Describing and Evaluating Curriculum: I. Identifying Skills, Goals, Experiences, Content and Values II. Curriculum Maps and Matrices Randy Richardson Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessing student learning from Public Engagement David Owen National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
Advertisements

SENIOR SEMINARS Specifics & Example Performances CEPR Center for Educational Policy Research.
Our Mission: Preparing Students for Postsecondary Success Mansoureh Tehrani R. L. Turner High School
Developing Mathematical Practices for Geometry, Algebra II and Beyond Developed by Education Development Center, Inc. with support from the Massachusetts.
Assessing General Education Joe Safdie San Diego Mesa College Joe Safdie San Diego Mesa College.
CURRICULUM/ CO-CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY January 24, 2013.
1 Engaged Campus – Institutional Level and Department Level presented to Engaged Department Summit CSU Chico – May 5, 2006 Season Eckardt, Administrative.
GRADUATE EDUCATION IN RESEARCH ETHICS FOR SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS Jorge J. Ferrér-Negrón 1, William J. Frey 1, Efraín O’Neill-Carrillo 2, Carlos Ríos-Velázquez.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Chemical Engineering curriculum renewal for the twenty first century: a work in progress Peter Holt, Jose Romagnoli and Ali Abbas.
The Common Core State Standards emphasize coherence at each grade level – making connections across content and between content and mathematical practices.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Project Based Learning
Building Strong Geoscience Departments for the Future Cathy Manduca, Carol Ormand Carleton College Heather Macdonald, Geoff Feiss, College of William and.
Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.
The Common Core State Standards Initiative Alisa Chapman, University of North Carolina October 24, 2013.
MODULE 7 Putting All Together and Designing the Course.
Program Assessment Randy Richardson University of Arizona 1.Assessing Your Environment Departmental SWOT Analysis 2.Assessing a Degree Program Learning.
Advantages of Using Children’s Literature provides a motivating introduction to complex curriculum topics mathematical vocabulary can be reinforced and.
The Changing Face of Education: How Common Core Impacts Our Curriculum Beth Smith President, ASCCC Oct. 31, 2013.
PROJECT BASED LEARNING
Common Core Standards for Mathematics Standards for Mathematical Practice Carry across all grade levels Describe habits of mind of a mathematically expert.
Bringing Together Design and Evaluation to Understand Student Learning Cathryn A. Manduca, Carleton College; Tim Bralower, Pennsylvania State University;
Building Strong Geoscience Departments: A Workshop Report Cathy Manduca, Carleton College Heather Macdonald, Geoff Feiss, College of William and Mary Randy.
Building Strong Geoscience Departments: Resources for the Community Heather Macdonald, College of William & Mary Cathryn Manduca, SERC at Carleton College.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
Selected Teaching-Learning Terms: Working Definitions...
Model for Sustaining Departmental Student Outcomes Assessment Russ E. Mullen, Mary H. Wiedenhoeft, Thomas A. Polito, Sherry L. Pogranichniy, and Michelle.
AAC&U Board Meeting Randy Bass Vice Provost for Education Georgetown University September 27, 2015 Liberal Learning and the Digital Future.
The First Year at the University of Wisconsin: Building a Foundation for Student Success Betsy Barefoot, EdD 2008 First-Year Conference University of Wisconsin.
Student Learning Outcomes and Curriculum Design at Montana State University David Mogk Head, Dept. Earth Sciences June 28, 2013 InTeGrate Workshop on Geoscience.
Draft implementation plan for our new purposes and objectives for General Education. Interim report of the Task Force on General Education and the Faculty.
1 Orientation 101 General Education Program Student Learning Outcomes.
Resources and Reflections: Using Data in Undergraduate Geosciences Cathy Manduca SERC Carleton College DLESE Annual Meeting 2003.
An overview for parents and families Butler Avenue School Julie Gillispie--March st Century Community Learning Center.
AAC&U Members on Recent Trends in General Education Design, Learning Outcomes, and Teaching Approaches Key findings from a survey among 325 Chief Academic.
InTeGrate-ing Geoscience Learning in Undergraduate Education Cathy Manduca, Sean Fox, Ellen Iverson, Carleton College; David Blockstein, NCSE; Tim Bralower,
The Role of Geoscience Departments in Preparing Future Geoscience Professionals Carol J. Ormand*, Science Education Resource Center R. Heather Macdonald,
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.
Describing and Evaluating Curriculum by Identifying Skills, Goals, Experiences, Content and Values Mary Savina Department of Geology, Carleton College.
Scotland’s Colleges is a trading name of both the Scottish Further Education Unit and the Association of Scotland’s Colleges Curriculum for Excellence.
Curriculum Mapping: Academic Faculty & Subject Librarians Working Together By Barbara Tierney, Head Research & Info Services, UCF Libraries With some content.
Developed in partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools (MD), Forward is a K–5 instructional system of services, tools, and curriculum. Forward.
Core Curriculum Workgroup Presentation to UEAC April 16, 2010.
Elements of curriculum
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Describing and Evaluating Curriculum I
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
Assessment Planning and Learning Outcome Design Dr
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Contemporary Issues in Curriculum: Chapters 1-5
Introduction to Pearson Forward
Intro to GETSI-Field Development Model & Guiding Principles
BU Hub Information for CAS Faculty and Staff
Mastery-Based Learning:
A five-year community effort to improve Earth literacy and build a workforce prepared to tackle environmental and resource issues InTeGrate supports integrated.
Common Core State Standards and Disciplinary Literacy
First-Stage Draft Plans for Gen Ed Revision
The New Illinois Learning Standards
InTeGrate Materials Development
Assessing Learning Outcomes
Program Assessment Processes for Developing and Strengthening
Taking a Giant Leap Using the Taxonomy of Significant Learning to Inform Instructional Design Ashlynn Kogut Texas A&M University.
Curriculum Mapping Best Practices in Jill Allison Kern, PhD
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Changing College Delivery Models to lessen Amounts Borrowed Scott Pulsipher, President AUTHOR’S NAME HERE.
Introduction to the AP Capstone™ Program
Research on Geoscience Learning
Service-Learning and Student Success
Presentation transcript:

Describing and Evaluating Curriculum: I. Identifying Skills, Goals, Experiences, Content and Values II. Curriculum Maps and Matrices Randy Richardson Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona (with thanks to Mary Savina, Carleton College) AGU Heads & Chairs, 2009

Predicting the future: What will the next 15 years hold in geoscience and geoscience education? More interested in applications More collaboration Different and broader career paths More societal relevance More complex data management tasks (from Beyond Earth System Science - Kip Hodges, 2007)Beyond Earth System Science - Kip Hodges, 2007 AGU Heads & Chairs, 2009

Trends in Higher Education Changing nature of the student body, Change in what it means to be an “educated person,” Emphasis on skills and habits of mind rather than content, Recognizing learning outside the classroom, A more cohesive and coherent first year experience, a capstone. (thanks to Chico Zimmerman, Perlman Center for Learning and Teaching, Carleton College) AGU Heads & Chairs, 2009

Thinking About Curriculum – Model #1 Emphasizing individual course titles and content: –Introductory geology (audience) –Specialized geoscience courses OR AGU Heads & Chairs, 2009

Thinking About Curriculum - Model #2 Emphasizing sequence and student intellectual development – –What are good second level courses? –What work as advanced courses? –What should students carry from one class to the next? OR AGU Heads & Chairs, 2009

Thinking About Curriculum – Model #3 – Identifying: Skills –Geoscience-specific –General Experiences Goals Values “Threshold concepts” (Randy Bass, Georgetown University) – (What are the central ideas from geoscience that are important to all students (majors and non- majors))? Other Content AGU Heads & Chairs, 2009

First fundamental question: What do you want your (seniors, graduates, alumni) to be able to do? First exercise: Defining goals, values, experiences, skills, knowledge (about 10 minutes of independent/small group work followed by 15 minutes of post-it organizing and reporting out). AGU Heads & Chairs, 2009

Student Learning Outcomes: Student Learning Outcomes California State University, Chico Students will be able to... Determine the physical and chemical composition of earth materials and the processes that produced them. –Identify and fully describe rocks ( AGU Heads & Chairs, 2009

Second fundamental question: Where in the curriculum (or co-curriculum) do students get these skills, experiences, etc.? Using the curricular map: Two Examples ( Visiting Workshop Program,

A matrix approach to curricular design This matrix concept has been used by the geology departments at Carleton and at College of William & Mary, as well as by other Carleton departments. AGU Heads & Chairs, 2009

Another version of the general matrix AGU Heads & Chairs, 2009

A breakdown of one category A = always; S = sometimes AGU Heads & Chairs, 2009

Second fundamental question, con’t: Exercise 2 Mapping curriculum and identifying where in curriculum experiences, goals, etc. are situated (about 20 minutes of independent and small group work on the maps and matrix). AGU Heads & Chairs, 2009

Thinking about assessment Use the capstone projects –Subjects and methods –Sources and experiences Use the department review process Check in with alumni Evaluate the course content AGU Heads & Chairs, 2009

Managing the department discussion – barriers and obstacles Identify principles and broadest learning objectives Identify skills, experiences, goals, values, threshold concepts, content areas Diagram or map structure of the major – as it is Identify the curricular (or co-curricular) locations of the skills, etc. Affirm (or at least acknowledge) perennial debates Check in with institutional and broader higher ed priorities Repeat more often than you think you need AGU Heads & Chairs, 2009

Connecting with institutional initiatives Importance of cross-cutting skills – not just “general education,” but also in major Quantitative reasoning, Writing Across the Curriculum, visuality, academic civic engagement, ethics, sustainability.... (Carleton has between eight and twenty, depending on who is counting) AGU Heads & Chairs, 2009