures in brackets based on total sample) Outside S&R 25% (5%) Don’t know/NA 34% (7%)

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 15. Moving destination by age and household size Q6b. Where are you likely to move to? Base: All planning to move * N.B. Small base size, treat data with caution (67)(66) (48*)(48*)(48*) (86)

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 16. Moving out reasons Q7. If you’re likely to move out of S&R please tell us why Base: All moving out of S&R (48*) *N.B. Small base size, treat data with caution House prices 23% House prices 23% Family reasons 26% Family reasons 26% Employment reasons 25% Employment reasons 25% Property sizes 15% Property sizes 15% Renting cost 8% Renting cost 8% Property availability 12% Property availability 12% Other reasons = 41% Mainly downsizing/age. 7 mentions anti-S&R

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 17. Accommodation needs All (182) % Detached (71) % Semi (38*) % Terrace (43*) % Detached Semi detached Bungalow Purpose built flat86810 Terrace7198 Converted flat5722 Private retirement home233- Care/nursing home11-- Housing Association retirement home1-2- N/A4421 Q8. What type of accommodation are you likely to need? Base: All planning to move in 10 years Current property N.B. All other bases too small to analyse * N.B. Small base size, treat data with caution

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 18. Bedroom needs All (182) % 1 (13*) % 2 (37*) % 3 (62) % 4+ (70) % N/A1---2 Average number Q9. How many bedrooms are you likely to need? Base: All planning to move in 10 years * N.B. Small bases, treat data with caution Current Bedrooms

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 19. Family member needs Q10. Do you have any family members who have moved away from S&R and would like to move back? Base: All weighted (963) N.B. Reported need, so treat data with caution Low significant variations ex 30% Area 2 (Andrews, Kemps, Coronation & Rother V) Yes No NA

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 20. Family member moving barriers Q11. Which, if any, of these reasons is preventing them from moving back to S&R? Base: Those with family wanting to move back (114) N.B. Reported barriers

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 21a. Family member needs Q12. What type of housing do you think they would need? Base: Those with family wanting to move back (114) Semi-detached 33% Private retirement home: 1%, Housing Association retirement home: 1%, N/A: 5% N.B. Reported needs Converted flat/maisonette 18% Terraced 16% Detached 12% Bungalow 8% Purpose built flat/maisonette 6%

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 21b. Bedrooms Q13. And how many bedrooms are they likely to need? Base: Those with family wanting to move back (114) Average = 2.4 N/A = 8% N.B. Reported needs

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 22. Combined housing needs Base: All planning to move/those with family planning to move back (267) Property typeProperty size Average = 2.8

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 23a. Housing types most needed Q14. Thinking about the future housing needs of the village in general, which types of homes do you think are most needed? (Please tick up to 5 only, out of the following 14 options) Base: All weighted (963) (only 17% Darvell)

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 23b. Housing types most needed Q14. Thinking about the future housing needs of the village in general, which types of homes do you think are most needed? (Please tick up to 5 only, out of the following 14 options) Base: All weighted (963) (49% Darvell)

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 23c. Housing types most needed All (963) % <45 (362) % (352) % 65+ (237) % 2 bedroom house bedroom house Energy/water efficient Housing Assoc. retirement home Private retirement home Shared ownership Rented H/A Bungalows Flat/maisonette bedroom house Care/nursing home bedroom house Self-build homes Caravan/mobile home 1121 N/A 4345 Q14. Thinking about the future housing needs of the village in general, which types of homes do you think are most needed? (Please tick up to 5 only, out of the following 14 options) Base: All weighted (963) Age

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 24. Parking provision Q17. On-site car parking would need to be provided as part of any new housing development. Do you agree or disagree that: Base: All weighted (963) *

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 25. Housing design criteria Q15. Thinking about the design of any new housing developments in S&R, how important are each of the following? Base: All weighted (963) High/medium priority 92% 90% 89% 87% 86% 84% 81% 67%* *20% not needed

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 26. Site selection – number of proposed properties propertires N.B. Darvell excluded from following analysis as all sites rated acceptable by c100% 45 6 ? ? ? ?

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 27a. Most acceptable sites Q16. A number of sites have been put forward for possible development. Though some sites may not be suitable for development until a site assessment has been done, we’re interested in your views on each of them. Base: All weighted excl. Darvell (779) 89% 75% 68% 69% cont… 3. Mill Site 3a. Adj Mill Site 8. Countrycrafts 12. Adj Culverwells* *Permission granted Number of properties 100 ? Very/quite Net

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 27b. Second option sites Q16. A number of sites have been put forward for possible development. Though some sites may not be suitable for development until a site assessment has been done, we’re interested in your views on each of them. Base: All weighted excl. Darvell (779) 56% 57% 56% 52% cont… 2. South of Pound Platt 11. Heathfield Gardens East 10. Heathfield Gardens West 1. Slides Farm …cont Number of properties 6 ? 45 Very/quite Net

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 27c. Least popular sites Q16. A number of sites have been put forward for possible development. Though some sites may not be suitable for development until a site assessment has been done, we’re interested in your views on each of them. Base: All weighted excl. Darvell (779) 47% 42% 44% 39% 37% Grove Farm Phase 1 4. Vicarage Land 9. Bishops Lane 6. Grove Farm Phase 2 7. Robertsbridge Club …cont Very/quite Net 35 ? Number of properties

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 27d. Are top sites acceptable across areas? Net scores Number of properties Site 3 Mill Site 100 Site 3a Adj Mill Site ? Site 8 Countrycrafts 7 Site 12 Adj. Culverwells 17 Total excl. Darvell Salehurst village and all outlying Andrews, Kemps, Coronation & Rother V Northbridge St and Rutley Close High St and everything off it Fair Lane, Fayre Meadow Station Road, Willowbank et al George Hill, Bishops and Heathfield Mill Rise Everything else west of the level crossing N.B. Northbridge Street more extreme scores

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 28. Village amenities – Retail, medical & leisure

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 29. Local shop usage Q18. Do you use the local shops in and around the Parish? Base: All weighted (963) Yes No NA

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 30. Frequency of shop usage Q19. If yes, how often do you use them? Base: All users – weighted (919) Average number days per week = 3 N.B. Frequency higher: Not working 4. High St and everything off it 5. Fair Lane, Fayre Meadow 6. Station Road, Willowbank et al Frequency lowest: 10. Darvell

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 31. Shop barriers Non users (27*) % Non/less often users (182) % Not enough choice of products2522 Pricing2210 Parking1622 Other3732* NA1422 Q20. If you don’t use the local shops regularly/at all is it because of: * N.B. Small base size, treat data with caution + Mainly lack of transport, convenience, order in

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 32. Use of medical facilities All (963) % Doctors at all86 Dentists at all56 Neither9 Both41 Doctors only45 Dentists only3 Q21. Do you use : The doctors surgery in the village/Either of the dentists in the village? Base: All weighted (963)

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 33. Preferred medical relocation sites Q22. It is understood that both the doctors and the dentists surgeries will need to move to larger/purpose built premises in the foreseeable future. Please tick your preferred sit for the relocation of each of these surgeries? Base: All weighted (963) 1.Slides Farm 1% / 1% Purple = Doctor Green = Dentist 2. South of Pound Platt *% / 1% 3. Mill site 45% / 43% 3a. Adj Mill site 3% / 4% 4. Vicarage land 3% / 3% 6. Grove Farm (2) 1% / 2% 5. Grove Farm (1) 3% / 3% 8. Countrycrafts 5% / 6% 7. Robertsbridge Club 15% / 11% 9. Bishops Lane 1% / 1% * = less than 1% 12. Adj. Culverwells 16% / 14% 10. Heathfield Gdn West 1% / * 11. Heathfield Gdn East * / 1%

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 34. Leisure facilities Q23. Listed below are different types of leisure facilities. For each one please tick how important you feel it is to provide this type of facility in S&R. Base: All weighted (963) Net High/medium priority 84% 76% 69% 70% 61% 57% 47% 42% 37% 76% 64% 55% 52% 35% 31% 28% 17% 3% -7%

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 35. Leisure facilities – Net priority scores by age All (963) % <45 (260) % 45 – 64 (339) % 65+ (345) % Improved & extended footpaths, bridleways etc Multiuse court Improved recreation facilities Venue for arts/community activities Gym/health club Swimming pool Off-road cycling track Community woodland for use a fuel source Skate park Local museum Q23. Listed below are different types of leisure facilities. For each one please tick how important you feel it is to provide this type of facility in S&R. Base: All weighted

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 36. Infrastructure

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 37. Village steward funding Q24. Would you be prepared to pay annually approximately 22p extra a week per household to fund a village steward for our Parish? Base: All weighted (963) Range by area 54% (2. Andrews, etc) to 80+% (8. Mill Rise, 4 Northbridge St, 6, Station Rd) 76% 10% 12% 2%

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 38. Review funding Q25. Would you be prepared to pay annually approximately 29p extra a week per household to fund a parking review? Base: All weighted (963) (43% excl. Darvell) (95% Darvell) 27% 35% 34% 4%

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 39. Review funding by area Q25. Would you be prepared to pay annually approximately 29p extra a week per household to fund a parking review? Base: All weighted (963) Average = 34% % willing to pay

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan High/medium priority 82% 74% 73% 69% 54% 48% 46% 28% Q26. The following suggestions for improving village safety have been raised by residents. How important are each of the measures in your view? Base: All weighted (963) 40a. Safety measures

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 40b. Safety – top initiatives by area Net differences Restoring pavements in High St Yellow lines Station Rd 20mph speed limit New pavements Station Rd All Salehurst village and all outlying Andrews, Kemps, Coronation & Rother V Northbridge St and Rutley Close High St and everything off it Fair Lane, Fayre Meadow Station Road, Willowbank et al George Hill, Bishops and Heathfield Mill Rise Everything else west of the level crossing, Darvell Q26. The following suggestions for improving village safety have been raised by residents. How important are each of the measures in your view? Base: All weighted (963)

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 41. Infrastructure ranking Q27. How much of a priority are each of the following types of infrastructure when it comes to developing/improving services? Base: All weighted (963) Net High/medium priority 88% 86% 80% 79% 84% 85% 79% 67% 76%

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 42. The environment

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 43. Improvements to open spaces Q28. How important are each of the following when it comes to enhancing community open spaces? Base: All weighted (963) Net High/medium priority 78% 74% 69% 60% 64% 54% 47% 31%

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 44. Importance of energy efficiency in new builds Q29. How important do you think it is for buildings in S&R to be energy efficient? Base: All weighted (963) 87% Flat across subgroups

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 45. Ranking of energy efficiency sources Q30. There are many ways of increasing the energy efficiency of buildings. Please tell us how important you feel each of the following to be? Base: All weighted (963) Net Diff. High/medium priority 88% 87% 83% 78% 84% 83% 76% 75% 70%

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 46. Employment premises

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 47a. Working status Q31. What is your current working status? Base: All weighted (963) 68% 31%

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 47b. Age profile of S&R work pool Q31. What is your current working status? Base: All working (578)

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 48. Working by area Q31. What is your current working status? Base: All working (578) Ave: 68%

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 49. Working premises Q32. In what type of premises do you work? Base: All working *Inflated by Darvell + Main ‘other premises’: Education, outdoors/farming, medical, various +

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 50. Work location Q33. Do you work: Base: All working 50%64% Net outside S&R NB: some multi-coding

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 51. Work location - % working in S&R Q33. Do you work: Base: All working 1 = Salehurst village and outlying 2 = Andrews/Kemps/Coronation & Rother V 3 = Northbridge St, Rutley Close 4 = High St, everything off it 5 = Fair Lane, Fayre Meadow 6 = Station Rd, Willowbank et al 7 = George Hill, Bishops & Heathfield 8 = Mill Rise 9 = Everything else west of level crossing 10 = Darvell Total: 36% (ex Darvell)

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 52. Distance to work Q34. If you work outside S & R how far do you travel to work? Base: All working Average distance 20.4 miles

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 53. Means of travel All (578) % S&R (322) % E. Sussex (129) % Beyond (181) % Car Foot Train Bike1211 Bus1*12 NA58-1 Q35. How do you usually travel to work? Base: All working

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 54. Any planned premises move Q36. Does your business plan to move premises: Base: All working (578) 6%

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 55. New premises needs Q37. Are the new premises likely to be: Base: All planning to move premises within 10 years (33*) Larger: 67%Same: 15%Smaller: 6% *NB: Small base size, treat data with caution

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 56. Whether start up planned Q38. Are you planning to set up your own business Base: All working (578) 5%

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 57. Start up/new business premises location Within S&R 42% East Sussex 4% Beyond 16% Q39. If you are planning to either move premises or set up your own business would this be: Base: All planning to move or start up (57*) Don’t know 32% NB: Small base size, treat data with caution

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 58. Consideration of S & R premises Q40. Would you consider moving to new premises in S & R if they were available? *NB Low base size, treat data wit h caution

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 59. Key themes Robertsbridge is a desirable place to live: 18 year average residency 40% of those planning to move want to stay 12% have relatives who’d like to move back Assuming flooding reservations have been taken into account, clear view about development locations and priorities. New property needs to be integrated to harmonise/retain feel of the locality + energy efficiency the norm nowadays 2-3 bedrooms affordable housing longer term retirement provision Further measures would improve local quality of life: improved footpaths and signposting village steward scheme traffic calming and parking enforcement

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 60a. Summary of findings Robertsbridge keeps its residents… 18 year average 8% of sample will want to move within S&R in the next 10 years + 12% think other family members will be keen to move here Lack of property and property prices are key barriers to moving to S&R  more affordable housing a must Residents feel S&R particularly needs: 2-3 bedroom properties energy efficient homes retirement provision affordable alternatives to buying The prime objective of any new development is integration – aesthetically, geographically and socially

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 60b. Summary of findings Assuming Adj. Mill Site (3a) can accommodate c30 houses, 4 sites emerge as clearly preferred to all others to meet housing needs: 3 – Mill Site (100 homes) 3a – Adjacent to Mill Site 8 – Countrycrafts (7 homes) 12 – Adjacent Culverwells (17 homes + work provision) (Though comments suggest desirability of spreading development) Mill Site also by far the most popular relocation site for medical facilities The main leisure priority is improvements to footpaths, with multi-use court in 2 nd place Employing a village steward much more welcome as a funded initiative than parking review

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 60c. Summary of findings Clear preferences for safety improvements – High Street pavement repair, yellow lines, 20 mph speed limit and new pavements in Station Road All aspects of infrastructure important for new developments and energy efficiency almost taken for granted Improved signposting and increase in green space desirable Residents rate well established energy efficiency measures higher than new approaches – but all reasons deemed important

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan 60d. Summary of findings 2/3 of sample work (60% if Darvell excluded where the whole community works) but only half work within S&R (or 1 in 3 if Darvell removed). Amongst those working away, average distance travelled is 20 miles S&R working population mainly travel on foot. Half of those who travel beyond East Sussex use the train. Car in the only means of transport for most working elsewhere in East Sussex 6% envisage moving premises in next 10 years (mainly to larger) and 5% planning a start-up in that period – equating in total to 1 in 10 of the working population of S&R. Just over 1 in 3 or movers/business starters likely to consider premises in S&R

Salehurst & Robertsbridge Neighbourhood Plan Linda Jones & Partners 1 Station Road Woodbridge Suffolk IP12 4AU / tfetfe