Sentencing Task Force Survey of Priorities Results.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Criminal Law and Procedure LWB 232 Week 13 - Sentencing dispositions.
Advertisements

SENTENCING REFORM IN NORTH CAROLINA Thomas W. Ross.
DUI AMENDMENTS PROPOSED BY ART LUSSE JUNE 30, 2010 LAW & JUSTICE INTERIM COMMITTEE.
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
Sentence Credits and Inmate Release
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Community Supervision and Alternative Sanctions Comparisons Barb Tombs July 16, 2007 Presentation to the CT Sentencing Task Force Subcommittees.
The New Technology of Community Corrections James Byrne Lecture.
Community Corrections
Probation, Parole, and Intermediate Sanctions
Sentencing and Punishment
Older Offenders & Criminal Justice
When Prisoners Come Home: Public Safety and Reintegration Challenges Joan Petersilia, Ph.D. Department of Criminology, Law & Society University of California,
Probation, Parole, and Intermediate Sanctions Chapter 12 Frank Schmalleger Criminal Justice Today 13 th Edition.
Lost Opportunities: The Reality of Latinos in the U.S. Criminal Justice System Nancy E. Walker J. Michael Senger Francisco A. Villarruel Angela M. Arboleda.
 Which crimes were changed and how will those changes impact the State Courts?  How does the emphasis on the Accountability Courts movement affect prosecutors?
CJPAC Cross-Training August 2010 State of Connecticut Department of Correction.
State of CT Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division Major Initiatives Update Presented to the Criminal Justice Policy Advisory Commission September.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Community-Based Corrections Generally CBC Generally Offender Selection The State of Modern CBC.
1 The MDOC Five Year Plan to Control Prison Growth Phase III: Long Term Policy Options SUMMARY BRIEF SUMMARY BRIEF Preliminary MDOC Proposal Revising Michigan’s.
Classification and Supervision in Probation and Parole
CRIMINAL LAW SUMMER 2011 TA SESSION NOTES Chapter 1 Punishment and Its Rationales.
Sentencing and the Presentence Investigation Report
1 CRJS 4476 Lecture #2. 2 Sentencing key here is in understanding the difference key here is in understanding the difference between the conviction and.
Chapter 12 Parole and Release to the Community 1.
Criminal Justice Chapter 9 Presentation Assignment By: Ciara Hairston & Kiya Holland May 4, 2012.
Deviance and Social Control Social Control The methods by which social groups try to ensure conformity. Prisons Laws Folkways mores Norms.
Chapter 4 Sentencing and punishment. In this chapter, you will look at the purposes and process of sentencing and the different factors affecting a sentencing.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
Criminal Justice System. Police Have immediate control over who is arrested “Police discretion” Size of U.S. population and number of police officers.
SENTENCING REFORM IN NORTH CAROLINA Thomas W. Ross.
Chapter 2 Sentencing and the Correctional Process Corrections: An Introduction, 2/e Seiter ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 4 Diversion and Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished 1.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
ASCA Performance Based Measures System Training Performance Standards, Measures, and Key Indicators ASCA 1.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 10 – Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
+ Sentencing Options. + Section 38 There are principles that must be considered when young people are sentenced. The main principle is to hold a young.
Sentencing and Corrections. Once Found Guilty, a defendant will be sentenced by a jury or judge.
Introduction to Criminal Justice Sentencing, Appeals, and the Death Penalty Chapter Nine Bohm and Haley.
Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections. JUSTIFICATION Reintegration Preparing offenders to return to the community unmarred by further criminal.
Presentation on the Phase 1 Report on the Home Confinement Program Orange County, Florida August 6, 2013.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions 1.  Intermediate sanctions emerged in the 1980s due to three factors: The belief that prisons were being overused Prison.
SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS CHAPTER 15 PAGES
Sentencing and the Correctional Process
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
BJS ReEntry Highlights (note: yearend 2002). BJS ReEntry At least 95% of all State prisoners will be released from prison at some point; nearly 80%
C11: Probation and Corrections  Sean Taylor:  What was his crime?  What was his sentence?  Do you think he received special treatment?
State Sentencing Policy Roundup Carl Reynolds Director, Office of Court Administration, Austin Texas.
Unit 8 Prof. Hulvat CJ240. Housekeeping…. We are winding down…. We are winding down…. Late work…. Late work…. Coming up in our final unit 9 Coming up.
Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis.
Criminal Justice Policy Development and Resource Reinvestment Len Engel, Esq. December 10, 2010 What Works Conference Portland, OR Crime and Justice Institute.
CJS 200 UOP Course Tutorial For more course tutorials visit
CRIMINAL LAW 4. Factors Affecting Sentencing Aggravating factors – things that increase the severity of the sentence. previous criminal record leader.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
When Discrimination is Legal: The Social Costs of Felony Convictions
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
FY17: Briefing on Jail Bed Contingency Funds
Graduate School of Social Work
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Imposing the ‘Sentence’
Punishment and Sentencing
Sentencing Commission Mandates and Probation Guidelines
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
11.2 – types of SENTENCes LAW 12.
Sentencing.
Presentation transcript:

Sentencing Task Force Survey of Priorities Results

Question #1 For this question respondents were asked to prioritize the following Sentencing Task Force statutory requirements a.Identify overarching criminal justice sentencing goals and policies b.Define current sentencing trends by offense types and offender characteristics c.Analyze sentencing trends by offense types and offender characteristics d.Review the actual versus intended impact of sentencing policies e.Determine the direct and indirect costs associated with sentencing policies. f.Review the fines and terms of imprisonment specified for violations of criminal statutes.

Question 1 Results *The majority of respondents feel that identifying overarching criminal justice sentencing goals and policies should be a priority for the Sentencing Task Force.

Question 1 Results Cont… This chart represents the average answers for each question, answers remain consistent

Answers Provided for the “Other” Category Lack of judicial discretion Reform the bail-bond situation including better uniform guidelines for the court to use in imposing amounts of money on defendants. Eliminate absolute statutes and classify all offenses in order to provide uniformity Racial impact on sentencing Establishment of a sentencing commission. Lack of judicial discretion Reform the bail-bond situation including better uniform guidelines for the court to use in imposing amounts of money on defendants. Eliminate absolute statutes and classify all offenses in order to provide uniformity Racial impact on sentencing Establishment of a sentencing commission.

Questions 2, 3 & 4 For the following questions, respondents were asked to circle all answers that apply. Answer “e” was an open ended answer which allowed respondents to provide information they felt was relevant but was not included. For the following questions, respondents were asked to circle all answers that apply. Answer “e” was an open ended answer which allowed respondents to provide information they felt was relevant but was not included.

Question #2 What aspects of Connecticut’s sentencing policies are working well? a.Truth in Sentencing laws b.Mandatory Minimum Sentencing for violent offenders c.Alternative Sentencing d.Community Supervision e.Other What aspects of Connecticut’s sentencing policies are working well? a.Truth in Sentencing laws b.Mandatory Minimum Sentencing for violent offenders c.Alternative Sentencing d.Community Supervision e.Other

Question 2 Results *The majority of respondents feel that the current Alternative Sentencing policy is working well

Answers Provided for Option “e” All “work”. We need to balance public safety, cost effectiveness and fairness. Mandatory Minimums are usually Draconian and apply more to drug offenses; not usually violent offenders All “work”. We need to balance public safety, cost effectiveness and fairness. Mandatory Minimums are usually Draconian and apply more to drug offenses; not usually violent offenders

Question #3 What aspects of Connecticut’s sentencing policies are working well? a.Truth in Sentencing laws b.Mandatory Minimum Sentencing c.Alternative Sentencing d.Community Supervision e.Other What aspects of Connecticut’s sentencing policies are working well? a.Truth in Sentencing laws b.Mandatory Minimum Sentencing c.Alternative Sentencing d.Community Supervision e.Other

Question 3 Results *The majority of respondents feel that the current Mandatory Minimum Sentencing policy is working well

Answers Provided for Option “e” Bail bond Industry. Not enough supervision in may cases, flat sentences Bail bond Industry. Not enough supervision in may cases, flat sentences

Question #4 What aspects of sentencing goals and policies would you like to explore in greater detail? a.Impact on recidivism b.Judicial discretion c.Structured sentencing (ex. Mandatory Minimums, 85% rule) d.Increased alternative sanctions e.Other What aspects of sentencing goals and policies would you like to explore in greater detail? a.Impact on recidivism b.Judicial discretion c.Structured sentencing (ex. Mandatory Minimums, 85% rule) d.Increased alternative sanctions e.Other

Question 4 Results * For this question, answers a through d are nearly equally distributed with only 6% of answers that indicated other aspects should be explored.The majority of respondents feel that both the impact on recidivism and increased alternative sanctions should be explored in greater detail. Respondents felt that Judicial discretion and structured sentencing were equally important.

Answers Provided for Option “e” Reduce the number of offenses which can result in incarceration. Do away with Mandatory Minimums All of the above answers need to consider public safety and handling offenders accountable. System must have discretion defined. Reduce the number of offenses which can result in incarceration. Do away with Mandatory Minimums All of the above answers need to consider public safety and handling offenders accountable. System must have discretion defined.

Question #5 Given the statutory mission of the Sentencing Task Force to identify and make recommendations for criminal justice policies in Connecticut, aside from sentencing, what other topics would you suggest we explore? *Note: this question was open ended Given the statutory mission of the Sentencing Task Force to identify and make recommendations for criminal justice policies in Connecticut, aside from sentencing, what other topics would you suggest we explore? *Note: this question was open ended

Answers Provided to Question #5 Points of discretion-plea bargaining Probation, parole, TS, revocation, classification, etc. Reform our entire bail-bond process Impact of pre-trial incarceration overuse of FTA’s Decriminalization for certain minor offenses Clear standards for probation violators Expand opportunity for sentence modification The importance of judicial independence The finding of community reintegration Points of discretion-plea bargaining Probation, parole, TS, revocation, classification, etc. Reform our entire bail-bond process Impact of pre-trial incarceration overuse of FTA’s Decriminalization for certain minor offenses Clear standards for probation violators Expand opportunity for sentence modification The importance of judicial independence The finding of community reintegration

Answers Provided for Question #5 cont.. Alternative programs for young offenders (mental health, education, vocation training, boot camps) More inmate transition programs Methods to reduce recidivism Collateral consequences of conviction. Alternative programs for young offenders (mental health, education, vocation training, boot camps) More inmate transition programs Methods to reduce recidivism Collateral consequences of conviction.

Question #6 Preferred Days & Times to Meet Best day: Mondays Alternate day: Tuesdays Time: Afternoons, for both Mondays and Tuesdays Best day: Mondays Alternate day: Tuesdays Time: Afternoons, for both Mondays and Tuesdays