Reliability-Based Design Methods of Structures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Direct Analysis Method of Design for Stability
Advertisements

DESIGN OF MEMBERS FOR COMBINED FORCES
Chapter 4 Functions of Random Variables Instructor: Prof. Wilson Tang CIVL 181 Modelling Systems with Uncertainties.
Chapter 11 Mechanical Properties of Materials
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 12 Methods of parametric estimation.
Structural Reliability Theory
Structural Reliability Analysis – Basics
University of Minho School of Engineering Territory, Environment and Construction Centre (C-TAC), DEC Uma Escola a Reinventar o Futuro – Semana da Escola.
Sampling Distributions
Chapter 9 Database Design
Component Reliability Analysis
Dr.M.V.Rama Rao Department of Civil Engineering,
Reliability Analysis Procedures for Infrastructure Facilities Andrzej S. Nowak University of Nebraska - Lincoln Outline  Causes of Uncertainty  Load.
1 Chapter 8: The Binomial and Geometric Distributions 8.1Binomial Distributions 8.2Geometric Distributions.
Introduction to Statistical Inference Chapter 11 Announcement: Read chapter 12 to page 299.
Population All members of a set which have a given characteristic. Population Data Data associated with a certain population. Population Parameter A measure.
Reinforced Concrete Design
Lecture 2 - Fundamentals. Lecture Goals Design Process Limit states Design Philosophy Loading.
Application of the Direct Optimized Probabilistic Calculation Martin Krejsa Department of Structural Mechanics Faculty of Civil Engineering VSB - Technical.
Statistical Analysis of Loads
MEGN 537 – Probabilistic Biomechanics Ch.7 – First Order Reliability Methods Anthony J Petrella, PhD.
Chapter 6 Lecture 3 Sections: 6.4 – 6.5.
Department of Electrical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University Robotic Interaction Learning Lab 1 The optimization of the application of fuzzy ant colony.
+ The Practice of Statistics, 4 th edition – For AP* STARNES, YATES, MOORE Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence Section 8.2 Estimating a Population Proportion.
Chapter 4 System Reliability Analysis of Structures.
7. Reliability based design Objectives Learn formulation of reliability design problem. Understand difference between reliability-based design and deterministic.
Brian Macpherson Ph.D, Professor of Statistics, University of Manitoba Tom Bingham Statistician, The Boeing Company.
Chapter 6. Control Charts for Variables. Subgroup Data with Unknown  and 
Sampling Design and Analysis MTH 494 Lecture-22 Ossam Chohan Assistant Professor CIIT Abbottabad.
Chapter 6 Lecture 3 Sections: 6.4 – 6.5. Sampling Distributions and Estimators What we want to do is find out the sampling distribution of a statistic.
BALLOON + JET ENGINE = QUALITATIVELY NEW TRANSPORTATION MEAN ??????? NO !
Sampling Design and Analysis MTH 494 Lecture-21 Ossam Chohan Assistant Professor CIIT Abbottabad.
Discriminative Training and Machine Learning Approaches Machine Learning Lab, Dept. of CSIE, NCKU Chih-Pin Liao.
Limit state design method
Unit 4 Review. Starter Write the characteristics of the binomial setting. What is the difference between the binomial setting and the geometric setting?
Department of Electrical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University 1 Robotic Interaction Learning Lab The ant colony algorithm In short, domain is defined.
26/04/99 Reliability Applications Department of Civil Engineering The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Ricardo O. Foschi.
1 EUROCODES A tool for building safety and reliability enhancement Introduction to EN 1990 – Section 6 Workshop on Eurocodes: Training the trainers Moscow.
RELIABILITY-BASED CAPACITY ASSESSMENT OF WATER STORAGE SYSTEM
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
MEGN 537 – Probabilistic Biomechanics Ch
CHAPTER 6 Random Variables
Lecture 5 - Flexure June 11, 2003 CVEN 444.
PSO -Introduction Proposed by James Kennedy & Russell Eberhart in 1995
Task: It is necessary to choose the most suitable variant from some set of objects by those or other criteria.
Chapter 3 Component Reliability Analysis of Structures.
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
MEGN 537 – Probabilistic Biomechanics Ch
Metode Eliminasi Pertemuan – 4, 5, 6 Mata Kuliah : Analisis Numerik
MEGN 537 – Probabilistic Biomechanics Ch
Second Order Analysis In the previous classes we looked at a method that determines the load corresponding to a state of bifurcation equilibrium of a perfect.
Regression in the 21st Century
Simple Linear Regression
Markov Decision Problems
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
2/3/ Estimating a Population Proportion.
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Presentation transcript:

Reliability-Based Design Methods of Structures Chapter 7 Reliability-Based Design Methods of Structures

Chapter 7: Reliability-Based Design Methods of Structures Contents 7.1 Reliability-Based Design Codes 7.2 Reliability-Based Design Formulas 7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes 7.4 Target Reliability Index in Chinese Codes 7.5 Practical LRFD Formulas in Current Codes

Chapter 7 Reliability-Based Design Methods of Structures 7.1 Reliability-Based Design Codes

7.1 Reliability-Based Design Codes …1 7.1.1 Role of a Code in the Building Process The building process includes planning, design, manufacturing of materials, transportation, construction, operation/use, and demolition. The role of a design code is to establish the requirements needed to ensure an acceptable level of reliability for a structure. The central role of a code is diagrammed in the following figure: Owner Designer Contractor User Code

7.1 Reliability-Based Design Codes …2 7.1.2 Code Levels Level Ⅰ Codes: Use deterministic formulas Level Ⅱ Codes: Use approximate probability limit state design formula Level Ⅲ Codes: Use full probability analysis and design formula Level Ⅳ Codes: Use the total expected life cycle cost of the design as the optimization criterion

7.1 Reliability-Based Design Codes …2 1. International Standard General Principles on Reliability for Structures (ISO2394: 1998) 2. Chinese Codes Unified Standard for Reliability Design of Engineering Structures (GB50153 — 92)

7.1 Reliability-Based Design Codes …3 1. Unified Standard for Reliability Design of Building Structures (GB50068 — 2001) 2. Unified Standard for Reliability Design of Highway Engineering Structures (GB/T50283 — 1999) 3. Unified Standard for Reliability Design of Railway Engineering Structures (GB50216 — 94) 4. Unified Standard for Reliability Design of Hydraulic Engineering Structures (GB50119 — 94) 5. Unified Standard for Reliability Design of Harbor Engineering Structures (GB50158 — 92)

Chapter 7 Reliability-Based Design Methods of Structures 7.2 Reliability-Based Design Formulas

7.2 Reliability-Based Design Formulas …1 7.2.1 Formulas of Reliability Checking There are three kinds of reliability checking formulas: … … … … …(1) … … … … …(2) … … … … …(3) where, , , are called target safety probability, target failure probability, or target reliability index. The third formula is generally used in practical engineering.

7.2 Reliability-Based Design Formulas …2 7.2.2 Single Factor Design Formulas The single factor formula based on mean values is as following: where, is the mean value of load effect is the mean value of resistance is the central safety factor R & S are normal distributions R & S are lognormal distributions

7.2 Reliability-Based Design Formulas …2 7.2.2 Single Factor Design Formulas The single factor formula based on characteristic values is as following: where, is the characteristic value of load effect is the characteristic value of resistance is the characteristic safety factor

7.2 Reliability-Based Design Formulas …3 Relationships among nominal load, mean load, and factored load , load effect Mean load Nominal load Factored load

7.2 Reliability-Based Design Formulas …4 Relationships among nominal resistance, mean resistance, and factored resistance , Resistance Mean resistance Nominal resistance Factored resistance

7.2 Reliability-Based Design Formulas …2 7.2.3 Multiple Factor Design Formulas (Load and Resistance Factor Design, LRFD) The LRFD formula is as following: Factored nominal resistance Total factored nominal load effect where, is the nominal (design) value of load effect component, is the load partial factor for load component, is the nominal (design) value of resistance or capacity, is the resistance partial factor.

7.2 Reliability-Based Design Formulas …2 7.2.3 Multiple Factor Design Formulas (Load and Resistance Factor Design, LRFD) The partial safety factors and must be calibrated based on the target index adopted by the code.

Chapter 7 Reliability-Based Design Methods of Structures 7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes

7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes …1 7.3.1 Calibration of Target Reliability Index 1. Basic Principles Consider a structural member which carry a dead load and a variant load. According to the original deterministic structural design code, the design formula of ultimate limit state design for this member can be stated as follows: where, — safety factor, — characteristic value of member resistance , , — characteristic value of permanent load effect and variant load effect designed according to the deterministic code .

7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes …2 Now, the problem can be re-formulated as follows: How much is the reliability implicit in the original deterministic structural design code (Level Ⅰ Code)? When the calibration method is used, the limit state equation in simple load combination condition can be formulated as: where, — structural member resistance, — dead load effect, — live load effect. It is assumed that the parameters and the probability distribution types of the three basic random variables are known. The calibration method can be implemented by the FORM method, for example, JC Method.

7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes …3 It is assumed that the following parameters of the basic random variables are known: bias factor: variation factor: It is assumed that is linearly related with and . Let , is called load effect ratio, then

7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes …4 2. Calculation Procedure (1) Assume one value of the load effect ratio ; (2) Determine the characteristic value of member resistance : (3) Determine the mean values and standard deviations of the basic variables : mean values: standard deviations: (4) Determine the limit state equation: (5) Solve the reliability index by the JC method. (6) Adjust the load effect ratio, calculate the mean value of different reliability indexes.

7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes …5 Example 7.1 Consider a RC axial compression short column carrying a dead load and an office live load, the column was designed according to the old “Design Code of Concrete Structures (TJ9-74)”. Assume that the ratio of live load to dead load , Try to calibrate the reliability index of the ultimate limit state in TJ9-74 code. Assume that the following parameters are known: is lognormal is normal is Extreme Ⅰ

7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes …6 Solution (1) Determine (2) Determine the means and standard deviations

7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes …7 (3) Determine the ultimate limit state equation (4) Determine the reliability index by the JC method The solution process of JC method is omitted. The solution result is : If the load effect ratio , then Please refer to the reference book “Reliability of Structures” by Professors Ou and Duan. Turn to Page 97, look at the table 5.3 carefully!

7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes …8 7.3.2 Calibration of Partial Factors 1. Basic Principles The partial factors in the LRFD format must be calibrated based on the target reliability index adopted by the code. In determining partial factors, the problem is reversed compared with reliability analysis context introduced in Chapter3. Reliability analysis Partial factor calibration Known: , Known: , Find: , Find: ,

7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes …9 2. Iteration Algorithm (1) Formulate the limit state function and design equation. Determine the probability distributions and appropriate parameters for basic variables. There can be at most only two unknown mean values needed to solve. One is , the other corresponds a variant load effect . Load effect ratios are used to relate the means of the load effects. For the first iteration, we can use the limit state equation evaluated at the mean values to get a relationship between the two unknown means. (2) Obtain an initial design point by assuming mean values. (3) For each of the design point values corresponding to a non- normal distribution, determine the equivalent normal mean and standard deviation by using equivalent normalization.

7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes …10 (4) Calculate the n values of direction cosine (5) Calculate the n values of design point (6) Update the relationship between the two unknown mean values by solving the limit state function. (7) Repeat Steps 3-6 until converge. (8) Once convergence is achieved, calculate the partial factors.

7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes …11 Example 7.2 Please refer to the textbook “Reliability of Structures” by Professor A. S. Nowak. Turn to Page 231, look at the example 8.1 carefully! The limit state function: The design equation: Known parameters: Probability information: R and Q are all normal and uncorrelated.

7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes …12 Solution Iteration cycle 1 (1) Assume iteration initial values (2) Calculate direction cosine

7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes …13 (3) Calculate design points (4) Update the relationship between the two unknown means Iteration cycle 2 (1) Calculate direction cosine

7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes …14 (2) Calculate design points (3) Update the relationship between the two unknown means Iteration cycle 3 (1) Calculate direction cosine

7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes …15 (2) Calculate design points (3) Update the relationship between the two unknown means Iteration cycle 4 (1) Calculate direction cosine have converge. The iteration stop.

7.3 Calibration for Deterministic Codes …16 Table 7.1 Convergence process for Example 7.2 Numbers of Iteration 1 2 3 4 -0.6402 -0.7964 -0.8000 0.7682 0.6048 0.6000 Assuming the mean values are the nominal design values, then the partial factors are :

Chapter 7 Reliability-Based Design Methods of Structures 7.4 Target Reliability Index in Chinese Codes

7.4 Target Reliability Index in Chinese Codes …1 7.4.1 Safety Class of Building Structures According to the importance and the consequences of structural damage, the safety class of buildings in Unified Standard for Reliability Design of Building Structures (GB50068 — 2001) is divided into three categories. The safety class is considered through the importance factor Table 7.2 Safety class of building structures Safety Class Consequences of Damage Types of Buildings Importance factor Class one Very severe Important buildings 1.1 Class two Severe Common buildings 1.0 Class three not severe Unimportant buildings 0.9

7.4 Target Reliability Index in Chinese Codes …2 7.4.2 Target Reliability Index for Ultimate Limit State Table 7.3 Target reliability index for ULS of structural member Types of damage Safety class Class one Class two Class three Ductile 3.7 3.2 2.7 Brittle 4.2

7.4 Target Reliability Index in Chinese Codes …3 7.4.3 Target Reliability Index for Serviceability Limit State Table 7.4 Target reliability index for SLS of structural member Irreversible Limit State Reversible Limit State 1. What are the rules of target reliability indexes ? 2. Why are the target reliability indexes for ultimate limit state and serviceability limit state different ? 3. How are these target reliability indexes determined ?

Chapter 7 Reliability-Based Design Methods of Structures 7.5 Practical LRFD Formulas in Current Codes

7.5 Practical LRFD Formulas in Current Codes …1 7.5.1 Ultimate Limit State Design Formulas where, — structural importance factor, — partial factor for dead load, , — partial factors for the 1st and ith variant load, — effect of permanent load characteristic value — effect of variant load characteristic value which dominates the load effect combination.

7.5 Practical LRFD Formulas in Current Codes …2 — effect of the ith variant load characteristic value — combination factor of the ith variant load — function of structural member — partial factor for structural member resistance, — characteristic value of material behavior, — characteristic value of geometric parameter. The second formula is mainly used in the structures, which is dominated by permanent load. The most unfavorable one of the above two formulas should be used in practical design situations. The partial factors in the above two formulas are determined by the principles introduced in this course and optimization method. You can refer to the P.98-101 in the reference book.

7.5 Practical LRFD Formulas in Current Codes …3 7.5.2 Serviceability Limit State Design Formulas 1. Design Formula for Characteristic Values 2. Design Formula for Frequent Values 3. Design Formula for Quasi-Permanent Values

7.5 Practical LRFD Formulas in Current Codes …4 where, — effect of a variant load frequent value which dominates the frequent load combination. — effect of quasi-permanent value of a variant load. — the deformation or crack limit value corresponding to characteristic value combination. — the deformation or crack limit value corresponding to frequent value combination. — the deformation or crack limit value corresponding to quasi-permanent value combination.

Chapter 7: Homework 7 Homework 7 Programming the above algorithms in MATLAB environment according to the iteration algorithm proposed by this course. (1) By using your own subroutine, re-check the example 7.2 in this course. (2) By using your own subroutine, re-calculate the example 8.3 in the text book on P.231

End of Chapter 7

End of This Course Thank you Very Much!