Comments on possible revisions to Criterion 6 Indicators Maintenance and enhancement of long-term socio- economic benefits to meet needs of societies Part.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE GHANA POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY Integration and Progress of Environmental Issues By Winfred Nelson NDPC November
Advertisements

SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting Overview
Deborah J. Shields USDA Forest Service - Research
Toward a Vision for a National System of Natural and Environmental Resource Indicators.
Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable Development and Evolution of the Criteria and Indicators.
Our Delphi Process Rounds 3-5 Helen Ivy Rowe. Definition A method for the systematic solicitation and collation of informed judgments on a particular.
Roundtable on Sustainable Forests. Forests cover about 750 million acres -- more than a quarter of the entire United States -- and sustainable management.
SRR Conceptual Model Relationship of Ecosystem Services to Sustainability and Indicator Based Monitoring.
USDA May 21, 2003 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable.
Cities and Green Growth OECD Green Cities Programme
TRP Chapter Chapter 6.8 Site selection for hazardous waste treatment facilities.
The Future of our Forests: Clarifying the Debate…
Assessing Progress For Sustainable Development
Harvard E -118 November 17,  UNWTO Initiative Indicators of Sustainable Development for Tourism Destinations (2004) Indicators of Sustainable Development.
Workshop on Transportation Corridor Evaluation With a focus on Economic and Community Development.
Community Happiness Index Gwendolyn Hallsmith, Director Department of Planning and Community Development City of Montpelier.
Key Results and Recommendations
African Geology and Mineral Information Systems Expert Group Consultative Meeting.
Key National Indicators and Supreme Audit Institutions: U.S. and INTOSAI Perspectives Bernice Steinhardt Director, Strategic Issues U.S. Government Accountability.
Ruth McWilliams National Sustainable Development Coordinator USDA Forest Service May 31, 2001 May 31, 2001 Science Day 2001 Sustainability Framework …
Exercise Group New Measures to Understand Societal Change Barbara Iasiello Global Project, OECD.
Britta Bierwagen 1, Roxanne Thomas 2, Kathryn Mengerink 2 & Austin Kane 2 1 Global Change Research Program National Center for Environmental Assessment.
Three Aspects of Sustainability 1.Inter-generational equity “The goal of sustainability is to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability.
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool Alessandra Alfieri UNSD.
SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounts: A Proposed Outline and Road Map Sixth Meeting of the UN Committee of Experts on Environmental-Economic Accounting.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool and Suggested Structure for Assessment United Nations Statistics.
Richard J.T. Klein Stockholm Environment Institute and Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Linköping University.
Outcomes of Public Health
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Managing Wales’ Natural Resources
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
The International Family Forestry Alliance (IFFA) is the global voice of family forestry, representing more than 25 million forest owners worldwide. National.
UN Framework for the Development of Environment Statistics (FDES) Why shape does matter Adriana Oropeza IV.
Final Conference June Maastricht, The Netherlands 1 Case Study: Kłodnica catchment, (Odra river basin) Poland Janusz Krupanek Institut for Ecology.
2 Natural Capital Accounting and Sustainable Development Robert Smith Statistics Canada International Workshop on Ecosystem and Natural Capital Accounting.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Information and international biodiversity conventions Eliezer Frankenberg Nature and Parks Authority.
Environment (Wales) Bill Legislation to sustainably manage Wales’ resources.
1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action Roadmap to Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas & HFA Mid-Term Review.
Comments on possible revisions to Criterion 6 Indicators Maintenance and enhancement of long-term socio- economic benefits to meet needs of societies Part.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
EPA’s Strength in Both GEOSS & ESIP; Environmental Health Decisionmaking January 10, 2008 George Gray, Ph.D. Assistant Administrator EPA Office of Research.
Progress on National Indicator Systems Theodore Heintz White House Council on Environmental Quality Dave Radloff U.S. Forest Service.
Large-scale organisations in context VCE Business Management Unit 3.
Capacity Development for the CDM (CD4CDM) First National Workshop - SURINAM Sustainable Development Impact Evaluation Miriam Hinostroza.
Goals and Indicators. Sustainable Measures Goals, Principles, Criteria, and Indicators  Goal – a description of future condition community members wish.
Kyrgyzstan priorities in environment protection B. Tolongutov, Director, State Regulation Center on Environment Protection & Ecological Safety Sector State.
1 1 The Global Project on Measuring the Progress of Societies OECD World Forum on Statistics, Knowledge and Policy Jon Hall, World Forum Project Leader,
Leading in the 21 st century- New paradigms for a globalizing world MGMT-E 152 Prof. Michael Pirson Class 4: October 8.
Measuring Progress towards Green Growth through indicators OECD work UNCEEA Sixth meeting New York, June 2011.
The Integration and Synthesis Group Progress and Possibilities Roundtable on Sustainable Forests November 17, 2004.
What Can We Say About the Economic, Institutional, and Legal Framework for Sustainable Forest Management in the United States? Roundtable on Sustainable.
Oregon Department of Forestry Kevin Birch Planning Coordinator Use of Criteria & Indicators and Sustainable Forest Management at Different Scales Oregon.
Measuring Sustainable development: Achievements and Challenges Enrico Giovannini OECD Chief Statistician June 2005.
Sustainable Forest Management and markets for environmental services David Brand Hancock Natural Resource Group (Australia) SUMBER:
Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch Incorporating Biodiversity into Trade-Related Integrated Assessments Presentation.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
Working Group on Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Thirteenth session, Geneva, 1 November 2012 Guidelines for developing national strategies to.
INTRODUCTION TO INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT Module 1 Session 1.3: What is Integrated Water Resources Management?
Natuurwetenschap & SamenlevingScience, Technology & Society Large Scale International Bio-energy Trade - Perspectives, Possibilities and Criteria; introduction.
Criteria and Indicators as Framework for Sustainable Forest Management Ruth McWilliams USDA – Forest Service Workshop on Sustainable Forest Management.
(I)WRM indicators A GWP PERSPECTIVE Water Country Briefs Project Diagnostic Workshop, Geneva, December 2010 Mike Muller : GWP-TEC.
1 Ecologic Institute Science and Policy for a Sustainable World Berlin – Brussels Washington DC – San Mateo CA Ecologic.eu EIUS.org.
Eurostat I) Context & objectives of KIP INCA project Project owner is the Environment Knowledge Community (EKC) EKC is an EU inter-services group involving.
Rocky Harris United Kingdom Revision of SEEA 2003 Options for the structure of Part III on applications.
Using Analysis and Tools to Inform Adaptation and Resilience Decisions -- the U.S. national experiences Jia Li Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental.
Andrew Haywood123, Andrew Mellor13,
The French National Agency on Water and Aquatic Environments
Presentation transcript:

Comments on possible revisions to Criterion 6 Indicators Maintenance and enhancement of long-term socio- economic benefits to meet needs of societies Part 1 – Mission and a Holistic Framework Ken Skog Peter Ince USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Madison, WI

Topics  Summary of comments on Criterion 6  Assumptions about C&I  Possible missions for C&I  How indicators relate to one another – – Latest science: the “systems” view – A working “holistic framework”  Ideas for additions/ changes

Summary of comments  Criterion 6 comments reflected a range of views about the mission of C&I in general  What is the mission of C&I?  Without a clear vision of the C&I mission, it will be difficult to recommend changes

Assumptions  We need more clarity on the mission of C&I before we can advise changes to C&I –Some alternative missions shown next  Some C&I missions may require better definition of a “C&I system” (others may not)  The Roundtable Integrated Systems Group (IGS) has not completed a systems definition  Our view is that we need at least a working holistic framework, if not a more complex model of the forest system

1. Accelerate National Learning  With a learning focus, C&I contribute to popular scientific understanding, and enhance the awareness and insight provided to leadership and to the public. This is a communication mission— creating awareness and understanding prior to thinking.  It requires no agreement on goals, nor any agreement on the basic elements of the strategy to attain goals. Possible mission for C&I (#1) Source: Martha F. Riche, 2003, Developing Key National Performance Indicators,” GAO and National Academies Forum, Feb 2003

2. Assess National Position and Progress  Measure the position of our country and monitor progress for our citizens. This is a broad, constituent-focused mission.  C&I become largely descriptive indicator sets* that provide a basis for comparing progress in one country with other countries, and our current with our past status.  This requires a generally accepted or common vision and holistic framework that helps uncover especially challenging problems and beneficial opportunities. *For example – GDP, National Income and Product Accounts, National productivity measures, etc. Possible mission for C&I (#2)

3. Provide a Context for Policy or Program Evaluation  C&I would be an essential body of knowledge to use in assessing performance of particular policies, programs, or institutions.  For example, a well-articulated and highly developed set of indicators could provide a context for improved implementation of governmental performance initiatives (e.g. the Government Performance and Results Act, which requires Federal agencies to measure their performance in meeting agreed-upon goals).  This requires a well-grounded conceptual basis that integrates a wide variety of activities into an accountability framework. C&I would become a scorecard for government performance. Possible mission for C&I (#3)

4. Systematically Guide Strategic Decisions  This mission has a policy integration focus, in that it combines policy indicators from a variety of sectors in a systems model that can guide policy choices by higher level decision makers.  This is a systems model that ensures integration by surfacing the interrelationships between different indicators.  This approach aims to answer relational questions (Why and How, not What or Whether), and responds to the growing perception amongst both experts and the public that interrelationships between economic, social, and environmental aspects of life are important and policies will have unanticipated effects if these interrelationships are not understood. Possible missions for C&I (#4)

Suggestions concerning missions  It is feasible to focus on fulfilling missions 1. and Accelerate National Learning - a communication focus— fostering public awareness, understanding, and thinking 2. Assess Position and Progress - provide a basis for comparing progress (tracking over time is key)  It is less feasible to undertake missions 3 and 4 3. Provide a Context for Evaluation – C&I were not intended to be the basis for judging performance of specific programs 4. Guide Strategic Decisions via a systems model that ensures integration – At present, high level decision makers do not typically use systems models to identify/understand interrelationships among different indicators for policy development  Mission 2 assumes people bring a broad “holistic framework” that helps them create indicators –What can we draw from the draft IGS Conceptual framework?

Initial Environmental Conditions Initial Natural Resource Capital Initial Social Capacity And Economic Capital Initial Human Conditions New Human Conditions New Social Capacity And Economic Capital New Natural Resource Capital New Environmental Conditions Interaction with Tangible Env. Events Interaction with Intangible Env. Attributes Land cover, land form and water flow alterations; Waste discharges; Biota transport Processes Producing Tangible Environmental Outputs Processes Producing Intangible Environmental Attributes Processes Producing Tangible Environmental Events Underlying Environmental Processes: Atmospheric Hydrologic Biologic/ Ecologic Geologic Investment, Use of Goods And Services Air, Water. Climate, Plants, Animals Soil, Microbes, Rocks Air, Water. Climate Plants, Animals Soil, Microbes, Rocks Production of Economic Goods and Services Extraction Flow of Tangible Environmental Outputs Flow of Intangible Environ. Attributes Flow of Tangible Environmental Events Environmental SubsystemHuman Subsystem Tier 2 – ISG Conceptual Framework Biomass, Water, Minerals Biomass, Water, Minerals Economic Assets & Liabilities Social Opportunities & Constraints Values & Norms Income, Health, Security Economic Assets & Liabilities Social Opportunities & Constraints Values & Norms Income, Health, Security Demographic, Cultural, Governance’ Legal, Market, Interaction, Family, Education Underlying Social And Economic Processes:

Initial Environmental Conditions Initial Natural Resource Capital Initial Social Capacity And Economic Capital Initial Human Conditions New Human Conditions New Social Capacity And Economic Capital New Natural Resource Capital New Environmental Conditions Interaction with Tangible Env. Events Interaction with Intangible Env. Attributes Land cover, land form and water flow alterations; Waste discharges; Biota transport Processes Producing Tangible Environmental Outputs Processes Producing Intangible Environmental Attributes Processes Producing Tangible Environmental Events Underlying Environmental Processes: Atmospheric Hydrologic Biologic/ Ecologic Geologic Investment, Use of Goods And Services Air, Water. Climate, Plants, Animals Soil, Microbes, Rocks Air, Water. Climate Plants, Animals Soil, Microbes, Rocks Production of Economic Goods and Services Extraction Flow of Tangible Environmental Outputs Flow of Intangible Environ. Attributes Flow of Tangible Environmental Events Environmental SubsystemHuman Subsystem Tier 2 – ISG Conceptual Framework Biomass, Water, Minerals Biomass, Water, Minerals Economic Assets & Liabilities Social Opportunities & Constraints Values & Norms Income, Health, Security Economic Assets & Liabilities Social Opportunities & Constraints Values & Norms Income, Health, Security Demographic, Cultural, Governance’ Legal, Market, Interaction, Family, Education Underlying Social And Economic Processes: Effect on Land use/ Land cover Benefits/ values Investments Capital/ capacity Suggested focus areas

A simplified “holistic framework” showing the role of existing indicators

INVESTMENT (flows) /Investment performance Forest mgt and industries (38) Research, development and education (39) Extension of new technology (40) Return on investment (41) CAPACITY (stocks) Natural capital Biodiversity (C1) Productivity (C2) Ecosystem health (C3) Soil and water (C4) Carbon cycles (C5) Protected areas (42) Subsistence use (47) Built capital Technology (40) Human capital R, D &E (39) Social capital Legal, institution, economic framework (C7) BENEFITS/ VALUES (Flows and stocks) Wood and Nonwood products (29-34) Recreation (35-37) Cultural and spiritual values (42-43) Employment and community (44-47) Well being A General Holistic Framework – Relationship of Criterion 6 Indicators to other Criteria Measure at t 0 t 1 Measure at National, regional scales

Workshop Objectives:  Provide specific recommendations for improving national level Indicators.  To inform the U.S. position on the refinement of the Montreal Process Criteria Indicators. –i.e. suggest changes for all countries to adopt

Suggested missing information or indicators  Benefits/ values –Distribution of benefits (equity) –Water and other ecological services  Holistic Feedback effect of benefits/ values on land use and capacities –Effect of benefits/values on land use and land value