Communication Patterns of Engineers Carol Tenopir

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee The role of publishing in the research process.
Advertisements

Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee Journal Reading In Universities: Comparing the U.S. and Australia (A Case Study)
Looking Ahead – Information Studies in the Workplace Help Us Design For the Future Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee web.utk.edu/~tenopir/
Data From Tenopir & King 18,000+ scientists and social scientists 1977 to present University and non-university workplaces Mostly North America Recent.
What Do We Know about Scientists’ Use of Information? Carol Tenopir Donald W. King
THE FUTURE OF ACADEMIC JOURNALS Amelia Acker | Information Ecology |
Measuring Value and Outcomes of Reading Dr. Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee Fiesole April 2010.
The Importance of Journals to the Scientific Endeavor Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
C. Tenopir 1 Scholarly Publishing at the Crossroads Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
The Need for Research Management Tools in Today’s Digital Library Lodz 06/2008 Aaron Maierhofer, RefWorks European Account Manager
Center for Information and Communication Studies University Investments in the Library: Measuring the Return Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
HOW ELECTRONIC JOURNALS ARE CHANGING ENGINEERS’ INFORMATION SEEKING & READING PATTERNS Donald W. King University of Pittsburgh School of Information Sciences.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Beyond Usage: Measuring Library Outcomes and Value Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
1 Connecting with Faculty Perceptions and Behaviors Dr. Karla Hahn Collection Management Team Leader University of Maryland Libraries.
Measuring Readings by Surveys Using Critical Incident Technique Surveys of Scientists and Engineers: Ensuring Reliable Research Evidence for Good Practice.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Measuring Value and ROI of Academic Libraries: The IMLS Lib-Value Project Carol Tenopir University of.
Center for Information and Communication Studies THE VALUE OF AND ROI IN SPECIAL LIBRARIES Donald W. King Honorary University Professor Bryant University.
Electronic or Print: Are Scholarly Journals Still Important? Carol Tenopir, University of Tennessee, USA.
Copyright Donald W. King and Carol H. Montgomery This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material to.
The Cost and Use of Electronic and Print Journal Collections Conference on Libraries in the Digital Age (LIDA) May 28 - June 1, 2007 Dubrovnic, Croatia.
The Digital Journal Collection in Libraries -what Libraries Are doing -Impact on Scientists Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
2007 Allen Press Emerging Trends in Scholarly Publishing Seminar Wednesday, April 12, 2007 Donald W. King, Distinguished Research Professor University.
Center for Information and Communication Studies The Link Among Faculty Purposes of Reading, Information Seeking Patterns, Aspects of Use, Value and the.
Understanding User Behavior Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Value of Scholarly Reading to Graduate Work: An Academic Survey of 3 U.S. Universities Rachel Volentine, Liz Whitson; University of Tennessee; College.
Swapan Deoghuria Scientist-II, Computer Centre Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science Kolkata , INDIA URL:
Center for Information and Communication Studies Donald W. King Adjunct Professor University of Tennessee Bryant University
What Does Usage Data Tell Us? Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Univeristy of Tennessee Knoxville Increasing Effective Student Use of the Scientific Journal Literature Award: DUE NSF:
Measuring the Value of Academic Libraries
Electronic Publishing and the Economics of Information Part II Implications for Libraries Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Center for Information and Communication Studies Measuring and Applying Data about Users in the Seton Hall Library Carol Tenopir Rachel Volentine Lisa.
Knowing Journal Users: Methods for User-Focused Research and a Case Study of Pediatricians Carol Tenopir Univ. of Michael Clarke.
Building Bridges Miles Conrad Lecture 2006 Carol Tenopir, University of Tennessee
SCIENCE RESEARCH DATABASES, WEBSITES, HARD COPY PRINT, & ELECTRONIC PRINT.
1 C. Tenopir Quality in the Online Environment Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Indispensable tools for research at its best “The Research Process: Providing your Researchers with the Right Tools to Achieve Success”
The Impact of Scholarly Communication on LIS Education Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee web.utk.edu/~tenopir/
Measuring Value and Outcomes of Reading Dr. Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
History and Hysteria Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee & Donald W. King Society of Scholarly Publishing Annual Meeting.
User Profile-Occupation Group LBSC601-Shady Grove-Spring 2012 Sara Hemmings Lauren Perelli Darrell Robertson Julie Shenk.
Journal Reading Patterns of Medical Faculty in a Digital Age Carol Tenopir
Pricing and Paying for Scientific Information during a Period of Transition Madeleine McPherson
Maximizing Library Investments in Digital Collections Through Better Data Gathering and Analysis (MaxData) Carol Tenopir and Donald.
Univeristy of Tennessee Knoxville Increasing Effective Student Use of the Scientific Journal Literature Award: DUE
Perceptions of Value and Value Beyond Perceptions Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee web.utk.edu/~tenopir/
Indexing of Tables and Figures: Scientists’ Reaction Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee web.utk.edu/~tenopir/
Increasing Effective Student Use of the Scientific Journal Literature (National Science Foundation National Science Digital Library Grant) School of Information.
How Scientists Use Journals: Electronic and Print Carol Tenopir Donald W. King
Center for Information and Communication Studies Shaping the Future of Scholarly Communication Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee (Visiting University.
Electronic Publishing and the Economics of Information SLA 2001 Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Undergraduate Science Students and Electronic Scholarly Journals Dr. Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Scientists’ Use of Journals: Differences (and Similarities) Between Print and Electronic Carol Tenopir Donald W. King, Randy Hoffman,
Towards Electronic Journals Carol Tenopir And Donald W. King
Increasing Effective Student Use of the Scientific Journal Literature.
C.Tenopir Using E-Journals To Promote Information Worldwide Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
The Digital Journal Collection in Libraries - What Libraries Are Doing -Impact on Scientists Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Market Research: Types of Data. What is Market Research? Market research is the collection, analysis, and interpretation of information used to develop.
Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee web.utk.edu/~tenopir/ How Electronic Journals Are Changing Scholarly Reading Patterns.
Researching Researchers: What User Studies Tell Us.
Use Patterns of Print and Electronic Journals Carol Tenopir, University of Tennessee, School of Information Sciences
Center for Information and Communication Studies Scholarly Reading in a Digital Age: Some things change, some stay the same Carol Tenopir University of.
The Use and Value of Scientific Journals Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee.
Patterns of Journal Use: What Are Our Users Telling Us? Carol Tenopir
Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration
Market Research: Types of Data.
Le développement des collections: l’impact du numérique et les pratiques en émergence Development of Collections: The Impact of Electronic Resources.
Use Patterns of Print and Electronic Journals
The Use and Value of Scientific Journals: Impact on Practitioners
Presentation transcript:

Communication Patterns of Engineers Carol Tenopir

Engineers are different!

4 Main Questions 1) How do engineers communicate in their work? 2)How much do engineers read scholarly journals? 3)Is there a pattern of the users of electronic vs. print? 4)How do engineers compare with other disciplines?

Data From: 20,000 + scientists, engineers, and social scientists 1977 to the present More than 100 university and non- university settings

Types of Data Demographic Estimates of behavior Details of “last” reading

More Details in: Tenopir and King, Communication Patterns of Engineers. IEEE/Wiley InterScience, 2004 Tenopir and King, Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, and Publishers. SLA, 2000.

Professionals’ Communication Cycle INFORMATION OUTPUT/SENDING AUDIENCE/READERS EXTERNAL INTERNAL Quantities WORK ACTIVITIES: RESEARCH, ADMINISTRATION, MARKETING, ETC. INFORMATION INPUT/RECEIVING Effort QuantitiesEffort

Proportions of Instances Channels outside company Channels within company 63 33

EngineersScientists Proportion of instances

Average Annual Amount Reading

Average Annual Amount of time (Hours) spent reading (Hrs)

Scholarly articles From a print or electronic journal “Separates” (eprints, preprints, from colleague, ILL, web site, etc.)

Average Time Spent and Number of Articles Read Per Year Per Scientist

Scholarly Article Reading Work FieldArticles Read (Per Year) Time Spent (Hours) Time Per Article (Min) Univ. Med.~ Chemists~ Life Scientists~ Physicists~ Soc Sci/Psych~ Engineers~ Updated June 2004

58.7% 23.8% 17.5% 6.3% 4.8 % 1.6% 4.8% Principal Purpose of Reading by Engineering Faculty

32.1% 25.0% 21.4% 10.7% 7.1% 3.6% Principal Purpose for Reading by ORNL Engineers

Principal Purposes of Reading University Engineers ORNL Engineers Medical Faculty Science Faculty Primary Research Background Research Current Awareness Teaching Background Research Teaching Teaching & Background Research

Reading Was Most Valuable for: University Engineers Medical Faculty Science Faculty Primary Research Consulting/ Advising Writing All others tiedWriting Primary Research Primary Research Current Awareness

Universities ORNL Library collection 42.9% 21.4% 35.7% 50.0% 17.9% 32.1% Separate copies Personal subscription Article Readings By Engineers

Separates Personal 36% 15% 62.3% Library 49% Separates 15.6%Library 22.1% AstronomersMedical Faculty Sources of Readings Personal

Separate copies Another person 47% Reprint 13% Preprint-electronic 7% Review copy 13% ILL/ Doc. Dev 20% Another person 60% Review copy 40% Universities ORNL

Universities ORNL Electronic 63% Print 37% Print 64% Electronic 36% Library Collection Readings By Engineers

Print 88% Electronic 12 % Electronic 44% Print 56% Universities ORNL Personal Subscriptions

AstronomersMedical Faculty Print 20% Electronic 80% Electronic 25% Print 75% Print or Electronic?

Means of Learning About Articles

62.3% 20.8% 16.9% Means of Learning About Articles Read Medical Faculty 39% 21% 37% Astronomers % 50% Engineering Faculty

83.3% 66.7% 33.3% 8.3% Universities ORNL Searching by Engineers

Universities ORNL 61.8% 46.6% 30.7%23.5% 23.1% 11.8% 2.9% Browsing By Engineers

by University and ORNL Engineers by the Age of Articles Read: Age of Articles Reading

Age of Articles Read Over Time 1 years 2-5 years 6-15 years >15 years

Summary of Communication Patterns of Engineers Engineers rely more on internal information sources Scientists read more scholarly articles Engineers spend more time on each reading Engineers use many ways to locate information—browse more and rely on colleagues more Engineers read articles for research; other things for other purposes