Compliance Issues Related to Direct Charging, Clerical and Administrative Costs NCURA FRA Conference New Orleans, LA March 5, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Office of Sponsored Projects Administration COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS.
Prepared by Office of Sponsored Programs Spring 2011.
WHAT TO EXPECT IN AN EXTERNAL AUDIT OR INVESTIGATION An Overview of External Audit and Investigative Processes Performed by Outside Entities at UCSD.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
Sailing Smoothly Over the C's of Cost Accounting Standards
1 Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs University of Missouri – St. Louis College of Education March 6, 2009.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
Top Risks in Sponsored Projects Financial Compliance: A Specific Focus on Direct Costs vs. F&A Costs Barbara Siegel, Acting Deputy Director of Grant and.
Basic Understanding of A-21, CASB, and DS2
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Two: Indirect Costs.
MARCH 26,2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SERIES 3, SESSION III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES)
Sponsored Programs How to Budget. BUDGETING BASIC CONSIDERATIONS  Benefit the Project  Allowable Costs  Total Cost Concept  Direct Costs  Indirect.
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
PAD Seminar – October, 2012 Gail L. Ryan, Assistant Vice President Sponsored Program Administration.
What You Need to Know To Ensure Compliance October 2014.
A-21 From budgets to post-award…. Agenda What is A-21? – quick overview Budget categories captured by A-21 Proposal budgets and A-21 (overview and tips)
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF COST ALLOCATION Presenters: Steven J. Zuraf, Branch Chief for Colleges/Universities, Non-Profits & Hospitals.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Financial Rep Meeting July 14, SPONSORED RESEARCH ROBERTA MCMANUS 2.
Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs University of Missouri College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources December 11, 2009.
NCURA Regional Meeting April 5, 2011 Allowable Costs – Proposal Development to Project Closeout Presented by: Ralph L. Brown Director of Research Administration.
Cost Accounting Standards -Policies and Procedures-
Financial and Grants Management Institute - March 18-20, Federal Grants Management for Fiscal Staff.
Cost Accounting Standards -Policies and Procedures-
Project Management: Post Award Policies, Procedures and Guidelines A Tutorial for New Principal Investigators.
Staff Timesheets 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
SOURCE: NSF WORK PLAN What is Audited??….HOT Topics Watching Nationally New regulations or changes to existing law Audit findings at other institutions.
Fiscal Compliance Corner Recent Happenings, etc. MRAM May 2015 Ted Mordhorst Director for Post Award Financial Compliance Research Accounting & Analysis.
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
9/25/2013. AGENDA  Introduction & General Overview  F&A Definition and Category Application  Application of F&A Cost Rates  The Distribution Basis.
Cost Transfers and Guaranteed Funding/Advanced Accounts.
2013 INBRE Project Subaward Management Barbara Bunge MSU Subaward Manager (406)
“Grants Boot Camp” Workshop Series January 9, 2014 Creighton University Sponsored Programs Administration 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE  Phone:
MANAGING SPONSORED PROJECTS FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE May 1, 2008 Office of Grants &Contracts Accounting.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Cost Principles: It Depends!
HSC and Main Campus Presentation December 4 & 5, 2012 Financial Services Center.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
1 The Auditor’s Perspective Division of Sponsored Research Research Administration Training Series Presented by: Joe Cannella Audit Manager,
COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS CAS 101 Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts OFFICE OF VICE PROVOST FOR RESEARCH.
Task Force on Federal Grant and Contract Compliance: Implementation Activities Dr. Jack Finney and Dr. Bill Knocke.
Costing and Cost Transfers John Caruso Campus Relations Manager, Sponsored Projects Administration.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
2008 California AmeriCorps Conference1 Federal and Grants Management for Program and Fiscal Staff.
FAR Part 31 Contract Cost Principles and Procedures.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Debra Murray, Georgetown University Tolise Miles, Children’s National Medical Center Clairice Lloyd, Georgetown University Medical Center Pre-Award and.
“Surviving an Audit” Al Willie, Office of Internal Audit
“Surviving an Audit” (or: Everyday things you can do that will both improve sponsored project management AND reduce audit findings) Al Willie Office of.
NCURA FRA XIV Making Connections Creating Harmony Extra Compensation Versus Direct Cost Versus Administrative Cost 1.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 The Basics of Grants Administration.
Post-Award basics MATTHEW MOORE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, POST-AWARD OPERATIONS.
1 SPS Primer SPS Primer Workshop Cost Accounting Considerations When Preparing Budgets for Sponsored Proposals Division of Financial Affairs.
Kuali Financial Systems – Financial Administrator Development Series - October, 2006 Indirect Cost Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs.
Main Campus Presentation December 5, 2012 Financial Services Center.
BACKGROUND, BEST PRACTICES, AND THE FUTURE OF DIRECT CHARGING ADMINISTRATIVE/CLERICAL SALARIES TO GRANTS MRAM MARCH 2014 Administrative and clerical salaries.
+ Departmental Research Administrator Training Series FS 204 Jean Cody Assistant Director, Post-Award Office of Sponsored Programs.
Sponsored Research Accounting1 Cost Transfers Policy and Procedure.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
RCC Update ORS Quarterly Meeting April 28, 2016 Julie Cole, Director Research Costing Compliance.
Policy and Procedure. Definition A cost transfer is the reassignment of a previously incurred expense from one account to another Transfers are considered.
12/11/20071 Indirect Cost Study Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs Indiana University Sally Link Cost Accounting Manager Financial Management Services.
Office Of Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs. What is 2 CFR Chapter 1 and 2 parts 200 Subpart E (OMB Uniform Guidance)? A document that contains Principles.
Presented by: Ralph L. Brown Director of Research Administration
ALLOWABLE EXPENDITURES BY PROGRAM
Post-Award Grant Administration
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
Post-Award Grant Administration
Presentation transcript:

Compliance Issues Related to Direct Charging, Clerical and Administrative Costs NCURA FRA Conference New Orleans, LA March 5, 2013

1. Introduction 2. History 3. Learning Objectives 4. HHS OIG Audit Issues 5. Tips for Audit Preparation 6. During the Audit 7. After the Audit 8. New NSF Audits Using Analytics 9. Other Federal Audits on the Horizon 10. Questions 11. Closing Copyright Agenda

Mark C. Davis Partner Attain Higher Education Phone – Robert S. Klein Consulting Associate Attain Higher Education Phone – Introduction Copyright

OMB Circular A-21 provides criteria for determining when clerical and administrative costs may be charged directly to projects. The Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted an initial set of reviews at four universities late in the last decade to determine if universities are complying with OMB A-21 requirements. An additional eight universities were subsequently selected and are being reviewed. History Copyright

The purpose of this training is to provide: An understanding of the regulations related to direct charging of clerical and administrative salaries, including a review of examples where such costing treatment is appropriate. An understanding of when it would be appropriate to direct charge non- salary expenses that are normally treated as F&A costs. How to prepare for an OIG review of this area, including organizing and managing the supporting data requirements, adequately documenting the propriety of direct charges, submitting requested data to the OIG and negotiating issues that may arise during the conduct of the audit. Learning Objectives Copyright

The regulations governing the propriety of direct charging clerical and administrative salaries and direct charging of non-salary expenses that are normally treated as F&A costs are included in three parts of OMB Circular A-21: Paragraph F.6.b. provides guidelines for the determination of departmental administrative costs as direct or F&A costs. Exhibit C provides examples of “major Project” where direct charging of administrative or clerical salaries may be appropriate. Appendix A - CAS provides the Cost Accounting Standard which requires consistency in allocating costs incurred for the same purpose by educational institutions. Background - regulations Copyright

OMB A-21 Paragraph F.6.b provides that the salaries of administrative and clerical staff should normally be treated as F&A costs. These costs may be directly charged only under exceptional circumstances: “Major Project” Individuals are specifically identified with the project or activity The project explicitly budgeted for the administrative and clerical personnel. Background- Paragraph F.6.b Copyright

A “Major Project” requires an extensive amount of administrative or clerical support. This support is significantly greater than the routine level of support provided by academic departments. Should have written justification and approval Background – Paragraph F.6.b Copyright

Examples of “Major Project” – Direct charging of administrative and clerical salaries may be appropriate under the following circumstances: Large complex programs - Center grants, Program projects Extensive data accumulation, analysis, reporting, surveying, tabulation (e.g. epidemiological studies, clinical trials) Making travel and meeting arrangements for large numbers of people (e.g. conferences and seminars) Principal focus is preparation and production of manuals, large reports, books, monographs (excluding routine progress, technical reports) Geographically inaccessible to normal departmental administrative services (e.g. research vessels) Project specific database management; individualized graphics or manuscript preparation; human or animal protocols; multiple project- related investigator coordination. Background – Exhibit C Copyright

Provides for consistency in allocating costs incurred for the same purpose by educational institutions. Basic principle is that all costs incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances, are either direct costs only or indirect costs only with respect to final cost objectives. Prevents “double charging” of costs Key is in the interpretation and application of the phrases “incurred for the same purpose” and “like circumstances” Background – CAS Copyright

Non-salary expenses normally treated as F&A costs Office supplies Postage Local (basic) telephone services Membership dues Journals and subscriptions Examples of exceptional circumstances Postage – mail survey Local telephone – dedicated phone lines for telephone survey Background – F.6.b Non-Salary Copyright

Stated objective of the review at UCSF was: “To determine whether the University of California, San Francisco (University) has claimed reimbursement for administrative and clerical expenses as direct charges to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants and contracts when those costs should have been treated as indirect costs and recovered through the University’s negotiated Facilities and Administrative (F&A) rates.” HHS OIG Audit - UCSF Copyright

The audit objective specifically related to (1) non-academic salaries and (2) administrative costs other than salaries, A stratified variables random sampling methodology was employed by the HHS OIG to select the expenditure items to be reviewed. This methodology was applied so that the HHS OIG could project the dollar impact of the findings to the entire universe. Payroll – 195 items in three strata were selected Non-Payroll – 114 items in two strata were selected HHS OIG Audit - UCSF Copyright

Scope of the Review: Limited to two fiscal years – FYE’s ended June 30, 2005 and Limited to charges on NIH projects Scope included charges to subawards, as well as direct charges to awards. HHS OIG Audit - UCSF Copyright

UCSF preparations for the audit: Once the expense items were selected by sampling, a separate folder was created for each item in the sample. Each sampling item was treated as a separate “mini-audit”. A detailed check list was completed for each item in the sample. This required that all of the required documentation to support the transaction was obtained. In addition, people involved in the transaction were identified. The folders and checklists were essential in controlling the item’s status, and ensuring that the appropriate materials were sent to the HHS OIG. HHS OIG Audit - UCSF Copyright

UCSF preparations for the audit continued: Relevant criteria were included in the checklists. For instance, for sampling items that involved cost transfers, it would be essential to demonstrate that cost transfers were timely, approved at the appropriate level and adequately justified. The award document and revisions (including budgets), as well as the proposal documents related to the award against which the sampling item were charged were included in the folder. This proved absolutely essential in providing justification for direct charging the sampled item. HHS OIG Audit - UCSF Copyright

Issues during the audit: Obtaining required supporting information was more complex than may be expected. Significant coordination was needed with the UCSF Audit Management Group (including consultants), the UCSF accounting department, departmental personnel and payroll personnel in order to fully document each item. In some cases, the problem was made more acute, because certain departmental personnel had left UCSF. A significant amount of effort was spent going through proposal documents, award documents and amendments to awards to support the treatment of expense items as direct costs, rather than as F&A costs. This was the application of the OMB Circular A-21 criteria. HHS OIG Audit - UCSF Copyright

Major issues included: Payment issues Payroll expense transfers Internal control / allocation issues Award documentation issues Sub award issues PAR issues Non-payroll expense transfers Departmental issues HHS OIG Audit - UCSF Copyright

Ensure that policies are in place and are followed. Conduct necessary training sessions. Conduct an internal review to ensure compliance with policies Ensure that expense items are properly reviewed before charging them as direct expenses to projects. Ensure that adequate documentation is obtained and retained at the time the expense is incurred. Ensure that approval for unusual expenses is received from awarding agencies. Assure that employees understand the regulations. Tips for Audit Preparation Copyright

Know the objective and the scope of the audit. To the extent possible, control the pace and the timing of the audit. Create a system to stay organized during the audit. Notify everyone who may be involved with the audit upfront and keep them involved. Form an Audit Management Team including (1) Internal Audit, (2) Cost Analysis, (3) Accounting, (4) Payroll, (5) Legal Counsel, etc. Carefully monitor and control OIG interviews with employees. During the Audit Copyright

Make sure that any written information sent to the auditors has been carefully reviewed internally. This will help ensure that the auditors receive what they have requested. Anticipate issues that the auditors may have with particular expense items. It may be that additional supporting information is needed to support the costing treatment of some items. If errors in approving cost items are encountered, correct them, and inform the auditors of the corrections. This can “take the wind” out of potential issues. The federal government likes it when institutions take responsibility for corrective actions. Be prepared to challenge and negotiate issues in the audit report. During the Audit Copyright

Review other fiscal years not included in the audit scope to determine if compliance issues exist in those years. Create / modify policies and procedures as needed to ensure compliance. Create training modules for employees who are new or need a refresher course. Retain all documentation related to the audit for the period prescribed by regulation. After the Audit Copyright

The NSF OIG has started a series of comprehensive audits at universities, which include the F.6.b. issue as well as other compliance issues. The University of California campuses at Santa Barbara and Davis and Los Angeles are going through this review. The NSF Audits include a review of: Summer salaries Cost Sharing F.6.b. issues Application of the F&A rate Charging for unallowable costs Propriety of use of fellowship funds NEW NSF AUDITS WITH ANALYTICS Copyright

NSF Audit is using “analytics” to test compliance, rather than statistical sampling. Analytics involves analysis of transactions by use of automated systems to identify “areas of risk”. The work involves use of computer generated data from the university and from NSF databases. Specific transactions that were identified as non compliant were questioned. Use of analytics is controversial because of the use of the databases leads to questions about the reliability of the databases. Also, the NSF practice of requesting information through many sources at the UCSB campus, rather than through one central source, is controversial and not standard audit practice. NSF Audit - Analytics Copyright

Additional HHS OIG audits on the F.6.b. issue are possible Additional NSF Compliance audits, using analytics, are possible The HHS OIG is planning audits of the Federal Demonstration Partnership campuses which are testing the new new “project based” time and effort reporting system. Other Federal Audits on the Horizon Copyright

QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION Questions and Discussion. Copyright

27 Proven Performance. Forward Thinking. Attain LLC Higher Education 8000 Towers Crescent Drive, 15 th Floor Vienna, VA Mark C. Davis, Vice President & Partner Bob Klein, Consulting Associate Attain LLC Higher Education 8000 Towers Crescent Drive, 15 th Floor Vienna, VA Mark C. Davis, Vice President & Partner Bob Klein, Consulting Associate