General guidelines for SixTrack The code options aim at being general with no implicit assumptions to avoid misunderstanding (overhead for the user) and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
5/3/2015J-PARC1 Transverse Matching Using Transverse Profiles and Longitudinal Beam arrival Times.
Advertisements

Software Delivery. Software Delivery Management  Managing Requirements and Changes  Managing Resources  Managing Configuration  Managing Defects 
Chapter 3: System design. System design Creating system components Three primary components – designing data structure and content – create software –
Tina design review Main design decisions. Top level modules. Responsibilities. Phases A & B. Test plan. Time table.
Incremental Path Profiling Kevin Bierhoff and Laura Hiatt Path ProfilingIncremental ApproachExperimental Results Path profiling counts how often each path.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Chapter 3 Planning Your Solution
The Project AH Computing. Functional Requirements  What the product must do!  Examples attractive welcome screen all options available as clickable.
Introduction Status of SC simulations at CERN
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
2006/09/19AOAsia 21 Towards Locating a Functional Concern Based on a Program Slicing Technique Takashi Ishio 1,2, Ryusuke Niitani 2 and Katsuro Inoue 2.
PTC ½ day – Experience in PS2 and SPS H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou.
 To explain the importance of software configuration management (CM)  To describe key CM activities namely CM planning, change management, version management.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Let’s look at the Hill’ equation again…  We can write the general solution as a linear combination of a “sine-like” and “cosine-like”
Tools for loss analysis and studies PS2/PS2+ Meeting 23 rd of May of 2007 Javier Barranco AB/ABP.
Updates to WISE for LHC run II Per Hagen May 2015.
European Interoperability Architecture e-SENS Workshop : Collecting data for the Cartography Tool 7-8 January 2015.
Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London P. Bonnal, B. Daudin, J. De Jonghe, CERN An Accelerator Design Tool for the International Design Study for the Neutrino.
The european ITM Task Force data structure F. Imbeaux.
Software Design Design is the process of applying various techniques and principles for the purpose of defining a device, a process,, or a system in sufficient.
Status of Space-Charge Simulations with MADX Valery KAPIN ITEP & MEPhI, Moscow GSI, 19-Feb-2009
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
© Janice Regan, CMPT 300, May CMPT 300 Introduction to Operating Systems Memory: Relocation.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
NA62 Trigger Algorithm Trigger and DAQ meeting, 8th September 2011 Cristiano Santoni Mauro Piccini (INFN – Sezione di Perugia) NA62 collaboration meeting,
Update Chris Rogers, Analysis PC, 13/07/06. State of the “Accelerator” Simulation Field model now fully implemented in revised MICE scheme Sanity checking.
MadX proposals R. De Maria, 29/8/2014. Makethin and thick dipoles Issues: Dipole edge elements cannot be used together thick dipole elements unless one.
Measurements at 40cm and Computer Aided Segment By Segment corrections Measurements at 40cm and Computer Aided Segment By Segment corrections Piotr Skowroński.
J-PARC Trace3D Upgrades Christopher K. Allen Los Alamos National Laboratory.
RHIC Retreat 2006, July 10-12, N.Malitsky. Model update and progress Model Update and Progress L. Ahrens, K. Brown, A. Luccio, N. Malitsky, V.Ptitsyn,
Metadata By N.Gopinath AP/CSE Metadata and it’s role in the lifecycle. The collection, maintenance, and deployment of metadata Metadata and tool integration.
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
PS losses during CT extraction, a history about 30 year long... J. Barranco, S. Gilardoni CERN - AB/ABP.
Zeuten 19 - E. Wilson - 1/18/ Slide 1 Recap. of Transverse Dynamics E. Wilson – 15 th September 2003  Transverse Coordinates  Relativistic definitions.
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
Beam-beam deflection during Van der Meer scans
Simplified Modeling of Space Charge Losses in Booster at Injection Alexander Valishev June 17, 2015.
E. Todesco EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD MODELING IN THE LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Thanks to the FiDeL team CERN, Space charge th April 2013.
Status of BDSIM Simulation L. Nevay, S. Boogert, H. Garcia-Morales, S. Gibson, R. Kwee-Hinzmann, J. Snuverink Royal Holloway, University of London 17 th.
UPDATE IN PTC-ORBIT PSB STUDIES Space charge meeting ( ) * Vincenzo Forte * Follows LIS meeting presentation 16/04/2012.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson - 23 Oct 2014 –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
PLACET User experiences with PLACET and examples of use for the Drive Beam CLIC Workshop 2008 Erik Adli, CERN/University of Oslo, October 16 th 2008 Lots.
WP2: Beam dynamics and optics Workflow between Work Packages 1 O. Brüning – BE-ABP WP2 HL-LHC meeting 17. November 2011.
Vacuum specifications in Linacs J-B. Jeanneret, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte in CLIC Workshop 09, 15 October 2009 Fast Ion Instability in Linacs and the simulation.
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
BNL trip  Goal of the BNL-FERMILAB- CERN collaboration  The codes  BB tune foot-prints  DA studies.
Beam-beam simulations with large synchrotron tune for strong RF focusing scheme D.Shatilov (BINP), M.Zobov (LNF) SBSR Workshop LNF, Frascati, 7-8 November.
Beam dynamics simulations with the measured SPARC gun- solenoid field G. Bazzano, P. Musumeci, L. Picardi, M. Preger, M. Quattromini, C. Ronsivalle, J.
DISCUSSION OF THE ARCS AND OVERALL LATTICE INTEGRATION FCC meeting 8th of January 2015 Antoine Chance.
MADX tutorial: injection and extraction systems Dr Rob Apsimon Dr Öznur Mete.
J. Snuverink and J. Pfingstner LinSim LinSim Linear Accelerator Simulation Framework with PLACET an GUINEA-PIG Jochem Snuverink Jürgen Pfingstner 16 th.
Hector : A fast multi-purpose simulator for particle propagation X. Rouby & J. de Favereau & K. Piotrzkowski -
Envelope tracking as a tool for low emittance ring design
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Tracking simulations of protons quench test
Task 2. 5: Beam-beam studies D. Banfi, J. Barranco, T. Pieloni, A
Overview of Needs for SixTrack on-line Aperture Check
Beam-Beam status in SixTrack (1)
Multi-Turn Extraction studies and PTC
Status and needs of dynamic aperture calculations
Beam-beam checks R. De Maria.
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
Study of Beam Losses and Collimation in JLEIC
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
Presentation transcript:

General guidelines for SixTrack The code options aim at being general with no implicit assumptions to avoid misunderstanding (overhead for the user) and to avoid frequent recompilations (overhead for team). The official repository should be used for production, while private copies should be limited to code developments. The documentation effort started recently and already helped many users and developers. It should be completed (missing elements to document are beam-beam and wire). In particular the manuals have the targets: – The user manual solves any ambiguities on units and sign conventions.user manual – The physics manual allows to understand the physics in the code and generate correct results. The equations should be as complete as needed to reproduce SixTrack results.physics manual – The developer manual clarifies the definitions, unit conventions of the variables used in the code and the overall structure of the code.developer manual

Beam Beam in MadX MadX implements a 4D kick in Twiss and Track module. label: BEAMBEAM, SIGX=real,SIGY=real, XMA=real,YMA=real,CHARGE=real, BBSHAPE=(circular, trapezoidal, hollow), WIDTH=real,BBDIR=int; XMA, YMAL: displacement, BBSHAPE: transverse distribution, WIDTH: length of the transverse edge, BBDIR: direction of the beam The mask file has the macros that extract position, beta from the strong beam, calculate the positions and parameters of the lens and install the bb elements. The SixTrack converter translates the MadX lattice into Sixtrack input (sufficient for 4D). The SixTrack user edits the fort.3 to enable 6D beam beam kicks.

SixTrack Beam Beam as present Fort.2 contains element and lattice definitions: Fort.2 – Has 3 blocks: single element list, block of linear elements and lattice. – For each element type one has 3 attributes per element, except beam-beam. Beam-beam element: name1 type h-sep v-sep strength-ratio σ_ hor σ_ ver σ_ lon name2 type h-sep v-sep strength-ratio σ_ hor σ_ ver σ_ lon Fort.3: contains most of the other input including beam information: Fort.3 BEAM partnum emitnx emitny sigz sige ibeco ibtyp lhc ibbc name1 ibsix xang xplane name2 … Ibeco: adding the dipole kick, ibtyp: algorithm for erfc, lhc: optics symmetries, ibbc: coupling effects, ibsix: number of slices, xang: crossing angle (what exactly?), xplane: plane of crossing For 6D, the slicing is calculated internally using the SixTrack optics module based on assumed symmetries between weak and strong optics that are not sufficiently general; Only 4D has the option to use the external input.

Beam-Beam lens update proposal Target: – Drop the LHC option since it already led to confusion and it is not general enough even for the LHC; – define explicitly in the input (fort.3) all the input parameters used by the beam-beam lens 4D and 6D. Steps: – Complete in the developer manual the definitions and units of the variables used by the beam-beam code (e.g. bbcu(1..10) ) related to the 6d slicing in order to understand the quantities the beam-beam routine use. – Complete the full equations of the kick (partially done) and the one used for the computations of the slices (not done) in the physics manual. – Update Sixtrack code and document the changes occurred in the input files. – Add missing 6D fields in the MadX bb element, change the Sixtrack converter and update the mask macros to compute the missing fields.

Example possible new input Fort.2 – Drop the recently added columns and keep name1 20 h-sep v-sep strength-ratio name2 20 h-sep v-sep strength-ratio Fort.3: add all relevant parameters (e.g.) – 4D lens name1 0 σ xx σ yy σ xy – 6D lens name1 ibsix strong_angle xplane