Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Village of Columbus Water Supply and System Improvements Luna County, New Mexico Presented to: Stakeholders.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessing Capacity Through Sanitary Surveys. SDWA §1420 Capacity Development ~To receive their full Drinking Water State Revolving Fund allotment, States.
Advertisements

July 15, 2008 – GB Work Session Discussion of Mayor Thomas E. Swisstack’s Priority List Recommendations.
Wakulla County Sewer Project Eutaw Utilities Presentation April 7, 2011.
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AS AGENTS OF CHANGE John Day Center for Environmental Farming Systems, NC State University.
City of San Juan Water & Wastewater Systems Improvements Hidalgo County, Texas Presented to: Project Sponsor and Agency Stakeholders July 24, 2003 City.
Washington State Department of Health Division of Environmental HealthOffice of Drinking Water Mike Dexel Water Resources Policy Lead Municipal Water Law.
Funding for Municipal Infrastructure Ruth Noemí Colón Acting Secretary of State George Stafford Deputy Secretary of State Public Finance and Management.
Article 41 Wastewater Planning Capacity Study To determine whether the Town will vote to adopt a resolution supporting the Town Manager’s allocation of.
Water Services Department Arizona Mexico Commission Bi-National Meeting March 9-11, 2008 David Cavazos Deputy City Manager Water Services Department Arizona.
2 Water and Waste Loans and Grants United States Department of Agriculture??? Rural Development: Mandate to improve the quality of life in Rural America.
Cuba’s Future Development Needs, Funding Models, and Alternatives. A Perspective of the Operation of a Cuban Water & Sewer Utility. Eduardo Vega-Llort,
Public Hearing FY 2011 Budget 1. City Council Goals FY 2011 Flood Recovery and Protection –Identify Funding and Sources for Flood –Restore Affordable.
City of Modesto FY Proposed Budget Utility Funds Utility Planning & Projects Public Works Finance.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
October In May 2000, Walkerton’s drinking water system became contaminated with deadly bacteria, primarily Escherichia coli O157:H7.1 Seven people.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
WEDA Winter Conference January 11, Community Programs Funding FY 2010 WEPCF Direct Loan $7,148,000$1,820,000 Grant 2,429,000 97,000 Guaranteed.
1 U.S. EPA State Revolving Fund: Providing Affordable Financing George Ames U.S. EPA IADF Conference on Financing Municipalities and Sub-National Governments,
KENTUCKY INFRASTRUCTURE AUTHORITY Office of the Governor Governor’s Office for Local Development 1024 Capital Center Drive, Suite 340 Frankfort, Kentucky.
+ Proposed Lockwood Targeted Economic Development District 2015 Yellowstone County.
South Carolina Finance Workshop for Small Water Systems June 4, 2013 Water Partnerships: Financial Advantages and Challenges SC Case Study: Lowcountry.
Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan City of Alamo Municipal Water and Wastewater Project Hidalgo County, Texas Presented to: Project Sponsor.
City Of Phoenix Water Rates June 30, 2011 Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department.
Chicago Department of Water Management Thomas H. Powers, P.E. Commissioner Leadership Summit June 2, 2015.
City of Polson April 5, 2010 PUBLIC HEARING Water System Improvements PRESENTATION ON PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT.
Imagine the result Impact Study on MSD Rate Payers of Proposed Consolidation/Merger Phase II – Towns of Biltmore Forest, Montreat and Weaverville Presentation.
NARUC Energy Regulatory Partnership Program The Georgian National Energy Regulatory Commission and The Vermont Public Service Board by Geoff Commons Vermont.
Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Niland Sanitary District Wastewater Systems Improvements Niland, California Presented.
Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Doña Ana MDWCA Water and Wastewater System Improvements Doña Ana County, NM Presented to: Stakeholders.
RURAL DEVELOPMENT WATER & WASTE PROGRAMS WATER AND WASTE FACILITIES WATER SYSTEMS OR COMPONENTS OF WATER SYSTEMS SEWER SYSTEMS OR COMPONENTS OF SEWER.
City of Lordsburg Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan City of Lordsburg Water and Wastewater System Improvements Lordsburg, New Mexico Presented.
Water & Waste Disposal Loans and Grants The funding purpose is to construct, enlarge, extend or improve water, wastewater and solid waste systems in rural.
BORDER ENVIRONMENT COOPERATION COMMISSION Mitigating Impacts on Water Resources: Environmental Infrastructure Investment.
Rapid Assessment Process Preliminary Project Plan City of Alpine, Texas Public Water and Wastewater System Improvements Presented to: Texas Agencies February.
Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan City of Marfa Water and Wastewater System Improvements Marfa, Texas Presented to: Stakeholders and Project.
Technical Assistance Grants to Communities Pipeline Safety Trust Conference New Orleans November 20, 2008 Steve Fischer PHMSA/Office of Pipeline Safety.
New Mexico Colonias Initiative & Trust Fund 2012 Presented by Medius, Inc.
BECC Certification Criteria. Our Role in the US/Mexico Border  The Border Environment Cooperation Commission and the North American Development Bank.
NC Water Resources Congress Annual Meeting Raleigh, NC October 30, 2014 State Water Infrastructure Update: The State of NC and Water, Wastewater and Stormwater.
City of San Luis, Arizona Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan City of San Luis Water & Wastewater Improvements Yuma County, Arizona Presented.
City of Calipatria Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan City of Calipatria Wastewater Systems Improvements Calipatria, California Presented.
Texas Water Development Board Financing Programs Presentation by Ignacio Madera, Jr. Office of Project Finance & Construction Assistance December 2, 2003.
NADB, INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMPETITIVENESS. 2 Raúl Rodríguez MEXICO’S COMPETITIVENESS DECLINE ( IMD’S RANKING AMONG 60 ECONOMIC REGIONS; 1 = BEST ) Source:
Investing In Our Future. Statement from Mayor Tom Murphy “The Gillette Regional Water Supply Project is essential for quality of life and economic development.
Damage Prevention – Are States as engaged as they need to be ? Pipeline Safety Trust Meeting November 20, 2008 New Orleans, LA Glynn Blanton, PHMSA State.
Mejoras en los sistemas de Agua Potable y Saneamiento en San Benito, Texas Water and Wastewater Facility Improvements in San Benito, Texas.
1 Public Hearing User Rate Adjustments April 8, 2008.
Department of Environmental Quality Water Infrastructure November 17, 2015 Water Infrastructure Funding to Financing.
1 NORTH VALLEY REGIONAL WATER AND WASTEWATER PROJECTS MEETING OF THE NEW MEXICO-TEXAS WATER COMMISSION May 19, 2005.
Ordinance Amending Chapter 37 Orange County Code Utilities Department October 21,
COSCDA Annual Conference PROGRAM PURPOSE Goal: To encourage communities to focus on workforce development as a long-term economic development strategy.
Water System Master Plan & Rate Study City of DeKalb, Illinois City Council Presentation May 16, 2015.
1. FY Proposed Budget Jamie Justice, Town Manager & Piet Swart, Finance Director April 26, 2016 Fiscal Year Proposed Budget 2.
PRE-PLANNING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. OVERVIEW ASSESSING OWNER CAPABILITIES ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWING.
DC Water 的项目合作与职业 发展机会 Chein-Chi Chang ( 張建祺 ), Ph. D., P. E. D. C. Water and Sewer Authority, USA University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA Environmental.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
Environmental Health Service Learning and Water Quality in Gales Point, Belize International Health and Human Service Learning Program Belize 2009 College.
RUSSELL - ROSSBURN WATER SUPPLY
City of Delavan 2017 Budget.
American Recovery & Reinvestment Act Funding for Rural Communities
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
City of Roundup, Montana
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
PLANNING DOCUMENTS 2018 New Mexico infrastructure finance conference
Nebraska Water Infrastructure Funding and Financing Programs
Capital Improvement Plans
Davidson County FY County Manager’s Proposed Budget
Dollars and Cents: Ways to Save and be More Resourceful
Indiana Finance Authority (IFA)
Presentation transcript:

Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Village of Columbus Water Supply and System Improvements Luna County, New Mexico Presented to: Stakeholders and Project Sponsor Santa Fe, NM February 4, 2003

 General Aspects  Environmental and Human Health Indicators  Technical Approach, Objectives and Funding Plan  Public Participation  Sustainable Development  Project Development Schedule  Stakeholder Comments/Discussion Agenda

General Aspects Project Location §The Village of Columbus is located in Luna County, New Mexico approximately 92 miles from the City of Las Cruces. The community is 3 miles from the U.S./Mexican Border.

State of Existing Water Supply and Distribution System  Water is supplied from one well. The “Southeast Well” or “New Well” was installed in The water treatment system includes an automatic chlorine valve that feeds the system directly as water is pumped from the “Southeast Well”.  A reverse osmosis (RO) water treatment system installed in is capable of producing approximately 400 gallons per day. The system treats for fluoride in pumped water and it provides drinking water only at the location of the RO treatment system with a maximum allocation of 5 gallons per day per person. The water distribution system supplies pumped water, but not treated for fluoride. General Aspects

State of Existing Water Supply and Distribution System  Concerns: Compliance with EPA Regulatory requirements in regards to fluoride, sodium and arsenic for drinking water quality standards. General Aspects

State of Existing Water Storage and Distribution System  A 100,000-gallon reservoir, measuring 24-feet in height and 27- feet inside diameter.  An additional water storage reservoir has also 100,000-gallons located within the Industrial Park. It measures 87-feet in height and has a 14-feet inside diameter.  In 1994, another water reservoir with a capacity of 243,500- gallons was constructed.  The water distribution system transports pumped water through approximately 24,450 linear feet of cast iron pipes, 54,770 linear feet of PVC pipes and 33,350 linear feet of transite pipes. The system has approximately 63 shutoff valves and 33 fire hydrants. General Aspects

State of Existing Water Storage and Distribution System  Concerns: Additional water storage capacity to help address concern over water shortages during drought conditions. The community needs to replace undersized cast iron pipelines (5,000 to 6,000 linear feet) throughout the Village downtown area and replacement of inoperable fire hydrants in the system. General Aspects

Proposed Water Supply and System Improvements  Water supply improvements to meet EPA regulatory requirements in regards to fluoride, sodium and arsenic for drinking water quality standards.  Improvements to the water distribution system, additional water storage capacity and the development of a 40-year water supply plan. General Aspects

Total Estimated Cost: $2 Million (Based on Village of Columbus estimate)  Final Design Development: $255,600  Construction of Facilities: $1,744,400 Note: Further definition of the needs through alternatives analysis and feasibility studies are needed to determine budget for design and construction. Therefore, the applicant’s proposed budget should be considered as a tentative. General Aspects

 Population: 1,765  Annual growth rate: TBD  MHI*: $13,  Unemployment rate: 14.2%  Legal utility provider  577 water accounts  459 sewer accounts  3 employees  Billing efficiency: TBD Project Sponsor Profile:

General Aspects  USDA-RUS: Funds in the amount of $475,000 for installation of a new groundwater well (South East Well) and improvements within colonias in  USDA-RUA: Funds received in in the amount of $75,000 for the purchase of additional water rights and installation of new groundwater well.  CDBG: Funds in the total amount of $300,000.  Request for financial assistance from the NADB for the completion of the wastewater system.  No prior BECC assistance. Prior Agency Support:

General Aspects  In 1993 the Village completed a Infrastructure Master Plan.  A Comprehensive Plan was completed in Prior Studies:

Human Health Indicators  Improvements to the water system are necessary to meet fire protection demand, which poses a direct threat to the health and safety of the Village of Columbus residents.  The improvements to the water supply and related systems will address human health and environmental issues for the residents in the Village.  Specifically, improvements to the water supply quality will address concentration of fluoride, sodium and arsenic in pumped water. Environmental and Human Health Indicators

Environmental Indicators  Problems with EPA regulatory requirements for drinking water are directly related to compliance with naturally occurrence of fluoride concentration in pumped water.  Additionally, high concentrations of sodium and arsenic have also been found in the pumped water. posed wastewater accumulated at the cesspools areas and deficient septic tank systems may be potential contamination sources. Environmental and Human Health Indicators

Compliance with Environmental Norms & Regulations Including Violations  The Village of Columbus drinking water supply has let to an Administrative Order from the EPA since 1992, directly related to high concentrations of fluoride above the acceptable limits in drinking water.  Recent laboratory results received by the New Mexico Environment Department indicated concentration levels of fluoride at the Southeast Well of 7.94 ppm.  As per the New Mexico Drinking Water Regulations 20 NMAC 7.1, Section 202.A(9), the specific Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for fluoride is 4 ppm. Environmental and Human Health Indicators

Technical Approach  Technical Assistance needed to develop documents which may include:  Facility Plan & Environmental Information Document  Engineering Design  Financial Analysis  Public Participation Program  Rate Study Technical Approach, Objectives and Funding Plan

Technical Assistance Tasks TaskSource PER and EIDBECC Water Conservation Plan/40-Year Water PlanBECC/Other Financial AnalysisBECC Public Participation ProgramBECC Project Certification DocumentBECC Final DesignBECC/Other Technical Approach, Objectives and Funding Plan

Identified Potential Funding Sources  USDA/Rural Utility Services (RUS)  Funds tailored for incorporated rural areas with populations of less than 10,000  New Mexico Legislative Appropriations  Multiple use – dependent on language presented in bill.  New Mexico Environment Department (NMED)  Rural Infrastructure Program loans, typically administer NM SAP  New Mexico Finance Authority (NMFA)  Water and WW Grants Program, DWSRF, Project and Equipment loans Technical Approach, Objectives and Funding Plan

Identified Potential Funding Sources  NM Water Trust Board  Annual authorized funding to address critical water projects  North American Development Bank (NADB)  BEIF and IDP  Border Environment Cooperation Commission (BECC)  PDAP program Technical Approach, Objectives and Funding Plan

Project Sponsor Financial Potential Revenues and Expenditures Summary (thousands) 2000 Revenues $183 Expenses $162 Net Available from Operations $21.5 Existing Debt:NoneAnnual Debt Service: $2.8* *Only for current outstanding sewer debt Water Avg. Monthly Residential Bill:$10.50 Technical Approach, Objectives and Funding Plan

Agency Perspectives - NADB  An initial analysis of the proposed project in regards to BEIF eligibility criteria provides a sense that the project will be eligible for this program.  An affordability analysis will be completed to determine any participation with BEIF grants including construction, hook-up and transition support.  Loan assistance can be available for construction and potential support may be provided by the IDP for completion of a rate study and other institutional capacity building needs. Technical Approach, Objectives and Funding Plan

Institutional Capacity Building  The project sponsor identified such needs as a capital improvement plan, rate study and the development of public participation programs as institutional needs.  Additional needs may include assistance in both the institutional and human capacity to administer the project.  Following the proposed 40-Year Water Supply Plan completion, basic training to the Village staff in understanding and maintaining the Plan may also be necessary.  The Frank M. Tejeda Center has conducted an Institutional Capacity Needs Assessment with the Village of Columbus. Technical Approach, Objectives and Funding Plan

Potential Obstacles  The project sponsor and the BECC are not aware of any legal issues that may jeopardize the proposed project, or any litigation problems with the current local government.  The Village has ample water rights.  A notable potential obstacle is the high cost of providing water treatment to address the quality issues present in the water basin near the Village.  Rate modifications may also provide a potential obstacle for receiving community support. Technical Approach, Objectives and Funding Plan

Identification of Main Stakeholders  Village of Columbus  The State of New Mexico Environment Department  New Mexico Finance Authority  North American Development Bank  Frank M. Tejeda Center  Border Environment Cooperation Commission  United States Department of Agriculture  Environmental Protection Agency Public Participation

Local Politics  The Village of Columbus local government is comprised of a Mayor, four councilors and a clerk/treasurer. The Village Commission has passed a resolution on March 13, 2002 authorizing the Mayor to seek Technical Assistance from BECC, and authorizing her staff to seek funding from the State of New Mexico and the North American Development Bank. Public Participation

Minimum Criteria Requirements  The Village of Columbus made a commitment to comply to all applicable minimum requirements for the project in compliance with the BECC’s sustainable development criteria. Based on the status of existing planning and capacity assessment conducted by the Tejeda Center, a strategy to meet the applicable requirements has been included in Attachment H of the Strategic Plan.  11 of 14 minimum requirements will apply to the project of which the Village currently complies with 2. The remaining 9 minimums will be addressed as part of the project development. Sustainable Development

Project Development Schedule Task NameDurationStartFinish Application Process6 days06/14/0206/21/02 Rapid Assessment Process123 days08/30/0202/18/03 Technical Assistance Process64 days02/05/0305/05/03 Project Development Process (TA, Public Participation, NEPA) 556 days02/19/0304/06/05 Final Design Process*298 days12/16/0404/06/05 BECC Certification Process39 days02/28/0506/05 *Task duration is included in Project Development Process duration.

Stakeholder Comments/Discussion Thank you for your participation and valuable input.