Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Navigation Committee AIRPORT NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM Louisville and Jefferson County FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flight Crew Activities During a Typical Flight
Advertisements

Work load and responsibilit y npor. Ing. Miroslava Šimonová.
Presented by United Arab Emirates MID ATM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (MAEP) TECHNICAL PROPOSAL.
Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Sensitive Facilities Committee AIRPORT NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM Louisville and Jefferson County MITIGATION ISSUES.
Air Traffic Management
By: Nurhan Tan, NAS Planning & Integration Date: Sept. 16, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration ACA Association of California Airports Conference S. Lake.
Excessive Noise Related to Aircraft Operations at Marine Corps Base Hawaii (MCBH) Presented by the Windward Coalition January
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
1 #4295. Which frequency should you expect to use for Regional Approach Control, control tower, and ground control respectively at DFW when coming from.
The main causes of the air traffic congestion are:
1 Comprehensive Management Plan for East Hampton Airport  Safety, Noise and Operations Peter J. Kirsch December 1, 2011.
Approach Charts and Procedures
Fuel Efficient Air Traffic Control Maryam Kamgarpour, PhD Student Claire Tomlin, Research Adviser John Robinson, NASA Ames Research Center December 17,
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: William Benner, Weather Processors Team Manager (AJP-1820), FAA Technical Center Date: 19 March 2007 Federal Aviation.
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 3.
Normal and Emergency Communication Procedures
RST processes Session 6 Presentation 3. A framework for RST processes Establishing an RST Membership Terms of reference Work programme (schedule, agenda,
Air traffic controllers (ATC) consideration and ATC solutions Session 5 Presentation 4.
AIR TRAFFIC ROUTES.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 6 1 Module 6: CSS and Livability in Construction, and Maintenance.
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL Presented by S.SUMESWAR PATRO Regd no:
Review Continuous Descent Operations Manual Roosevelt Pena (Dom Rep)
Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group NOISE ABATEMENT STRATEGIES Alternatives and Results New Zion Baptist Church Neighborhood Orientation and Discussion.
A FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS GUIDE FOR SOLOING A STUDENT PILOT.
Chapter 6 Section A. STAR Standard Terminal Arrival Route –Depart the enroute structure –Navigate to destination –Terminate with an instrument approach.
MIT ICAT MIT ICAT 1October 17, 2002 Exploring the Envelope of a Modified 3° Decelerating Approach for Noise Abatement Liling Ren & John-Paul Clarke October.
CARE/ASAS Validation Framework Guidelines & Case Studies Mark Watson NATS.
Emerging Issues for Air Navigation Service Providers Rudy Kellar Vice President, Operations NAV CANADA September 2007.
Situational Awareness Numerous aircraft and operational displays, when combined with effective and efficient communications and facilities, provide Air.
Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Canadian Implementation Presentation to Air Transport Association of Canada 9 November 2010.
Lecture 3: Air Traffic Control Tower
East Hampton Airport Safety, Noise and Operational Management Plan Peter J. Kirsch December 1, 2011.
RECITE A PRAYER…(15 SECONDS). ATM TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTION TO AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT,TYPE OF CONTROL AREAS & FLIGHT PLAN 2. AERODROME CONTROL 3. AREA CONTROL.
EUROCONTROL European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
Fourth Public Meeting June 20, 2002 Reid-Hillview Airport FAR Part 150 Noise and Land Use Compatibility Study.
Lecture 9: Ecological Factors & Aircraft Performance AIRCRAFT WEIGHT & PERFORMANCE.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration DCIT 41 Plenary Mark Patterson, FAA, AFS June 2015 Flight Standards Update.
Working environment WO Blanka Zelenková. Vocabulary & Definitions & Abbreviations Tower Cab – the upper part of the Control TWR where ATC crew is situated.
Dublin Airport Stakeholders Forum 26 th November 2008 Irish Aviation Authority Dermot Mc Mahon.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Noise 101: Federal Noise Laws and Regulations Town of Payson M.L. Chittick, Scottsdale FSDO January.
Review Chapter 4-8. Departure and Arrival Charts DPs, STARs and visual approaches are routinely assigned by ATC DPs and STARs are issued to simplify clearance.
F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Dan Hanlon.
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Record of Decision (ROD) Announcement Congressional Briefing Name: Steve Kelley Date: September 5, 2007 Federal.
Gary Stowell Noise Abatement Manager San Jose International Airport The Next Step - An Airport Perspective.
Farnborough Airspace Change Proposal Briefing to FACC 6 th March 2014 TAG Farnborough Airport.
REGULATIONS FOR ARMY AIRCRAFT CW2 ROBERT GOEBEL. Administrative Please turn off all: –Cell phones –Beepers –Palm Pilots –Gameboys –Stereos –Watch alarms.
INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PLANNING
Mr. Lagomarsino Money Power with Technology Applications.
99-11 UH-60 IPC IFR PUBLICATIONS & REGULATIONS WOPA.
Port of Bellingham Briefing BELLINGHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN BRIEFING April 2014.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Teterboro Runway 19 Quiet Visual Approach Teterboro Users Group (TUG) Gerald Lynch, Eastern Service.
Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Navigation Committee Noise Abatement Strategies: The Critical Questions  Which runway use provides the most noise.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
Teterboro Airport Part 150 Noise/Land Use Compatibility Study
Physical Characteristics
Holding Procedures.
OBJECTIVES Direct the aircraft on the ground and in the air by Ground-based Controllers Separate aircrafts to prevent collisions, Organize and arrange.
Допълнение 7 на PANS-ATM (ICAO Doc 4444)
NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM Completing the Package
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Kabul RNAV Visual & RNP-AR Process & Benefits
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
DCA, A Pilot’s Perspective
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 3.
Balanced Approach to Noise Mitigation
Balanced Approach to Noise Mitigation
Air Traffic Control System
Presentation transcript:

Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Navigation Committee AIRPORT NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM Louisville and Jefferson County FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Navigation Committee ABATEMENT CROSSWALK ·Structural measures ·Control measures ·Procedural measures ·Management measures ·Evaluative measures ·Air Traffic Control ·Approach & Departure Procedures ·Operator Procedures ·Airport Policies and Regulations ·Program Management

Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Navigation Committee STRUCTURAL MEASURES ·offset path for approach to 17R, departure from 35L ·extended approach fixes and departure turn points for higher maneuvering altitudes ·optimized flight corridors following river and major highways ·waypoints to guide traffic in corridors, rather than radar vectors ·navaids as required to define waypoints ·navigational standards for fleet ·runway extension for higher north departure on 35L; displaced south arrival on 17R held pending cost/benefit analysis

Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Navigation Committee CONTROL MEASURES ·prefer* south flow, except as provided below ·from , prefer* north flow ·for operations north of the airfield, prefer* runway 17R with offset for arrivals, 35L with offset for departures ·retain current operations south of the airfield (no runway preference*; diverge from 17R according to traffic & destination) ·retain/enhance contraflow program ·minimize exceptions to contraflow * “prefer” means according to the same criteria used now for weather, runway conditions and traffic load, recognizing that peak operations typically require both runways if available

Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Navigation Committee PROCEDURAL MEASURES ·publish standardized arrival, departure procedures ·provide for uniform descent at safe (3º) slope; discontinue current altitude exceptions ·grant visual approach clearance only after aircraft pass final approach fixes ·publish preferred noise abatement procedures in approach and departure plates ·prefer uniform descent procedures for arrivals ·prefer distant abatement procedures for departures ·continue current run-up restrictions

Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Navigation Committee MANAGEMENT MEASURES ·establish airport noise office ·community noise forum to succeed Study Group (same construct) ·maintain Website and information centers ·reinforce communications and liaison links with staff, carriers, controllers, government agencies, media, and public ·equip noise office with hardware and software for effective monitoring and evaluation ·develop real-time runway use decision aids, with common access for management, ATC, carriers, and community

Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Navigation Committee EVALUATIVE MEASURES ·establish flight track monitoring system ·provide for sample noise monitoring ·maintain fleet lists for ·exceptions to noise abatement program (i.e. light aircraft) ·navigational performance capability ·develop and tabulate data sets for various metrics ·conduct in-house noise modeling ·document and evaluate emerging technologies and measures for potential application

Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Navigation Committee ASSESSMENTS ·airfield capacity & delay ·air traffic control issues ·aircraft operational and economic issues ·cost analysis ·financial feasibility...must be applied to entire package!

Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Navigation Committee A “PUNCH LIST” ·capacity and delay issues ·chapter draft reviews ·contraflow management program ·cost/benefit assessments ·approach procedures ·displaced threshold analysis ·updated airport economic impact ·new technology documentation ·revised fleet forecast ·navigational capabilities list ·data collection/metrics ·runway extension update ·runway use figures ·scope issues, e.g. tech memos ·revised UofL impact ·workbook updates