Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
Advertisements

MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
California English Language Development Test (CELDT) and Reclassification Palm Middle School
Poway Unified Board of Education Academic Performance Index (API) and Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) October 15, 2012.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 20, 2011.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
A New School Accountability Model. Draft – March Check for Updates to this Presentationhttp://
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
ON TARGET WITH AMAOS 1, 2, 3 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS September 29, 2009 Welcome.
STAR 2010 September 10, Agenda New in 2010 Interpreting reports Comparing results Appendixes A-G 2.
2009 STAR Interpreting and Using Results August 2009 Webcast.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
2008 STAR Interpreting and Using Results August/September 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CST DATA ANALYSIS STAR RESULTS Presented by Audrey Lee Director, Curriculum & Educational Technology 10 September.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Academic Achievement Highlights San Francisco Unified School District August 2010.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting State.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Riverside County Office of Education November 22, 2013.
Data-Driven Conversations with Special Education Teachers and Administrators to Improve Student Outcomes and State Accountability Emily Wolk Department.
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
How Do Students with Disabilities Participate in the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program? September 28, 2011.
How Do Students with Disabilities Participate in the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program? September 29, 2010.
Information About the Accountability Provisions of No Child Left Behind California Department of Education Policy and Evaluation Division July 2003.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
How Do Students with Disabilities Participate in the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program? December 9, 2009.
STAR Testing Presented by: Caitlin Cline Theresa Anson EDUC 472.
California Standards Test (CST) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Results, Oakland Unified School District Division of Student Achievement.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST High School.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Ross Valley School District STAR, API and AYP Summary Toni Beal, Director of Student Services September 27, 2011.
Planning, Assessment & Research Analysis and Use of Student Data Part I Administrative Academy Los Angeles Unified School District.
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District Catch A Rising STAR Understanding Your STAR Student Report (Revised 2012)
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
Department of Research and Evaluation
How Do Students with Disabilities Participate in the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program? September 29, 2010.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
STAR CST Reports and AYP Predictions
Using Data to Drive Your School’s Instructional Program
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
Hedenkamp Elementary School
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Santa Ana Unified School District Dept. of Research and Evaluation
Santa Ana Unified School District Dept. of Research and Evaluation
Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School
Santa Ana Unified School District Dept. of Research and Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate

Presentation Goals SAUSD CST Highlights and Data Mat Our School’s CST Results AYP and API Next Steps Helpful Reports on DataDirector to View STAR Results

Reflecting on last year... In departments, What were your goals last year for the CST? What did you do to achieve those goals?

CST Scores 2011 CST Results

Q: How are the CST results reported to schools and teachers? Site administrators and staff receive CST results of: ◦ Individual students ◦ Classes ◦ Grade levels ◦ Schools ◦ District ◦ County ◦ And, overall state performance

SAUSD Data Mats Work with a partner to examine the Data Mat... What do you notice within your subject area/s and grades? What do you notice about other subject areas? What patterns do you notice overall from elementary through high school in the various subject areas?

Santa Ana Highlights English–Language Arts We had more than 900 additional students score proficient and advanced from 2009 to 2011 in English Language Arts; a 5.9% overall increase from Overall growth in the percent proficient and advanced in English Language Arts increased from 2% to 5% in Grades 2-5, 7-8, and from the prior year. Percent proficient and advanced increased 5% in English Language Arts in Grades 3 and 7 from the prior year. Mathematics In Mathematics, we had more than 1,800 additional students score proficient and advanced from 2009 to 2011; a 8.5% overall increase from Grade 4 exceeded the 2011 NCLB Target (68.5%) in Mathematics for Overall growth in the percent proficient and advanced in Mathematics increased from 2% to 8% in Grades 2-7 from the prior year. Increased percent proficient and advanced in Algebra I (Grades 10-11), Geometry (Grade 10), and Algebra II (Grade 11) from the prior year. There was an increase of approximately 250 students in Grade 10 Algebra II while maintaining the same percent proficient and advanced from the prior year.

Santa Ana Highlights (cont.) History-Social Science There was an increase in the percent proficient and advanced in History- Social Science; furthermore, there is a general trend of yearly increases since 2007 in Grade 8, 10, and 11. Science The number of students scoring proficient and advanced in Grade 5 Science increased by 3% from the prior year. Overall growth in the percent proficient and advanced in Biology (Grades 10-11) increased from 2% to 4% from the prior year. There was a 3% increase in Grade 10 Chemistry and a 6% increase in Grade 11 Physics in percent proficient and advanced from the prior year.

Our School’s 3-Year CST Summary Report What do you notice? Are these results what you expected based on what you did? Insert your school’s 3 –Year CST Summary Report Here

Now, let’s go deeper... Look at your subject and grade reports based on the and CSTs Look within subject and also look outside your subject area What do you notice? What questions might you have?

Next Steps: Think about what you discussed and your feedback from your colleagues Recommendation: Discuss within your dept. and with your administrator to determine your goals for this year

State and Federal Accountability systems

Our Accountability System Federal Accountability Status model Every school & district has the same target. Targets reach 100% proficient by Type of rating=Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)  Meets or does not meet AYP State Accountability Growth model with a statewide performance goal of 800 Schools and all subgroups have growth goals. Type of rating=Academic Performance Index (API)  Scale of Source: California Department of Education (CDE) The CST is used for both Accountability Systems. The AYP also includes CAPA, CMA (All Schools) & CAHSEE (For High Schools)

Adequate Yearly Progress - AYP Academic Performance Index - API Components of AYP Participation rate Percent Proficient API Graduation rate All Proficient and Advanced Students Count on your score Components of API Advanced 1000 Proficient 875 Basic 700 Below Basic 500 Far Below Basic 200 Every Student Counts

AYP Percent Proficient Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) Elementary and Middle Schools are based on: The California Standards Tests (CSTs) The California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for students with severe cognitive disabilities California Modified Assessment (CMA) High Schools are based on: Results from the Grade 10 California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) administration The California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for students with severe cognitive disabilities in English-language arts and mathematics in grade 10 NCLB prohibits the use of norm-referenced test data in measuring student achievement

Annual Measurable Objectives To achieve AYP, a school must meet or exceed Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) schoolwide and for each student subgroup:  Economically disadvantaged  Major ethnic and racial groups  Students with disabilities  English language learners

AMOs: English language arts Elementary and Middle Schools

AMOs: Math Elementary / Middle Schools

API Test Weights

You may want to insert your KDS API and AYP Reports here. If you are unable to locate them, please contact SAUSD Dept. of Research and Evaluation

DataDirector: What’s New

Suggested Pre-Built Reports for Viewing STAR Results on DataDirector Report Name: What is it? What does it include?Notes: CST Scaled Scores Easy to read snapshot of individual student performance on a CST as they relate to the performance band. Identifies students who are on the margins of advancing or falling-back a proficiency level Filters and identifies students by performance level or scaled score, e..g. I only want to view students who were on the “bubble,” 340 and above on the CST ELA for grade 9. CST Cluster Scores Identifies performance for individual students, teachers, district and state on each of the strands tested on the CST. Provides pie charts and bar graphs on classroom averages, school averages, district averages as well as performance level distributions. Important: Remember to use the Summary Options menu. Click on the“Include Teacher Summary” option to view the pie charts. Pivot TableCST or CELDT student performance comparison over a 2 year period. Creates pivot tables that identify “sliders, gainers, stickers.” See next slide CST Percent Proficient Trend Analysis Multi-tiered analysis of students proficient on the CST. Includes bar graphs and charts of students’ performance over time. Includes disaggregated subgroup performance. Compare growth trends in number of students proficient or at the varying proficiency levels for multiple years. Select “Cohort Report” to see only students who took any of the selected assessments. Select “Limited Cohort Report” for students who took all selected assessments. The “Year to Year Comparison” compares students and their test results from one academic year to another.

Contact Information Santa Ana Unified School District Department of Research and Evaluation (714) Phone (714) Fax