MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Gulf Coast Environmental Affairs Group January 14, 2010 Galveston, Texas Civil Penalty Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INCIDENT NOTIFICATION WHO YOU GONNA CALL? Environmental Conference June 4, 2012.
Advertisements

CG-2692, CG-2692A, CG-2692B and Drug Testing
Field Operations and State-Managed Plugging Overview
GCREAG Regulatory Update March 2014 Jodie Connor J. Connor Consulting, Inc.
Irish Coast Guard Local Authority oil spill Contingency Plans.
What is Audit Resolution? The action that will be taken to resolve Findings and Management Decisions.
Subpart S - SEMS September 11, 2012 Prepared by: BSEE, Office of Safety Management Author: Jason Mathews.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Spill Response Plans – Why Are They Developed? Alan K. Mayberry.
The Revised Federal EEO Complaint Process Prepared by the IHS Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights Office May 16, 2000.
GCEAG Meeting January 12,  NPR Issued September 14, 2011  Comments were due November 14, 2011  Focuses on six new or expanded items  Stop work.
Ron DeJuliis, Commissioner of Labor and Industry Rob McGeeney, Program Manager Larry Kreseski, Chief inspector Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation.
Nearly 50 American workers are injured every minute of the 40-hour work week and almost 17 die each day (OSHA) In 2003: 111 million workers at 7 million.
GCREAG Regulatory Update January, 2014 Lincoln Stroh J. Connor Consulting, Inc.
1 Hydraulic Fracturing Regulatory Processes in Louisiana James H. Welsh Commissioner of Conservation.
MSHA Criteria for Citations Flagrant Violations As Required by the Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Determining the True Root Cause(s) of Accidents and Safety Incidents Incident Investigation and Analysis.
Cal/OSHA PSM Unit Activities in 2014 and a look at 2015
LAUSD INJURY AND ILLNESS PREVENTION PROGRAM FOR SUPERVISORS AND EMPLOYEES As required by California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 3203.
Effective Workplace Safety Inspections OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT LOSS PREVENTION UNIT.
Article 42. – Emergency Safety Interventions ESI Regulations K.A.R and As Passed by the Kansas State Board of Education 2.
UNEMPLOYMENT CONSULTANTS, INC. SPECIALISTS IN CONTROLLING EMPLOYER'S UNEMPLOYMENT TAXES UNEMPLOYMENT PROGRAM SHRM Tuesday, February 12, 2013.
OVERVIEW OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION IN THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES.
Safety and Loss Control
A presentation by: State Fire Marshal Stephen Coan
U.S. Department of Homeland Security United States Coast Guard USCG Drug & Alcohol Program Compliance Requirements.
New Ag Waiver for the San Diego Region (including Temecula Valley) Water Quality Workshop Rancho California Water District November 6, 2008 Presented by.
Customer Service Enforcement After AB 2987 John Risk Communications Support Group, Inc. (c) 2006 John Risk Communications Support Group, Inc. (c) 2006.
Occupational Safety & Health Act of 1970
Occupational Safety & Health Act of 1970
Inspection and Enforcement. Course Objective: Inspection and Enforcement Managers will be able to apply their knowledge and understanding of the program.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Liquid Pipeline Advisory Committee Meeting Arlington,
Emergency Response to Environmental Accidents Paul M. Schmidt, Esq.
MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Lake Jackson District Lake Charles District Lafayette District Houma District New Orleans District.
CONSIDERATION OF STREAMLINED PROCESS FOR STIPULATED WASTE TIRE HAULER AND WASTE TIRE FACILTY ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY CASES CIWMB Board Meeting Agenda Item.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Part 13 Informal Complaint Process Filing and Investigating Informal Complaints 35 th Annual Airports.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
MSHA Part 100 Overview. Reformulates the process of assigning points to arrive at an assessment. Adds a provision to an operator’s history addressing.
Significant Provisions Of S MINERS ACT Significant Provisions Of S MINERS ACT Pertaining to Enforcement of all M/NM Mines. New ombudsman within the Office.
Rabbanai T. Morgan Current as of 26 January 2006 Protests.
The OSH Act authorizes the Department of Labor to conduct inspections, issue citations and proposed penalties OSHA representatives are authorized to:
Rhonda Anderson, RHIA, President  …is a PROCESS, not a PROJECT 2.
1 Book Cover Here Copyright © 2015, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Chapter # 12 The Supervisor’s Role in Safety Security Supervision and Management.
Orange County Building Safety / Consumer Fraud Unit Unlicensed Contracting Board of County Commissioners January 15, 2013.
Enforcement What to Expect From the Water Boards, and What to Look for Locally ENTS Workshop August Mark Bradley Office of Enforcement CA State.
Slide 1 Subpart O What’s Working & What’s Not Deepwater Operations Conference and Exhibition November 10-12, 2009.
EPA P-1 Corrective Action Streamlined Consent Orders Bob Greaves Region 3 Deb Goldblum Region 3 Tom Krueger Region 5.
At Lewis Field Glenn Research Center Industry Briefing Solicitation No. NNC04Z70010R Construction Services Contract June 15, 2004.
M S H A PART 100 RULING. 30 CFR PART 100 ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL PENALTIES; FINAL RULE.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Oil Spill Response Plans A History Lesson PHMSA Review and Approval.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PREVENTION & PREPAREDNESS May 11, 2016 REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM.
Conservation Development and Planning Department Code Compliance Flow Chart for County Code (Zoning & Land Use) Violations COMPLAINT RESEARCH AND PRIORITIZE.
Miners Rights Rights & Responsibilities Under the Mine Safety & Health Act of 1977 NC DOL Mine & Quarry Bureau Mine Safety & Health Training Revised 2010.
Division of Fire Prevention and Investigation: A view of working fires in 2015 April 27,
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
NAPA COUNTY Conservation Development and Planning Department Code Compliance Flow Chart Building Code Violations 1 COMPLAINT Written complaint (form, letter,
Boarding Home Facilities Presented to the Housing Committee November 7,
Recent Legal and Regulatory Developments Impacting Offshore Drilling Operations Michael D. Farber R. Scott Nuzum October 20, 2016.
Office of Enforcement Civil Penalties Update
Office of Legal Affairs
USCG Investigations LT Allan Storm.
FACILITY SECURITY PLANS (FSP’s)
Offshore Oil and Gas Environmental Issues
The Oil Pollution Act of 1990
Bill 30 An Act to Protect the Health and Well Being of Working Albertans.
Risk Assessment in Construction
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Cupa violation Review BAESG Meeting May 20, 2019 Matthew Burge
Annual Enforcement Report Overview
The OCS BBSSM Website AAPL – OCS Committee Workshop January 19, 2006 (Houston, TX)
LAUSD INJURY AND ILLNESS PREVENTION PROGRAM FOR SUPERVISORS AND EMPLOYEES As required by California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 3203.
Presentation transcript:

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Gulf Coast Environmental Affairs Group January 14, 2010 Galveston, Texas Civil Penalty Program

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Agenda Statistics Inspections and Enforcement Civil Penalties Appeals

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America GOM Safety Statistics Fatalities Injuries Blowouts Collisions Fires Pollution >50 bbls

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Inspection Types Primary –Sampling –Production Complete –Production Partial –Drilling –Workover –Pipeline –Accident Investigation –Onshore Meter –Coast Guard Secondary –Environmental –Flaring –H2S –Abandonment –Completion –Wireline –Coast Guard

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Violations Termed as an “Incident of Noncompliance (INC)” –Documented using MMS National Potential Incidents of Noncompliance (PINC) List and; –MMS Form 1832 Carries 3 types of enforcement actions based on the severity of the violation. –Warning –Component Shut-in –Facility Shut-in May also result in civil penalties against the operator

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Enforcement - Warning Warnings are issued when the violation poses no immediate danger to personnel, equipment, or the environment

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Enforcement – Component Shut-in Component Shut-ins are issued for a specific piece of equipment or location when the violation poses an immediate danger to personnel, equipment, or the environment and it can be shut-in w/o affecting the overall safety of the facility.

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Enforcement – Facility Shut-in Facility Shut-ins are issued when the violation poses an immediate danger to the entire facility, personnel, or the environment and the specific piece of equipment or location cannot be shut-in w/o affecting the overall safety of the facility.

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America GOM Region Drilling * Warning INCs Component SI INCs Facility SI INCs Total INCs Rig Inspections INC/Inspection Ratio * As of January 5, 2010

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America GOM Region Production * Warning INCs Component SI INCs Facility SI INCs Total INCs Components Inspected INC/Component Ratio * As of January 5, 2010

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Civil Penalty Program

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America OCS Civil Penalty History 1978 Lands Act Amendments – Section 24 –Created the Civil Penalties Program –Fine $10,000/day/violation 1983 Industry case against civil penalty –Must allow “reasonable time to correct” –MMS no longer pursued civil penalties 1990 Oil Pollution Act –If threat, no time needed to correct –Fine increased to $20,000/day/violation

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America OCS Civil Penalty History 1997 MMS Revised Civil Penalty Regulations –Plain English – streamlined process –Fine increased to $25,000/day/violation 2003 Fine increased to $30,000/day/violation 2007 Fine increased to $35,000/day/violation

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Monetary Adjustment of Civil Penalties Public Law , Section 8201 states: –The Secretary shall, by regulation at least every 3 years, adjust the penalty specified in this paragraph to reflect any increases in the Consumer Price Index (all items, United States city average) as prepared by the Department of Labor.

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Civil Penalty Matrix Note: W = Warning, C = Component Shut-in, and S = Facility Shut-in; * = Starting Point for Assessment GENERALIZED TABLE FOR CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSMENTS IN $/DAY/VIOLATION Enforcement Code Category ACategory BCategory C W $3,000 – 35,000 ($10,000)* $5,000 – 35,000 ($15,000)* $10,000 – 35,000 ($20,000)* C $5,000 – 35,000 ($15,000)* $10,000 – 35,000 ($20,000)* $15,000 – 35,000 ($25,000)* S $10,000 – 35,000 ($20,000)* $15,000 – 35,000 ($25,000)* $20,000 – 35,000 ($30,000)*

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Civil/Criminal Penalty Program 30 CFR states that MMS will review the following violations for Civil Penalty: –Violations that cause injury, death, or environmental damage –Violations that pose a threat to human life, property or the environment –Violations that are not corrected within the time allowed –Violations of the Oil Spill Financial Responsibility Requirements

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Responsibilities Districts –Conducts inspections –Issues violations (INCs) –Determines threat associated with violation –Builds civil penalty case –Forwards civil penalty case to regional coordinator Regional CP Coordinator –Reviews cp case –Assigns reviewing officer

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Responsibilities Reviewing Officer –Reviews case –Reviews merits (violation & threat) of case –Seeks additional information –Issues NPCP –Reviews information submitted from operator –Makes decision based on the preponderance of the evidence presented. –Issues final decision

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Civil Penalty Time Line

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Civil Penalty Program * ** Total Cases Paid Dismissed Total INCs Total Collected $953,750$548,000$2.45MM$3.1MM$1.16MM$210,000 Assessment Amount (Avg$/INC/day) $11,190$11,460$10,710$20,472 ^$12,924$18,888 * One case pending ^ CPI adjustment 3/2007 ** Pending cases = 21

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Top Five Civil Penalty INCs P103 (15)P103 (11)P103 (21)P103 (24)G111 (8)G110 (5) G110 (3)G110 (5)G110 (10)G112 (14)P103 (6)G112 (2) G111 (2)G112 (1)P307 (10)G110 (9)G112 (4)E100 (1) P130 (2)G111 (1)P308 (10)E103 (4)P280 (2)E102 (1) P283 (2)E102 (1)P301 (6)E100 (4)G110 (1)

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America

Regulations Governing Appeals Any MMS decision can be appealed under 30 CFR 290 Subpart A. There are 2 types of Appeals: –Informal – An informal appeal may be made to the issuing officer’s next level supervisor. The informal appeal can also be elevated further up the chain of command if needed. –Formal – A formal appeal may be made to the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA)

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Formal Appeal Process –A formal appeal may be made to the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA). See NTL 2009-N12 –A formal appeal MUST be filed within 60 days of the INC’s issue date or the receipt of a decision (NO extensions). –The Operators Statement of Reason must submitted to the IBLA within 30 after filing the Notice of Appeal.

MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Additional information: address: Questions? Thank you David Dykes