Class 24 Copyright, Winter, 2010 International Issues Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Kelly J. Kubasta, Klemchuk Kubasta LLP Gray Market Goods What Are They? Black Market Goods that are illegal and/or distributed through illegal channels.
Advertisements

Choice of Law in Copyright Law Ryan Moore. What is Copyright Law? It is a principle of American law that an author of a work may reap the fruits of his.
Copyright or Copywrong. What is a copyright and what can be copyrighted? What is “Fair Use” and what four factors determine “Fair Use”? What are the two.
Class 22 Copyright, Winter, 2010 Copyright Misuse Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
San Cannon Federal Reserve Board IASSIST 2010
Class 3 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Claims Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Class 5 Copyright, Winter, 2010 Derivative Works Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Class 9 Copyright, Winter, 2010 Authorship and Ownership Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago.
US Copyright and Intellectual Property Issues Carol Green.
Copyright Law Boston College Law School March 18, 2003 Rights - Moral Rights.
Ethics of Copyright Infringement Thomas H. Mak CS 301.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 2, 2009 Copyright – Rights – Fair Use.
1 CS 502: Computing Methods for Digital Libraries Lecture 25 Access Management.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School January 26, 2007 Copyright – Rights – Fair Use.
Class 11 Copyright, Spring, 2008 Distribution and First-Sale Doctrine Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University.
Class 12 Copyright, Winter, 2010 Distribution and First-Sale Doctrine Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University.
Class 7 Copyright, Winter, 2010 Governmental Works Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Copyright, Fair Use, and Derivative Works
CS155b: E-Commerce Lecture 7: Jan. 30, 2001 A Computer Scientist’s View of Copyright Law.
The Regulation of International Transactions What are some of the risks of international trade?
Class 13 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Sales of Assets Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Class 12 Copyright, Spring, 2008 Performance and Display Rights Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of.
Copyright and Fair Use Guidelines: Using Protected Materials to Enhance Instruction.
Copyright 101 Understanding the Basics 1. Myths You can use anything you can download from the Internet If a work does not contain the copyright symbol.
1 herbert van de sompel CS 502 Computing Methods for Digital Libraries Cornell University – Computer Science Herbert Van de Sompel
Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Computer Ethics Christina McCorkle.
Intellectual Property Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property Intellectual effort, not by physical labor Intangible property Lawsuits involve infringement.
By Collin Henry. Copyright is a protection that covers published and unpublished literary, scientific and artistic works, and other forms of expression.
U.S. Copyright Enforcement Benjamin Hardman Attorney / Advisor Office of Intellectual Property Policy & Enforcement, USPTO.
G. Randall Watts, M.Div., MS Assistant Director for Resource Management MUSC Library.
Chapter 27 International Law in a Global Economy
Exhausted yet? A 15-minute crash course in the First Sale Doctrine Eric Harbeson Music Library Association 26 February, 2015.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008: CLASS 2 Professor Fischer Introduction to Copyright 2: Historical Background AUGUST 20, 2008.
Class 21 Copyright, Winter, 2010 Online Distribution Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Class 20 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Interest Rates Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Class 22 Copyright, Spring, 2008 Copyright and the Constitution Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of.
Copyright Fundamentals Exclusive Rights Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University.
The Quest for Copyright Understanding Miguel Guhlin
Class 20 Copyright, Spring, 2008 Copyright Misuse Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Chapter 1: Legal Ethics 1. © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use.
Copyright Information IFAST Secretariat Report Prepared for IFAST 19 Calgary, AB, Canada June 6-7, 2002 by Megan Hayes IFAST Secretariat ATIS Manager for.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2001 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 19 (MARCH 26, 2002)
CETAK COPY RIGHT Written by Asma’ Humaira Binti Suhaimi.
“ 10 Big Myths about Copyright Explained” By: Brad Templeton Presented By: Nichole Au December 6, 2007.
Class 25 Copyright, Winter, 2010 Copyright and the Constitution Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of.
Copyright Donna Min Shiroma School Library Services Advanced Technology Research Branch Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Student Support © September.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer March 19, 2003.
Copyright By: Team 2. What Is Copyright?  Copyright is a form of protection provided by the laws, to the authors of “original works of authorship,” including.
Class 7 Copyright, Spring, 2008 Authorship and Ownership Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago.
Intellectual property (IP) refers to creations of the mind: inventions, literary and artistic works, music, movies, symbols, names, images, and designs.
Supreme Court Decision in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons: An SIIA Briefing to Discuss What the Court Said and the Potential Fallout Keith Kupferschmid.
Intellectual Property and Public Policy: Application of Flexibilities in the International IP and Trade system --Limitation and Exceptions for Education.
Turkish private international law on matrimonial property and successions Zeynep Derya TARMAN Koç Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi
Copyright and Fair Use. Plagiarism? Starting with a term you’ve all heard before: Plagiarism. What is Plagiarism?
Creative Commons & Co. Maarten Zeinstra Stichting Nederland Kennisland | Knowledgeland Creative Commons Netherlands
Rear Vision Mirrors and Crystal Balls Copyright Symposium 2014 Australian National Maritime Museum, Sydney 14 March 2014 Nicholas Smith Barrister Blackstone.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer November 15, 2006.
What you don’t know could harm you
The University of Chicago
Class 21 Copyright, Autumn, 2016 Copyright Misuse
Class 23 Copyright, Autumn, 2016 International Issues
Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order
Class 3 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Claims
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Class 4 Secured Transactions, Fall, 2018 Rights in the Collateral
The Legalities of Technicalities task 4
Copyright Law and Fair Use
Presentation transcript:

Class 24 Copyright, Winter, 2010 International Issues Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago Copyright © Randal C. Picker. All Rights Reserved.

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker2 Organizing Domestic and Foreign Markets n Two Examples u DVDs: Technological Separation u Quality King: Legal Separation

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker3 [SC: Amazon Incred US]

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker4 [SC: Amazon Incred UK]

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker5 Comparing Prices n Same DVD u US: $17.99 u UK: £14.99 n Exchange Rate (as of April 21, 2005): $1 = £ , $ = £1 n Matching Prices u $17.99 = £9.37 u £14.99 = $28.77

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker6 [SC: US Encoding]

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker7 [SC: UK Encoding]

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker8 [SC: Amazon on Encoding]

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker Manufacture, importation, and public distribution of certain copies n (a) u Prior to July 1, 1986, and except as provided by subsection (b), the importation into or public distribution in the United States of copies of a work consisting preponderantly of nondramatic literary material that is in the English language and is protected under this title is prohibited unless the portions consisting of such material have been manufactured in the United States or Canada.

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker Infringing importation of copies or phonorecords n (a) u Importation into the United States, without the authority of the owner of copyright under this title, of copies or phonorecords of a work that have been acquired outside the United States is an infringement of the exclusive right to distribute copies or phonorecords under section 106, actionable under section 501.

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker Infringement of copyright n (a) u Anyone who violates any of the exclusive rights of the copyright owner as provided by sections 106 through 121 or of the author as provided in section 106A(a), or who imports copies or phonorecords into the United States in violation of section 602, is an infringer of the copyright or right of the author, as the case may be.

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker12 Quality King n Core Facts u L’anza makes shampoo; labels are copyrighted works u L’anza sells at higher prices in the US than in foreign markets u Quality King acts as middleman to bring shampoo back to US

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker13 Quality King u Ninth Circuit rules for L’anza, saying that applying 109 first-sale defense would gut 602

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker14 Making, Selling, Importing n Hypo: US Printing, Foreign Sale u I print a copyrighted book in the US u I sell copies in the US for $50 u I export copies to the UK and sell them there myself for $25 u Importer buys in the UK for $25, takes the book to the US and sells for $35 n How does Sec. 602 apply to this situation?

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker15 Quality King Result n This is the “round trip” case u Books started in US, left and returned u Under Quality King, 109(a) first-sale rights “attach” w Attach based on location of printing in US— “lawfully made under this title” w That is independent of where the particular copy of the book is sold (see fn. 14 on p.661)

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker16 Making, Selling, Importing n Hypo: Foreign Printing, Foreign Sale u I print a copyrighted book in the US and sell copies in the US for $50 u I print copies in the UK and sell them there for $25 u Importer buys in the UK for $25, takes the book to the US and sells for $35 n How does Sec. 602 apply to this situation?

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker17 Analysis n This is the one-way case u 109(a) doesn’t attach, seemingly, to the books printed in the UK u 602(a) should apply and should block imports n Does this make it possible to enforce price discrimination in this case?

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker18 Analysis u Only way to enforce the across-country price discrimination is by moving the printing overseas n Contrary to US interests?; compare Sec. 601

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker19 602(a) Rewrite n (a) u Importation into the United States, without the authority of the owner of copyright under this title, of copies or phonorecords of a work that have been acquired outside the United States is an infringement of the exclusive right to distribute copies or phonorecords under section 106, actionable under section 501. n How would Quality King come out?

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker20 Analysis n 109 and First-Sale Doctrine u Irrelevant under Rewrite n Overinclusive? u Would cover US tourist buying book in England to read on plane home

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker21 But See 602(a)(2) n This subsection does not apply to ‑ u (2) importation, for the private use of the importer and not for distribution, w by any person with respect to no more than one copy or phonorecord of any one work at any one time, or w by any person arriving from outside the United States with respect to copies or phonorecords forming part of such person’s personal baggage

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker22 Legislative History n From the Congressional Report u Section 602(a) first states the general rule that unauthorized importation is an infringement merely if the copies or phonorecords “have been acquired outside the United States,” but then enumerates three specific exceptions … If none of the three exemptions applies, any unauthorized importer of copies or phonorecords acquired abroad, could be sued for damages and enjoined from making use of them, even before any public distribution in this country has taken place.

Making Copies I n Hypo: Plain Vanilla u Author A writes and publishes book u Buyer buys it at store for $20 u Buyer copies the book and sells copies n Copyright issues? November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker23

Making Copies II n Hypo: US, then UK u Author A, a United States citizen, writes and publishes book in the United States u Buyer buys it at store in the US for $20 u Buyer moves to the UK with the book and copies it there and sells copies n Copyright issues? November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker24

Answer n Chasing Buyer u Buyer is in the UK as are his assets u Two possible strategies w Path 1: Sue in the US, get judgment there, and take it to UK to sue to get foreign judgment—the US judgment—enforced there w Path 2: Sue in the UK and get judgment there November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker25

Answer n Focus on the Differences u Path 1 w US author will be domestic author who published book under US law w Central question in the US case will be one of extraterritoriality: does US law apply to actions taken outside of the US (here the copying in the UK)? See that in Subafilms November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker26

Answer w Central question in the follow-on UK case will be about the recognition of foreign judgments (what should a UK court do with a US judgment?) w We see a version of this in Viewfinder Suit brought in France under French law; judgment then brought to the US courts for enforcement November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker27

Answer u Path 2 w If Author goes directly to the UK, then the question will be what rights does a foreign author—the US author—have under domestic UK copyright law w That in turn is a question about how the relevant copyright conventions and treaties operate November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker28

Answer Berne Convention – Universal Copyright Convention – URL_ID=1814&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTIO N=201.htmlhttp://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/ev.php- URL_ID=1814&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTIO N=201.html TRIPs – e.htmhttp:// e.htm WIPO Copyright Treaty – mlhttp:// ml November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker29

Answer WIPO Phonograms – US Bilateral Treaties – November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker30

Setting Up Viewfinder I n Hypo u Jeff Koons makes an original sculpture u Rogers sees it and takes a photograph of it u Rogers sells the photograph to a third party n Copyright issues? November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker31

Setting Up Viewfinder II n Hypo u Jeff Koons sews an original dress u Rogers sees it and takes a photograph of it u Rogers sells the photograph to a third party n Copyright issues? November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker32

Viewfinder n Start With u n French Law u uk uk w L w L w L 122-5(3) November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker33

US Recognition of Foreign Judgments n nact99/1920_69/ufmjra62.pdf nact99/1920_69/ufmjra62.pdf u Focus on Section IV(B)(3): w “A foreign judgment need not be recognized if … (3) the [cause of action] [claim for relief] on which the judgment is based is repugnant to the public policy of this state;” November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker34

Subafilms n Law Design Question u Where should US law apply and why? w In the Making Copies II hypo, should US law apply to the UK violation? Should we rely instead on UK law n More Minor Question u How does the “to authorize” language at the top of 106 influence this? November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker35

November 29, 2015Copyright © Randal C. Picker Exclusive rights in copyrighted works n Subject to sections 107 through 121, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following: u (1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords; u (2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;