Introduction of RAVEN Internal meeting on future instrument projects at Subaru Shin Oya ( Subaru Telescope/NAOJ) ‏ Hilo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geminis Future AO Program A Decade of AO Evolution at Gemini Recent AO Program Highlights Doug Simons Gemini Observatory.
Advertisements

Subaru AO in future. Outline Overview of AO systems at Mauna Kea and in the world. Ongoing plan of AOS at Subaru and Mauna Kea. What’s in future.
GLAO instrument specifications and sensitivities
RASC, Victoria, 1/08/06 The Future of Adaptive Optics Instrumentation David Andersen HIA.
National Research Council Canada Conseil national de recherches Canada Experimental Laboratory for Instrument Development in Astrophysics Jean-Pierre Véran.
University of Durham Astronomical Instrumentation Group ELT Science Case, Oxford, Report on work done for NIO GSMT book Simon Morris With Cedric.
PI type instruments Yosuke Minowa Naruhisa Takato, Ikuru Iwata (New Development group, Subaru Telescope) Subaru User’s Meeting 2013 (2014/01/21)
Page 1 Lecture 17 The applications of tomography: LTAO, MCAO, MOAO, GLAO Claire Max AY 289 UC Santa Cruz March 7, 2013.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Thermal Infrared Observation using Adaptive Secondary Mirror (ASM) Hiroshi TERADA (Subaru Telescope)  Ground-based Thermal IR w/AO  Subaru Thermal IR.
AO188/LGS status AO188 development group(Subaru Telescope, NAOJ) (JST)
NGAO System Design Review Response Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting June 18, 2008.
1 Laser Guide Star Wavefront Sensor Mini-Review 6/15/2015Richard Dekany 12/07/2009.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
PSWG March Adaptive Optics Systems Engineering on GMT Peter McGregor.
Trade Study Report: NGAO versus Keck AO Upgrade NGAO Meeting #5 Peter Wizinowich March 7, 2007.
5 th February 2010 FP7 Prep WP9000 Progress Meeting 1 Update Tim Morris Durham University FP7 Prep WP 9340.
What Requirements Drive NGAO Cost? Richard Dekany NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
ADASS XVII - September, Software Modelling of IFU Spectrometers Nuria P. F. Lorente UK Astronomy Technology Centre Royal Observatory, Edinburgh,
TMT Instrumentation Canadian capabilities and interests David Loop, NRC-HIA June 26, 2010.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array Observing with ALMA.
GMT Instrument Development Gary Da Costa ANU Representative GMT Science Advisory Committee.
TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 Ellerbroek, AO4ELT, Paris, June Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory Corporation Adaptive Optics for.
MCAO A Pot Pourri: AO vs HST, the Gemini MCAO and AO for ELTs Francois Rigaut, Gemini GSMT SWG, IfA, 12/04/2002.
W. M. Keck Observatory Subaru Users’ Meeting
Next generation wide field AO (GLAO) and NIRMOS for Subaru Telescope.
T-REX OU4 HIRES The high resolution spectrograph for E-ELT E. Oliva, T-REX meeting, Sexten Pustertal (I)1.
This page is intentionally blank. A new view of the Universe VIII Fred Watson (and the RAVErs) April 2005 A new view of the Universe VIII Fred Watson.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
FLAO commissioning with InfraRed Test Camera (IRTC) S. Esposito, G. Brusa, A. Riccardi FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
Telescopes & recent observational techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 4 Chapters 3 & 6.
Infrared Wavefront Sensor (IR-WFS) Yutaka Hayano Internal Meeting on Future Instrument Projects at Subaru April 26, 2010.
Viewing the Universe through distorted lenses: Adaptive optics in astronomy Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute & JHU.
AO review meeting, Florence, November FLAO operating Modes Presented by: S. Esposito Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri / INAF.
From NAOS to the future SPHERE Extreme AO system T. Fusco 1, G. Rousset 1,2, J.-L. Beuzit 3, D. Mouillet 3, A.-M. Lagrange 3, P. Puget 2 and many others.
Mid-InfRAred Camera wo LEns (MIRACLE) for SPICA Takehiko Wada and team MIRACLE.
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
February 2013 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics (GLAO) Experiment on Mauna Kea Doug Toomey.
Future Plan of Subaru Adaptive Optics
1 Characterization of the T/T conditions at Gemini Using AO data Jean-Pierre Véran Lisa Poyneer AO4ELT Conference - Paris June , 2009.
ATLAS The LTAO module for the E-ELT Thierry Fusco ONERA / DOTA On behalf of the ATLAS consortium Advanced Tomography with Laser for AO systems.
Kyoto 3DII (3DII) + AO Apr 26 HST 1.What is 3DII? 2.Purposes of 3DII + AO188 3.What is needed for this? 4.Present status 5.Cass or Nasmyth in future?
Subaru/FMOS Commissioning: Brief history & current status Naoyuki Tamura Instrument scientist Subaru Telescope, NAOJ Expected performance Observation “A.
Conference “Feeding the Giants: ELTs in the era of Surveys” -- Ischia 31/08/2011 Large field of view and ELTs: an impossible marriage? Paolo Ciliegi (INAF.
AO188/LGS Status and Schedule 1 Yutaka Hayano January 31, 2008.
Status report of AO188+LGS (+future AO) Yutaka Hayano (Subaru Telescope, NAOJ) S. Oya, M. Hattori, Y. Saito, Y. Minowa, M. Ito, H. Terada, T.S. Pyo, H.
K. G. Strassmeier, Polarimetry with ELTs, Utrecht, Nov./Dec Smart Focal Plane Spectropolarimetry with the E-ELT Klaus G. Strassmeier, Leibniz-Institute.
The FMOS Facility for the SUBARU telescope Gavin Dalton Oxford/RAL.
A global approach to ELT instrument developments J.-G. Cuby for the French ELT WG.
Keck Observatory in the TMT Era Keck Strategic Planning meeting September 18, 2009.
Keck Observatory Overview Peter Wizinowich W. M. Keck Observatory AOSC May 31, 2004.
1 Comparative Performance of a 30m Groundbased GSMT and a 6.5m (and 4m) NGST NAS Committee of Astronomy & Astrophysics 9 th April 2001 Matt Mountain Gemini.
Science with Giant Telescopes - Jun 15-18, Instrument Concepts InstrumentFunction range (microns) ResolutionFOV GMACSOptical Multi-Object Spectrometer.
Overview Science drivers AO Infrastructure at WHT GLAS technicalities Current status of development GLAS: Ground-layer Laser Adaptive optics System.
25s detection of the Sy1 galaxy NGC3516 The Palermo BAT survey project Application to a sample of SDSS LINERs V. La Parola, A.Segreto, G. Cusumano, V.
Subaru GLAO Simulation
AO4ELT, Paris A Split LGS/NGS Atmospheric Tomography for MCAO and MOAO on ELTs Luc Gilles and Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory.
Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Authors: Christopher Neyman 1, Richard Dekany 2, Mitchell Troy 3 and Peter Wizinowich 1. 1 W.M. Keck Observatory, 2 California.
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes Center for Adaptive Optics.
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. AO corrected average Strehl ratios at different field positions and Sun elevations.
Current Status of FMOS and Schedule Toward the Common Use Naruhisa Takato.
Page 1 Lecture 15 The applications of tomography: LTAO, MCAO, MOAO, GLAO Claire Max AY 289 March 3, 2016.
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
Laser(s) for Keck Observatory’s Next Generation AO (NGAO) System
NGAO System Design Project Plans and Schedule
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Presentation transcript:

Introduction of RAVEN Internal meeting on future instrument projects at Subaru Shin Oya ( Subaru Telescope/NAOJ) ‏ Hilo

Outline RAVEN project –project outline –Multi-Object Adaptive Optics (MOAO)‏ Subaru Telescope and RAVEN –carry-in instrument (PI instrument)‏ –NsIR platform (2013 ~ 2015)‏ –support for the design & science (2010 ~ )‏ Schedule face-to-face meeting on September 24&25, 2009 kick-off meeting on March 16&17, 2010

RAVEN Project MOAO demonstrator –laboratory experiment –on-sky scientific verification Led by Canadian Group –University of Victoria (UVic)‏ –Hezberg Institute for Astronomy (HIA)‏ Already Funded –6M CAD by BCKDF/CFI Leading Edge Fund –In kind contribution from HIA & Subaru (> 400K CAD)‏ 2013 ~ 2015 Hilo/Summit The first 8m-class MOAO system

MOAO Faint Objects Guide Stars Telescope WFSs DMs Instruments Tomographic wavefront reconstruction Open-loop control Key Technologies FOV: -patrol: ~arcmin -unit: ~arcsec

2 nd gen

MOAO for TMT Feasibility study in 2006 –opto-mechanical design –performance evaluation –system engineering UF / HIA Caltech

W FS A W FS B W FS C DMDM Already done in Canada Succeeded in on-sky open-loop correction VOLT: Victoria Open-Loop Testbed Andersen et al.,Proc.SPIE,7015,70150H –single channel –on-axis –on-sky (May, ’08)‏ –1.2m telescope –Arcturus (R=0.3)‏

UVic March 16-17, 2010 VOLT on-sky results Used long exposures (80ms) on OL WFS A to center starlight Changed telescope focus to achieve proper platescale For ~1ms exposures on a very bright star, our threshold on the OL WFS was above the readnoise As predicted by CAOS simulations, we did not achieve the diffraction limit We improved the image quality from ~2.5 arcsec to 0.5 arcsec FWHM and increased the peak flux by 5x I-band (900nm)‏ 20s r 0  OLAO No AO 2.5”0.5” 20sec short exp. simulation?

To be done at Subaru To be done at Subaru The first 8m-class demonstration of MOAO Challenges at Subaru: –on-sky tomographic wavefront reconstruction using multiple-NGSs –calibration method of the system –scientific verification for example: metal-poor star search in the Galactic bulge Herbig-Haro objects, silhouette disk limiting GS mag : mag

UVic March 16-17, 2010 Raven Raven is a down-scale MOAO prototype, precursor of MOAO on ELTs – 3 WFSs patrolling a 2.0 arcmin field-of-view – 2 deployable DMs plus a fixed woofer – 2 “truth” WFSs – 2 science paths feeding IRCS – Slit spectrograph IRCS – FPGA based RTC 3-4 years development phase On sky test in the last year

Configuration w/ Subaru Subaru will provide: –Telescope (NsIR)‏ –IRCS –AO188 (TBD) –technical support (man power)‏ Relation between AO188 and RAVEN 1.Telescope direct w/o AO188 2.AO188 w/ BIM188 woofer correction 3.AO188 w/o BIM188 woofer correction No new focus will be added (use existing NsIR or NsIR+AO188 focus) ‏ meeting

Computer / SOSS Computer –all PCs/electronics will be placed at NsIR (baseline)‏ –computer room space needed? (TBD)‏ –summit network (E-LAN)‏ SOSS –during experiment observation, we do not prepare inerface for RAVEN –SOSS will be used for Telescope & IRCS (AO188)‏ –If the project is extended to accept proposals, RAVEN will prepare SOSS interface (TBD)‏

System Diagram

Time Line

What’s coming next RAVEN team visits Subaru (Hilo/summit)‏ –May 1 st - 3 rd –discussion on the configuration at NsIR Carry-in instrument proposal submission –August? Conceptual Design Review –September?

Summary Introduction of RAVEN project –on-sky MOAO demonstrator –Canadian fund and group Subaru Telescope and RAVEN –carry-in instrument installed on NsIR platform –Subaru will support the project as a partner –tomography, calibration, scientific verification, etc Schedule –3 ~ 4 year project (2013 ~ Hilo/Summit)‏ –RAVEN team visit (5/1 – 5/3)‏

Appendix

UVic March 16-17, 2010 Raven: Funds & Partners $6 Million CAD BCKDF/CFI Leading Edge Fund In kind contribution from HIA & Subaru telescope Collaborators –TMT –DRAO Penticton –UBC –University of Florida –Durham University –Lyrtech –INO

Proposed MOAO for TMT CaltechUF/HIA FOV(deployable)‏5 arcmin FOV(unit)‏ 1.5 arcsec2.2 arcsec # of unit1620 wavelength 0.8 ~ 2.5  m spectral res. R=2,000 ~ 10,000R=1,000 ~ 20,000 speacial res ~ 50mas16 ~ 50mas

VOLT on-sky results Used long exposures (80ms) on OL WFS A to center starlight Changed telescope focus to achieve proper platescale For ~1ms exposures on a very bright star, our threshold on the OL WFS was above the readnoise As predicted by CAOS simulations, we did not achieve the diffraction limit We improved the image quality from ~2.5 arcsec to 0.5 arcsec FWHM and increased the peak flux by 5x

Subaru Nasmyth IR Size: 1.65m X 1.7m X 1.5m Weight: 800kg Limits for RAVEN