1 Watonwan County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oklahoma Strategic Highway Safety Plan – Vision, Mission and Goal presented to SHSP Leadership Group SHSP Working Group presented by Susan Herbel, Cambridge.
Advertisements

AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS.
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
County Road Safety Plans Experiences with Development and Implementation Richard (Rick) West, PE Otter Tail County Public Works Director/County Engineer.
57 th Traffic Conference. The National Problem — ,200 Fatalities 2.68M Injuries $230.6B / year $820 per person 3.3 Million Deaths Since 1928.
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Roadway Departure Crash
GAMPO. Randy Clayton Operations Manager, Strategic Highway Safety Plan Georgia Governor’s Office of Highway Safety.
1 The Road Towards Zero Deaths: Rules to Live By Joe Toole Associate Administrator for Safety Federal Highway Administration Missouri Traffic and Safety.
Type Name Here Technical Program Services Eduardo C. Serafin, PE, AICP.
Hardin County Engineering Department September 12, 2006.
Carver County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/15/ Year Crashes Carver.
Meeting the AASHTO Safety Goal Daniel L. Carter, PE UNC Highway Safety Research Center AASHTO Safety Mgmt Subcommittee Meeting September 2, 2009.
Learning Outcomes Identify safety issues unique to local and rural areas. Identify common challenges to improving road safety. Explain why road agencies.
Office of Safety Research and Development Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation TRANSPORTATION SAFETY PRIORITIES GOVERNMENT.
Data Analysis and Use 3-1 NLTAPA Joint Safety Work Group Webinar November 18, 2013.
Early 2009 SD Crash Statistics Transportation Safety Conference “Working together to Save Lives” Office of Accident Records Chuck Fergen.
8th Annual Michigan Traffic Safety Summit Guidance for Implementation of AASHTO’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan Timothy R. Neuman, PE Vice President and.
1 MnDOT County Roadway Safety Plans Review Meeting 1 Metro June 21, 2012.
Annual Safety Meeting February 21, 2007 Ron Marshall, SD LTAP Local Rural Road Safety in SD - What does the data tell us?
The Safety Solution is Local and Personal !!! Business of Saving Lives The Safety Problem Is Global.
IDAHO’S CRASH PROBLEM & PROGRAMS. Mission - Zero traffic deaths on Idaho roads Fewer than 200 annual traffic deaths by 2012 Goals.
1 FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION November 5, 2010.
A Systemic Approach to Safety Management NLTAPA Annual Conference July 30, 2012 Hillary Isebrands, P.E., PhD.
City of Henderson Citizens Traffic Advisory Board NDOT SAFETY UPDATE.
October 17, 2012 Connie S. Sorrell Chief of Systems Operations.
Saving Lives: A Vital FHWA Goal Safety Priorities for 2003 Michael Halladay FHWA Office of Safety Michigan Traffic Safety Summit; April 29, 2003.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
1 Ramsey County Review Meeting 1 June 21, Metro* County Crash Data Overview 2 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury.
1 Washington County Review Meeting 1 June 21, 2012.
October 24, 2015 The Vermont Highway Safety Alliance Vermont Highway Safety Alliance AARP Driver Safety Annual Meeting October 29, 2014 Presented by: Kevin.
Other Road Users  Motorists should always be on the look out for pedestrians and oncoming traffic Pedestrian Laws: Failure to yield Penalties Include:
Statewide Analysis Strategies Missouri’s Blueprint for Safer Roadways.
1 MnDOT County Roadway Safety Plans Review Meeting #1 - ATP 2 June 25, 2012.
Rural Transportation Planning Eunice Fitzpatrick Transportation Planner Kentucky River ADD Hazard, KY.
Lane Departures By: Deborah S. McAvoy, M.S., P.E., PTOE Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
1 September 28, 2011 Safety Strategies Workshop Brown County Faribault County Martin County Watonwan County.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
Unsignalized Intersections Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.
1 Update Update MnDOT’s County Roadway Safety Plans CTS Transportation Research Conference May 23, 2012 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
Name Agency Date, Year Understanding Younger Drivers.
Caltrans External Advisory Liaison Committee October 2015.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Doug Bish OTCDC March 8th.
Director Malcolm Dougherty California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) October 28, 2015 Caltrans’ Highway Safety Improvement Program.
Polk County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/ Year Crashes Polk.
1 Marshall County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.
ATP 2 Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/ Year Crashes ATP 2 7,072.
2011 National Association of County Engineers Conference Mn/DOT County Roadway Safety Plans April 20, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
ATP 1 County Road Safety Plan 1 Brad Estochen MnDOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology
Iihs.org Automated enforcement. Number of U.S. communities with speed cameras and red light cameras January 2016 Automated enforcement uses technology.
Estimation of 2001 Crash Costs Using FARS and GES John McFadden, Len Meczkowski, FHWA-Office of Safety R&D; Carol Conly, Lendis Corporation; Promod Chandhok,
Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Presented at Pooled Fund Meeting April 19, 2004.
INDOT Office of Traffic Safety Manager, Mike Holowaty
1 Faribault County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
1 Polk County Review Meeting 1 June 25, ATP 2 County Crash Data Overview 06/25/2012 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious.
1 St. Louis County Review Meeting 1 August 29, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
SCDOT Highway Safety Program
What’s UP with County Roads?
Other Road Users Motorists should always be on the look out for pedestrians and oncoming traffic Pedestrian Laws: Failure to yield Penalties Include: •Up.
UDOT SafeMap hosted by Numetric
Intersection Crash Analysis in the State of Oregon
Florida Department of Transportation
Driver Education Committee June 25, 2018
Crash Severity for Lane Departures Crashes
Presentation transcript:

1 Watonwan County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services

8/31/20112 Watonwan County Crash Data Overview 5 Year Crashes Watonwan County Year Crashes Watonwan County State System 351 – 50% 6 – 27% State System 351 – 50% 6 – 27% CSAH/CR 195 – 28% 13 – 59% CSAH/CR 195 – 28% 13 – 59% Rural 110 – 56% 11 – 85% Rural 110 – 56% 11 – 85% Urban 85 – 44% 2 – 15% Urban 85 – 44% 2 – 15% All Way Stop 2 – 5% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 2 – 5% 0 – 0% Run off Road 32 – 63% 6 – 75% Run off Road 32 – 63% 6 – 75% On Curve 7 – 22% 0 – 0% On Curve 7 – 22% 0 – 0% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 6 (27%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 4 (18%), 0 (0%) Head On – 3 (14%), 0 (0%) Other – 3 (14%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 6 (27%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 4 (18%), 0 (0%) Head On – 3 (14%), 0 (0%) Other – 3 (14%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop/Yield 22 – 55% 0 – 0% Thru-Stop/Yield 22 – 55% 0 – 0% Right Angle – 2 (100%), 0 (0%) Signalized 3 – 7% 0 – 0% Signalized 3 – 7% 0 – 0% Inters-Related 23 – 31% 3 – 27% Inters-Related 23 – 31% 3 – 27% Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Date of Analysis: June 23, 2011 Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). City, Twnshp, Other 126 – 18% 0 – 0% City, Twnshp, Other 126 – 18% 0 – 0% Inters-Related 40 – 47% 2 – 100% Inters-Related 40 – 47% 2 – 100% Not Inters-Related 37 – 44% 0 – 0% Not Inters-Related 37 – 44% 0 – 0% Right Angle – 7 (19%), 0 (0%) Other – 7 (19%), 0 (0%) Head On – 5 (14%), 0 (0%) Not Applicable – 5 (14%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 7 (19%), 0 (0%) Other – 7 (19%), 0 (0%) Head On – 5 (14%), 0 (0%) Not Applicable – 5 (14%), 0 (0%) Animal 35 – 32% 0 – 0% Animal 35 – 32% 0 – 0% Not Inters-Related 51 – 68% 8 – 73% Not Inters-Related 51 – 68% 8 – 73% Head On, SS Opp 6 – 12% 1 – 13% Head On, SS Opp 6 – 12% 1 – 13% On Curve 1 – 17% 1 – 100% On Curve 1 – 17% 1 – 100% Unknown/Other 8 – 9% 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 8 – 9% 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 1 – 1% 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 1 – 1% 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 13 – 33% 2 – 100% Other/Unknown 13 – 33% 2 – 100% All Way Stop 0 – 0% All Way Stop 0 – 0% Head On – 2 (13%), 1 (50%) Run Off Road – 2 (13%), 1 (50%) Other– 4 (25%), 0 (0%) Head On – 2 (13%), 1 (50%) Run Off Road – 2 (13%), 1 (50%) Other– 4 (25%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop/Yield 16 – 70% 2 – 67% Thru-Stop/Yield 16 – 70% 2 – 67% Unknown – 1 (14%), 1 (100%) Run Off Road – 4 (57%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 2 (29%), 0 (0%) Unknown – 1 (14%), 1 (100%) Run Off Road – 4 (57%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 2 (29%), 0 (0%) Signalized 0 – 0% Signalized 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 7 – 30% 1 – 33% Other/Unknown 7 – 30% 1 – 33% Not Animal 75 – 68% 11 – 100% Not Animal 75 – 68% 11 – 100% Unmappable 25 – 4% 3 – 14% Unmappable 25 – 4% 3 – 14%

ATP 7 County Crash Data Overview 8/31/ Year Crashes ATP 7 23, Year Crashes ATP 7 23, State System 10,038 – 43% 265 – 39% State System 10,038 – 43% 265 – 39% CSAH/CR 5,379 – 23% 265 – 40% CSAH/CR 5,379 – 23% 265 – 40% Rural 3,408 – 63% 221 – 83% Rural 3,408 – 63% 221 – 83% Urban 1,971 – 37% 44 – 17% Urban 1,971 – 37% 44 – 17% All Way Stop 73 – 7% 1 – 3% All Way Stop 73 – 7% 1 – 3% Run off Road 1,165 – 67% 98 – 68% Run off Road 1,165 – 67% 98 – 68% On Curve 419 – 24% 45 – 31% On Curve 419 – 24% 45 – 31% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 219 (50%), 5 (36%) “Other” – 50 (11%), 3 (21%) Left Turn – 34 (8%), 3 (21%) Ran Off Road – 15 (3%), 2 (14%) Right Angle – 219 (50%), 5 (36%) “Other” – 50 (11%), 3 (21%) Left Turn – 34 (8%), 3 (21%) Ran Off Road – 15 (3%), 2 (14%) Thru-Stop 440 – 45% 14 – 48% Thru-Stop 440 – 45% 14 – 48% Right Angle – 95 (38%), 4 (50%) Head On – 11 (4%), 2 (25%) Rear End – 64 (25%), 1 (13%) “Not Applicable” – 4 (2%), 1 (12%) Right Angle – 95 (38%), 4 (50%) Head On – 11 (4%), 2 (25%) Rear End – 64 (25%), 1 (13%) “Not Applicable” – 4 (2%), 1 (12%) Signalized 252 – 26% 8 – 28% Signalized 252 – 26% 8 – 28% Inters-Related 774 – 29% 62 – 28% Inters-Related 774 – 29% 62 – 28% Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). Includes Steele County City, Twnshp, Other 8,104 – 34% 141 – 21% City, Twnshp, Other 8,104 – 34% 141 – 21% Inters-Related 985 – 50% 29 – 66% Inters-Related 985 – 50% 29 – 66% Not Inters-Related 684 – 35% 14 – 32% Not Inters-Related 684 – 35% 14 – 32% Run Off Road – 113 (17%), 4 (29%) “Other” – 88 (13%), 4 (29%) Head On – 54 (8%), 4 (29%) Rear End – 157 (23%), 1 (7%) Run Off Road – 113 (17%), 4 (29%) “Other” – 88 (13%), 4 (29%) Head On – 54 (8%), 4 (29%) Rear End – 157 (23%), 1 (7%) Animal 761 – 22% 3 – 1% Animal 761 – 22% 3 – 1% Not Inters-Related 1,734 – 66% 145 –67% Not Inters-Related 1,734 – 66% 145 –67% Head On, SS Opp. 86 – 5% 16 – 11% Head On, SS Opp. 86 – 5% 16 – 11% On Curve 16 – 19% 4 – 25% On Curve 16 – 19% 4 – 25% Unknown/Other 302 – 15% 1 – 2% Unknown/Other 302 – 15% 1 – 2% Unknown/Other 136 – 5% 11 – 5% Unknown/Other 136 – 5% 11 – 5% Other/Unknown 220 – 22% 6 – 21% Other/Unknown 220 – 22% 6 – 21% Right Angle – 111 (31%), 18 (60%) Run Off Road – 61 (17%), 6 (20%) SS Opp – 14 (4%), 2 (7%) Head On – 14 (4%), 2 (7%) Right Angle – 111 (31%), 18 (60%) Run Off Road – 61 (17%), 6 (20%) SS Opp – 14 (4%), 2 (7%) Head On – 14 (4%), 2 (7%) Thru-Stop 360 – 47% 30 – 48% Thru-Stop 360 – 47% 30 – 48% Run Off Road – 145 (38%), 12 (38%) “Other” – 57 (15%), 6 (19%) Right Angle – 45 (12%), 5 (16%) Head On – 21 (6%), 4 (13%) Run Off Road – 145 (38%), 12 (38%) “Other” – 57 (15%), 6 (19%) Right Angle – 45 (12%), 5 (16%) Head On – 21 (6%), 4 (13%) Other/Unknown 381 – 49% 32 – 52% Other/Unknown 381 – 49% 32 – 52% Not Animal 2,645 – 78% 218 – 99% Not Animal 2,645 – 78% 218 – 99% All Way Stop 19 – 2% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 19 – 2% 0 – 0% Signalized 13 – 2% 0 – 0% Signalized 13 – 2% 0 – 0% 3

Watonwan Crash Data Overview Rural Crashes 85% of the CSAH/CR severe crashes occurred in rural areas. Non-Intersection Related Crashes 73% (8) of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are non-intersection related. 75% (6) of CSAH/CR severe rural, non-intersection related are run off road severe crashes, 0% (0) of which occurred on a curve. Intersection-Related Crashes 27% (3) of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are intersection-related. 67% (2) occurred at thru-stop/yield intersections (50% of these crashes were head on and 50% were road departure). Urban Crashes 15% (2 crashes) of the CSAH/CR severe crashes occurred in urban areas. 8/31/20114

Watonwan Emphasis Areas 8/31/20115 Emphasis Area Statewide Percentage ATP 7Watonwan County Interstate, US & THCSAH & CR City, Twnshp & Other Interstate, US & THCSAH & CR City, Twnshp & Other Total Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes8, Drivers Young drivers (under 21)24%16%(40)25%(62)28%(36)33%(2)27%(4)50%(1) Unlicensed drivers8%7%(17)8%(19)9%(12)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Older drivers (over 64)14%20%(51)12%(31)14%(18)33%(2)27%(4)50%(1) Aggressive driving and speeding-related20%21%(53)17%(42)23%(30)17%(1)7%(1)50%(1) Drug and alcohol-related26%20%(51)32%(79)30%(39)0%(0)20%(3)50%(1) Inattentive, distracted, asleep drivers20%28%(72)20%(49)18%(23)0%(0)20%(3)0%(0) Safety awareness Unbelted vehicle occupants25%23%(59)32%(81)34%(44)50%(3)27%(4)50%(1) Special Users Pedestrians crashes8%3%(7)6%(14)13%(17)0%(0)7%(1)50%(1) Bicycle crashes4%1%(2)0%(1)4%(5)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Vehicles Motorcycles crashes16%15%(37)17%(43)11%(14)17%(1)0%(0)0%(0) Heavy vehicle crashes10%23%(58)13%(32)5%(7)0%(0)13%(2)0%(0) Safety enhancements Highways Train-vehicle collisions0% (0)1%(3)1%(1)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Road departure crashes28%30%(76)47%(117)26%(33)33%(2)60%(9)50%(1) Consequences of leaving road Intersection crashes42%31%(79)33%(83)45%(58)33%(2)33%(5)50%(1) Head-On and Sideswipe (opposite) crashes 15%21%(52)21%(52)17%(22)33%(2)20%(3)0%(0) Work zone crashes2% (6)2%(4)1%(1)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) EMSEnhancing Emergency Capabilities Management Information and decision support systems More effective processes DPS Crash Data Records, 2006 to 2010 Top 5 Emphasis Areas by Jurisdiction Note: Numbers are not additive, as one crash may involve a young driver at an intersection. The numbers represent severe crashes (Fatal and A-type Injury crashes)

Watonwan Segment Analysis 112 total segments Total Crashes – 250 Severe Crashes – 12 – on 10 segments  CSAH 8 from CSAH 8 RT & BHD (3 severe crashes)  2 road departure, 1 other 56 segments with 0 crashes Many segments have rumble strips at stops, however some municipalities do not allow them 8/31/20116

Watonwan Intersection Analysis 159 intersections Total Crashes – 73 Severe Crashes – 4 – at 4 intersections  2 road departures, 1 sideswipe opposing, 1 head on 129 (81%) intersections with 0 crashes 8/31/20117

Safety Workshop Objective: Multidisciplinary discussion of a short list of safety strategies (Note: there is no discussion of specific crash locations.) Date: September 28 Location: Watonwan County Human Services, St. James, MN Agenda 8:30 – Coffee and Registration 9:00 – Introductions Presentations – Law Enforcement and Local Safety Advocates Background Information/Desired Outcomes Breakout Sessions – Prioritize Strategies 12:00 – 1:00 - Lunch Report Back/Final Presentation 2:45 – 3:00 - Wrap-up 8/31/20118

9 Watonwan County’s Sample Invite

8/31/ Safety Workshop – County Assignments June Confirm groups and select group leaders Prioritize dates August Secure Location and Caterer – Group Coordinator people $12/person (“all in” including delivery, tax and tip) Send invites (example has been provided) September All Counties: RSVP Head Count to Roger Risser by September 21 Group Coordinator: Confirm final headcount by September 21 Group Coordinator: Carla Stueve (SRF) at Provide final headcount Audio-visual availability for the workshop