VISIBILITY ANALYSIS RECOMMENDATIONS FEDERAL LAND MANAGERS’ AIR QUALITY RELATED VALUES WORKGROUP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prioritized Sites for Amphipod TIE Study Identify 12 potentially toxic inter-tidal sites Sample four sites at a time to find two suitable sites for amphipod.
Advertisements

1 NC-DAQ Educational Opportunities Series 18 March 2015 Regional Haze Discussions and Issues in North Carolina.
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
Clean Air Corridor Section 309 Requirements Presentation to WRAP Board July 24, 2002.
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
1 Cumulative Impact Management: A Framework for Northeast BC Presentation of Research Results Science and Community Environmental Knowledge Fund Presented.
© Nancy E. Mayo 2004 Sample Size Estimations Demystifying Sample Size Calculations Graphics contributed by Dr. Gillian Bartlett.
Regional Haze Rule Guidance: Tracking Progress & Natural Levels Overview of the concepts currently envisioned by EPA working groups by Marc Pitchford;
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
© 2004 Zephyr Environmental Corporation Air Quality Impacts Analysis Presented to: American Public Power Association APPA New Generation Meeting: Anticipating.
PM Model Performance Goals and Criteria James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling Meeting Denver, CO May 26,
1 WRAP Fire Tracking Systems Draft Intent of WRAP FTS Policy – Assist states/tribes to address emissions inventory and tracking associated with fire in.
1 WRAP Policy Fire Tracking Systems Draft December 9, 2002 FEJF Meeting December 10-11, 2002 Jackson, WY.
1 Regional NEPA Analysis of NOx Emissions from Potential Oil & Gas Development Scott F. Archer USDI - Bureau of Land Management March.
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Regional Haze Rule Best Available Retrofit Technology Government to Government Consultation Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.
Components of Curriculum. is a working document that identifies:  what students need to know,  what students need to be able to do, and  how students.
Update on IMPROVE Light Extinction Equation and Natural Conditions Estimates Tom Moore, WRAP Technical Coordinator May 23, 2006.
Regional Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Goals I.Overview II.Complications III.Simplifying Approaches Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Reasonable.
Brief Description of CALPUFF Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Options for Estimating Natural Background Visibility in the VISTAS Region Ivar Tombach with benefit of material prepared by Jim Boylan and Daniel Jacob.
BART Guideline Overview WESTAR August 31, 2005 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Todd Hawes
REGIONAL HAZE BART – Key Issues For Consideration Eric Massey, Arizona DEQ Lee Alter, WGA SSJF Meeting June 3, 2004 Denver, Colorado.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Regulatory Requirements For Modeling. Air Quality Model Estimates Developing Air Pollution Control Plans Assessment of Environmental Impacts Projecting.
Proposed Reasonable Progress Rule Workshop Brief Background and Procedure Public Workshop June 14, 2007.
The National Environmental Policy Act and Oil and Gas Development in Region 8 WESTAR Oil and Gas Conference October 22, 2008.
FLAG, Policy Overview 15 December 1999 Presenter - Bruce Bayle USDA/Forest Service.
AoH Conference Call October 8, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Cristina Gonzalez-Maddux ITEP MODEL INPUTS AND FEDERAL GUIDANCE CRISTINA GONZALEZ-MADDUX ITEP, RESEARCH SPECIALIST.
FLMs, PSD Increment, and AQRVs: the Oregon experience WESTAR Fall Technical Conference Seattle September 2003 Philip Allen, Oregon DEQ.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference on PSD Increment Tracking & Cumulative Effects Modeling Seattle, Washington Conducting Class I Area Increment Analyses.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
1 Conducting Reasonable Progress Determinations under the Regional Haze Rule Kathy Kaufman EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards January 11,
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
IMPROVE Algorithm for Estimating Light Extinction Draft Recommendations to the IMPROVE Steering Committee.
Class I Air Quality Related Values Kevin J. Finto Hunton & Williams APPA Energy and Air Quality Task Force Washington, D.C. March 10, 2005.
Summary of June 15, 2005 Revisions to RH BART and BART Guidelines.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
How Tribes Use Models Part 1 Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference Introduction to Class I Area Impact Analyses September 16, 2003 John Bunyak National Park Service.
Source: Javier Fochesatto Regulatory Context for Modeling Robert Elleman EPA Region 10.
Lecture 6 Title: Project Cost Management MIS 434.
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
Senate Bill 288- Limits Changes to Air Districts’ New Source Review Rules Beverly Werner, Manager Stationary Source Division California Air Resources Board.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
Comparisons of CALPUFF and AERMOD for Vermont Applications Examining differing model performance for a 76 meter and 12 meter (stub) stack with emission.
Sustainable Fisheries Goal Implementation Team Executive Committee Meeting March, 26 th 2012.
EPA Region 10 Cumulative Effects Analysis Methodology Development Rob Wilson and Herman Wong WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 16, 2003.
Types of Models Marti Blad PhD PE
Environmental Laws.
EPA Air Policy Priorities
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
WESTAR Increment Recommendations
Draft Modeling Protocol for PM2.5
Registrations.
Major New Source Review (NSR) Part 2
Boiler Sheltered Initiative
Tom Moore (WESTAR and WRAP) and Pat Brewer (NPS ARD)
John Bunyak National Park Service
IMPROVE Data Processing
Air Resource Specialists, Inc. July 23, 2004
Status Report: “Significant Impact” from Mobile Sources and Road Dust
RA BART Overview Deb Wolfe 8/9/2019.
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation
EPA’s Roadmap for the Second Planning Period
Presentation transcript:

VISIBILITY ANALYSIS RECOMMENDATIONS FEDERAL LAND MANAGERS’ AIR QUALITY RELATED VALUES WORKGROUP

“…methods for analyzing the impacts on visibility from new or modified air pollution sources.”

REGULATORY BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION National Goal (Clean Air Act Section 169A) –Sets goal as no manmade impairment Definition of Visibility Impairment (40 CFR § (x)) –Sets natural conditions as the benchmark

COMPONENTS OF THE RECOMMENDATION Analysis Methodology (including a prescriptive outline) Class I Area Specific Information Identifies Thresholds –levels of concern –analysis thresholds –decision thresholds Sample Application

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE New Sources (PSD and those subject to new source review) should not, by themselves, significantly impede progress toward the national visibility goal

METHODOLOGY PROTOCOLS Discrete Plumes (Near Field) –Sources within 50 km of the Class I Area –Visibility parameters contrast color difference (delta E) –Natural conditions as benchmark –VISCREEN, PLUVUE II

PROTOCOLS (CONTINUED) Aggregates of Discrete Plumes (Distant/multi-source) –Multiple Sources or Greater than 50 km from Class I Area –Visibility parameter Extinction –Natural Conditions as Benchmark –CALPUFF

PROTOCOLS (CONTINUED) Cumulative Analyses of all new source growth Required under Some Conditions

LEVELS OF CONCERN Near Field –Screening |C|>=0.05 delta E >= 2 –Refined |C| >= 0.02 delta E >= 1 Distant/Multi-source –delta b ext >=10% –10%  delta b ext >=5% requires further analysis

ANALYSIS THRESHOLDS de minimis threshold for further analyses –0.4% change in extinction (single source) threshold for need for cumulative analyses –5% change in extinction (single source) –if a cumulative analyses has already been done

DECISION THRESHOLDS Near field –Screening |C|< 0.05 delta E < 2 –Refined |C|< 0.02 delta E < 1 Distant/Multi-source –single source (S.S) < 0.4% –cumulative delta b ext >= 10% but S.S. delta b ext < 0.4%

SPECIFIC CLASS I AREA INFORMATION Estimates of Natural Conditions –NAPAP East/West Estimates for Aerosol By species Non-hygroscopic components Hygroscopic components –Extinction calculation algorithm –Rayleigh extinction –Site specific or interpolated relative humidity adjustment factors