Study of Direct Photon Pair Production in Hadronic Collisions at √s=14 TeV (Preliminary Results) Sushil Singh Chauhan Department of Physics & Astrophysics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Work done in collaboration with Stefano Frixione 1 Leonardo Bertora, 2004 April 14 Jet and Di-jet production in Photon–Photon collisions Leonardo Bertora.
Advertisements

 gg→H for different MCs: uncertainties due to jet veto G. Davatz, ETH Zurich.
Jet Physics at the Tevatron Sally Seidel University of New Mexico XXXVII Rencontres de Moriond For the CDF and D0 Collaborations.
A Comparison of Three-jet Events in p Collisions to Predictions from a NLO QCD Calculation Sally Seidel QCD’04 July 2004.
Cold nuclear matter effects on dilepton and photon production Zhong-Bo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory Thermal Radiation Workshop RBRC, Brookhaven.
DIPHOX and RESBOS. Standard model diphoton spectrum not very well understood. Has been studied mostly at ‘low’ diphoton masses for Higgs background estimation.
In the R-parity violating SUSY model at hadron colliders 张仁友 中国科学技术大学.
Jets and QCD resummation Albrecht Kyrieleis. BFKL at NLO Gaps between Jets.
Working group C summary Hadronic final states theory Mrinal Dasgupta.
High E T Jet Physics at HERA José Repond Argonne National Laboratory On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Small-x Workshop, Fermilab, March 28-30,
Glauber shadowing at particle production in nucleus-nucleus collisions within the framework of pQCD. Alexey Svyatkovskiy scientific advisor: M.A.Braun.
PIC 2001 Michael Strauss The University of Oklahoma Recent Results on Jet Physics and  s XXI Physics in Collision Conference Seoul, Korea June 28, 2001.
Cambridge Workshop July 18, 2002 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Sources of b-Quarks at the Tevatron  Important to have good leading (or leading-log)
Olivier RavatLes Houches/June 3rd Higgs associated production at LHC : Thecase Olivier Ravat, Morgan Lethuillier IPN Lyon Les Houches 2003 : Physics.
Direct di-  Tevatron On behalf of the & Collaborations Liang HAN University of Science & Technology of China (USTC)
16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.
QCD at LHC with ATLAS Theodota Lagouri Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration) EPS July 2003, Aachen, Germany.
11/28/20151 QCD resummation in Higgs Boson Plus Jet Production Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Ref: Peng Sun, C.-P. Yuan, Feng Yuan, PRL.
Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.
QCD Physics with ATLAS Mike Seymour University of Manchester/CERN PH-TH ATLAS seminar January 25 th / February 22 nd 2005.
DIS Conference, Madison WI, 28 th April 2005Jeff Standage, York University Theoretical Motivations DIS Cross Sections and pQCD The Breit Frame Physics.
St. Andrews, Scotland August 22, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage Rick Field University of Florida Outline  Do we need a.
Jets and α S in DIS Maxime GOUZEVITCH Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet Ecole Polytechnique – CNRS/IN2P3, France On behalf of the collaboration On behalf of.
1 Correcting LO W  (Z  ) Cross Sections to NLO Al Goshaw Duke University December 1, 2010.
Some recent QCD results at the Tevatron N. B. Skachkov (JINR, Dubna)
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
CDF Paper Seminar Fermilab - March 11, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Sorry to be so slow!! Studying the “Underlying Event” at CDF CDF Run 2 “Leading.
Don LincolnExperimental QCD and W/Z+Jet Results 1 Recent Dijet Measurements at DØ Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for the DØ Collaboration.
ATLAS Higgs Search Strategy and Sources of Systematic Uncertainty Jae Yu For the ATLAS Collaboration 23 June, 2010.
Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.
QCD at the Tevatron M. Martínez IFAE-Barcelona Results from CDF & D0 Collaborations.
Heavy Particles & Hard Jets: from ttbar at the Tevatron to SUSY at the LHC Peter Skands (Fermilab) with T. Plehn (Edinburgh & MPI Munich), D. Rainwater.
Recent QCD Measurements at the Tevatron Mike Strauss The University of Oklahoma The Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics for the CDF and DØ Collaborations.
QCD Results from ATLAS and CMS Emanuela Barberis Northeastern University DPF2015, Ann Arbor MI, 4-8 August Hard process (2 or more partons) Soft.
ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, July 5, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 ICHEP 2012 Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run.
Physics at the LHC M. Guchait DHEP Annual Meeting 7-8 th April, 2016.
Inclusive jet photoproduction at HERA B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction & motivation QCD calculations and Monte.
Status of NLOjet++ for dijet angular distributions
QCD CORRECTIONS TO bb →h h
Energy Dependence of the UE
Measurement of SM V+gamma by ATLAS
Studies of prompt photon identification and 0 isolation in first p-p collisions at √s=10 TeV May 20, 2009 Meeting Frascati Raphaëlle Ichou.
Prompt Photons at ATLAS
Photon Cross Sections at Ecm=2TeV
Lecture 2 Evolution and resummation
Implications of First LHC Data: Underlying Event Measurements
Higher order  Generator Studies at 7 TeV
QCD at LHC with ATLAS Arthur M. Moraes University of Sheffield, UK
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Determination of g/g from Hermes High-pT hadrons
PHZ 6358 Fall 2011 The Modeling of the Underlying Event Rick Field
PHENIX measurement on direct photon production
Predicting MB & UE at the LHC
Di-jet production in gg collisions in OPAL
Hard Core Protons soft-physics at hadron colliders
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Kinematic Map in x,Q for CTEQ4
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Single Diffractive Higgs Production at the LHC *
The Tevatron Connection
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF and the LHC
Status of NLOjet++ for dijet angular distributions
The Next Stretch of the Higgs Magnificent Mile
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event”
Inclusive Jet Production at the Tevatron
Perspectives on Physics and on CMS at Very High Luminosity
PYTHIA 6.2 “Tunes” for Run II
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Jet Quenching Effects of High Energy A+A Collisions in RHIC
Presentation transcript:

Study of Direct Photon Pair Production in Hadronic Collisions at √s=14 TeV (Preliminary Results) Sushil Singh Chauhan Department of Physics & Astrophysics University of Delhi, Delhi

Outline  Importance of direct photon pair production study.  Comparison of the result for DØ experiment.  Discussion on low Qt discrepancy.  Prediction at LHC energy.  Effect of isolation cone cut.  Kt smearing model for LO using Pythia.  Work to do.

Importance of This Analysis  The direct di-photon is one of the background subprocess for SM Higgs at LHC energy.  It is an irreducible background in the mass range GeV at LHC energy.  Study of isolation cone cut effect at LHC energy.  Effect of the fragmentation contribution on the results.  Study of infrared sensitivity of diphoton Pt spectrum.

Code Used * The partonic level code called DIPHOX is used for this process. * This code does a full NLO calculation for this process. * It takes the fragmentation contribution into account. * Collinear singularity are removed using phase space slicing technique. * It suffers from infrared divergence.

Direct Subprocesses

Some Other Sub processes

One Fragmentation Sub process

Two Fragmentation Sub process

Isolation Cut Parameters Definition To isolate a photon, – Define a cone of size R in η- Φ space –Sum up the hadronic E had T in R – Photon is isolated if E T < E T CUT in R  R 2 min = [ y( γ1) – y(γ2) ] 2 + Φ 2 γγ

√s=1.8 TeV, Pt1≥14.90 GeV, Pt2≥13.85 GeV, η<|1.0|, CTEQ6M R=0.4, Et=2 GeV, R min =0.3

√s=1.8 TeV, Pt1≥14.90 GeV, Pt2≥13.85 GeV, η<|1.0|, CTEQ6M R=0.4 GeV, Et=2 GeV, GeV, R min =0.3

Discrepancy at low Q T The differential cross section for small Q T is QCD prediction is reliable when Q T ≈ Q (hard scale), and less reliable when Q T <<Q. In this region photon pair is accompanied by multiple soft gluon radiation. To calculate reliably, multiple soft gluon emission must be taken into account. Fragmentation part is free of such divergence.

√s=1.8 TeV,Pt1≥14.90 GeV, Pt2≥13.85 GeV, η<|1.0|, CTEQ6M R=0.4, Et=2 GeV, GeV, R min =0.3

√s=1.8 TeV, Pt1≥14.90 GeV, Pt2≥ GeV, GeV, η<|1.0|, CTEQ6M R=0.4, Et=2 GeV, GeV, R min =0.3

√s=14 TeV, Pt1≥40 GeV, Pt2≥25 GeV, η<|2.5|, CTEQ6M, R=0.4, Et=5 GeV, GeV, R min =0.3

√s=14 TeV, Pt1≥40 GeV, Pt2≥25 GeV,η<|2.5|, CTEQ6M R=0.4, Et=5 GeV, GeV,R min =0.3

√s=14 TeV, Pt1≥40 GeV, Pt2≥25 GeV, η<|2.5|, CTEQ6M Et=5 GeV, GeV,R min =0.3

Kt –Smearing Model We parameterized the ISR gluon in terms of Kt smearing. This provides an additional transverse impulse to the outgoing partons. The expression for LO cross section is σ(h1h2→γγ)=∫ dx1 dx2 f a1/h1 (x1,Q 2 ) f a2/h2 (x2,Q 2 ) σ(a1a2→γγ) To introduce the transverse kinematics of the initial-state partons,we extend each integral over the PDF to the k t -space. dx f a/h (x,Q 2 ) → dx d 2 k t g(k t ) f a/h (x,Q 2 ) we assume a Gaussian type of K t distribution, where g(k t )=( exp(-k 2 t / ) /(π )) =4* 2 /π Pythia adds Kt to each colliding parton with a Gaussian variance.

Effect of Kt- smearing Model to LO calculation of Di-Photon K-factor = dσ(LO + Kt smearing) dσ( LO )

Work to do Correction to NLO Qt spectrum for DØ & LHC using Kt smearing model. To get the Pt spectrum for ISR gluon at LHC energy. Study the effect of different PDFs on the present results. Prediction for different η regions at LHC energy. Study of stringent isolation cut. Detailed study of fragmentation at LHC energy Study of scale uncertainty.