1 SCA Cell Utilizing Scheme The output of each preamp-shaper channel is sampled continuously at 20 MHz and stored the SCA cells. There are 96 cells for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CPT Week, Nov 2003, B. Paul Padley, Rice University1 CSC Trigger Status, MPC and Sorter B. Paul Padley Rice University November 2003.
Advertisements

Improvements to ME1/1 TMB Algorithm from Simulation Studies US CMS EMU Workshop Vadim Khotilovich, Texas A&M University.
O. Buchmueller, Imperial College, W. Smith, U. Wisconsin, UPO Meeting, July 6, 2012 Trigger Performance and Strategy Working Group Trigger Performance.
US Beam Test Results and ORCA validation for CMS EMU CSC front-end electronics N. Terentiev Carnegie Mellon University CMS EMU Meeting, CERN June 18, 2005.
TMB and RAT Status Report Endcap Muon OSU April 16, 2004 Yangheng Zheng University of California, Los Angeles  TMB Status  RAT Status.
CSC Muon Trigger September 16, 2003 CMS Annual Review 1 Current Status of CSC Trigger Elements – Quick Summary Jay Hauser, with many slides from Darin.
CSC Synchronization Procedure and Plans CMS Endcap Muon FNAL October 29, 2004 Jay Hauser* / Martin Von der Mey / Yangheng Zheng University of.
Endcap Muon meeting: CMU, Oct 19, 2003 J. Hauser UCLA 1 CSC Trigger Primitives Test Beam Studies Main Test Beam 2003 Goals: Verify the peripheral crate.
6 June 2002UK/HCAL common issues1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: UK commitments Trigger issues DAQ issues Readout electronics issues Many more.
Digital CFEB Prototype Plans 1 B. Bylsma, CSC Upgrade Workshop, Ohio State Univ., April 23-24, 2010 Ben Bylsma The Ohio State University.
S. Durkin, USCMS-EMU Meeting, Oct. 21, 2005 Critical Data Errors S. Durkin The Ohio State University USCMS EMU Meeting, FNAL, Oct. 20, 2005.
CSC Trigger Report: Results from June 25 ns beam test Production plans Software Darin Acosta University of Florida.
An Asynchronous Level-1 Tracking Trigger for Future LHC Detector Upgrades A. Madorsky, D. Acosta University of Florida/Physics, POB , Gainesville,
Alexei Safonov (Texas A&M University) For the EMU community.
NSW background studies Max Bellomo, Nektarios Benekos, Niels van Eldik, Andrew Haas, Peter Kluit, Jochen Meyer, Felix Rauscher 1.
EMU DAQ MotherBoard Jianhui Gu The Ohio State University ESR, CERN, November 2003.
CMS EMU CSC Upgrade Digital CFEB B. Bylsma, CMS Upgrade Workshop, FNAL, Nov. 8, Ben Bylsma The Ohio State University.
Status of the CSC Track-Finder Darin Acosta University of Florida.
Track-Finder Trigger at the Beam Test Results and Features Darin Acosta, Rick Cavanaugh, Victor Golovtsov, Lindsey Gray, Khristian Kotov, Alex Madorsky,
CSC Endcap Muon Port Card and Muon Sorter Upgrade Status May 2013.
CPT Week, April 2001Darin Acosta1 Status of the Next Generation CSC Track-Finder D.Acosta University of Florida.
Test Beam Wrap-Up Darin Acosta. Darin Acosta, University of Florida 18 June 2004 USCMS Meeting 2 Agenda n Darin/UF: General recap of runs taken, tests.
Upgrade of the CSC Endcap Muon Port Card Mikhail Matveev Rice University 1 November 2011.
DAQMB Production Status S. Durkin The Ohio State University Florida EMU Meeting 2004.
1.2 EMU Electronics L.S. Durkin CMS Review CERN, September 2003.
Draft of talk to be given in Madrid: CSC Operations Summary Greg Rakness University of California, Los Angeles CMS Run Coordination Workshop CIEMAT, Madrid.
NUMI Off Axis NUMI Off Axis Workshop Workshop Argonne Meeting Electronics for RPCs Gary Drake, Charlie Nelson Apr. 25, 2003 p. 1.
A Study of Proton-Proton Collisions at the LHC The Ohio State University - Task A.2 B.G. Bylsma, L.S. Durkin, D. Fisher, J Gilmore, J.H. Gu, D. Larson,
Digital CFEB (an Update) B. Bylsma, EMU at CMS Week, March 16, Ben Bylsma The Ohio State University.
UCLA meeting, 2012 Hauser1 Since last week Technical Coordination workshop Gave talk on CSC upgrades New 2013 timeline – ME4/2 seems okay, ME1/1 is tight,
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, B.Paul Padley, Rice University1 CSC Muon Trigger On Detector Components B. Paul Padley Rice University June, 2002.
Track-Finder Test Beam Results Darin Acosta. Darin Acosta, University of Florida 30 July 2004 Trigger Meeting CSC Beam Test (Muon Slice Test) ME.
DAQMB Status – Onward to Production! S. Durkin, J. Gu, B. Bylsma, J. Gilmore,T.Y. Ling DAQ Motherboard (DMB) Initiates FE digitization and readout Receives.
10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.1 Experience with Trigger Electronics for the CSC System of CMS J. Hauser*, E. Boyd, R. Cousins,
Electronics Review, May 2001Darin Acosta1 OPTICAL SP 1 Muon Sorter 3  / port card 3  / sector ME1 ME2-ME3 ME4 SR DT TF SP From CSC Port Cards MS MB1.
Upgrade of the CSC Endcap Muon Port Card with Spartan-6 FPGA Mikhail Matveev Rice University 30 April 2012.
1J. Gu CERN CSC Meeting July 2008 DAQMB/FEBs Readiness for First Beam Jianui Gu The Ohio State University.
Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 1 A Digital Pipelined Cathode Front End Board (DCFEB) Stan Durkin The Ohio State University.
Effects of Endcap Staging/Descoping D.Acosta University of Florida.
GMM, 05-Jul-2015 Jay Hauser Another look at CSC ME3/1, ME4/1 descoping 1  Recall descoping scenarios for 235 and 200 MChF:  Tiziano:
August 24, 2011IDAP Kick-off meeting - TileCal ATLAS TileCal Upgrade LHC and ATLAS current status LHC designed for cm -2 s 7+7 TeV Limited to.
CMS Week, 3-7 November CSC Trigger Test Beam Report Cast of many.
6 April 2007G. Rakness (UCLA) 1 CSC runs at minus side slice test 27 Mar – 5 Apr Color scheme: Successes Problems/questions Greg Rakness University.
The Ohio State University
SCT readout limitation estimate with data
CSC Synchronization Procedure and Plans
Phase 2 Muon Electronics
CSC EMU Muon Port Card (MPC)
University of California Los Angeles
“Golden” Local Run: Trigger rate = 28Hz
Trigger, DAQ, & Online: Perspectives on Electronics
CMS EMU TRIGGER ELECTRONICS
Issues with Simulating High Luminosities in ATLAS
University of California Los Angeles
University of California Los Angeles
Current Status of CSC Trigger Elements – Quick Summary
CSC Trigger Update Specific issues:
Darin Acosta University of Florida
VELO readout On detector electronics Off detector electronics to DAQ
September CSC Beam Test Report
CSC Trigger Primitives Test Beam Studies
TPC electronics Atsushi Taketani
University of California Los Angeles
August 19th 2013 Alexandre Camsonne
SLHC CSC Electronics Upgrade Spearheaded by OSU CMS Group
BUCKEYE has internal shift register which controls calibration
The Ohio State University USCMS EMU Meeting, FNAL, Oct. 29, 2004
Global Trigger Finds Correct BX
FED Design and EMU-to-DAQ Test
Plans for the 2004 CSC Beam Test
Presentation transcript:

1 SCA Cell Utilizing Scheme The output of each preamp-shaper channel is sampled continuously at 20 MHz and stored the SCA cells. There are 96 cells for each SCA channel. They are used as 12 blocks of 8 cells each. The blocks to be used in the sampling are kept in a (constantly updating) pool of free blocks. At any time, 2 blocks (16 cells) are taken from this pool to capture 8 useful voltage samples. They are put back into the pool when one of the following condition is satisfied. –No LCT trigger is found 800 ns later. –There is an LCT trigger, but there is no L1 accept  s later. –L1-LCT match found and digitization completed 26  s later.

2 LHC Rate Assumptions L1 accept: 100 kHz LCT rate: 69 kHz per CFEB (worst case – ME1/1) Estimated LCT rate for 10**34 lumi (D. Acosta et al, 2001) Chamber Type LCT rate per CFEB (kHz) ME1/1 69 ME1/2 4 ME1/3 2 ME2/1 21 ME2/2 3 ME3/1 11 ME3/2 2 ME4/1 8 ME4/2 9 L1-LCT coincidence rate per CFEB: 100 kHz x 70 kHz x 75 ns = 0.5 kH Digitization time (with 6 ADCs on each CFEB) 16 channels x 16 samples/channel x 100 ns = 26  s

3 Effective Buffer Size of SCA at LHC Average number of LCT’s during 2.2  s (=3  s-0.8  s) holding time for 2-blocks:  =2.2x10 -6 x70x10 3 =0.15 Average number of L1-LCT matches during 26  s digitization time:  =26x10 -6 x0.5x10 3 =0.013 Probability of overwriting SCA: 6.1x10 -10

4 Effective Buffer Size of SCA at SLHC At SLHC: use same L1 accept rate, exclude ME1/1, assuming rates go up linearly. Maximum LCT rate is 200 kHz (excluding ME1/1), L1-LCT match rate is 1.5 kHz. Average number of LCTs during 2.2  s (=3  s-0.8  s) holding time for 2-blocks:  =2.2x10 -6 x200x10 3 =0.44 Average number of L1-LCT matches during 26  s digitization time:  =26x10 -6 x1.5x10 3 =0.04 Probability of overwriting SCA: 9.3x10 -6

LHC SLHC Test Beam LCTL1A Rate (KHz) LCT Rate (KHz) SCA Overflow Probability 2 GigHz Fiber Limit

6 SCA Overflow Probability L1A-LCT time (  sec) SLHC Nominal LCT 200 KHz L1ALCT 2 KHz SCA Overflow versus L1A Latency

7 CSC FE Electronics Issues at SLHC Radiation (Probably OK) - present electronics tested to 3x(safety factor) 10 LHC years - SEU resets at LHC ~20 minutes -> 2 minutes at SLHC 25 nsec -> 12 nsec Crossing Time (OK Firmware Change) - no problems anticipated Data Flow (OK if LCT scales linearly) - we have seen no SCA overflows at 5X LHC rates - SCA rate calculations show CFEB can take even higher rates - SCA rates sensitive to LCT and L1A Latency - DAQMB has buffer overruns at ~15X LHC rates CFEB/DAQMB - cathode dominates data volume Viability of CFEB and DAQMB designs depend solely on LCT and L1A rates and latency.

8 Peripheral Crate 2 DMB, 2 TMB 1 CCB, 1 MPC FED crate 1 DDU PC TTC crate DAQ Data Trigger primitives S1 S2 S3 beam Track finder Crate TRIDAS Rate Capabilites of Present System 2003 Time Structured Beam Test Nominal LHC Rate/Chamber excluding ME1/1 and ME1/A 200 kHz LCT 2 kHz L1ALCT CPT Week: Nov. 6, 2003 J. Mumford We ran 100 kHz pion LCTs into 1 CFEB (5x LHC) 1 kHz LCTL1A (LHC) 16 time samples no problem 8 time samples no problem 10 kHz LCTL1A (10xLHC)16 time samples buffer overrun 8 time samples no problem Note: Buffer overwrites were on DAQMB. No overflow of SCAs was observed. SCA buffer calculations agree with results.

9 Paul, The usage of capacitors in the SCA has two bottlenecks. The first is a pipeline, while the second is a classic queuing problem. To solve probabilities correctly one should run a MonteCarlo, but here is a simplified back of the envelope calculation. There are 12 blocks of 8 capacitors in the firmware algorithm. Four are in use at anytime, though theoretically we can use all of the blocks. After the beam crossing the four blocks are shifted through until an LCT arrives (~800 nsec). Pipeline: When an LCT arrives two blocks are stored for a period of time T=L1A(time)-LCT(time)=~2usec. Since multiple sets of two blocks can be in the pipeline probabilities are given by a poissonian pdf with: mu=Rate*T ps0=poissonian(mu,0) ps1=poissonian(mu,1)... ps6=poissonian(mu,6) Queue: When the L1A arrives events with a correlated LCT will be digitized. In terms of queing theory our rate of arrival is the LCT*L1A rate of 1kHz. It takes approximately 25 usec to process the two blocks. (for queuing theory equations see rho=Rate*T=1.e3*25e-6=0.025 P0=1/(1+rho+rho**2+...) P1=rho*P0 P2=rho**2*p0... P6=rho**6*p0 Since the pipeline and queue are uncorrelated one would expect the probability of have more than 6 sets of 2 blocks occupied is: Prob:=1-ps0*(p0+p1+p2+p3+p4+p5+p6)-ps1*(p0+p1+p2+p3+p4+p5)- ps2*(p0+p1+p2+p3+p4)-...-ps6*p0 I will point you to slides monday. Cheers, Stan