Breaking Down An Arguments Into Propositions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Formal Criteria for Evaluating Arguments
Advertisements

Test the validity of this argument: Some lawyers are judges. Some judges are politicians. Therefore, some lawyers are politicians. A. Valid B. Invalid.
Test the validity of this argument: Some lawyers are judges. Some judges are politicians. Therefore, some lawyers are politicians. A. Valid B. Invalid.
Argument vs. Assertion.
Introduction to Proofs
Four Rules of Aristotelian Logic 1. Rule of Identity: A is A 2. Rule of Non-Contradiction: A is not (-A) 3. Rule of Excluded Middle: Either A or (-A)
Rules of Inferences Section 1.5. Definitions Argument: is a sequence of propositions (premises) that end with a proposition called conclusion. Valid Argument:
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to identify the types of fallacious reasoning discussed in Chapter 6. Chapter 6 discusses fallacies of insufficient.
1 Logic Logic in general is a subfield of philosophy and its development is credited to ancient Greeks. Symbolic or mathematical logic is used in AI. In.
Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs 1.1 Propositional Logic 1.2 Propositional Equivalences 1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers 1.4 Nested Quantifiers.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 4 Diagramming Arguments.
Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.
GMAT CRITICAL REASONING Spring GETTING STARTED 1. Read the question 1. Read the question 2. Identify the type of question 2. Identify the type of.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 4 Lecture Notes Chapter 4.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Intro to Logic: the tools of the trade You need to be able to: Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people’s claims). Organize arguments.
Assessing and Developing Argument ©
Logic 3 Tautological Implications and Tautological Equivalences
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 3 Analyzing Arguments.
BASIC CONCEPTS OF ARGUMENTS
Chapter 9: Making Inferences and Drawing Conclusions
Good Endings. –Re-state your thesis in different words –Choose an ending strategy that’s appropriate for your topic. »Summarize your main points OR give.
Introduction to Proofs
Historical Argument OCTOBER 3, AN ARGUMENT IS AN ATTEMPT TO ESTABLISH THE TRUTH OF A CLAIM. AN ARGUMENT OFTEN INCLUDES PREMISES, OR SUPPORTING ARGUMENTS.
GLE Explore the concept of premises, including false premises. Intro to Logic.
Arguments Jason M. Chang Critical Thinking. Lecture Outline I.Basics of an argument II.Identifying premises and conclusions.
Chapter 1: Lecture Notes What Is an Argument? (and What is Not?)
March 3, 2015Applied Discrete Mathematics Week 5: Mathematical Reasoning 1Arguments Just like a rule of inference, an argument consists of one or more.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument By David Kelsey.
BUS 290: Critical Thinking for Managers
Persuasive Appeals Logos AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION.
Determining Validity and Invalidity in Deductive Arguments PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 6, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) All dogs have two heads. 2. All tigers are dogs. ___________________________________ 3. All tigers have two.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
Types of reasoning… Deductive Those aimed at validity…attempt to convince us of the conclusion using linked premises (i.e. the premises directly link.
Do you agree with the following proofs? 1.Prove that  2 is irrational. Proof: Suppose that  2 is not irrational, then  2 = p/q for some natural numbers.
Argument Diagramming Part I
History of Philosophy Lecture 5 Formalizing an argument
Chapter 4 Argument Analysis 1 Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition Joel Rudinow Vincent E. Barry Mark.
Sentence (syntactically Independent grammatical unit) QuestionCommandStatement “This is a class in logic.” “I enjoy logic.” “Today is Friday.”
Our life will make more sense We will discover the truth We will avoid being lied to or used by others.
Argument. Persuasion vs Argument Persuasive WritingArgumentative Writing Goal: To get reader to agree with you on a particular topic Goal: to get reader.
Elements of Argument Logic vs. Rhetoric. Syllogism Major Premise: Advertising of things harmful to our health should be legally banned. Minor Premise:
EL 1204 ESSAY, REPORTS AND JOURNALS. Verbs of Attribution.
Argument.
Persuasive Texts Understanding Argument. Definitions Argument: A set of statements where it is claimed that one statement (conclusion) is true and supported.
Critical Thinking Lesson 2 Arguments and Conclusions – The Indicators Learning Objectives: 1.To be aware of what argument indicators are. 2.To be able.
Introduction to Logic Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument By David Kelsey.
Making Inferences and Drawing Conclusions. Definitions An inference is a logical conclusion that is based on what an author has stated. A conclusion is.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
RECOGNIZING, ANALYZING, AND CONSTRUCTING ARGUMENTS
Introduction to Argument
A Crash Course in Logic : Introduction to Philosophy
RECOGNIZING, ANALYZING, AND CONSTRUCTING ARGUMENTS
Symbolization Review.
Building Argument and Integrating Evidence
The Power of Critical Thinking
II. Analyzing Arguments
How to Write an Argument
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument
6.4 Truth Tables for Arguments
Deductive & Inductive Reasoning
Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments
Critical Thinking Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument
Propositional Logic 5) And Copyright 2008, Scott Gray.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Breaking Down An Arguments Into Propositions Logical Reasoning Breaking Down An Arguments Into Propositions

Steps to Breaking Down an Argument Bracket the Propositions. Identify the Conclusion. Some arguments contain conclusion indicators such as: therefore, thus, hence, so, which shows that, for these reasons, consequently, it follows that, to help you identify the conclusion. If there is a Conclusion Indicator, CI, circle it and write CI above it. When there is no conclusion indicator ask “what is this proposition trying to prove, or convince me of, or try putting the word therefore, in front of the proposition you think may be the conclusion.

Steps to Breaking Down an Argument Once you identify the conclusion, draw a double line under it. Example: All cats are felines. Lightening is a feline. Therefore, Lightening is a cat.

Steps to Breaking Down an Argument 3. Identify the Premises. Identify the premises or those propositions that support the conclusion. Draw a single line under each premise. Words such as because, since, for, given that, maybe inferred from, the reason is that, as shown by, in view of, are all common Premise Indicators. If there is a Premise Indicator, circle it, and put PI above it.

Steps to Breaking Down an Argument Example: Students who sit in front of the classroom generally earn higher grades. Therefore, you should move to the front of the class, since I know you want to improve your GPA.