Bill Anderson Purdue University 23 March 2011 Perspectives on Launch Propulsion System Roadmap.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Due Diligence of Technology Mission Critical: The Rocky Research scientist, engineers & mfg specialist are dedicated to assist potential investors in.
Advertisements

1 AIAA Delta Forum AIAA Public Policy A CRISIS IN AERONAUTICS The NASA Landscape Aerospace Sciences Meeting January 8, 2001 Carol A. Cash, Chair Aeronautics.
Innovate Now: Overview and Next Steps February 2007.
FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY International conference “Europe space policy: ambitions 2015” Session 1. “General view on propulsion systems: LV of the future”
A GenCorp Company High Thrust In-Space Propulsion Technology Development R. Joseph Cassady Aerojet 22 March 2011.
DRAFT Page 1 A unique, non-profit, economic development organization Who we are What we do Lead and partner with industry, academia and government regionally.
Liquid Rocket Engine Cycles
M. R. Tetlow and C.J. Doolan School on Mechanical Engineering
Technologies for Low Cost Reusable Launch Vehicles Eric Besnard, Professor California State University, Long Beach (562)
© The Aerospace Corporation 2011 NRC Workshop on NASA Technology Roadmaps TA01 - Launch Propulsion Systems Randy Kendall General Manager Launch Systems.
Blue Origin AIAA Civil Space Symposium Huntsville, Alabama
1 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee Evaluation Measures and Criteria for Humans Spaceflight Options 12 August 2009.
Introduction Over the past 20 years there have been numerous attempts to develop a new RLV All failed or prematurely canceled All share a common issue:
Launch Vehicles. LAUNCH SYSTEM CONCEPTS SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT MAIN VEHICLE PRIMARY LIQUID OR SOLID ROCKET PROPELLANT.
Launch Propulsion: SMC/LR Perspectives Presented to
Architecture Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
Protecting the Public, Astronauts and Pilots, the NASA Workforce, and High-Value Equipment and Property Mission Success Starts With Safety The Future Role.
Introduction to Hypersonic Propulsion Systems
Choices: Some Considerations in Configuring Launch Systems Dr. John M. Jurist Adjunct Professor of Space Studies, Odegard School of Aerospace Sciences,
List of investigators PPU’s for Next Generation EP Brian Gilchrist, UM Steve Battel, Battel Engineering (consultant) Alec Gallimore, UM Ken Arnett, UM-Space.
International Space Station: National Laboratory Development Brad Carpenter Space Operations Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters.
List of investigators Next Generation EP PPUs Brian Gilchrist, UM Steve Battel, Battel Engineering (consultant) Alec Gallimore, UM Ken Arnett, UM-Space.
NASA_G_O_02_09_05.ppt 1 National Goals and Objectives National Goal To advance U.S. scientific, security, and economic interests through a robust space.
Propulsion Engineering Research Center NASA Technology Roadmap: Launch Propulsion Systems Robert J. Santoro The Propulsion Engineering Research Center.
Page - 1 Rocketdyne Propulsion & Power Role of EASY5 in Integrated Product Development Frank Gombos Boeing Canoga Park, CA.
USA Fundamental Hypersonics
Liquid & Solid Propulsion Overview
Govt. Girls Higher Secondary School , Pattom , Trivandrum.
Linking Economic and Workforce Development: A Regional Sector Approach Bob Sheets Business and Industry Services Northern Illinois University September,
NASA-KSC Safety and Health Presentation March 18,
Comprehend why the shuttle was developed Comprehend the space shuttle’s main features Comprehend the shuttle’s legacy The Space Shuttle Program.
A Case for Theory-Based Research on Level of Automation and Adaptive Automation David B. Kaber Department of Industrial Engineering North Carolina State.
Chapter 24 Space Vehicular Systems. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Identify.
1 Aeronautics Explorer Post Katherine ‘Katie’ Fallon Midview HS Goal: Aeronautics Explorer Post Katherine ‘Katie’ Fallon Midview HS Goal:To explorer the.
NASA’s Future Plans Hampton Black -- 10/8/12. Any of these sound familiar? “Isn’t NASA shutting down?” “Since the space shuttle is retired, we’re not.
ESMD Education Presentation to Space Grant Directors March 2007 Jerry Hartman Exploration Systems Mission Directorate Education Lead.
 Expand upon knowledge base developed from Panther 1 solid rocket launch (6/28/06)  Enhance relationship and training opportunities between Florida.
Welcome to the Symposium on Space Transportation Policy and Market Risks November 16, 2011 Space Policy Institute Elliott School of International Affairs.
Transforming the Tech Valley Workforce Region A Blueprint From Traditional Manufacturing to Globally Competitive Advanced Manufacturing and Technology.
Propulsion Challenges: Past, Present and Future Dr. Alan Garscadden Chief Scientist Propulsion Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration marshall Elaine Flowers Duncan Engineering Directorate March 6, 2012 Marshall Space Flight Center.
Copyright 2004 Northrop Grumman Corporation 0 21 June 2004 Doug Young NG Lead Executive for Project Constellation Northrop Grumman Corporation Cooperating.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transitioning Toward the Future of Commercial Human Spaceflight COMMERCIAL CREW PROGRAM AIAA Spring Dinner.
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
Rocket Engines India Morris November 3, What are Rocket Engines??? Jet engines that use only propellant mass for forming the high speed jet/ thrust.
11 Space Transportation Policy and Market Risks Panel 5 – International Customers, Competitors and Partners The George Washington University Elliot School.
NASA’s Organization National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
1 Stan Graves Vice President, Science & Engineering ATK Propulsion Systems March 23 – 24, 2011 NASA Technology Roadmaps.
Melt-infiltrated C f /ZrC composite combustion chambers as fabricated (top) and during hot-fire testing at NASA GRC (bottom). INNOVATION Ultramet has developed.
Approved For Public Release © The Aerospace Corporation 2009 June 17, 2009 Initial Summary of Human Rated Delta IV Heavy Study Briefing to the Review of.
October, 2005 NASA’s Exploration Architecture. 2 A Bold Vision for Space Exploration  Complete the International Space Station  Safely fly the Space.
03/20/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Air Force NASA NCSS FAA Industry University Etc.
Launch Structure Challenge - Background Humans landed on the moon in 1969 – Apollo 11 space flight. In 2003, NASA started a new program (Ares) to send.
Directorate for Education and Human Resources Photo credits (from left) : U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Intel Free Press, Kate Ter Haar, Woodley Wonder.
액체로켓엔진의 이론과 실제 한국항공우주연구원 발사체추진제어팀 임 하 영.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA SBIR/STTR A holistic Approach LK Kubendran, PhD, MBA Portfolio Executive Commercial Partnerships Programs.
National Goals and Objectives
Liquid Rocket Engines Require many moving parts and plumbing.
NASA Hypersonic Research
In-situ Propellant Production and ERV Propulsion System
11/18/2018 Development of Cryogenic Engine for GSLV MkIII: Technological Challenges RS Praveen, N Jayan, KS Bijukumar, J Jayaprakash, V Narayanan, G Ayyappan.
Dr. Malcom Phelps Presentation by
Pre-normative REsearch for Safe use of Liquid HYdrogen
Studies of High-Pressure Acoustic Combustion Instabilities in Hydrocarbon-Oxygen Liquid-Propellant Rocket Engines Based on Reduced Chemical-Kinetic Mechanisms.
AE 473 Liquid Propulsion : Engine Cyles. Open and Closed Engine Cycles.
NASA Technology Roadmaps ATK Commentary
DESIGN OF THE ARIES IV TRIBRID LIQUID PROPELLANT ROCKET ENGINE
Video ULA.
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Deep Space Exploration Requires the best from all of us
Presentation transcript:

Bill Anderson Purdue University 23 March 2011 Perspectives on Launch Propulsion System Roadmap

General Comments Roadmap is comprehensive and appears to represent the interests of most stakeholders US leadership in space is not mentioned in the draft Apparent need for variety of launch systems provides opportunity for international cooperation Impact of space assembly and operations, human-rated systems Systems and technologies need to be optimized and down- selected - may have economic and political consequences Continued support of selected mature systems and more sustained investment in future technologies is sensible Maintaining skilled workforce and inspiring and developing new scientists and engineers should be primary Reliability and Affordability aspects should be done by commercial sector with NASA oversight

Propulsion System Developments Solid and liquid systems are proposed Liquid HC, methane, hydrogen engines are proposed – why not develop international partnerships for expander cycle and methane engines? Large lifter appears to be unique to NASA’s needs - Is it necessary? Green propellants, high-energy density hydrocarbons, densified cryos have limited payback Serving broad range of interests can compromise main mission

Liquid Rocket Propulsion System Technology Investments

8 Engines – Boosters and Upper Stages Hydrogen, RP, and Methane-Fueled

Liquid Rocket Propulsion System Technology Investments Aare What needs to be done? Manufacturing & Materials represent 19/26 of the “Major Challenges”

Liquid Rocket Propulsion System Technology Investments Answer is to test, test, test

Research Needs for Rocket Engines – Survey Questions What cycles should we be working on Technology areas needing fundamental results What are the research needs Objectives of the fundamental studies Any Relative Comments 2010 JPC Panel on Liquid Propulsion

Broad Research Areas Mission Dependent Optimization of Engine Cycles System Level Models –Engines and test facilities –Efficient use of variable-fidelity tools Materials, Fabrication, and Joining Processes –Productive source of incremental improvements –Coatings and material systems –Thermo-mechanical strain-resistant materials Life Prediction and Measurement –Local, time-dependent environments –Strain-life models Turbomachinery –Cavitation, engine transients, and off-design margins Thrust Chambers and Propellants

Survey Results Cycles –Heavy-lift HC-fueled engines, LOX-methane, combined cycle Research Objectives –Fundamental experiments & detailed modeling of combustion instability, throttling, ignition, & transients –Benchmarking: high-fidelity simulations and high-fidelity measurements/experiments with well-known BC’s –Management and analysis of huge data sets –Properties and processes of mixtures at supercritical conditions –Life, reliability, and cost –Atomization modeling –Careful scale-up to multiple-element environments –Development and validation of robust CFD codes for design –Thermal degradation of HC fuels –Higher-energy, less-toxic mono/bipropellants –Material treatments

Additional Comments Sustained basic research program that supports long-term goals is critical Many phenomena are specific to the type of injector, cycle, and propellants that are used Application of high-fidelity simulations to rocket combustors is years away Educational opportunities need to be increased, esp for flight experiences Number of PhD’s entering industry and government should increase

Closing Comments Roadmap needs to be better focused

Closing Comments Roadmap needs to be focused Objective and rigorous study on launch needs is necessary to define optimized launch architecture and select launch propulsion systems

Closing Comments Roadmap needs to be focused Objective and rigorous study on launch needs is necessary to define optimized launch architecture and select launch propulsion systems Development and implementation of heritage launch systems should be left to industry, NASA should continue to support foundational engineering for these systems

Closing Comments Roadmap needs to be focused Objective and rigorous study on launch needs is necessary to define optimized launch architecture and select launch propulsion systems Development and implementation of heritage launch systems should be left to industry, NASA should continue to support foundational engineering for these systems Development of new systems (60K expander cycle, methane engine, heavy lifter) should be conducted with international partners

Closing Comments Roadmap needs to be focused Objective and rigorous study on launch needs is necessary to define optimized launch architecture and select launch propulsion systems Development and implementation of heritage launch systems should be left to industry, NASA should continue to support foundational engineering for these systems Development of new systems (60K expander cycle, methane engine, heavy lifter) should be conducted with international partners Launch manifest does not support development of highly reusable system, or investment in propellant technologies

Closing Comments Roadmap needs to be focused Objective and rigorous study on launch needs is necessary to define optimized launch architecture and select launch propulsion systems Development and implementation of heritage launch systems should be left to industry, NASA should continue to support foundational engineering for these systems Development of new systems (60K expander cycle, methane engine, heavy lifter) should be conducted with international partners Launch manifest does not support development of highly reusable system, or investment in propellant technologies Strong and visible focus on advanced systems is necessary – combined cycle, ground- and air-launched – but they need to be down-selected also

Number of Graduate Students Majoring in Propulsion in the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Graduate Student Placement MLPW Florida TPAcademia JSAurora Flight Sciences NP??? NNAcademia MDSpaceX YYBlue Origin TMPW Rocketdyne KMSpaceX EBAerospace Corp CJBlue Origin JWPW Rocketdyne PHRedstone RSBlue Origin KLSpaceX LDVentions DHBlue Origin LOWoods Hole SRBlue Origin