How to Establish and Manage a Technology Transfer Office

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

National Core Indicators Overview for the State of Washington Lisa A. Weber, Ph.D. Division of Developmental Disabilities.
Building pertinent relationships to move innovation out of Midwest Federal labs for private commercialization.
Partnership Intermediaries Joseph Teter Director of Technology Transfer NAVSEA Carderock Division Federal Laboratory Consortium Mid-Atlantic.
U.S. Jurisdiction Summary Chart Legal Requirement re: Duties of Child Representative Child’s AttyBest Interests Representative Categorization Required.
EDUCATION SERVICE UPDATE
AASHTOWare Program Benefits Standing Committee on Highways October 18, 2013 Tom Cole, Idaho DOT AASHTO Special Committee on Joint Development.
Legal Department Outside Counsel Management 1 Enhanced Outside Counsel / Vendor Management Processes Timekeeper level budgeting for litigation matters.
1 FTA Program Update 2009 SCOPT Winter Meeting Phoenix, AZ December 1 – 4, 2009.
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Achieving and Maintaining Near Universal Coverage Under the Affordable Care Act: Key Issues For Federal and State Policy Makers Sara.
TIG 2012 INFORMATION SESSION David Bonebrake, Glenn Rawdon, Jane Ribadeneyra Legal Services Corporation.
Technology Transfer 2005 Mid Atlantic Regional Support Office.
Background Information on the Newspoets Total Number: 78 active newspoets. 26 (of the original 36) newspoets from returned this year.
1 The National Environmental Information Exchange Network History and Overview Office of Water National STORET/WQX User Meeting November 27, 2007.
Agencies’ Participation in PBMS January 20, 2015 PA IL TX AZ CA Trained, Partial Data Entry (17) Required Characteristics & 75% of Key Indicators (8) OH.
SSSS. Today’s Agenda 1.Importance of an accurate list 2.Status report on ERIC 3.ERIC membership responsibilities for state and local elections officials.
National Journal Presentation Credits Producers: Katharine Conlon Director: Afzal Bari House Committee Maps Updated: March 19, 2015.
MD VT MA NH DC CT NJ RI DE WA
State and Local Health Department Governance Classification System
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 240 sessions with 8,187 participants
Part A/B MAC Current Jurisdictions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
IRS Large Business & International Division (LB&I)
Children's Eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP by Income, January 2013
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Other Adults, January 2017
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Avaya Consultant Relations Program
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
States with Section 1115 ACA Expansion Waivers, December 2015
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Collier County Tourism Research
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Coverage of Low-Income Adults by Scope of Coverage, January 2013
Dual Eligibles Across the States
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
PRACTICA & ONLINE ED AUTHORIZATION STATUS
States including governance in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including governance in their SSIP improvement.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
(map is coded by CAE-CD region)
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Presentation transcript:

How to Establish and Manage a Technology Transfer Office Dr. J. Scott Deiter Naval Surface Warfare Center Albuquerque, New Mexico April 26, 2010

Dr. J. Scott Deiter Director of Technology Transfer Office, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC), Indian Head Division, for 15 years Technology transfer responsibilities include: Marketing and licensing Navy intellectual property Negotiating CRADAs among the lab, industry, state and local governments, and academia Outreach activities to develop partnering opportunities Interaction with partnership intermediaries FLC Chair (2007-Present) ORTA Representative for NSWC, Indian Head Division Regional Coordinator and Deputy Coordinator, FLC Mid-Atlantic Region Research Chemist at NSWC for 24 years

ORTA—Focal Point for Technology Transfer 3

Know Your Lab Teammates Contact your Lab Director, OC, PA Introduce yourself to your management Become aware of lab capabilities Attend tech meetings Seek competent HELP! - Administrative and legal assistance

Official Designations/ Authority Official letter of appointment as ORTA - Written confirmation of your position from the Director/Commander of the lab Authority to sign official correspondence related to ORTA Obtain copies of all delegations of authority for your lab - To enter into CRADAs, protecting agency inventions - Designation of tech transfer point of contact - SECNAVINST 5700.16A (for the Navy)

Important Registrations Become an FLC member - Register as Lab Representative or ORTA representative - Ensure lab voting rights - Attend meetings to make contacts and fill Rolodex - Mentors for guidance Register as Lab Representative and/or ORTA representative with your agency Register within your FLC region, attend meetings

Note: ( ) denotes total labs plus agency reps. Verified Voting Locations by Regions Current Structure ID 1 WA 4 OR 3 NV 2 CA 23 AZ 2 AK 0 HI 0 Far West 35 LA 1 KY 0 TN 3 MS 4 AL 6 (7) GA 2 (3) FL 11 (12) SC 2 NC 5 Southeast 34 (37) MN 0 WI 1 IL 5 IN 1 OH 13 (14) MI 1 Midwest 21 (22) ND 1 SD 0 NE 1 OK 2 KS 1 AR 1 MO 2 IA 1 TX 9 MT 1 WY 1 CO 10 NM 4 UT 3 Mid-Continent 37 PA 6 Mid-Atlantic 88 (106) MD 53 (60) DE 0 VA 18 (23) WV 1 (2) DC 10 (15) NY 3 NJ 6 CT 2 RI 2 MA 5 ME 0 VT NH 1 Northeast 19 PR 0 Note: ( ) denotes total labs plus agency reps.

Know Duties of ORTA Rep CRADAs - Writing, negotiation, safekeeping original document - Knowing when to use CRADA vs. some other legal vehicle - CANNOT release funding and SOW to third party - Identifying nonprofits available for helping private industry Patents - Writing, negotiating patent licenses Maintaining latest versions of legal instruments Develop an Invention Evaluation Board Training scientists and engineers (S&Es) on CRADA and patent processes (annually)

Know Duties of ORTA Rep (Cont.) ORTA T2 training (through FLC, LES, AUTM) Market lab intellectual property (IP), capabilities - FLC sponsors booth space at selected meetings Outreach (EDCs, state & local governments, private businesses) Identify and utilize EDCs, state nonprofits Find POCs within educational institutions for interaction

BUILD A TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER LIBRARY!!

ORTA Handbook Legal foundation for the ORTA Functions of ORTA Technology transfer mechanisms Federal T2 organizations Nonfederal T2 organizations Describes IP rights T2 legislation and Executive Orders Model CRADAs for GOGO and GOCO laboratories Available on FLC website (free)

Technology Transfer Desk Reference Tech transfer overview Role of FLC in T2 CRADA legislative authority IP issues Available on FLC website (free)

Federal Technology Transfer Legislation & Policy (“Green Book”) Technology innovation legislation highlights Legislation applicable to all federal agencies Special legislative provisions applicable to specific agencies Special provision language Executive orders Available on FLC website (free)

Licensing References “Licensing - A Strategy for Profits” - Edward P. White, published by LES, 1997 Licensing Executives Society - Negotiating techniques - IP valuation - Foreign licensing - Copyrights, trademarks, software - www.usa-canada.les.org

FLC SERVICES AND PRODUCTS

FLC Communications FLC website management Monthly newsletter Publications - Technology for Today - FLC calendar - FLC awards booklet Roundtable management Design of FLC promotional materials FLC presentations

FLC Website Main Page

FLC Technology Locator Mission: In cooperation with the federal laboratories, the FLC Technology Locator provides a clearinghouse for requests from businesses, industrial development organizations, state and local governments, academia, not-for-profit organizations, individuals, and other federal agencies and laboratories

FLC Technology Locator Service Connects all federal labs through e-mail service Used by nonfederal entities to solve problems, find expertise or unique facilities, find technologies E-mail sent from nonfederal entity to FLC Locator Service Locator Service sends e-mail with contents of need to all members of FLC registered as Lab Reps or ORTA Lab Rep or ORTA reviews request and replies if that lab can help solve the problem Service is free, fast-acting, valuable mechanism for finding solutions to needs

FLC NewsLink

FLC Store

SECURING LAB INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

ORTA IP Responsibilities ORTA Rep has major responsibility for identifying and protecting lab IP Include ORTA signature line on route sheets for papers and presentations OR copies of papers Read lab newspapers and agency highlights Attend technical briefings Brief management on need to protect IP Monitor funding for basic research - Remind scientists to contact you if invention made

Secure Lab IP Obtain disclosures from inventors Convene Invention Evaluation Board (IEB) meeting Make business decision to use federal funds to file for patent protection Lab patent attorney conducts prior art search Identify any commercial applications for inclusion in claims Obtain copy of patent application Obtain copy of filing with USPTO Determine if PCT coverage is necessary Federal government protects inventions with patents, but does not copyright any manuals, texts, etc. Navy does patent software

Establish an Invention Evaluation Board Board includes: ORTA Rep, patent attorney, and knowledgeable scientist from each scientific department Board makes a business decision to spend lab funds (up to $8K or more) to attempt to patent an invention ORTA: Announces IEB meeting to all hands, develops agenda, with presentations from each inventor IEB votes on invention based on rating factors, and PA announces decision to inventors If IEB rejects an invention, the scientist keeps IP rights, but government keeps royalty-free right

IEB Rating Factors Navy needs/requirements – Degree to which invention addresses need Feasibility/use – Degree to which the invention could be expected to be used by the Navy. Is it currently in actual use by the Navy? Mission relevance – Degree to which the invention enhances the core technical capabilities or status of the Division Technological advancement – What is the relative significance of the invention? Is it a pioneering invention? Is this a significant or a marginal improvement in the art, etc.? Degree of development – Has a working model been built? Has comparative testing been done? Dual use – Potential for commercialization, licensing (for income to the command and the inventor(s)), attracting CRADA partners, etc Affordability impact – To what degree could the invention be expected to reduce acquisition or life-cycle costs? Environmental impact – To what degree does the invention provide a positive impact on the environment?

IP Management Get access to IP MIS (or comparable) - Access to filing, issue, maintenance dates Obtain market search tool(s) - Dun & Bradstreet information - iMarket marketplace software

Use Novel Resources for IP Market Assessments BE CREATIVE! University of Baltimore “Lab to Market” Program Johns Hopkins University Business Opportunities Partnership intermediaries such as Tech Link, Tech Match, First Link, Maryland TEDCO Novel Venture Capital Groups - Genesis Technologies

The Omnipak™ - Container Technology for a New Age Objective: Transfer, commercialize and transition container technology developed by the Navy for a new age in shipping Benefits: Saves DoD $millions yearly by reducing packaging costs, damage to goods, injury Eliminates unit load failure Increases shipment size and security Technology: A container technology that is highly durable, cost-effective and safe. The containers open easily for inspection and will greatly reduce any negative impact on the environment. They are collapsible, reusable, interlocking and built for all modes of shipping. OmniPak™ Participants: Invented by the Indian Head Division of the Naval Surface Warfare Center Exclusively licensed to Baltimore Shipping Technologies, Inc. by Navy Dir. of Technology (Dr. J. Scott Deiter, ORTA) Status: Baltimore Shipping Technologies awarded $75K from TEDCO to develop prototype 1st commercial sale in June 2006 DoD will replace 120-plus pallets with the OmniPak™ container technology A new defense against a major bioterror threat while reducing DoD packaging and shipping costs

Develop Marketing Tools Tech transfer brochures - Describe how to do business with your lab - Provide some success stories Technology one-pagers for technologies with commercial value Develop exhibition booth for technology transfer - IP with commercial value - Unique facilities - Unique expertise

Federal Register Notices NOTICES MUST BE EXACT! Get copies for: - Notices of availability - Notices of intent to license - Notice of correction john.deiter@navy.mil or JAG office for copies

Sample Federal Register Notice DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Navy Notice of Availability of Government-Owned Inventions; Available for Licensing AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The following inventions are assigned to the U.S. Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy and are available for licensing by the Department of the Navy. U.S. Patent Application Serial Number 11/009847 entitled “Multiple Shock Event Sensing Device.” U.S. Patent Application Serial Number 11/040,291 entitled “MEMS Inertial Delay Device.” U.S. Patent Application Serial Number 10/826,791 entitled “Container, and Related Methods.” U.S. Patent Application Serial Number 11/040,300 entitled “MEMS Multi-Directional Shock Sensor.” U.S. Patent Application Serial Number 10/040,292 entitled “Method and Device for Clearing Firebreaks and Controlling Fire.” U.S. Patent Application Serial Number 11/010,701 entitled “Inhibition of Aluminum Oxidation Through the Vapor Depositions of a Passivation Layer and Method Thereof.” ADDRESS: Requests for copies of the Patent Applications cited should be directed to the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Code CAB, 101 Strauss Avenue, Indian Head, MD 20640-5035. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Dr. J. Scott Deiter, Head, Technology Transfer Office, Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division, Code CAB, 101 Strauss Avenue, Indian Head, MD 20640-5035, telephone (301) 744-6111.

Appropriate Contacts For Non-standard Agreements U.S. Trade Representative (as of March 18, 2009) - Ron Kirk rkirk@ustr.eop.gov Federal Register - LCDR Ann Vallandingham, JAGC (as of January 2, 2009) USN, Office of the Judge Advocate General Administrative Law Division (Code 13) 1322 Patterson Avenue SE, Suite 3000 Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374 COMM: 703-614-7245 (DSN: 224-7245)

Ethical Issues in Licensing Who may become involved in developing a patent license - Inventor having an interest in the deal How is royalty income used? What is publicly available when reporting a CRADA? Responsibility for protecting proprietary information (invention disclosures) Potential issues dealing with Invention Evaluation Board Safekeeping of files, such as invention disclosures and original CRADA documents

Maintain Databases Keep table of yearly metrics on: - Number of CRADAs (annual and cumulative active) - Amount of CRADA funding - Number of patents - Patent royalty income - Number of patent licenses - Other legal instruments (PIAs, EPAs)

DTTIS Database Report T2 Agreements (CRADAs, patent licenses, etc.) to DOD through Navy version of the Defense Technology Transfer Information System (DTTIS) database Within 30 days after agreement is signed, you must report the agreement through the Navy DTTIS DTTIS website URL is <www.onr.navy.mil/dttis> Accessing DTTIS - Enter the DTTIS URL in the location box of your browser - Click on the first link on the home page to go to the primary information Technology Transfer Database Elizabeth McLaughlin at emclaughlin@dttis-onr.rk.anteon.com

Tech Transfer Business Plan List CRADAs, patents, licenses Report metrics from databases Report success stories Present financial data Fact sheets on success stories Think about your future plans/add them Keeping track of this info throughout the year will prepare you for numerous data calls!

Tech Transfer Via Internet Maintain tech transfer website - Use as marketing tool for patents, patent applications - Provide all forms and instructions - List patents and identify those with commercial potential - Identify unique facilities - Describe partnering success stories Acquire tech transfer button on home page

PARTNERSHIP INTERMEDIARIES AND PARTNERSHIP INTERMEDIARY AGREEMENTS

What is a PIA? Statutory authority is Title 15 U.S.C. Section 3715 Partnership Intermediary Agreement Statutory authority is Title 15 U.S.C. Section 3715 PIA is a contract or Memorandum of Understanding between a federal lab and an entity known as a partnership intermediary PIA provides for the partnership intermediary to perform services for the federal laboratory that increase the likelihood of success in the conduct of cooperative or joint activities with small business firms, institutions of higher education, or educational institutions

Partnership Intermediary Defined by organization’s “structure & function” - Structure An agency of a state or local government, or A nonprofit entity owned, operated and funded in whole or in part by state or local government - Function Assist, counsel, advise, evaluate, or cooperate with small business firms, institutions of higher education

Examples of a Partnership Intermediary Tech Link: Dr. John Dennis, jdennis@montana.edu Free, very successful, will help write FLC award nomination packages, other Foresight Science & Technology: Dr. Phyllis Speser phyllis.speser@foresightst.com Cost, GSA contractor, very successful, numerous offices Nonprofits such as: TEDCO Franklin Partnerships Any local economic development center Universities with business marketing programs

Example of Partnership Intermediary Maryland TEDCO A nonprofit public corporation Provides link between capabilities at federal lab and technology needs of businesses throughout Maryland Serves as intermediary to locate and advise on R&D capabilities that may be made available to small businesses and universities Develops technology marketing programs and showcases federal lab technologies Sponsors activities and programs that showcase technology and capabilities of small businesses and educational institutions which may be of interest to federal labs

PIA BOILERPLATE Contact ME for Navy version!! I’ll forward PIA boilerplate to you. Or Call your agency for appropriate boilerplate

CRADAS vs. Work for Others 10 USC 2539b, 2563 Routine work conducted Work description submitted, proposal requested, cost estimate, time schedule, delivery package Must be proprietary subject to customer’s requirements R&D not conducted under Work for Others

Outreach Efforts Educate public on value of technology transfer - Promote CRADAs - Create awareness of patents available for licensing - Promote awareness of capabilities, personnel, facilities - Collaborate for problem solving - Present at business, state and local government meetings

For Technology Transfer Help Contact the Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer www.federallabs.org (856) 667-7727 Flc-all@flc2.federallabs.org (All FLC subscribers) Flc-eb@flc2.federallabs.org (EB members) Flc-votingNational@flc2.federallabs.org (national voting info)

T2 Mechanisms Used by Federal Agencies See Federal Technology Transfer Mechanisms Database on FLC website - www.federallabs.org/flc/education/t2-matrix

CONTACT INFORMATION J. Scott Deiter Naval Surface Warfare Center – Indian Head Division Indian Head, MD 20640 E-mail: john.deiter@navy.mil Phone: 301-744-6111