The LHCb CERN R. Graciani (U. de Barcelona, Spain) for the LHCb Collaboration International ICFA Workshop on Digital Divide Mexico City, October.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 AMY Detector (eighties) A rather compact detector.
Advertisements

31/03/00 CMS(UK)Glenn Patrick What is the CMS(UK) Data Model? Assume that CMS software is available at every UK institute connected by some infrastructure.
Oliver Gutsche - CMS / Fermilab Analyzing Millions of Gigabyte of LHC Data for CMS - Discover the Higgs on OSG.
T1 at LBL/NERSC/OAK RIDGE General principles. RAW data flow T0 disk buffer DAQ & HLT CERN Tape AliEn FC Raw data Condition & Calibration & data DB disk.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
The Asymmetry between Matter and Antimatter Besma M’charek FEW, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
The LHCb DAQ and Trigger Systems: recent updates Ricardo Graciani XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics.
LHC Experiments at Liverpool E2V Visit – Nov 2005 Introduction Si Technology Upgrade/Maintenance Summary.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
1 Data Storage MICE DAQ Workshop 10 th February 2006 Malcolm Ellis & Paul Kyberd.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
Exploiting the Grid to Simulate and Design the LHCb Experiment K Harrison 1, N Brook 2, G Patrick 3, E van Herwijnen 4, on behalf of the LHCb Grid Group.
CERN/IT/DB Multi-PB Distributed Databases Jamie Shiers IT Division, DB Group, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland February 2001.
Large scale data flow in local and GRID environment V.Kolosov, I.Korolko, S.Makarychev ITEP Moscow.
Introduction to the workshop LHCb Generators Tuning Mini Workshop Bucharest 22 nd & 23 rd November 2012 LHCb Generators Tuning Mini Workshop Bucharest.
LHC’s Second Run Hyunseok Lee 1. 2 ■ Discovery of the Higgs particle.
25 February 2000Tim Adye1 Using an Object Oriented Database to Store BaBar's Terabytes Tim Adye Particle Physics Department Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
IOP HEPP 6-8 April 2009Matthew Tamsett, RHUL 1 Determining the ATLAS electron trigger efficiency in BSM channels from Data Matthew Tamsett, RHUL Supervisor:
1 Chasing the Higgs boson with a worldwide distributed trigger system Sander Klous NIKHEF VENI proposal 2006.
Measurement of CP violation with the LHCb experiment at CERN
FPCP04, Daegu, 9 Oct 2004P J Dornan - Imperial College London1 B-Physics at the LHC P J Dornan Imperial College, London.
Preparation of KIPT (Kharkov) computing facilities for CMS data analysis L. Levchuk Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology (KIPT), Kharkov, Ukraine.
Computing Infrastructure Status. LHCb Computing Status LHCb LHCC mini-review, February The LHCb Computing Model: a reminder m Simulation is using.
1 Kittikul Kovitanggoon*, Burin Asavapibhop, Narumon Suwonjandee, Gurpreet Singh Chulalongkorn University, Thailand July 23, 2015 Workshop on e-Science.
LHCb computing in Russia Russia-CERN JWGC, March 2007.
LHCb computing in Russia Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow) Russia-CERN JWGC, October 2005.
Copyright © 2000 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Title – 1 Distributed Trigger System for the LHC experiments Krzysztof Korcyl ATLAS experiment laboratory H.
Fermilab User Facility US-CMS User Facility and Regional Center at Fermilab Matthias Kasemann FNAL.
Finnish DataGrid meeting, CSC, Otaniemi, V. Karimäki (HIP) DataGrid meeting, CSC V. Karimäki (HIP) V. Karimäki (HIP) Otaniemi, 28 August, 2000.
DIS 2004, Strbske Pleso,April LHCb experiment sensitivity to CKM phases and New Physics from mixing and CP violation measurements in B decays LHCb.
The BTeV Project at Fermilab Talk to DOE/Fermi Group Jan. 11, 2001 Introduction – Joel Butler Tracking detectors – David Christian Particle Identification.
Prompt J/  and b ➝ J/  X production in pp collisions at LHCb Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 7 Dec 2010 For the LHCb Collaboration KRUGER 2010 Workshop.
Indexing and Selection of Data Items Using Tag Collections Sebastien Ponce CERN – LHCb Experiment EPFL – Computer Science Dpt Pere Mato Vila CERN – LHCb.
The LHCb Italian Tier-2 Domenico Galli, Bologna INFN CSN1 Roma,
Les Les Robertson LCG Project Leader High Energy Physics using a worldwide computing grid Torino December 2005.
The KLOE computing environment Nuclear Science Symposium Portland, Oregon, USA 20 October 2003 M. Moulson – INFN/Frascati for the KLOE Collaboration.
M. Poli Lener XI Spring School - "Bruno Touschek" 1 Luminosity measurements with dimuon and single muon reconstruction of Z 0 and W decays OUTLINE:  LHCb.
Experimental Particle Physics Do you want to discover… What is the origin of mass ? Discover the Higgs boson with ATLAS Why is there more matter than anti-matter.
Outline: The LHCb Computing Model Philippe Charpentier, CERN ICFA workshop on Grid activities, Sinaia, Romania, October
NA62 computing resources update 1 Paolo Valente – INFN Roma Liverpool, Aug. 2013NA62 collaboration meeting.
By Henry Brown Henry Brown, LHCb, IOP 10/04/13 1.
Large scale data flow in local and GRID environment Viktor Kolosov (ITEP Moscow) Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow)
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Computing Issues for the ATLAS SWT2. What is SWT2? SWT2 is the U.S. ATLAS Southwestern Tier 2 Consortium UTA is lead institution, along with University.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 LHCb computing for the analysis : a naive user point of view Workshop analyse cc-in2p3 17 avril 2008 Marie-Hélène Schune, LAL-Orsay for LHCb-France Framework,
LHCbComputing Computing for the LHCb Upgrade. 2 LHCb Upgrade: goal and timescale m LHCb upgrade will be operational after LS2 (~2020) m Increase significantly.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
Sinéad Farrington University of Glasgow for the CDF Collaboration European Physical Society Aachen, 17 th -23 rd July 2003 B Lifetimes and Flavour Tagging.
LHCb Current Understanding of Italian Tier-n Centres Domenico Galli, Umberto Marconi Roma, January 23, 2001.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Collaborative Research Projects in Australia: High Energy Physicists Dr. Greg Wickham (AARNet) Dr. Glenn Moloney (University of Melbourne) Global Collaborations.
Grid technologies for large-scale projects N. S. Astakhov, A. S. Baginyan, S. D. Belov, A. G. Dolbilov, A. O. Golunov, I. N. Gorbunov, N. I. Gromova, I.
LHC collisions rate: Hz New PHYSICS rate: Hz Event selection: 1 in 10,000,000,000,000 Signal/Noise: Raw Data volumes produced.
Ian Bird WLCG Workshop San Francisco, 8th October 2016
evoluzione modello per Run3 LHC
LHCb computing in Russia
LHCb Computing Model and Data Handling Angelo Carbone 5° workshop italiano sulla fisica p-p ad LHC 31st January 2008.
Philippe Charpentier CERN – LHCb On behalf of the LHCb Computing Group
Proposal for the LHCb Italian Tier-2
CERN, the LHC and the Grid
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
R. Graciani for LHCb Mumbay, Feb 2006
LHCb Computing Philippe Charpentier CERN
Using an Object Oriented Database to Store BaBar's Terabytes
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
LHCb thinking on Regional Centres and Related activities (GRIDs)
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
The LHCb Computing Data Challenge DC06
Presentation transcript:

The LHCb CERN R. Graciani (U. de Barcelona, Spain) for the LHCb Collaboration International ICFA Workshop on Digital Divide Mexico City, October 2007

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 2 Overview Introduction The LHCb experiment The LHCb Computing Model Making LHCb Summary

Introduction

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 4 The Large Hadron Collider LHC = 27 km CERN is a laboratory where scientists unite to study the building blocks of matter and the forces that hold them together. CERN

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 5 The structure of Matter PARTICLES: LEPTONS&QUARKS FORCES: The Standard Model = +

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 6 The Large Hadron Collider Geneva protons 14 TeV = 14·10 12 eV

The LHCb experiment MATTER: ANTI-MATTER:

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 8 Where is anti-matter? In principle: –particles and anti-particles are produced in pairs and, –they annihilate in pairs. E = mc 2 But, our world is made out of matter. So, where is the anti-matter? –There must be some difference to explain its absence. One of the ingredients is CP asymmetry.

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 9 B LHCb The aim of the experiment, is to study with very good precision: –CP asymmetry in B systems, and –rare B decays. The Standard Model predicts differences between matter and anti-matter for B-mesons. BaBar PEP-II) and Belle KEKB) experiments have recorded 500·10 6 bb pairs each. LHC: –there is a much larger bb cross section: 500 μb  bb pairs / year –All B-hadrons are produced: B + (40%), B 0 (40%), B s (10%),  b (10%)

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN Physicists 49 Institutions 15 Countries The LHCb Apparatus (I) B  B

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 11 The LHCb Apparatus (II) Average RAW event size: Trigger 1.0 kB Velo 5.5 kB RICH 4.3 kB Trackers14.8 kB Muon 1.3 kB Calo 9.7 kB Total36.5 kB

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 12 The LHCb Apparatus (III)

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 13 Taking Data 40 MHz 0.2 kHz 35 GB/s 1.8 kHz 700 TB/y 2·10 10 Evt./y pp collisions occur every 25 ns LHCb selects interesting signals Online reconstruction and selection The result is 20 billion events with ~2 billion are full bb pairs. 1 MHz

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 14 Studying B decays Final states must be fully reconstructed: –“Simple” 2 body decays: –“Easy” to find leptonic decays: –Or “complicated” multi-hadron decays: Different physics studies require different B decays to be reconstructed. From the first level of the trigger events are classified in different streams (up ~30).

The LHCb Computing Model

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 16 Processing Data DST 75kB/evt RAW 35kB/evt Stripping rDST 20kB/evt Analysis Reconstruction nTuple CERN + 6 Tier1’s

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 17 Simulating Data DST 250kB/evt Produced at Tier2’s, CERN + 6 Tier1’s Simulating 1 event ~ Reconstructing 100 events

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 18 Computing Resources Reconstruction & Stripping: CERN + 6 Tier1’s (CNAF, GRIDKA, IN2P3, NIKHEF-SARA, PIC, RAL). –Several iterations per year, require: –~ 5.3 M SpecInt2000 Monte Carlo Simulation: Tier2’s –4 billion evt./year, require: –11.4 M SpecInt2000 Storage: –~ 4.0 PB of Tape –~ 3.2 PB of Disk

Making LHCb

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 20 LHCb Require full reconstruction of B hadrons from their decay products. Many tens of channels are interesting. –Expect > 10 6 events for some channels –Expect < 100 events for other channels There are many other channels. –Backgrounds, contaminations, … Use different data samples for different parts of their analysis.

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 21 Typical analysis Use a signal channel: O(10 5 evt). –Produce several selections or ntuples to study their properties. Use few control channels: O(10 5 evt). –Produce several selections or ntuples to study backgrounds, systematics, contaminations,… Use some inclusive sample: O(10 6 evt). –Produce several selections or ntuples to study efficiency, resolutions,… Use Simulated data: O(10 5 evt). –To cross check models, hypothesis,… Estimate: 10 7 evt. x 10 kB / evt. = 100 GB –Produced at Tier1’s and transfer to Local resources for further reduction/processing/analysis. For larger statistics up to 1 TB are expected.

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 22 Typical analysis DST Analysis nTuple DST Analysis nTuple DST Analysis nTuple DST Analysis nTuple Signal Monte Carlo Control Inclusive Now the physicist iterates over these data to prepare his Tier3

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 23 Response for Analysis Assume all data can be in O(1 day). –Reasonable since all data will be on disk. How long does the physicist need to get back the result? –100 Mbs 50 % 100 GB / 50 Mbs = 4.5 hours 1 TB / 50 Mbs = 45 hours

Summary

ICFA Workshop Mexico 2007 The LHCb CERN 25 Summary Processing LHCb data will need large amounts of CPU, Storage and Networking. LHCb has decided for a Computing Model where most of the network traffic is between Tier1’s (including CERN). Tier2 contributions to simulation are not limited by bandwith (in total few MB/s). Our Brazilian colleges are actively participating in the preparations for the analysis of LHCb data and are expected to contribute as successfully in the future. Response time for analysis may be slow if “good” connectivity is not guaranteed. LHC will start in 2008 and we hope to be at full speed by LHCb will measure CP violation and improve our understanding of the difference between matter and anti-matter.