Learning Gains, Student Attitudes, and impacts on LA’s in Phys 1110 (Sp ‘03) S. Pollock With NSF/STEM-TP support.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Physics Large-Course Redesign Project Introductory-level Algebra-based and Calculus-based Physics I and Physics II Courses PHYS 1101, PHYS 1102 Serve Pre-Med/Health.
Advertisements

College Algebra Course Redesign Southeast Missouri State University.
Improving on the Recitation Section: Tutorials in Introductory Physics Wed Brown Bag SJP Fa '05.
Methodology Student Course Performance with Objectives Based Assessment Todd A Zimmerman, Gabriel Hanna - University of Wisconsin-Stout Question: Does.
“And that means looking for some of the best models out there. There are community colleges like Tennessee's Cleveland State that are redesigning remedial.
When Top Down Meets Bottom Up: Supporting Educational Transformation in a Physics Department Steven Pollock, Noah Finkelstein, Katherine Perkins, Stephanie.
POGIL vs Traditional Lecture in Organic I Gary D. Anderson Department of Chemistry Marshall University Huntington, WV.
Blended classes are an exciting way to learn. Their convenience and scheduling appeals to many students, but they are not for everyone. Students drop-out.
Redesign of PSYC 1101 into a 50% Online (Hybrid) Course Sue Spaulding, UNC Charlotte Pearson Education March 9, 2012 Boston Office.
Building on a Base: tools, practices, and implications from physics education research (PER) S.J. Pollock N.D. Finkelstein Physics Department Thanks for.
Tracking Transformed Courses: Impacts of Tutorials, Instructor, Text, … SJP Summer '05.
Examining the Gender Gap in Introductory Physics Lauren Kost Steven Pollock, Noah Finkelstein Department of Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder.
How do we evaluate how effective we are in helping our students master course material? In promoting our broader educational agendas? -Prelim and final.
SEAS Acad Mtg – 8/26/03Prof. Frank Sciulli Introduction - Physics SEAS Academic Meeting l Intro: Frank Sciulli – Professor in the Physics Dept. u Lecturing.
1. Introduction Fundamental English Writing Skills Dr. Hsin-Hsin Cindy Lee.
School For Health Studies Blended Learning Top Ten Tips: Designing a Blended Learning Course.
Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Physics 121. Tuesday, March 4, 2008.
Why should we change how we teach physics? Derek Muller & Manju Sharma Sydney University Physics Education Research (SUPER)
Gender Differences in Students' Perceived Experiences in Introductory Physics Lauren Kost Steven Pollock, Noah Finkelstein Department of Physics University.
Institute for innovation and development of learning process
EVIDENCE BASED WRITING LEARN HOW TO WRITE A DETAILED RESPONSE TO A CONSTRUCTIVE RESPONSE QUESTION!! 5 th Grade ReadingMs. Nelson EDU 643Instructional.
Physics I MOOC – Educational Outcomes David Lieberman*, Michael Dubson ¶, Katherine Goodman ¶, Ed Johnsen ¶, Jack Olsen ¶ and Noah Finkelstein ¶ * Department.
 Do non-majors learn genetics at a different rate than majors?  What factors affect how students think about and learn difficult genetics concepts? Jenny.
Parental Involvement & Teacher Communication Inna Shenker Spring 2011 Mid-term.
ANGELA SHORT SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND HUMANITIES KEVIN STARRS, SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING(RETIRED!) Designing and Delivering an online module.
Can MOOCs Reduce Teaching Costs and Provide High Quality Undergraduate Education? High School Students Undergraduate Education Careers, Employment Uday.
AFT 7/12/04 Marywood University Using Data for Decision Support and Planning.
Operation STEM Cleveland State University February 22, 2014.
Bruce White Ruth Geer University of South Australia.
Glen Hatton Introduction to Financial Accounting TURNING THE ACCOUNTING CLASSROOM UPSIDE DOWN Randy Hoffma n Introduction to Managerial Accounting PHASE.
Prof. Matthew Hertz WTC 207D /
Undergraduate Survey for Math Dialogue March 2010 Transition from High School to University Technology in High School Math Classes Resources for Undergraduates.
Adventures in flipping a cell biology course Dr. Katie Shannon Biological Sciences Missouri S&T Flipped Fridays.
1 Physics 1110: Mechanics Tutorial pretest due at 4pm today Tutorials tomorrow in G2B60, G2B75, & G2B77 Web page:
Using Discipline Specific Action Research to Inform Curriculum Development & Classroom Practice A Case Study: Workshop Physics.
A Comprehensive Cognitive Approach to Science Teacher Training Physics and Chemistry Cyrill Slezak Hillsdale College.
Research Problem In one sentence, describe the problem that is the focus of your classroom research project about student learning: Biology undergraduates.
Assessing multiple research-based transformations in second semester physics. Steven J. Pollock University of Colorado at Boulder ( per.colorado.edu) We.
Curriculum Design & Review Process CDRP in Science.
Philip W. Young Dept. of Chemistry & Engineering Physics, University of Wisconsin-Platteville, Platteville, WI Correlation between FCI Gains and.
Physics Concept Surveys TDSB physics team May 28, 2004.
Choice and Application of Keypads to Small Classes Paul Williams Department of Physics Austin Community College Austin, Texas
Will it work for us? Dan Clune IT596 Spring 2005.
Research Problem First year students experience of their first semester of General Chemistry as a significant hurdle in their successful progression through.
Boiler Gold Rush. How to Succeed in Math Course Coordinators: MA 15910, Introduction to Calculus (AG only)....Charlotte Bailey MA 15800, Precalculus…………………………………….David.
Research Problem Across the Undergrad Science curriculum some concepts are consistently hard to acquire despite repeated exposure and appear to have a.
Final Report. WST 100 and WST 300 Large introductory course traditionally serving up to 2400 students a year in 18 sections With redesign we are able.
SoTL Institute Presentation Samantha Elliott Kerry July 18, 2008.
Click to add title A Busy Professor’s Guide to Sanely Flipping Your Classroom Dr. Cynthia Furse Electrical & Computer Engineering.
Patrik Hultberg Kalamazoo College
Physics Education Research at CU S.J. Pollock SPS Fall 05 or why do I keep filling out those online surveys at the start of every course?
Introductory Physics Course Reform at UA – Current Status and Lessons Learned J.W. Harrell and Stan Jones Department of Physics & Astronomy University.
Use of Pre-Instruction Tests to Predict Student Course Performance David E. Meltzer Arizona State University Supported in part by NSF DUE #
There is a small but significant difference in course grades and final exam scores for males & females Consistent with Tai & Sadler (2001): males perform.
Proficiency Based Physics Brooke Schmidt and Eric Hawker Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy.
Girls and Physics Chris Meyer York Mills C. I.
Economics 175 American Economic History
Developing a Survey Instrument to Improve Students’ Learning
Rachel Glazener, Assistant Professor Natural and Behavioral Sciences
Hybrid Mathematics 140 Course (INTRODUCTORY STATISTICS) using Carnegie Mellon’s Open Learning Initiative.
The purposes of grading student work
Gender Differences in both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance Jennifer Docktor, Kenneth Heller, + UM PER Group University.
Gender Differences in both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance Jennifer Docktor, Kenneth Heller, + UM PER Group University.
SP10/ WK-1 Ala Ike School Weekly Bulletin.
Mrs. Spelhaug Iowa Core Geometry
Lecture Demonstrations and the Force Concept Inventory
How to Teach TEXAS Style
Welcome to Physics 1D03 !.
Welcome to Mrs. Stuart’s Math 8 Class
Choice and Application of Keypads to Small Classes
Presentation transcript:

Learning Gains, Student Attitudes, and impacts on LA’s in Phys 1110 (Sp ‘03) S. Pollock With NSF/STEM-TP support

Class structure/reforms Conceptual emphasis: clickers in lecture Tutorials: based on U Wash materials, with use of LA’S (Average attendance: 85%) (Modest) explicit attention to “the hidden curriculum”: thinking about thinking reality link coherence “Propaganda”: the value of collaboration, discussion.

Role/training of LA’s LA/TA training: Mon 5-6:30 every week Roles: cover 3 (50 min) tutorials/wk Partner with TA, but no recitation grading 1-2 help room hours/week Help grade 1-2 midterms (long answer q’s)

Data Collection FCI pre/post tutorial pre/post [clicker and exam] Detailed grade information Regular student online surveys SALG survey In class anonymous surveys VASS/CLASS pre/post (Wendy Adams) Danielle Harlow’s observations LA/TA self reflections Students LA’s

Force Concept Inventory (FCI) Phys 1110 Fa ‘03 R. Hake, ”…A six-thousand-student survey…” AJP 66, (‘98).

Force Concept Inventory (FCI) Phys 1110 Fa ‘03 R. Hake, ”…A six-thousand-student survey…” AJP 66, (‘98).

FCI gains N=394 (of 562) Average =.62 Median =.67

Phys 1110 Fa ‘03 pre-post Average pretest: 53% (N=507) Average posttest: 81% (N=445) 352 had post ≥ 70%

CLASS results

Correlation of course grade (not including tutorial hw) to tut hw Skip more corr’s.

Correlate clicker with grade Average class attendance: 80%

Correlate class attend with grade

Correlation of fci gain to tut hw

Attitude about tutorial Online midterm. N=464 (of 562) PosNeg Tut. useful5721 Like tut.2144 Groups useful728 Like groups5914 Anonymous question end of semester N= Online question end of semester, N= % “Neg all along” 8.7%“more neg in the end” 15.8% “positive all along” 54.2% “more pos in the end” 11 SALG end of sem, N=250 10

Learning value of class activities

Learning value of resources

Value of individ support

Perceived gains Skip gains

Feelings... End of semester anonymous survey

Learning gains on tutorial topics (prelim!) Topic Pre (%) Post (click) gPost (exam/ final) g 1d accel (a at top ) (accel constant) / d accel Direction (circ/ curve) Magnitude

Learning gains on tutorial topics-ii Topic Pre (%) Post (click) gPost (exam/ final) g Newton Free body diag. Hard, rel motion N-III / / Relative motion* (speed up in diff frames) * This topic was not covered in lecture or reading.

Learning gains on tutorial topics-iii Topic Pre (%) Post (click) gPost (exam/ final) g Newton II extended body9-2033* Conserve p Collision/cons One object very massive (74 silent).7.9 (.7) * This is consistent, actually higher, than UW has measured. They've since modified this tutorial.

Gender differences Women (25%): self reported hours/week 5.5 Men (75%): self reported hours/week 4.6

Other effects TA/LA: None on grade, or FCI gain Possible (slight) impact on attitude about tutorials. Room: None on grade, or FCI gain Possible (slight) impact on attitude about tutorials. (appears to be independent of TA) LA comments

Some (high) correlations.91: my predicted grade after 2nd midterm with final grade.75: long answer exam q’s with multiple choice exam q’s.67: CAPA homework with tutorial hw.46: self-reported calculus grade with course grade.59: course grade with tutorial attendance.40: their prediction of 1st exam score with 1st exam score

Research questions Impacts of modified instruction Clickers/peer instruction Tutorials Other: Thinkwell (video text) Use of LA’s Help Room… on: (Measurable) learning gains Affect/attitudes of students Pedagogical content knowledge of LA’s

LA comments: LA 1) "The tutorial setup was a great experience... I will be taking everything I've learned in this class with me for my future career as a teacher” LA 2) "After teaching for a semester, I am very committed to teaching again at some point in my life. I am enrolling in the School of Ed, and I plan on teaching after graduating... I had never learned physics in any way resembling the tutorials, but now I will definitely try to model parts of my classrooms around cooperative learning".

more LA comments LA 3) "As a result [of being an LA] my views on a career in teaching have changed. I have decided to become a high school physics teacher... I have learned so much about physics, teaching, learning, education, and collaborative learning from being [an LA]" LA 4) "This experience of teaching tutorials has shown me different styles of learning, and allowed me to begin the process of understanding and helping all types of students. But the most valuable thing I have gained was the heads up to the fact that a good teacher will only come with time, and practice does make perfect".

Still to come: Relation of CLASS data to learning gains (and tutorial attitude?) More detailed pre/post results on variety of topics Comparison of pre/post with UW students (?) LA development: impacts on them (Danielle) Early predictors of success/failure (Pat) What else? (There’s a lot of micro-data here!!)