Farnborough Airspace Change Proposal Briefing to FACC 26 th November 2014 TAG Farnborough Airport.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Farnborough Airspace Change Proposal FACC Briefing 4 October 2012.
Advertisements

ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
BRIEFING OFFICER APPROVAL AUTHORITY TRAINING Updated Jan09.
University of Trieste PHD school in Nanotechnology Writing a proposal … with particular attention to FP7 Maurizio Fermeglia.
Future Airspace Strategy (FAS) Heathrow Airport Consultative Committee 31 st March 2010 Phil Roberts Assistant Director of Airspace Policy 1 1.
Environment case Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009 Hellen Foster, Jarlath Molloy NATS, Imperial College London.
LAQM.PG(S)(09) – new biomass guidance. PG(S)(09) published in February Reflects changes since PG(S)(03) 2003: - biomass burning not a significant issue.
The Design Process. Analysis Think – what should the final design do? List customer requirements Consider constraints – balance tradeoffs Define specifications.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
Farnborough Airspace Change Proposal Briefing to FACC 7 th March 2013.
Risk Assessment – An Essential Standard
1 Airspace Change Process & Airspace Trials in the context of Modernising UK Airspace Darren Rhodes Civil Aviation Authority.
Environmental Impact Assessment Prepared by: Miss Syazwani Mahmad Puzi School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop 5 to 6 November 2012 New Delhi, India Roles and Responsibilities of Council Members and Focal Points.
1 Pre-Hearing Conference November 6-10, 2011 Submissions of BIM on Process Issues.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
Future Airspace Strategy VFR Implementation Group FASVIG 2 Meeting Friday 21 st February 2014.
S10 CONS5Q25 Lara Tookey. Review of estimators workings Decision on what margin to apply Bid submission details Submit your Tender.
EARTO – working group on quality issues – 2 nd session Anneli Karttunen, Quality Manager VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland This presentation.
IT 499 Bachelor Capstone Week 8. Adgenda Administrative Review UNIT Seven UNIT Eight Project UNIT Nine Preview Project Status Summary.
SUA Process Overview FAA JO
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
Centro de Estudos e Sistemas Avançados do Recife PMBOK - Chapter 4 Project Integration Management.
CRISTAL ATSAW Project Sep 2007 ASAS TN Christelle Pianetti, DSNA Simona Canu-Chiesa, Airbus.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)
Stocktaking Exercise UNFCCC Workshop, Manila Ravi Sharma United Nations Environment Programme – Global Environment Facility.
Noise Policy Options for Farnborough Airport – Presentation on work carried out by Hepworth Acoustics for Rushmoor Council Peter Hepworth Thursday 31 st.
State of implementation of the decision III/6f regarding Ukraine (MOP 2, June, , 2008, Riga, Latvia)
1 Status of PSC recommendations (January December 2007) Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration 14 March 2008.
08 June 2006 Portland 2006: aircraft certification session Yves Morier The EASA Advance -NPA for UAV systems Certification Presentation by: Y Morier EASA.
Federal agency for medicines and health products EC REGULATION 1901/2006 ON MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR PAEDIATRIC USE AND HOMEOPATHIC MEDICINAL PRODUCTS Marie-Anne.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC3) Montreux, Switzerland June 16-18, 2009 Application of World Bank Safeguard.
Applications for Non-recurrent subsidy to carry out Major Repairs / Slope Repairs Briefing Session for Schools under the Direct Subsidy Scheme
Excellence Investigation and Selection AS90033 Apply a decision-making model to produce a solution to a given brief – Version 3.
NextGen Next Generation Air Transportation System
Federal Aviation Administration Clarification to Policy and Procedures Concerning Use of Airport Revenues; Proceeds from Taxes on Aviation Fuel Presented.
NOAA Aviation Safety Board Meeting May 16, 2006 Lieutenant Commander Debora Barr NOAA Aviation Safety Program.
Federal Aviation Administration Clarification to Policy and Procedures Concerning Use of Airport Revenues; Proceeds from Taxes on Aviation Fuel Presented.
Energy Networks Association RIIO-ED1 Update for Suppliers December 2012.
Hydro One Community Liaison Committee Minister’s Conditions Meeting #2 August 19, 2014 Solina Hall.
Negotiation of Proposals Dr. Evangelos Ouzounis Directorate C DG Information Society European Commission.
OCT Environmental Profiles DEVCO-TF OCT, September 2013.
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Record of Decision (ROD) Announcement Congressional Briefing Name: Steve Kelley Date: September 5, 2007 Federal.
2 Reduction of GHG emissions Energy Efficiency Design Index – Minimum power to ensure safe manoeuvring in adverse conditions Tripartite – Tokyo,
Farnborough Airspace Change Proposal Briefing to FACC 6 th March 2014 TAG Farnborough Airport.
Public Consultation Session: Consultation and Transparency Requirements for Offshore Petroleum Activities Francesca Astolfi A/g General Manager, Offshore.
Airspace Update Gatwick Airport Airspace Seminar 2016 Charles Kirwan-Taylor Director of Corporate Affairs and Sustainability 1 Tuesday, 10 May 2016.
Gatwick Airspace Seminar Emma Simpson Principal Airspace Regulator Civil Aviation Authority 10 May 2016.
ISO Session 3 Environmental Management and Ethics in Management.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) A Scottish replacement to Air Passenger Duty (APD) Elaine McCall Environmental Assessment Team The Scottish Government.
1 Package on food improvement agents Food additives Food enzymes Flavourings Common procedure Developments since earlier consultation.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners
GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS ACT
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
Facebook Campus Expansion Project EIR
The Design Process.
National Airspace and Noise Policy
Brandon O’Reilly (CEO TAG) to Eagle Radio on 27th March 14:
Aquatic Facility Regulation and Guidance Reviews
Sharon Mahony Environment Unit
2008 Quebecor CDS Protocol Auction Timeline
Definition of Project and Project Cycle
Balanced Approach to Noise Mitigation
Roles and Responsibilities of Council Members and Focal Points
BPR AS Review Programme
Balanced Approach to Noise Mitigation
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Outputs Estimated Tendering Process Timeline (16 – 31 weeks)
Presentation transcript:

Farnborough Airspace Change Proposal Briefing to FACC 26 th November 2014 TAG Farnborough Airport

Reminder of the ACP process Summary of the consultation responses How we are reacting to responses What’s next? To cover today

UK CAA CAP 725 process Consultation completed Feedback document A produced “what people told us” Feedback document B being developed “developing our final proposal based upon what people told us” All consultation activities and design outputs are being developed in accordance with CAA and Government processes and guidelines Reminder of the process we are following

The consultation generated over 13,000 comments from more than 2,500 stakeholders In addition, more than 700 documents were submitted in support of responses Responses to the consultation

In broad terms, the areas of concern raised by the two core groups of stakeholders were as follows: Aviation stakeholders 1. Access to the proposed airspace 2. Justification for the proposed changes 3. Safety issues caused by funnelling or compression of non-Farnborough aircraft around or beneath the proposed airspace Other stakeholders 1. Environmental impact (primarily noise) 2. Justification for the proposed changes 3. Safety What does the initial analysis show?

What are we doing as a result of the feedback received? As per the CAP 725 process, we are assessing the feedback and, where appropriate, attempting to mitigate the impacts upon stakeholders In practice, this means we are reviewing the design, adjusting and compromising where this is possible Designing routes which offer the best solutions in terms of aircraft performance and environmental impacts in line with Government policy

No. The CAA have confirmed that the consultation process has been carried out appropriately. We will, however be re-engaging some key aviation stakeholders Re-engagement for clarification of viewpoints and to help understand issues in relation to operational and procedural matters Re-engagement is a normal part of the process We have complied with, and often exceeded, the CAA and Government requirements for the consultation process Will we be re-consulting with any stakeholders?

Safety validation of design options This will take place over the next 8-12 weeks Flight validation of procedures This will take place over the next 10 weeks and will involve flying of arrival and departure procedures in aircraft simulators and aircraft Real-time simulation of whole concept of operations This will take place in March 2015 Preparation of feedback report B This has commenced and the document will be published in March/April 2015 ACP submission to CAA This will take place in April 2015 What next?

Feedback Report Part B will contain the airspace and route designs that we will submit to the CAA for evaluation. It will also contain the reasons why we are progressing this design in particular, using the information detailed in Feedback Report Part A. Essentially, this report is a comprehensive and detailed explanation of what has been done in response to consultation and the justification of why the design to be submitted is the most appropriate Following publication of this report, the ACP documentation will be submitted to CAA for their consideration and decision FACC will get sight of feedback report B just prior to publication What is feedback report B?

Questions?